India's burgeoning population has led to an increased demand for transportation services, particularly in urban areas. To address the growing mobility needs and mitigate the adverse effects of personal vehicle usage, efficient public transit services are imperative. Several Indian cities have implemented bus rapid transit (BRT) systems to address this problem, but ridership for the majority of the BRT systems remains below breakeven (this refers to the point at which the revenue generated from ridership equals or surpasses the costs associated with operating and maintaining the transportation system). Thus, it is necessary to assess the determinants of commuter satisfaction with BRT. The present study aims to examine factors affecting travel satisfaction among BRT commuters. By using structural equation modeling (SEM), the effect of demographic (age and gender) and travel-related variables (fare price, travel time, trip frequency, reliability, ease of using bus service, and comfort level) on BRT commuters' satisfaction and usage of BRT services were analyzed. It was found that while ease of using the service, comfort level, and reliability positively affect BRT travel satisfaction, trip frequency is significantly affected by the ease of using the service only. Furthermore, demographic variables (age, and gender of respondents) were not found to have significant effect of travel satisfaction and trip frequency. The findings from this can study serve as a base for policymakers, city officials, and urban planners to identify commuters' priorities for a well-functioning BRT in India and formulate policies to attract riders by enhancing their preferences.
HansenM.HuangY.Road Supply and Traffic in California Urban Areas. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 31, No. 3, 1997, pp. 205–218.
2.
MolloyJ.TchervenkovC.AxhausenK. W.Estimating the External Costs of Travel on GPS Tracks. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 95, 2021, p. 102842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102842
3.
CrociE.Urban Road Pricing: A Comparative Study on the Experiences of London, Stockholm and Milan. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 14, 2016, pp. 253–262. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.062
4.
MayeresI.OchelenS.ProostS.The Marginal External Costs of Urban Transport. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1996, pp. 111–130.
5.
SaxenaA.GuptaV.Carpooling: Who is Closest to Adopting It? An Investigation into the Potential Car- Poolers Among Private Vehicle Users: A Case of a Developing Country, India. Transport Policy, Vol. 135, 2023, pp. 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.03.007
6.
SaxenaA.YadavA. k.Adopting a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach to Identify Barriers to Electrification of Urban Freight in India. Transportation Research Record, 2023. 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231176812
7.
SaxenaA.YadavA. K.Evaluating the Appropriate Fuel-Based Bus Technology in Indian Context by Integrating Fuzzy AHP-Fuzzy TOPSIS. European Transportation - Trasporti Europei, No. 92, 2023, pp. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.48295/ET.2023.92.6.
8.
GuZ.LiuZ.ChengQ.SaberiM.Congestion Pricing Practices and Public Acceptance: A Review of Evidence. Case Studies on Transport Policy, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2018, pp. 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.01.004
9.
AbuLibdehA.Traffic Congestion Pricing: Methodologies and Equity Implications. In Urban Transport Systems (YaghoubiH., ed.), InTechOpen, 2017, pp. 203–227. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:168314166.
10.
BörjessonM.KristofferssonI.The Gothenburg Congestion Charge. Effects, Design and Politics. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 75, 2015, pp. 134–146.
11.
BergantinoA. S.IntiniM.PercocoM.New Car Taxation and Its Unintended Environmental Consequences. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 148, 2021, pp. 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.03.026
12.
O’RiordanV.RoganF.Ó’GallachóirB.DalyH.Impact of An Emissions-Based Car Tax Policy on CO2 Emissions and Tax Revenue from Private Cars in Ireland. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 17, No. 9, 2023, pp. 969–981. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2022.2132562
13.
SatiennamT.JaensirisakS.SatiennamW.DetdamrongS.Potential for Modal Shift by Passenger Car and Motorcycle Users Towards Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) in an Asian Developing City. IATSS Research, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2016, pp. 121–129. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2015.03.002
14.
WangY.WangZ.LiZ.StaleyS. R.MooreA. T.GaoY.Study of Modal Shifts to Bus Rapid Transit in Chinese Cities. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 139, No. 5, 2013, pp. 515–523.
15.
IngvardsonJ. B.NielsenO. A.Effects of New Bus and Rail Rapid Transit Systems–An International Review. Transportation Review, Vol. 38, No. 1, 2018, pp. 96–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1301594
16.
JarzabJ.LightbodyJ.MaedaE.Characteristics of Bus Rapid Transit Projects: An Overview. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2002, pp. 31–46. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.5.2.2
17.
PahsM.RohdenM.HampstenD.GallantS.BertiniR.Door-to-Door Mobility: Evaluating a Bus Rapid Transit Community Transport Concept. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2002, pp. 137–161. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.5.2.7
18.
MerkertR.MulleyC.HakimM. M.Determinants of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) System Revenue and Effectiveness – A Global Benchmarking Exercise. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 106, 2017, pp. 75–88. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.09.010
19.
LevinsonH. S.ZimmermanS.ClingerJ.GastJ.Synthesis of Case Studies. Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board, 2003. 1841: 1–11.
20.
WirasingheS. C.KattanL.RahmanM. M.HubbellJ.ThilakaratneR.AnowarS.Bus Rapid Transit - A Review. International Journal of Urban Science, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2013, pp. 1–31.
21.
de VriesH. J. M.ReviA.BhatG. K.HilderinkH.LucasP. L.India 2050: Scenarios for an Uncertain Future. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Bilthoven, the Netherlands, 2007.
22.
Ministry of Road Transport & Highways. Road Transport Year Book (2017-18 & 2018-19). Govermnet of India, New Delhi, India, 2021.
23.
FatimaE.KumarR.Introduction of Public Bus Transit in Indian Cities. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2014, pp. 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2014.06.001
24.
SaxenaA.Texting and Crossing: An Extended Theory of Planned Behaviour to Model the Psychological and Demographic Factors Related to Pedestrians’ Use of Cell Phone for Texting at Crosswalks in Developing Country. IATSS Research, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2023, pp. 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2023.01.003
25.
SaxenaA.Assessing the Factors Affecting the Perceived Crossing Speed of Pedestrians and Investigating the Direct and Indirect Effects of Crash Risk Perception on Perceived Crossing Speed. Journal of Transportation and Health, Vol. 28, 2023, p. 101541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2022.101541
26.
SaxenaA.ChoudhuryB.Internalizing the Externalities of Urban Private Transport – A Case of Gurugram, National Capital Region, India. Case Studies on Transportation Policy, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2022, pp. 1885–1897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.08.002
27.
TripathyD.SamantaD. P. K.Bus Rapid Transit System (BRTS) Iripathy, Debapriyan India: An Overview. International Journal of Engineering Research in Mechanical and Civil Engineering Special Issue Advanced Transportation Systems Infrastructure, 2017, pp. 102–108.
28.
KathuriaA.ParidaM.Ravi SekharC.SharmaA.A Review of Bus Rapid Transit Implementation in India. Cogent Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2016, p. 1241168. http://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2016.1241168
29.
RizviA.SclarE.Implementing Bus Rapid Transit: A Tale of Two Indian Cities. Research in Transportation Economics, Vol. 48, 2014, pp. 194–204. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2014.09.043
MahadeviaD.JoshiR.DateyA.Low-Carbon Mobility in India and the Challanges of Social Inclusion: Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Case Studies in India. UNEP Risø Centre Energy, Climate and Sustainable Development, Technical University of Denmark, 2013.
32.
MahendraA.RajagopalanL.Evaluating Health Impacts from a Bus Rapid Transit System Implementation in India Case Study of Indore, Madhya Pradesh. Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board, 2015. 2531: 121–128.
33.
MagassyT. B.BaturI.MondalA.AsmussenK. E.KhoeiniS.PendyalaR. M.BhatC. R.Influence of Mode Use on Level of Satisfaction with Daily Travel Routine: A Focus on Automobile Driving in the United States. Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board, 2022. 2676: 1–15.
34.
Hoang-TungN.KojimaA.KubotaH.Recognising Customers’ Patterns of Bus Service Patronage Using a Loyalty Framework. IATSS Research, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2014, pp. 148–156. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2013.10.001
35.
CatsO.AbenozaR. F.LiuC.SusiloY. O.Evolution of Satisfaction with Public Transport and Its Determinants in Sweden Identifying Priority Areas. Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board, 2015. 2538: 86–96.
36.
SukhovA.LättmanK.OlssonL. E.FrimanM.FujiiS.Assessing Travel Satisfaction in Public Transport: A Configurational Approach. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 93, 2021, p. 102732.
37.
WangsnessP. B.ProostS.RødsethK. L.Vehicle Choices and Urban Transport Externalities. Are Norwegian Policy Makers Getting it Right?Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 86, 2020, p. 102384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102384
38.
AnnavarapuS.Book Review: Entangled Urbanism: Slum, Gated Community and Shopping Mall in Delhi and Gurgaon. Urban Studies, Vol. 53, No. 12, 2016, pp. 2670–2673.
39.
Singh PatyalV.KumarR.Singh KushwahS.Modeling Barriers to the Adoption of Electric Vehicles: An Indian Perspective. EnergyVol. 237, 2021, p. 121554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121554
40.
Aceves-GonzálezC.EkambaramK.Rey-GalindoJ.Rizo-CoronaL.The Role of Perceived Pedestrian Safety on Designing Safer Built Environments. Traffic Injury PreventionVol. 21, No. S1, 2020, pp. S84–S89. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2020.1812062
41.
SinhaS.Shivanand SwamyH. M.ModiK.User Perceptions of Public Transport Service Quality. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 48, 2020, pp. 3310–3323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.121
SunF.JinM.ZhangT.HuangW.Satisfaction Differences in Bus Traveling Among Low-Income Individuals Before and After COVID-19. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 160, 2022, pp. 311–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.04.015
44.
GuzmanL. A.EnríquezH. D.HesselP.BRT System in Bogotá and Urban Effects: More Residential Land Premiums?Research in Transportation Economics, Vol. 90, 2021, p. 101039.
45.
MajumdarB. B.JayakumarM.SahuP. K.PotoglouD.Identification of Key Determinants of Travel Satisfaction for Developing Policy Instrument to Improve Quality of Life: An Analysis of Commuting in Delhi. Transport Policy, Vol. 110, 2021, pp. 281–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.06.012
46.
HamedM. M.OlaywahH. H.Travel-Related Decisions by Bus, Servis Taxi, and Private Car Commuters in the City of Amman, Jordan. Cities, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2000, pp. 63–71.
47.
YangM.ZhaoJ.WangW.LiuZ.LiZ.Metro Commuters’ Satisfaction in Multi-Type Access and Egress Transferring Groups. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 34, 2015, pp. 179–194. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.11.004
48.
MaT. Y.Van AckerV.LordS.GerberP.Dissonance and Commute Satisfaction: Which Reference Point to Use?Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environments, Vol. 100, 2021, p. 103046.
49.
LiJ.XuL.YaoD.MaoY.Impacts of Symbolic Value and Passenger Satisfaction on Bus Use. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 72, 2019, pp. 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.04.012
50.
FangD.XueY.CaoJ.SunS.Exploring Satisfaction of Choice and Captive Bus Riders: An Impact Asymmetry Analysis. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 93, 2021, p. 102798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102798
51.
SusiloY. O.CatsO.Exploring Key Determinants of Travel Satisfaction for Multi-Modal Trips by Different Traveler Groups. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 67, 2014, pp. 366–380. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.08.002
52.
MárquezL.AlfonsoA. J. V.PovedaJ. C.In-Vehicle Crowding: Integrating Tangible Attributes, Attitudes, and Perceptions in a Choice Context Between BRT and Metro. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 130, 2019, pp. 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.061
53.
GuzmanL. A.Gomez CardonaS.Density-Oriented Public Transport Corridors: Decoding their Influence on BRT Ridership at Station-Level and Time-Slot in Bogotá. Cities, Vol. 110, 2021, p. 103071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.103071
54.
DengT.NelsonJ. D.The Perception of Bus Rapid Transit: A Passenger Survey from Beijing Southern Axis BRT Line 1. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 35, No. 2, 2012, pp. 201–219.
55.
DeepaL.MondalA.RamanA.PinjariA. R.BhatC. R.SrinivasanK. K.PendyalaR. M.RamaduraiG.An Analysis of Individuals’ Usage of Bus Transit in Bengaluru, India: Disentangling the Influence of Unfamiliarity with Transit from that of Subjective Perceptions of Service Quality. Travel Behaviour and Society, Vol. 29, 2022, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2022.05.001
56.
MatubatubaR.De Meyer-HeydenrychC. F.Developing an Intention to Use Amongst Non-Users of the Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) System: An Emerging Market Perspective. Research in Transportation Bussiness & Management, Vol. 45, 2022, p. 100858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2022.100858
57.
AtomboC.Dzigbordi WemegahT.Indicators for Commuter’s Satisfaction and Usage of High Occupancy Public Bus Transport Service in Ghana. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 11, 2021, p. 100458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100458
58.
GuzmanL. A.BeltranC.BonillaJ.Gomez CardonaS.BRT Fare Elasticities from Smartcard Data: Spatial and Time-of-the-Day Differences. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 150, 2021, pp. 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.06.018
59.
GanjiS. S.AhangarA. N.AwasthiA.Jamshidi BandariS.Psychological Analysis of Intercity Bus Passenger Satisfaction Using Q Methodology. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 154, 2021, pp. 345–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.10.023
60.
RatanavarahaV.JomnonkwaoS.KhampiratB.WatthanaklangD.IamtrakulP.The Complex Relationship Between School Policy, Service Quality, Satisfaction, and Loyalty for Educational Tour Bus Services: A Multilevel Modeling Approach. Transport Policy, Vol. 45, 2016, pp. 116–126. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.09.012
61.
dell’OlioL.IbeasA.CecínP.Modelling User Perception of Bus Transit Quality. Transport Policy, Vol. 17, No. 6, 2010, pp. 388–397.
62.
O’FarrellP. N.MarkhamJ.Commuter Perceptions of Public Transport Work Journeys. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1974, pp. 79–100.
63.
GolobT. F.Structural Equation Modeling for Travel Behavior Research. Transportation Research Part B: Methodology, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2003, pp. 1–25.
AshkrofP.Correia GH deA.CatsO.van AremB.Ride Acceptance Behaviour of Ride-sourcing Drivers. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 142, 2021, p. 103783. http://arxiv.org/abs/2107.07864
67.
AbouelelaM.TirachiniA.ChaniotakisE.AntoniouC.Characterizing the Adoption and Frequency of Use of a Pooled Rides Service. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technology, Vol. 138, 2022, p. 103632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2022.103632
68.
HumphriesL.Evaluating the Use of a Prosocial Digital Game to Identify and Compare Preschool Children’s Social and Emotional Skills. In Emotions, Technology, and Digital Games (S. Y.TettegahDavid HuangW., eds.). Academic Press, 2016, pp. 313–332. http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801738-8.00013-0
69.
HairJ.TomasH.RingleC. M.Review of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R: A Workbook. Springer Cham, New York, 2022.
70.
ChiuC. Y.ChiaS. I.WanW. W. N.Measures of Cross-Cultural Values, Personality and Beliefs. In Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs (G. J.BoyleSaklofskeD. H.MatthewsG., eds). Elsevier Inc., 2015, pp. 621–651. http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386915-9.00022-X
71.
JiangK.YangZ.FengZ.YuZ.BaoS.HuangZ.Mobile Phone Use While Cycling: A Study Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 64, 2019, pp. 388–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.05.020
72.
UllmanJ. B.BentlerP. M.Structural Equation Modeling. In Handbook of Psychology: Research Methods in Psychology (J. A.SchinkaVelicerW. F.WeinerI. B., eds.), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2013, pp. 661–690. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0224.
MuthénB.A General Structural Equation Model with Dichotomous, Ordered Categorical, and Continuous Latent Variable Indicators. Psychometrika, Vol. 49, No. 1, 1984, pp. 115–132.
75.
TanC.ShiY.BaiL.TangK.SuzukiK.NakamuraH.Modeling Effects of Driver Safety Attitudes on Traffic Violations in China Using the Theory of Planned Behavior. IATSS Research, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2022, pp. 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2022.02.001
76.
PanJ. Y.LiuD.Mask-Wearing Intentions on Airplanes During COVID-19 – Application of Theory of Planned Behavior Model. Transport Policy, Vol. 119, 2022, pp. 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.01.023
77.
DirgahayaniP.SutantoH.The Effect of Transport Demand Management Policy on the Intention to Use Public Transport: A Case in Bandung, Indonesia. Case Studies on Transport Policy, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2020, pp. 1062–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2020.03.004
78.
EhteshamradS.SaffarzadehM.MamdoohiA.NordfjærnT.Behavior of Parents and Children in the Way They Use Public Transport. A Case Study of Iranian Households. Case Studies on Transport Policy, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2022, pp. 454–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.01.006
79.
MohamedM.HigginsC.FergusonM.KanaroglouP.Identifying and Characterizing Potential Electric Vehicle Adopters in Canada: A Two-Stage Modelling Approach. Transport Policy, Vol. 52, 2016, pp. 100–112. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.07.006
80.
ZhaoX.LiX.RakotonirainyA.Bourgeois- BougrineS.DelhommeP.Predicting Pedestrians’ Intention to Cross the Road in Front of Automated Vehicles in Risky Situations. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 90, 2022, pp. 524–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2022.05.022
81.
CheungG. W.Cooper-ThomasH. D.LauR. S.WangL. C.Reporting Reliability, Convergent and Discriminant Validity with Structural Equation Modeling: A Review and Best-Practice Recommendations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-023-09871-y
82.
GuptaR.FalkT. H.Latent Factor Analysis for Synthesized Speech Quality-of-Experience Assessment. Quality and User Experience, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2017, pp. 1–16.
83.
MaskeyR.FeiJ.NguyenH. O.Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Maritime Research. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2018, pp. 91–111. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2018.06.006
84.
KholodovY.JeneliusE.CatsO.van OortN.MouterN.CebecauerM.VermeulenA.Public Transport Fare Elasticities from Smartcard Data: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. Transport Policy, Vol. 105, 2021, pp. 35–43.
85.
PaulleyN.BalcombeR.MackettR.TitheridgeH.PrestonJ.WardmanM.ShiresJ.WhiteP.The Demand for Public Transport: The Effects of Fares, Quality of Service, Income and Car Ownership. Transport Policy, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2006, pp. 295–306.
86.
SuárezM.MurataM.Delgado CamposJ.Why Do the Poor Travel Less? Urban Structure, Commuting and Economic Informality in Mexico City. Urban Studies, Vol. 53, No. 12, 2016, pp. 2548–2566.
87.
JainD.TiwariG.Gender and Income Based Variability in Travel Choices in Vishakhapatnam, India. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 48, 2020, pp. 2870–2890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.232
88.
SsvS.Rao KvK.Trip Chaining Behavior in Developing Countries: A Study of Mumbai Metropolitan Region, India. European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, Vol. 53, No. 3, 2013, pp. 1825–3997.
89.
Sinha RoyS.van der WeideR.Poverty in India Has Declined over the Last Decade But Not As Much As Previously Thought. Working Paper 9994. World Bank, Washington, DC, 2022.
90.
The New Indian Express. Chief Minister MK Stalin’s Free Bus Travel Scheme for Women Wins Nationwide Accolades. New Indian Express, May2021.
91.
Hoang-TungN.KojimaA.KubotaH.Impacts of Travellers’ Social Awareness on the Intention of Bus Usage. IATSS Research, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2016, pp. 130–137. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2015.03.001
92.
OlfindoR.Transport Accessibility, Residential Satisfaction, and Moving Intention in a Context of Limited Travel Mode Choice. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 145, 2021, pp. 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.01.012
93.
PritchardJ. P.GeursK.TomasielloD. B.SlovicA. D.NardocciA.KumarP.GiannottiM.Hagen-ZankerA.Satisfaction With Travel, Ideal Commuting, and Accessibility to Employment. Journal of Transport and Land Use, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2021, pp. 995–1017.
94.
RahmanM.AktherM. S.ReckerW.The First-and-Last-Mile of Public Transportation: A Study of Access and Egress Travel Characteristics of Dhaka’s Suburban Commuters. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 24, 2022, p. 100025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubtr.2022.100025
95.
AbenozaR. F.CatsO.SusiloY. O.How Does Travel Satisfaction Sum Up? An Exploratory Analysis in Decomposing the Door-To-Door Experience for Multimodal Trips. Transportation, Vol. 46, No. 5, 2019, pp. 1615–1642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9860-0
96.
KanuriC.VenkatK.MaitiS.MulukutlaP.Leveraging Innovation for Last-Mile Connectivity to Mass Transit. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 41, No. 2018, 2019, pp. 655–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.09.114
97.
McGuckinN.ZmudJ.NakamotoY.Trip-Chaining Trends in the United States: Understanding Travel Behavior for Policy Making. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2005. 1917: 199–204.
98.
HayatiA.PradonoPurboyoH.MaryatiS.Discrete-Choice Modeling of Non-Working Women’s Trip-Chaining Activity Based. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Vol. 158, No. 1, 2018, p. 012017.
99.
SubbaraoS. S. V.SwaroopS. N. V.ShekharR. S.Interrelationships Between Mode Choice and Trip-chain Choice decisions: A Case of Mumbai Metropolitan Region. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 48, No. 2018, 2020, pp. 3049–3061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.182
100.
SaxenaA.GuptaV.ShrivastavaB.An Assessment of Public Transport Accessibility Levels for Slums in Bhopal. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, Vol. 10, No. 5, 2021, pp. 252–258.
101.
GrahnR.QianS.HendricksonC.Improving the Performance of First- and Last-Mile Mobility Services Through Transit Coordination, Real-Time Demand Prediction, Advanced Reservations, and Trip Prioritization. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technology, Vol. 133, 2021, p. 103430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103430
102.
SchomakersE. M.KlatteM.LotzV.BiermannH.KoberF.ZiefleM.Analysis of the Potential of a New Concept for Urban Last-Mile Delivery: Ducktrain. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 14, 2022, p. 100579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2022.100579
103.
LiuZ.JiaX.ChengW.Solving the Last Mile Problem: Ensure the Success of Public Bicycle System in Beijing. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 43, 2012, pp. 73–78. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.079
104.
LunkeE. B.Commuters’ Satisfaction with Public Transport. Journal of Transport and Health, Vol. 16, 2020, p. 100842.
105.
MaJ.LiuG.KwanM. P.ChaiY.Does Real-Time and Perceived Environmental Exposure to Air Pollution and Noise Affect Travel Satisfaction? Evidence from Beijing, China. Travel Behaviour and Society, Vol. 24, 2021, pp. 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2021.05.004
106.
AnderssonD.NässénJ.The Gothenburg Congestion Charge Scheme: A Pre-Post Analysis of Commuting Behavior and Travel Satisfaction. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 52, 2016, pp. 82–89. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.02.014
107.
SaxenaA.ShrivastavaB.Examining Factors Affecting the Willingness of Rickshaw Operators to Adopt Battery Operated Rickshaws: The Case of Bhopal, India. Transportation Research Record: Journal of Transportation Research Board, 2022. 2677: 325–340.
108.
SaxenaA.YadavA.Examining the Effect of COVID–19 On Rail Freight Volume and Revenue Using the ARIMA Forecasting Model and Assessing the Resilience of Indian Railways During the Pandemic. Innovative Infrastructure Solution, Vol. 7, No. 348, 2022, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00929-2
109.
NarasimhaP. T.JenaP. R.MajhiR.Impact of COVID-19 on the Indian Seaport Transportation and Maritime Supply Chain. Transport Policy, Vol. 110, 2021, pp. 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.05.011
110.
BandyopadhyayA.BhatnagarS.Impact of COVID-19 on Ports, Multimodal Logistics and Transport Sector in India: Responses and Policy Imperatives. Transport Policy, Vol. 130, 2023, pp. 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.10.014
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
