Rubber-coated ballast (RCB) is a newly invented ballast made up of natural aggregates coated with recycled crumb rubber with the help of polyurethane binder. The deformation, degradation, resilience, damping, and acceleration time response for unreinforced (UR) and geogrid-reinforced (GR) RCB-natural ballast mix were explored under cyclic loading conditions. The results from the cyclic loading tests indicated that the deformation of RCB samples was higher than that of natural ballast owing to the softening properties of crumb rubber. It was also seen that the deformation of the RCB-natural ballast mix increased with the increase in RCB content. Furthermore, the resilient modulus (Mr) of the RCB-natural ballast mix reduced while the damping ratio (Dr) increased with the increase in RCB content. Moreover, the GR RCB-natural ballast mix exhibited lesser deformations, whereas the Mr and Dr improved compared with the UR RCB-natural ballast mix. Additionally, RCB significantly reduced the sleeper acceleration and ground-borne vibration compared with natural ballast. These accelerations were further reduced, to some extent, when the RCB-natural ballast mix was reinforced with geogrid. The particle breakage of the GR RCB-natural ballast mix was reduced considerably compared with the UR natural ballast. To minimize the volumetric strain and particle breakage of the RCB-natural ballast mix and maximize the Mr and Dr, it is recommended that around 50% of RCB content is mixed with GR natural ballast.
SeligE. T.WatersJ. M.Track Geotechnology and Substructure Management. Thomas Telford Publications, London, 1994.
2.
BathurstR. J.RaymondG. P.Geogrid Reinforcement of Ballasted Track. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1987. 1153: 8–14.
3.
LiuS.HuangH.QiuT.KwonJ.Comparative Evaluation of Particle Movement in a Ballast Track Structure Stabilized with Biaxial and Multiaxial Geogrids. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2017. 2607: 15–23.
4.
HussainiS. K. K.SwetaK.Application of Geogrids in Stabilizing Rail Track Substructure. Frontiers in Built Environment, Vol. 6, 2020, p. 20. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.00020.
5.
HussainiS. K. K.SwetaK.Investigation of Deformation and Degradation Response of Geogrid-Reinforced Ballast Based on Model Track Tests. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Vol. 235, No. 4, 2021, pp. 505–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409720944687.
6.
MishraD.KazmeeH.TutumluerE.PforrJ.ReadD.GehringerE.Characterization of Railroad Ballast Behavior Under Repeated Loading: Results from New Large Triaxial Test Setup. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2013. 2374: 169–179.
7.
MishraD.QianY.KazmeeH.TutumluerE.Investigation of Geogrid-Reinforced Railroad Ballast Behavior Using Large-Scale Triaxial Testing and Discrete Element Modeling. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2014. 2462: 98–108.
8.
NimbalkarS.IndraratnaB.Improved Performance of Ballasted Rail Track Using Geosynthetics and Rubber Shock Mats. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 142, No. 8, 2016, p. 040160. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001491.
9.
PrasadK. V. S.HussainiS. K. K.Review of Different Stabilization Techniques Adapted in Ballasted Tracks. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 340, 2022, p. 127747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127747.
10.
RaymondG.IsmailI.The Effect of Geogrid Reinforcement on Unbound Aggregates. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 21, No. 6, 2003, pp. 355–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(03)00044-X.
11.
JingG.WangJ.WangH.SiahkouhiM.Numerical Investigation of the Behavior of Stone Ballast Mixed by Steel Slag in Ballasted Railway Track. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 262, 2020, p. 120015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120015.
NavaratnarajahS. K.IndraratnaB.Use of Rubber Mats to Improve the Deformation and Degradation Behavior of Rail Ballast Under Cyclic Loading. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 143, No. 6, 2017, p. 04017015. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001669.
14.
de O.Lima, A.DerschM. S.TutumluerE.EdwardsJ. R.QianY.Support Condition and Traffic Loading Patterns Influencing Laboratory Determination of Under Ballast Mat Bedding Modulus and Insertion Loss. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2018. 2672: 74–84.
15.
SongW.HuangB.ShuX.WuH.GongH.HanB.ZouJ.Improving Damping Properties of Railway Ballast by Addition of Tire-Derived Aggregate. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2019. 2673: 299–307.
16.
ZahranK.NaggarH. E.Effect of Sample Size on TDA Shear Strength Parameters in Direct Shear Tests. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2020. 2674: 1110–1119.
17.
JayasuriyaC.IndraratnaB.NgoT. N.Experimental Study to Examine the Role of Under Sleeper Pads for Improved Performance of Ballast Under Cyclic Loading. Transportation Geotechnics, Vol. 19, 2019, pp. 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2019.01.005.
18.
NavaratnarajahS. K.IndraratnaB.NgoN. T.Influence of Under Sleeper Pads on Ballast Behavior Under Cyclic Loading: Experimental and Numerical Studies. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 144, No. 9, 2018, p. 04018068. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001954.
19.
LiuS.SussmannT.RidingK.StuartC.Modeling Railway Track Mechanical Behavior with Under Tie Pads and Under Ballast Mats. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2023. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981231189746.
20.
HoC. L.HumphreyD.HyslipJ. P.MoorheadW.Use of Recycled Tire Rubber to Modify Track–Substructure Interaction. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2013, 2374: 119–125.
21.
ConstanzoN. M.PitaA. L.FontserèV.MarriedJ.CarrascalI.DiegoS.NEOBALLAST: Seeking for the Ballast of the Future. Proc., 3rd International Conference Railway Technology, Vía Libre Railway Research, Madrid, Spain, 2016, pp. 49–61.
22.
Sol-SánchezM.Moreno-NavarroF.Rubio-GámezM. C.ManzoN.FontseréV.Full-Scale Study of Neoballast Section for its Application in Railway Tracks: Optimization of Track Design. Materials and Structures, Vol. 51, No. 2, 2018, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-018-1167-2.
23.
EsmaeiliM.NamaeiP.Effect of Mother Rock Strength on Rubber-Coated Ballast (RCB) Deterioration. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 316, 2022, p. 126106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126106.
24.
AlamM. N.HussainiS. K. K.Performance of Geogrid-Reinforced Rubber-Coated Ballast and Natural Ballast Mix Under Direct Shear Conditions. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 35, No. 9, 2023, p. 04023290. https://doi.org/10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-15461.
RDSO-GE-0011. Guidelines for Blanket Layer Provision on Track Formation. Research Design and Standard Organisation (RDSO), Ministry of Railways, India, 2007.
28.
IRS-GE-1. Specifications for Track Ballast. Research Design and Standard Organisation (RDSO), Ministry of Railways, India, 2016.
29.
HussainiS. K. K.GundavaramD.Shear Strength and Drainage Characteristics of Elastomeric Polyurethane Treated Coal-Fouled Ballast. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2022. 2676: 704–717.
30.
SwetaK.HussainiS. K. K.Behavior Evaluation of Geogrid Reinforced Ballast-Subballast Interface Under Shear Condition. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2019, pp. 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2018.09.002.
31.
SwetaK.HussainiS. K. K.Effect of Geogrid on Deformation Response and Resilient Modulus of Railroad Ballast Under Cyclic Loading. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 264, 2020, p. 120690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120690.
32.
IndraratnaB.IonescuD.ChristieH. D.State-of-the-Art Large Scale Testing of Ballast. In: Proc., Conference on Railway Engineering, CORE 2000: Railway Technology for the 21st Century, Adelaide, Australia, 2000, pp. 208–220.
33.
HussainiS. K. K.IndraratnaB.VinodJ. S.Performance Assessment of Geogrid-Reinforced Railroad Ballast During Cyclic Loading. Transportation Geotechnics, Vol. 2, 2015, pp. 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2014.11.002.
34.
GundavaramD.HussainiS. K. K.Application of Elastomeric Polyurethane in Performance Improvement of Rail Ballast Subjected to Cyclic Loading. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2023, p. 04023019.
35.
IndraratnaB.HussainiS. K. K.VinodJ. S.The Lateral Displacement Response of Geogrid-Reinforced Ballast Under Cyclic Loading. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 39, 2013, pp. 20–29.
36.
SwetaK.HussainiS. K. K.Role of Particle Breakage on Damping, Resiliency and Service Life of Geogrid-Reinforced Ballasted Tracks. Transportation Geotechnics, Vol. 37, 2022, p. 100828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100828.
37.
RDSO/GE/IRS/0004-Part III. Specification for Geogrid to be Used as Reinforcement for Railway Formation. Research Design and Standard Organisation (RDSO), Ministry of Railways, Lucknow, India, 2018.
Le PenL. M.PowrieW.Contribution of Base, Crib and Shoulder Ballast to the Lateral Sliding Resistance of Railway Track: A Geotechnical Perspective. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Vol. 225, No. 2, 2011, pp. 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409710397094.
40.
TimoshenkoS.GoodierJ. N.Theory of E = Elasticity. McGraw-Hill, Singapore, 1970.
41.
LackenbyJ.IndraratnaB.McDowellG.ChristieD.Effect of Confining Pressure on Ballast Degradation and Deformation Under Cyclic Triaxial Loading. Geotechnique, Vol. 57, No. 6, 2007, pp. 527–536. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2007.57.6.527.
42.
ASTM D3999. Standard Test Methods for the Determination of the Modulus and Damping Properties of Soils Using the Cyclic Triaxial Apparatus. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 2003.
43.
JacobsenL. S.Steady Forced Vibration as Influenced by Damping: An Approximate Solution of the Steady Forced Vibration of a System of One Degree of Freedom Under the Influence of Various Types of Damping. Transactions of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Vol. 52, No. 2, 1930, pp. 169–178.
44.
TouqanM.El NaggarM. H.StarkT. D.In-Situ Performance Assessment of Track Superstructure on Fouled Railroad. Transportation Geotechnics, Vol. 32, 2022, p. 100695.
45.
IndraratnaB.LackenbyJ.ChristieD.Effect of Confining Pressure on the Degradation of Ballast Under Cyclic Loading. Géotechnique, Vol. 55, No. 4, 2005, pp. 325–328. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2005.55.4.325.
46.
IndraratnaB.NimbalkarS.ChristieD.RujikiatkamjornC.VinodJ. S.Field Assessment of the Performance of a Ballasted Rail Track With and Without Geosynthetics. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 136, No. 7, 2010, pp. 907–917. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000312.
