Comparative Study of Ground Penetrating Radar Systems with Time Delay Methods for Accurate Pavement Thickness and Dielectric Constant Estimation

Abstract

The applicability of using ground penetrating radar (GPR) as a non-destructive technology for estimating the thickness and dielectric constant of pavement layers has been extensively documented in the literature. Time delay methods (TDMs) have been the most commonly used by researchers. However, various studies have reported different results with respect to the suitability of different GPR systems and TDMs for dielectric constant and thickness estimation. Thus, this study aims to compare the use of ground-coupled GPR and air-coupled GPR (AC-GPR) for estimating the dielectric constant of pavement materials. In the context of TDMs, the study examines three methodologies for assessing the traveled distance in the investigated layer. The study involves laboratory experiments using asphalt and dry sand. Also, it comprises a sensitivity analysis to examine the effect of different experimentation setups. The study employed two GSSI antennas: 51600S (GC-51600S) and GSSI 42000S (AC-42000S). Using the manufacturer’s recommended operation setups, the results generally indicated the possibility of simplifying the TDM calculation by considering the 42000S and 51600S antennas as monostatic for pavement materials with different dielectric constants (≥3) with an error rate within 5%. Moreover, the study indicates that using AC-GPR may be inappropriate for common midpoint analysis using the default mounting setups. These findings provide valuable insights into the suitability and limitations of different GPR systems and calculation methods for accurately estimating pavement’s dielectric constant and thickness.

Keywords

infrastructure highway maintenance pavements testing and evaluation of transportation structures ground penetrating radar testing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alsharqawi

Dawood

Abdelkhalek

Abouhamad

Zayed

Condition Assessment of Concrete-Made Structures Using Ground Penetrating Radar. Automation in Construction, Vol. 144, 2022, p. 104627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104627.

Abdelkader

E. M.

Zayed

Faris

Synthesized Evaluation of Reinforced Concrete Bridge Defects, Their Non-Destructive Inspection and Analysis Methods: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis of the Past Three Decades. Buildings, Vol. 13, No. 3, 2023, p. 800. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13030800.

Abdelkader

Zayed

Comprehensive Inspection System for Concrete Bridge Deck Application: Current Situation and Future Needs. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 34, No. 5, 2020, p. 03120001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0001484.

Faris

Zayed

Abdelkader

E. M.

Fares

Corrosion Assessment Using Ground Penetrating Radar in Reinforced Concrete Structures: Influential Factors and Analysis Methods. Automation in Construction, Vol. 156, 2023, p. 105130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105130.

Qin

Zhang

Tang

Wang

Automatic Recognition of Tunnel Lining Elements from GPR Images Using Deep Convolutional Networks with Data Augmentation. Automation in Construction, Vol. 130, 2021, p. 103830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103830.

Dawood

Zhu

Zayed

Deterioration Mapping in Subway Infrastructure Using Sensory Data of GPR. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 103, 2020, p. 103487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103487.

Evans

Frost

Stonecliffe-Jones

Dixon

Assessment of In Situ Dielectric Constant of Pavement Materials. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007. 2037: 128–135.

Cao

Al-Qadi

I. L.

Development of a Numerical Model to Predict the Dielectric Properties of Heterogeneous Asphalt Concrete. Sensors, Vol. 21, No. 8, 2021, p. 2643. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21082643.

Leng

Al-Qadi

I. L.

An Innovative Method for Measuring Pavement Dielectric Constant Using the Extended CMP Method with Two Air-Coupled GPR Systems. NDT & E International, Vol. 66, 2014, pp. 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2014.05.002.

10.

Lahouar

Al-Qadi

I. L.

Loulizi

Clark

T. M.

Lee

D. T.

Approach to Determining In Situ Dielectric Constant of Pavements: Development and Implementation at Interstate 81 in Virginia. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2002. 1806: 81–87.

11.

Porubiaková

Komačka

A Comparison of Dielectric Constants of Various Asphalts Calculated from Time Intervals and Amplitudes. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 111, 2015, pp. 660–665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.07.129.

12.

Loizos

Plati

Accuracy of Pavement Thicknesses Estimation Using Different Ground Penetrating Radar Analysis Approaches. NDT & E International, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2007, pp. 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2006.09.001.

13.

Marecos

Fontul

Solla

de Lurdes Antunes

Evaluation of the Feasibility of Common Mid-Point Approach for Air-Coupled GPR Applied to Road Pavement Assessment. Measurement, Vol. 128, 2018, pp. 295–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.06.062.

14.

Al-Qadi

I. L.

Lahouar

Use of GPR for Thickness Measurement and Quality Control of Flexible Pavements. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 73, 2004, pp. 501–528.

15.

Geophysical Survey Systems, Inc. GSSI Antenna Manual. Geophysical Survey Systems, Inc., Nashua, NH, 2017.

16.

Ahmed

M. U.

Tarefder

R. A.

Maji

A. K.

Incorporating Transmitter–Receiver Offset to Interpret Pavement Layer Thicknesses by GPR. Case Studies in Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 6, 2016, pp. 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csndt.2016.11.002.

17.

Hamrouche

Saarenketo

Improvement of a Coreless Method to Calculate the Average Dielectric Value of the Whole Asphalt Layer of a Road Pavement. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, GPR 2014, Brussels, Belgium, IEEE, New York, 2014, pp. 899–902. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGPR.2014.6970556.