This paper proposes a stochastic model for mixed traffic consisting of human-driven vehicles (HVs), connected automated vehicles (CAVs), and degraded connected automated vehicles (DCAVs). The model addresses the issue that most of the current literature ignores: the degradation of CAVs, and the heterogeneity and uncertainty of HVs, CAVs, and DCAVs. The source of uncertainty was the heterogeneous behavior of HVs, CAVs, and DCAVs, captured using vehicle-specific car-following relations, that is, parametric uncertainty. The proposed model allowed for the explicit investigation of the uncertainty, efficiency, and stability of mixed traffic under various CAV penetration rates, different positions of CAVs in the traffic stream, and the different degradation levels of CAVs. The numerical experiment results showed that a larger CAV penetration rate helped to reduce uncertainty and improve the efficiency and stability of traffic flow. Furthermore, we investigated the impact of different position combinations of CAVs in the mixed traffic stream on traffic performance under four scenarios: 1) CAVs randomly distributed in the traffic stream, 2) CAVs forming a platoon traveling in the front of the traffic stream, 3) CAVs forming a platoon traveling in the middle of the traffic stream, and 4) CAVs forming a platoon traveling in the rear of the traffic stream. The results demonstrated that Scenario 2 gave the best performance in reducing uncertainty and improving efficiency and stability under different CAV penetration rates, whereas Scenario 4 performed the worst. Moreover, increasing degradation levels of CAVs negatively affected the reduction of uncertainty and improvement of efficiency and stability.
MaJ.LiX.ZhouF.HuJ.ParkB. B.Parsimonious Shooting Heuristic for Trajectory Design of Connected Automated Traffic Part II: Computational Issues and Optimization. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 95, 2016, pp. 421–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2016.06.010.
2.
ZhouF.LiX.MaJ.Parsimonious Shooting Heuristic for Trajectory Design of Connected Automated Traffic Part I: Theoretical Analysis with Generalized Time Geography. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 95, 2017, pp. 394–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2016.05.007.
3.
GuanettiJ.KimY.BorrelliF.Control of Connected and Automated Vehicles: State of the Art and Future Challenges. Annual Reviews in Control, Vol. 45, 2018, pp. 18–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2018.04.011.
4.
YuC.FengY.LiuH. X.MaW.YangX.Integrated Optimization of Traffic Signals and Vehicle Trajectories at Isolated Urban Intersections. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 112, 2018, pp. 89–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.04.007.
5.
LuG.NieY.LiuX.LiD.Trajectory-Based Traffic Management Inside an Autonomous Vehicle Zone. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 120, 2019, pp. 76–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.12.012.
6.
LiL.LiX.Parsimonious Trajectory Design of Connected Automated Traffic. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 119, 2019, pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.11.006.
7.
FengY.YuC.LiuH. X.Spatiotemporal Intersection Control in a Connected and Automated Vehicle Environment. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 89, 2018, pp. 364–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.02.001.
8.
GuoY.MaJ.XiongC.LiX.ZhouF.HaoW.Joint Optimization of Vehicle Trajectories and Intersection Controllers with Connected Automated Vehicles: Combined Dynamic Programming and Shooting Heuristic Approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 98, 2019, pp. 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.11.010.
9.
BansalP.KockelmanK. M.Forecasting Americans’ Long-Term Adoption of Connected and Autonomous Vehicle Technologies. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 95, 2017, pp. 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.10.013.
10.
NgoduyD.Analytical Studies on the Instabilities of Heterogeneous Intelligent Traffic Flow. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, Vol. 18, No. 10, 2013, pp. 2699–2706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2013.02.018.
11.
NgoduyD.Instability of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Traffic Flow: A Macroscopic Approach. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, Vol. 18, No. 10, 2013, pp. 2838–2851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2013.02.007.
12.
NikolosI. K.DelisA. I.PapageorgiouM.Macroscopic Modelling and Simulation of ACC and CACC Traffic. Presented at the 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2015), Gran Canaria, Spain, 2015.
13.
TalebpourA.MahmassaniH. S.Influence of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles on Traffic Flow Stability and Throughput. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 71, 2016, pp. 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.07.007.
14.
YeL.YamamotoT.Impact of Dedicated Lanes for Connected and Autonomous Vehicle on Traffic Flow Throughput. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 512, 2018, pp. 588–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.08.083.
15.
XieD.-F.ZhaoX.-M.HeZ.Heterogeneous Traffic Mixing Regular and Connected Vehicles: Modeling and Stabilization. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 20, No. 6, 2019, pp. 2060–2071. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2018.2857465.
16.
JinS.SunD.-H.ZhaoM.LiY.ChenJ.Modeling and Stability Analysis of Mixed Traffic with Conventional and Connected Automated Vehicles from Cyber Physical Perspective. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 551, 2020, p. 124217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2020.124217.
17.
RezaeiA.CaulfieldB.Simulating a Transition to Autonomous Mobility. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, Vol. 106, 2021, p. 102175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2020.102175.
18.
TreiberM.HenneckeA.HelbingD.Congested Traffic States in Empirical Observations and Microscopic Simulations. Physical Review E, Vol. 62, No. 2, 2000, pp. 1805–1824. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.62.1805.
19.
YaoZ.HuR.WangY.JiangY.RanB.ChenY.Stability Analysis and the Fundamental Diagram for Mixed Connected Automated and Human-Driven Vehicles. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 533, 2019, p. 121931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.121931.
20.
WangH.QinY.WangW.ChenJ.Stability of CACC-Manual Heterogeneous Vehicular Flow with Partial CACC Performance Degrading. Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2019, pp. 788–813. https://doi.org/10.1080/21680566.2018.1517058.
21.
JiaD.NgoduyD.VuH. L.A Multiclass Microscopic Model for Heterogeneous Platoon with Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication. Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2019, pp. 311–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/21680566.2018.1434021.
22.
QinY.WangH.Stabilizing Mixed Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Traffic Flow to Balance Capacity Using Car-Following Model. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2023, pp. 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2021.1985490.
23.
ChenY.KongD.SunL.ZhangT.SongY.Fundamental Diagram and Stability Analysis for Heterogeneous Traffic Flow Considering Human-Driven Vehicle Driver’s Acceptance of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Vehicles. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 589, 2022, p. 126647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2021.126647.
24.
JiangR.WuQ.ZhuZ.Full Velocity Difference Model for a Car-Following Theory. Physical Review E, Vol. 64, No. 1, 2001, p. 017101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.64.017101.
25.
MilanésV.ShladoverS. E.Modeling Cooperative and Autonomous Adaptive Cruise Control Dynamic Responses Using Experimental Data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 48, 2014, pp. 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2014.09.001.
26.
LiuH.KanX. D.ShladoverS. E.LuX.-Y.FerlisR. E.Modeling Impacts of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Mixed Traffic Flow in Multi-Lane Freeway Facilities. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 95, 2018, pp. 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.07.027.
27.
XiaoL.WangM.SchakelW.van AremB.Unravelling Effects of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Deactivation on Traffic Flow Characteristics at Merging Bottlenecks. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 96, 2018, pp. 380–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.10.008.
28.
ChenD.SrivastavaA.AhnS.LiT.Traffic Dynamics Under Speed Disturbance in Mixed Traffic with Automated and Non-Automated Vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 113, 2020, pp. 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.03.017.
29.
ZhengF.LiuC.LiuX.JabariS. E.LuL.Analyzing the Impact of Automated Vehicles on Uncertainty and Stability of the Mixed Traffic Flow. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 112, 2020, pp. 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.01.017.
30.
PloegJ.Semsar-KazerooniE.LijsterG.van de WouwN.NijmeijerH.Graceful Degradation of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2015, pp. 488–497. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2014.2349498.
31.
NtousakisI. A.NikolosI. K.PapageorgiouM.On Microscopic Modelling of Adaptive Cruise Control Systems. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 6, 2015, pp. 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2015.03.010.
32.
Vander WerfJ.ShladoverS. E.MillerM. A.KourjanskaiaN.Effects of Adaptive Cruise Control Systems on Highway Traffic Flow Capacity. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2002. 1800: 78–84.
33.
YuS.ShiZ.The Effects of Vehicular Gap Changes with Memory on Traffic Flow in Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Strategy. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 428, 2015, pp. 206–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2015.01.064.
34.
van AremB.van DrielC. J. G.VisserR.The Impact of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Traffic-Flow Characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2006, pp. 429–436. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2006.884615.
35.
ChenD.AhnS.ChitturiM.NoyceD.Truck Platooning on Uphill Grades Under Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC). Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 23, 2017, pp. 1059–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.058.
36.
HuaX.YuW.WangW.Stability Analysis of Heterogeneous Traffic Flow with Connected and Automated Vehicles: Joint Consideration of Communication Failures and Driver Takeover. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 2022, 2022, pp. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5142956.
37.
YuW.HuaX.ZhaoD.WangW.XiangY.Safety Impact of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Vehicles’ Degradation Under Spatial Continuous Communication Interruption. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2022, pp. 309–331. https://doi.org/10.1049/itr2.12145.
38.
TuY.WangW.LiY.XuC.XuT.LiX.Longitudinal Safety Impacts of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Vehicle’s Degradation. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 69, 2019, pp. 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2019.03.002.
39.
YaoZ.XuT.JiangY.HuR.Linear Stability Analysis of Heterogeneous Traffic Flow Considering Degradations of Connected Automated Vehicles and Reaction Time. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 561, 2021, p. 125218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2020.125218.
40.
ZhouL.RuanT.MaK.DongC.WangH.Impact of CAV Platoon Management on Traffic Flow Considering Degradation of Control Mode. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 581, 2021, p. 126193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2021.126193.
41.
FriedrichB.The Effect of Autonomous Vehicles on Traffic. In Autonomous Driving (M.MaurerGerdesJ. C.LenzB.WinnerH., eds.), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 317–334.
42.
SharmaA.ZhengZ.KimJ.BhaskarA.HaqueM. M.Assessing Traffic Disturbance, Efficiency, and Safety of the Mixed Traffic Flow of Connected Vehicles and Traditional Vehicles by Considering Human Factors. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 124, 2021, p. 102934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102934.
43.
JiangR.JinC.-J.ZhangH. M.HuangY.-X.TianJ.-F.WangW.HuM.-B.WangH.JiaB.Experimental and Empirical Investigations of Traffic Flow Instability. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 94, 2018, pp. 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.08.024.
44.
MilanesV.ShladoverS. E.SpringJ.NowakowskiC.KawazoeH.NakamuraM.Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control in Real Traffic Situations. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2014, pp. 296–305. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2013.2278494.
45.
US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration. Next Generation SIMulation I-80 Data (4.00 p.m to 4.15 p.m, 5.00 p.m to 5.15 p.m, 5.15 p.m to 3.30 p.m). https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/trafficanalysistools/ngsim.htm. Accessed September 1, 2023.
ShladoverS. E.SuD.LuX.-Y.Impacts of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Freeway Traffic Flow. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2012. 2324: 63–70.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
