The likelihood of pedestrians exhibiting aberrant walking behaviors and being involved in traffic collisions increases substantially if they are distracted while walking because of using their mobile phones. To reduce the frequency with which pedestrians use their phones while walking, a detailed analysis of the elements that influence this behavior is required. This research studied people’s behavior and behavioral intentions to use mobile phones while walking, using an expanded version of the theory of planned behavior. Four hundred sixty-three college students completed an online survey that assessed attitudes and behaviors related to mobile phone use. The results showed that attitude, perceived behavioral control, mobile phone addiction, crash history, and prototype similarity significantly affected behavioral intentions, whereas subjective norms, descriptive norms, perceived risk, and prototype favorability did not. In addition, behavioral intentions, perceived behavioral control, mobile phone addiction, and crash history had significant impacts on behavior, whereas perceived risk did not. The results from this study could be utilized to develop interventions to reduce the frequency with which college students use their mobile phones while walking, which is essential for improving road safety.
World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Road Safety 2018: Summary. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.
2.
DemirB.ÖzkanT.DemirS.Pedestrian Violations: Reasoned or Social Reactive? Comparing Theory of Planned Behavior and Prototype Willingness Model. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 60, 2019, pp. 560–572.
3.
ReasonJ.Human Error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990.
4.
Abdel-AtyM. A.RadwanA. E.Modeling Traffic Accident Occurrence and Involvement. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 32, No. 5, 2000, pp. 633–642.
5.
QuW.ZhangH.ZhaoW.ZhangK.GeY.The Effect of Cognitive Errors, Mindfulness and Personality Traits on Pedestrian Behavior in a Chinese Sample. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 41, 2016, pp. 29–37.
6.
ScopatzR. A.ZhouY.Effect of Electronic Device Use on Pedestrian Safety: A Literature Review. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C., 2016.
7.
BaschC. H.EthanD.ZybertP.BaschC. E.Pedestrian Behavior at Five Dangerous and Busy Manhattan Intersections. Journal of Community Health, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2015, pp. 789–792.
8.
PharoE.Extent of Mobile Phone Use by Pedestrians on Controlled Crossings in Central Hobart, Tasmania. Journal of the Australasian College of Road Safety, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2019, pp. 14–19.
9.
OrtizN. C.RamnarayanM.MizenkoK.Distraction and Road User Behavior: An Observational Pilot Study Across Intersections in Washington, DC. Journal of Transport & Health, Vol. 7, 2017, pp. 13–22.
10.
FernándezC.VicenteM. A.CarrilloI.GuilabertM.MiraJ. J.Factors Influencing the Smartphone Usage Behavior of Pedestrians: Observational Study on “Spanish Smombies”. Journal of Medical Internet Research, Vol. 22, No. 8, 2020, p. e19350.
11.
RopakaM.NikolaouD.YannisG.Investigation of Traffic and Safety Behavior of Pedestrians While Texting or Web-Surfing. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 21, No. 6, 2020, pp. 389–394.
12.
StarkJ.RuzsicskaK.WiesmannT.Young Pedestrians’ Mobile Phone Use While Crossing the Road. Transactions on Transport Sciences, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2022, pp. 78–84.
13.
YadavA. K.VelagaN.A Systematic Review of Observational Studies Investigating the Influence of Mobile Phone Distraction on Road Crossing Behaviour of Pedestrians. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 91, 2022, pp. 236–259.
14.
LennonA.Oviedo-TrespalaciosO.MatthewsS.Pedestrian Self–Reported Use of Smart Phones: Positive Attitudes and High Exposure Influence Intentions to Cross the Road While Distracted. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 98, 2017, pp. 338–347.
15.
JiangK.LingF.FengZ.WangK.GuoL.Psychological Predictors of Mobile Phone Use While Crossing the Street Among College Students: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2017, pp. 118–123.
16.
HouM.ChengJ.XiaoF.WangC.Distracted Behavior of Pedestrians While Crossing Street: A Case Study in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2021, p. 353.
17.
WhiteM.WhiteJ.SiuhiS.MwakalongeJ.Self-Reported Behaviors and Habits of Distracted College Pedestrians While Walking. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2017. 2661: 76–83.
18.
AlsalehR.SayedT.ZakiM. H.Assessing the Effect of Pedestrians’ Use of Cell Phones on Their Walking Behavior: A Study Based on Automated Video Analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2018. 2672: 46–57.
19.
CrowleyP.MadeleineP.VuillermeN.The Effects of Mobile Phone Use on Walking: A Dual Task Study. BMC Research Notes, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2019, pp. 1–6.
20.
EgodawattaH. M.AmarasinghaN.Mobile Phone Use at Un-signalized Mid-Block Pedestrian Crossings in Sri Lanka. Proc., Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, No. 12, Colombo, Sri Lanka, 2019.
21.
HaS.-Y.JungY.-J.ShinD.The Effect of Smartphone Uses on Gait and Obstacle Collision During Walking. Medical Hypotheses, Vol. 141, 2020, p. 109730.
22.
MohammedH. A.Assessment of Distracted Pedestrian Crossing Behavior at Midblock Crosswalks. IATSS Research, Vol. 45, No. 4, 2021, pp. 584–593.
23.
CampisiT.OtkovićI. I.ŠurdonjaS.Deluka-TibljašA.Impact of Social and Technological Distraction on Pedestrian Crossing Behaviour: A Case Study in Enna, Sicily. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 60, 2022, pp. 100–107.
24.
RaoniarR.MauryaA. K.Pedestrian Crossing Behaviour at Signalized Intersection Crosswalks: An Observational Study of Factors Influencing Pedestrian Walking Speed, Safety Margin, and Violation. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 14, 2022, pp. 1456–1474.
25.
YoshikiS.TatsumiH.TsutsumiK.MiyazakiT.FujikiT.Effects of Smartphone Use on Behavior While Walking. Urban and Regional Planning Review, Vol. 4, 2017, pp. 138–150.
26.
AlejalilN.DavoodiS. R.Mobile Phone Usage and Its Effects on Pedestrians’ Distraction. International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2017. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijhrba.35431.
27.
GrudenC.Istoka OtkovicI.SramlM.Pedestrian Safety at Roundabouts: Their Crossing and Glance Behavior in the Interaction with Vehicular Traffic. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 159, 2021, p. 106290.
28.
LiuY.AlsalehR.SayedT.Modeling the Influence of Mobile Phone Use Distraction on Pedestrian Reaction Times to Green Signals: A Multilevel Mixed-Effects Parametric Survival Model. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 81, 2021, pp. 115–129.
29.
GilletteG.FitzpatrickK.ChryslerS.AvelarR.Effect of Distractions on a Pedestrian’s Waiting Behavior at Traffic Signals: Observational Study. Transportation Research Record : Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2016. 2586: 111–119.
30.
JiangK.LingF.FengZ.MaC.KumferW.ShaoC.WangK.Effects of Mobile Phone Distraction on Pedestrians’ Crossing Behavior and Visual Attention Allocation at a Signalized Intersection: An Outdoor Experimental Study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 115, 2018, pp. 170–177.
31.
BaswailA.AllinsonL.GoddardP.PfefferK.Adolescents’ Mobile Phone Use While Crossing the Road. Safety, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2019, p. 27.
32.
ZhangH.ZhangC.ChenF.WeiY.Effects of Mobile Phone Use on Pedestrian Crossing Behavior and Safety at Unsignalized Intersections. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 46, No. 5, 2019, pp. 381–388.
33.
SchwebelD. C.StavrinosD.ByingtonK. W.DavisT.O’NealE. E.De JongD.Distraction and Pedestrian Safety: How Talking on the Phone, Texting, and Listening to Music Impact Crossing the Street. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 45, 2012, pp. 266–271.
34.
WangD.Distracted Visual Attention During Walking: Response to an Unexpected Event While Walking and Using a Smartphone in Young Healthy Adults. Thesis. University of Oregon, Eugene, 2015.
35.
CourtemancheF.Labonté-LeMoyneE.LégerP.-M.FredetteM.SenecalS.CameronA.-F.FaubertJ.BellavanceF.Texting While Walking: An Expensive Switch Cost. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 127, 2019, pp. 1–8.
36.
ThompsonL. L.RivaraF. P.AyyagariR. C.EbelB. E.Impact of Social and Technological Distraction on Pedestrian Crossing Behaviour: An Observational Study. Injury Prevention, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2013, pp. 232–237.
37.
MwakalongeJ.SiuhiS.WhiteJ.Distracted Walking: Examining the Extent to Pedestrian Safety Problems. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), Vol. 2, No. 5, 2015, pp. 327–337.
38.
PešićD.AntićB.GlavićD.MilenkovićM.The Effects of Mobile Phone Use on Pedestrian Crossing Behaviour at Unsignalized Intersections–Models for Predicting Unsafe Pedestrians Behaviour. Safety Science, Vol. 82, 2016, pp. 1–8.
39.
TapiroH.Oron-GiladT.ParmetY.Cell Phone Conversations and Child Pedestrian’s Crossing Behavior; A Simulator Study. Safety Science, Vol. 89, 2016, pp. 36–44.
40.
ChenP.-L.SalehW.PaiC.-W.Texting and Walking: A Controlled Field Study of Crossing Behaviours and Inattentional Blindness in Taiwan. Behaviour & Information Technology, Vol. 36, No. 4, 2017, pp. 435–445.
41.
HamannC.DulfD.Baragan-AndradaE.PriceM.Peek-AsaC.Contributors to Pedestrian Distraction and Risky Behaviours During Road Crossings in Romania. Injury Prevention, Vol. 23, No. 6, 2017, pp. 370–376.
42.
TianK.MarkkulaG.WeiC.SadraeiE.HiroseT.MeratN.RomanoR.Impacts of Visual and Cognitive Distractions and Time Pressure on Pedestrian Crossing Behaviour: A Simulator Study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 174, 2022, p. 106770.
43.
HorberryT.OsborneR.YoungK.Pedestrian Smartphone Distraction: Prevalence and Potential Severity. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 60, 2019, pp. 515–523.
44.
StavrinosD.PopeC. N.ShenJ.SchwebelD. C.Distracted Walking, Bicycling, and Driving: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mobile Technology and Youth Crash Risk. Child Development, Vol. 89, No. 1, 2018, pp. 118–128.
45.
SimmonsS. M.CairdJ. K.TaA.SterzerF.HagelB. E.Plight of the Distracted Pedestrian: A Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis of Mobile Phone Use on Crossing Behaviour. Injury Prevention, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2020, pp. 170–176.
46.
RenJ.ChenY.LiF.XueC.YinX.PengJ.LiangJ.FengQ.WangS.Road Injuries Associated with Cellular Phone Use While Walking or Riding a Bicycle or an Electric Bicycle: A Case-Crossover Study. American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 190, No. 1, 2021, pp. 37–43.
47.
NasarJ. L.TroyerD.Pedestrian Injuries Due to Mobile Phone Use in Public Places. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 57, 2013, pp. 91–95.
48.
LinP.-S.KourtellisA.ZhangY.Understanding of Safety Impact and Potential Causes of Distracted Walking and Biking. Proc., 28th ICTPA Annual Conference (ICTPA 2015) and the 3rd IACGE International Conference on Geotechnical and Earthquake Engineering (IACGE2015), Los Angeles, CA, 2015.
49.
SolahM. S.DerosB.JawiZ. M.HarunN. Z.HamzahA.AriffinA. H.The Effects of Mobile Electronic Device Use in Influencing Pedestrian Crossing Behaviour. Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine, Vol. 16, No. Special Volume (1), 2016, pp. 61–66.
50.
PerraV.-M.BasbasS.Investigating Pedestrians’ Crossing Behavior While Using Mobile Phones at Signalized and Unsignalized Intersections in the City of Thessaloniki. Proc., 9th International Congress on Transportation Research, Athens, Greece, October 2019, pp. 24–25.
51.
PiazzaA. J.KnowldenA. P.HibberdE.LeeperJ.PaschalA. M.UsdanS.Distracted Mobile Device Use Among Street-Crossing College Student Pedestrians: An Observational Approach. Journal of American College Health, Vol. 70, No. 7, 2022, pp. 2135–2142.
52.
HaolanZ.CampbellI. M.GiangW. C.Phone-Related Distracted Walking Injuries as a Function of Age and Walking Environment. Proc., Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, No. 65, Sage Publications, Los Angeles, CA, 2021, pp. 611–615.
53.
SaltosA.SmithD.SchreiberK.LichensteinS.LichensteinR.Cell-Phone Related Injuries in the United States from 2000–2012. Journal of Safety Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2015, pp. 1–14.
54.
RussoB. J.JamesE.AguilarC. Y.SmaglikE. J.Pedestrian Behavior at Signalized Intersection Crosswalks: Observational Study of Factors Associated with Distracted Walking, Pedestrian Violations, and Walking Speed. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2018. 2672: 1–12.
55.
ChenP.-L.PaiC.-W.Pedestrian Smartphone Overuse and Inattentional Blindness: An Observational Study in Taipei, Taiwan. BMC Public Health, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2018, pp. 1–10.
56.
AppelM.KrischN.SteinJ.-P.WeberS.Smartphone Zombies! Pedestrians’ Distracted Walking as a Function of Their Fear of Missing Out. Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 63, 2019, pp. 130–133.
57.
HouM.ChenS.ChengJ.The Effect of Risk Perception and Other Psychological Factors on Mobile Phone Use While Crossing the Street Among Pedestrians. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 170, 2022, p. 106643.
58.
ZhengH.GiangW. C. W.Risk Perception and Distraction Engagement with Smart Devices in Different Types of Walking Environments. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 162, 2021, p. 106405.
59.
TontodonatoP.DrinkardA.Predictors of Cellphone-Related Distracted Walking Among College Students. The Social Science Journal, 2021, pp. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2021.1899360.
60.
YadavA. K.ChoudharyS. S.PawarN. M.VelagaN. R.Investigating the Role of Beliefs in Influencing the Hand-Held and Hands-Free Mobile Phone Use Among Pedestrians in India. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, Vol. 30, 2023, pp. 79–90.
61.
HouM.ChengJ.The Role of Social Networks in Mobile Phone Use Among Pedestrians: A Pilot Study in China. Sustainability, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2021, p. 420.
62.
YangY.WangL.EasaS. M.ZhengX.Analysis of Electric Bicycle Riders’ Use of Mobile Phones While Riding on Campus. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 19, No. 10, 2022, p. 5905.
63.
JiangK.YangZ.FengZ.YuZ.BaoS.HuangZ.Mobile Phone Use While Cycling: A Study Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 64, 2019, pp. 388–400.
64.
AjzenI.The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50, No. 2, 1991, pp. 179–211.
65.
PiazzaA. J.KnowldenA. P.HibberdE.LeeperJ.PaschalA. M.UsdanS.Mobile Device Use While Crossing the Street: Utilizing the Theory of Planned Behavior. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 127, 2019, pp. 9–18.
66.
BartonB. K.KologiS. M.SironA.Distracted Pedestrians in Crosswalks: An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 37, 2016, pp. 129–137.
67.
KohH.MackertM.A Study Exploring Factors of Decision to Text While Walking Among College Students Based on Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). Journal of American College Health, Vol. 64, No. 8, 2016, pp. 619–627.
68.
SchwebelD. C.CanterM. F.HasanR.GriffinR.WhiteT. R.JohnstonA.Distracted Pedestrian Behavior: An Observational Study of Risk by Situational Environments. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 23, No. 6, 2022, pp. 346–351.
69.
GibbonsF. X.StockM. L.GerrardM.The Prototype-Willingness Model. In The Wiley Encyclopedia of Health Psychology (SweenyK.RobbinsM. L.CohenL. M., eds.), Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2020, pp. 517–527.
70.
SaberF.Mirzaei-AlavijehM.Mostafavi-DaraniF.Zamani-AlavijehF.Why Male Adolescent Bicyclists Perform Risky Stunts? A Qualitative Study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 88, 2022, pp. 1–12.
71.
YangH.LiuX.SuF.CherryC.LiuY.LiY.Predicting E-Bike Users’ Intention to Run the Red Light: An Application and Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 58, 2018, pp. 282–291.
72.
AlhomoudM.AlSalehE.AlzaherB.Car Accidents and Risky Driving Behaviors Among Young Drivers from the Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 23, No. 8, 2022, pp. 471–477.
73.
WangJ.WangX.Structural Equation Modeling: Applications Using Mplus. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2019.
74.
HairJ. F.RingleC. M.SarstedtM.PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2011, pp. 139–152.
75.
ChinW. W.The Partial Least Squares Approach to Structural Equation Modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, Vol. 295, No. 2, 1998, pp. 295–336.
76.
FornellC.LarckerD. F.Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1981, pp. 39–50.
77.
HairJ. F.BlackW.BabinB.Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson Education, London, UK, 2009.
78.
BrandtR. K.HausteinS.HagenziekerM.MøllerM.Cyclists’ Handheld Phone Use and Traffic Rule Knowledge. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 86, 2022, pp. 121–130.
79.
KummenejeA.-M.RundmoT.Attitudes, Risk Perception and Risk-Taking Behaviour Among Regular Cyclists in Norway. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 69, 2020, pp. 135–150.
80.
BasseM.TwiskD.KayeS.-A.Pro-social Behaviour in Young Passengers: Predictive Utility of the Social Reaction Pathway of the Prototype Willingness Model. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 74, 2020, pp. 151–160.
81.
ShukriM.JonesF.ConnerM.Theory of Planned Behaviour, Psychological Stressors and Intention to Avoid Violating Traffic Rules: A Multi-Level Modelling Analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 169, 2022, p. 106624.
82.
EsmailiA.AghabaykK.ParishadN.StephensA. N.Investigating the Interaction Between Pedestrian Behaviors and Crashes Through Validation of a Pedestrian Behavior Questionnaire (PBQ). Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 153, 2021, p. 106050.
83.
Muhammad ButtF.DalhatM. A.Shahid MinhasK.Al-mojilA.Influence of Seat Belt Use Behavior and Road Traffic Crash Experience on the Use of Child Restraint Systems: A Step Further. Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2021.07.005.
84.
NgueutsaR.KouabenanD. R.Accident History, Risk Perception and Traffic Safe Behaviour. Ergonomics, Vol. 60, No. 9, 2017, pp. 1273–1282.
85.
ChouhanS. S.KathuriaA.SekharC. R.Examining Risky Riding Behavior in India Using Motorcycle Rider Behavior Questionnaire. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 160, 2021, p. 106312.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
