This study investigates the ultimate load-bearing capacity of rigid two-way concrete pavements placed on conventional and reinforced soil embankments using upper-bound limit analysis (UBLA). In the presence of the median strip, upper-bound solutions of rigid pavements resting on reinforced embankments did not draw much attention from previous researchers. Therefore, a rigorous UBLA is performed, adopting the multi-block failure mechanism for the intended purpose. The true upper-bound solution is achieved by satisfying the conditions of geometric compatibility and kinematic admissibility. The effects of the proximity of dual carriageways and embankment slopes on the load-bearing capacity of pavements are expressed in relation to interaction factors. The critical spacing beyond which the proximity effect ceases to exist is estimated for different slope angles of the embankment. A parametric investigation is performed to understand the influence of various soil parameters, embankment geometry, and layers of reinforcement. A notable improvement in the performance of two closely spaced rigid pavements can be observed by providing additional layers of reinforcement. The current outcomes are sensible and match well with the existing investigations.
GóngoraA. G.PalmeiraE. M.Influence of Fill and Geogrid Characteristics on the Performance of Unpaved Roads on Weak Subgrades. Geosynthetics International, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2012, pp. 191–199.
2.
Abu-FarsakhM.HanandehS.MohammadL.ChenQ.Performance of Geo-Synthetic Reinforced/Stabilized Paved Roads Built Over Soft Soil Under Cyclic Plate Loads. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 44, No. 6, 2016, pp. 845–853.
3.
SukuL.PrabhuS. S.RameshP.BabuG. S.Behavior of Geocell-Reinforced Granular Base Under Repeated Loading. Transportation Geotechnics, Vol. 9, 2016, pp. 17–30.
4.
EvirgenB.BuyukB.CilG. T.DegerT.Experimental Performance of Polyester-Fiber-Based Soil Geogrids Against Reflective Cracks. Transportation Research Record, 2021. 2675(12): 53–64.
5.
MishraD.QianY.KazmeeH.TutumluerE.Investigation of Geogrid-Reinforced Railroad Ballast Behavior using Large-Scale Triaxial Testing and Discrete Element Modeling. Transportation Research Record, 2014. 2462(1): 98–108.
6.
BiZ.GongQ.HuangJ.Long-Term Stability of High-Speed Railway Geosynthetic Reinforced Pile-Supported Embankment Subjected to Traffic Loading Considering Arching Effect. Transportation Research Record, 2020. 2674(7): 596–607.
7.
MichalowskiR. L.Limit Analysis in Stability Calculations of Reinforced Soil Structures. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 16, No. 6, 1998, pp. 311–331.
8.
ChenQ.Abu-FarsakhM. Y.SharmaR.ZhangX.Laboratory Investigation of Behavior of Foundations on Geosynthetic-Reinforced Clayey Soil. Transportation Research Record, 2007. 2004(1): 28–38.
9.
Abu-FarsakhM. Y.GuJ.VoyiadjisG.TaoM.Numerical Parametric Study of Strip Footing on Reinforced Embankment Soils. Transportation Research Record, 2007. 2004(1): 132–140.
10.
HanJ.YangX.LeshchinskyD.ParsonsR. L.Behavior of Geocell-Reinforced Sand Under a Vertical Load. Transportation Research Record, 2008. 2045(1): 95–101.
11.
ChakrabortyD.KumarJ.Bearing Capacity of Strip Foundations in Reinforced Soils. International Journal of Geomechanics, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2014, pp. 45–58.
12.
IslamM. A.HossainM. S.BadhonF. F.BhandariP.Numerical Study of Recycled-Plastic-Pin- and Geosynthetic-Platform-Supported Embankment Over Soft Soil. Transportation Research Record, 2022. 2676(9): 159–171.
13.
KosekiJ.Use of Geosynthetics to Improve Seismic Performance of Earth Structures. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 34, 2012, pp. 51–68.
14.
HasheminezhadA.BahadoriH.Seismic Response of Shallow Foundations Over Liquefiable Soils Improved by Deep Soil Mixing Columns. Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 110, 2019, pp. 251–273.
15.
BahadoriH.MotamediH.HasheminezhadA.MotamedR.Shaking Table Tests on Shallow Foundations over Geocomposite and Geogrid-Reinforced Liquefiable Soils. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 128, 2020, p. 105896.
16.
MeyerhofG. G.Load-Carrying Capacity of Concrete Pavements. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, Vol. 88, No. 3, 1962, pp. 89–116.
17.
MichalowskiR. L.Limit loads on reinforced foundation soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 130, No. 4, 2004, pp. 381–390.
18.
KumarJ.SahooJ. P.Bearing Capacity of Strip Foundations Reinforced with Geogrid Sheets by Using Upper Bound Finite-Element Limit Analysis. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Vol. 37, 2013, pp. 3258–3277.
19.
BiswasN.GhoshP.Bearing Capacity for Isolated Surface Strip Footing Resting on Multilayered Soil Bed. Indian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 49, No. 1, 2019, pp. 37–49.
20.
ZhangZ.WangM.YeG. B.HanJ.A Novel 2D-3D Conversion Method for Calculating Maximum Strain of Geosynthetic Reinforcement in Pile-Supported Embankments. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 47, No. 3, 2019, pp. 336–351.
21.
ZhangL.OuQ.ZhouS.Analytical Study of the Dynamic Response of a double-Beam Model for a Geosynthetic-Reinforced Embankment Under Traffic Loads. Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 118, 2020, p. 103330.
22.
van EekelenS. J. M.HanJ.Geosynthetic-Reinforced Pile-Supported Embankments: State of the Art. Geosynthetics International, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2020, pp. 112–141.
23.
MannaD.SanthoshkumarG.GhoshP.Upper-Bound Limit Load of Rigid Pavements Resting on Reinforced Soil Embankments – Kinematic Approach. Transportation Geotechnics, Vol. 30, 2021, p. 100611.
24.
SharmaP.HarinarayanaT.Solar Energy Generation Potential Along National Highways. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 16, 2013, pp. 1–13.
25.
ShuklaS.SivakuganN.DasB.A State-of-the-Art Review of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Slopes. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2011, pp. 17–32.
26.
KumarJ.GhoshP.Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Two Interfering Rough Strip Footing. International Journal of Geomechanics, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2007, pp. 53–62.
27.
KumarJ.GhoshP.Upper Bound Limit Analysis for Finding Interference of Two Nearby Strip Footings on Sand. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, Vol. 25, No. 5, 2007, pp. 499–507.
28.
LavasanA. A.GhazaviM.Behavior of Closely Spaced Square and Circular Footings on Reinforced Sand. Soils and Foundations, Vol. 52, No. 1, 2012, pp. 160–167.
29.
GhoshP.RajeshS.SaichandS.Linear and Non-Linear Elastic Analysis of Closely Spaced Strip Foundations Using Pasternak Model. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2017, pp. 228–243.
30.
RoyS. S.DebK.Interference Effect of Closely Spaced Footings Resting on Granular Fill Over Soft Clay. International Journal of Geomechanics, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2019, p. 04018181.
31.
SchmüdderichC.LavasanA. A.TschuchniggF.WichtmannT.Behavior of Nonidentical Differently Loaded Interfering Rough Footings. Journal of Geotechnical Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 146, No. 6, 2020, p. 04020041.
32.
BiswasN.GhoshP.Interaction of Adjacent Strip Footing on Reinforced Soil Using Upper Bound Limit Analysis. Geosynthetics International, Vol. 25, No. 6, 2018, pp. 599–611.
33.
RoyS. S.DebK.Effect of Aspect Ratio of Footing on Behaviour of Two Closely-Spaced Footings on Geogrid-Reinforced Sand. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 4, 2020, pp. 443–453.
34.
AcharyyaR.DeyA.Assessment of Bearing Capacity of interfering Strip Footings Located Near Sloping Surface Considering Artificial Neural Network Technique. Journal of Mountain Science, Vol. 15, No. 12, 2018, pp. 2766–2780.
35.
RajD.SinghY. M.KayniaA.Behavior of Slopes Under Multiple Adjacent Footing Sand Buildings. International Journal of Geomechanics, Vol. 18, No. 7, 2018, p. 04018062.
36.
SoubraA. H.Upper Bound Solution for Bearing Capacity of Foundations. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 125, No. 1, 1999. pp. 59–68.
37.
ChenW. F.Limit Analysis and Soil Plasticity. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1975.
38.
PalA.GhoshP.MajumderM.Interaction Effect of Two Closely Spaced Skirted Strip Foundations in Cohesionless Soil Using Upper-Bound Limit Analysis. International Journal of Geomechanics, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2017, p. 06016022.
39.
GhoshP.KumarP.Interference Effect of Two Nearby Strip Footings on Reinforced Sand. Contemporary Engineering Sciences Journal, Vol. 2, No. 12, 2009, pp. 577–592.
40.
KumarJ.KouzerK. M.Bearing Capacity of Two Interfering Footings. International Journal for Numerical Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2008, pp. 251–264.
41.
KumarA.SaranS.Closely Spaced Footings on Geogrid-Reinforced Sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 129, No. 7, 2003, pp. 660–664.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
