This paper presents a methodology to detect rear-end conflicts at signalized intersections with the help of roadside LiDAR sensors. Raw data collected in the point cloud format from the sensors was processed using a series of data processing algorithms to obtain vehicle trajectories. Time-based (MTTC), deceleration-based (SDI), and severity-based (CSI) surrogate safety indices were calculated from the vehicle trajectories to identify the conflict threats at every frame of the dataset, which were further aggregated together to evaluate the risk exposure and risk severity at different temporal segments of the leader/follower car-following period to obtain a rear-end conflict index. The identified conflicts were compared with the historical crash records using negative binomial models. The results indicate correlation between the identified conflicts and the crashes, and further provide new information about the rear-end crash risks at the intersection which could support the proactive approach of traffic safety analysis.
BlincoeL.MillerT. R.ZaloshnjaE.LawrenceB. A.The Economic and Societal Impact of Motor Vehicle Crashes, 2010 (Revised). Report No. DOT HS 812 013. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C., 2015.
2.
BajwaR.RajagopalR.VaraiyaP.KavalerR.In-Pavement Wireless Sensor Network for Vehicle Classification. Proc., 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, IEEE, Chicago, IL, 2011, pp. 85–96.
3.
KrajewskiR.BockJ.KloekerL.EcksteinL.The Highd Dataset: A Drone Dataset of Naturalistic Vehicle Trajectories on German Highways for Validation of Highly Automated Driving Systems. 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Maui, HI, 2018, pp. 2118–2125.
4.
PunzoV.BorzacchielloM. T.CiuffoB.On the Assessment of Vehicle Trajectory Data Accuracy and Application to the Next Generation SIMulation (NGSIM) Program Data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 19, No. 6, 2011, pp. 1243–1262.
5.
ZhaoJ.GaoY.YangZ.LiJ.FengY.QinZ.BaiZ.Truck Traffic Speed Prediction Under Non-Recurrent Congestion: Based on Optimized Deep Learning Algorithms and GPS Data. IEEE Access, Vol. 7, 2019, pp. 9116–9127.
6.
SunL.ZhangD.ChenC.CastroP. S.LiS.WangZ.Real Time Anomalous Trajectory Detection and Analysis. Mobile Networks and Applications, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2013, pp. 341–356.
7.
GöhringD.WangM.SchnürmacherM.GanjinehT.Radar/Lidar Sensor Fusion for Car-Following on Highways. The 5th International Conference on Automation, Robotics and Applications, IEEE, Wellington, New Zealand, 2011, pp. 407–412.
8.
SunY.XuH.WuJ.ZhengJ.DietrichK. M.3-D Data Processing to Extract Vehicle Trajectories From Roadside LiDAR Data. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2018. 2672: 14–22.
DimitriouL.StylianouK.Abdel-AtyM. A.Assessing Rear-End Crash Potential in Urban Locations Based on Vehicle-by-Vehicle Interactions, Geometric Characteristics and Operational Conditions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 118, 2018, pp. 221–235.
11.
WangX.Abdel-AtyM.BradyP. A.Crash Estimation at Signalized Intersections: Significant Factors and Temporal Effect. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2006. 1953: 10–20.
12.
KostyniukL. P.EbyD. W.Exploring Rear-End Roadway Crashes From the Driver’s Perspective. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor, MI, 1998.
13.
Abdel-AtyM.AbdelwahabH.Modeling Rear-End Collisions Including the Role of Driver’s Visibility and Light Truck Vehicles Using a Nested Logit Structure. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 36, No. 3, 2004, pp. 447–456.
14.
StrandbergL.Winter Braking Tests With 66 Drivers, Different Tyres and Disconnectable ABS. International Workshop on Traffic Accident Reconstruction, Tokyo, 1998, pp. 58–72.
15.
MachianiS. G.AbbasM.Safety Surrogate Histograms (SSH): A Novel Real-Time Safety Assessment of Dilemma Zone Related Conflicts at Signalized Intersections. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 96, 2016, pp. 361–370.
16.
HaywardJ.Near Misses as a Results of Safety at Urban Intersections. PhD thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, Pensylvania State University, University Park, PA, 1971.
17.
ZhengL.SayedT.ManneringF.Modeling Traffic Conflicts for Use in Road Safety Analysis: A Review of Analytic Methods and Future Directions. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 29, 2021, p. 100142.
18.
GettmanD.PuL.SayedT.ShelbyS. G.EnergyS.Surrogate Safety Assessment Model and Validation. Final Report, FHWA-HRT-08-051. Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, McLean, VA, 2008.
19.
GuoY.EssaM.SayedT.HaqueM. M.WashingtonS.A Comparison Between Simulated and Field-Measured Conflicts for Safety Assessment of Signalized Intersections in Australia. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 101, 2019, pp. 96–110.
20.
YanX.Abdel-AtyM.RadwanE.WangX.ChilakapatiP.Validating a Driving Simulator Using Surrogate Safety Measures. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2008, pp. 274–288.
21.
HuangF.LiuP.YuH.WangW.Identifying if VISSIM Simulation Model and SSAM Provide Reasonable Estimates for Field Measured Traffic Conflicts at Signalized Intersections. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 50, 2013, pp. 1014–1024.
22.
GuoF.KlauerS. G.McGillM. T.DingusT. A.Evaluating the Relationship Between Near-Crashes and Crashes: Can Near-Crashes Serve as a Surrogate Safety Metric for Crashes? National Highway Traffic Safety Administrattion, Washington, D.C., 2010.
23.
WangC.StamatiadisN.Surrogate Safety Measure for Simulation-Based Conflict Study. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2013. 2386: 72–80.
24.
RajputP.ChaturvediM.PatelV.Road Condition Monitoring Using Unsupervised Learning Based Bus Trajectory Processing. Multimodal Transportation, Vol. 1, No. 4, 2022, p. 100041.
25.
PaulM.GhoshI.Development of Conflict Severity Index for Safety Evaluation of Severe Crash Types at Unsignalized Intersections Under Mixed Traffic. Safety Science, Vol. 144, 2021, p. 105432.
26.
KatrakazasC.TheofilatosA.IslamM. A.PapadimitriouE.DimitriouL.AntoniouC.Prediction of Rear-End Conflict Frequency Using Multiple-Location Traffic Parameters. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 152, 2021, p. 106007.
27.
LiZ.AhnS.ChungK.RaglandD. R.WangW.YuJ. W.Surrogate Safety Measure for Evaluating Rear-End Collision Risk Related to Kinematic Waves Near Freeway Recurrent Bottlenecks. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 64, 2014, pp. 52–61.
28.
ZhaoP.LeeC.Assessing Rear-End Collision Risk of Cars and Heavy Vehicles on Freeways Using a Surrogate Safety Measure. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 113, 2018, pp. 149–158.
29.
ParkH.OhC.MoonJ.KimS.Development of a Lane Change Risk Index Using Vehicle Trajectory Data. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 110, 2018, pp. 1–8.
30.
XingY.LvC.CaoD.Personalized Vehicle Trajectory Prediction Based on Joint Time-Series Modeling for Connected Vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 69, No. 2, 2019, pp. 1341–1352.
31.
BattiatoS.FarinellaG. M.GalloG.GiudiceO.On-Board Monitoring System for Road Traffic Safety Analysis. Computers in Industry, Vol. 98, 2018, pp. 208–217.
32.
KhanM. A.EctorsW.BellemansT.JanssensD.WetsG.UAV-Based Traffic Analysis: A Universal Guiding Framework Based on Literature Survey. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 22, 2017, pp. 541–550.
33.
StipancicJ.Miranda-MorenoL.SaunierN.Vehicle Manoeuvers as Surrogate Safety Measures: Extracting Data From the GPS-Enabled Smartphones of Regular Drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 115, 2018, pp. 160–169.
34.
XieK.OzbayK.YangH.LiC.Mining Automatically Extracted Vehicle Trajectory Data for Proactive Safety Analytics. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 106, 2019, pp. 61–72.
35.
KathuriaA.VedagiriP.Evaluating Pedestrian Vehicle Interaction Dynamics at Un-Signalized Intersections: A Proactive Approach for Safety Analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 134, 2020, p. 105316.
36.
St-AubinP.Miranda-MorenoL.SaunierN.An Automated Surrogate Safety Analysis at Protected Highway Ramps Using Cross-Sectional and Before–After Video Data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 36, 2013, pp. 284–295.
37.
PulvirentiG.De CeunynckT.DistefanoS.DanielsN.LeonardiS.Safety of Bicyclists in Roundabouts With Mixed Traffic: Video Analyses of Behavioural and Surrogate Safety Indicators. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 76, 2021, pp. 72–91.
38.
ChauhanR.DhamaniyaA.ArkatkarS.Spatiotemporal Variation of Rear-End Conflicts at Signalized Intersections Under Disordered Traffic Conditions. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, Vol. 147, No. 11, 2021, p. 05021007.
39.
EssaM.SayedT.Traffic Conflict Models to Evaluate the Safety of Signalized Intersections at the Cycle Level. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 89, 2018, pp. 289–302.
40.
WuJ.XuH.ZhengY.TianZ.A Novel Method of Vehicle-Pedestrian Near-Crash Identification With Roadside LiDAR Data. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 121, 2018, pp. 238–249.
41.
LvB.SunR.ZhangH.XuH.YueR.Automatic Vehicle-Pedestrian Conflict Identification With Trajectories of Road Users Extracted From Roadside Lidar Sensors Using a Rule-Based Method. IEEE Access, Vol. 7, 2019, pp. 161594–161606.
42.
BandaruV. K.RomeroM. A.LizarazoC.TarkoA. P.Tscan – Stationary LiDAR for Traffic and Safety Applications: Vehicle Interpretation and Tracking. Joint Transportation Research Program Publication No. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2021/31. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 2021.
43.
AnishaA. M.Abdel-AtyM.AbdelraoufA.IslamZ.ZhengO.Automated Vehicle to Vehicle Conflict Analysis at Signalized Intersections by Camera and LiDAR Sensor Fusion. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2023. 2677: 117–132.
44.
ZhangY.BhattaraiN.ZhaoJ.LiuH.XuH.An Unsupervised Clustering Method for Processing Roadside LiDAR Data With Improved Computational Efficiency. IEEE Sensors Journal, Vol. 22, No. 11, 2022, pp. 10684–10691.
45.
ZhaoJ.XuH.LiuH.WuJ.ZhengY.WuD.Detection and Tracking of Pedestrians and Vehicles Using Roadside LiDAR Sensors. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 100, 2019, pp. 68–87.
46.
ZhaoJ.XuH.ZhangY.ShankarV.LiuH.Automatic Identification of Vehicle Partial Occlusion in Data Collected by Roadside LiDAR Sensors. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2022. 2676: 708–718.
47.
ArunA.HaqueM. M.WashingtonS.SayedT.ManneringF.How Many Are Enough? Investigating the Effectiveness of Multiple Conflict Indicators for Crash Frequency-by-Severity Estimation by Automated Traffic Conflict Analysis. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 138, 2022, p. 103653.
48.
OzbayK.YangH.BartinB.MudigondaS.Derivation and Validation of New Simulation-Based Surrogate Safety Measure. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2008. 2083: 105–113.
49.
WangC.XieY.HuangH.LiuP.A Review of Surrogate Safety Measures and Their Applications in Connected and Automated Vehicles Safety Modeling. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 157, 2021, p. 106157.
50.
AASHTO. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2018.
51.
LaureshynA.De CeunynckT.SvenssonC.KarlssonÅ.DanielsS.In Search of the Severity Dimension of Traffic Events: Extended Delta-V as a Traffic Conflict Indicator. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 98, 2017, pp. 46–56.
52.
WangC.XuC.DaiY.A Crash Prediction Method Based on Bivariate Extreme Value Theory and Video-Based Vehicle Trajectory Data. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 123, 2019, pp. 365–373.
53.
Institute of Transportation Engineers. Traffic Engineering Handbook. 2016.
54.
DongC.ClarkeD. B.YanX.KhattakA.HuangB.Multivariate Random-Parameters Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial Regression Model: An Application to Estimate Crash Frequencies at Intersections. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 70, 2014, pp. 320–329.
55.
CaliendoC.GuidaM.Microsimulation Approach for Predicting Crashes at Unsignalized Intersections Using Traffic Conflicts. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 138, No. 12, 2012, pp. 1453–1467.
56.
LiP.Abdel-AtyM.YuanJ.Using Bus Critical Driving Events as Surrogate Safety Measures for Pedestrian and Bicycle Crashes Based on GPS Trajectory Data. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 150, 2021, p. 105924.
57.
WuJ.XuH.ZhangY.SunR.An Improved Vehicle-Pedestrian Near-Crash Identification Method With a Roadside LiDAR Sensor. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 73, 2020, pp. 211–224.
58.
ArunA.HaqueM. M.BhaskarA.WashingtonS.SayedT.A Systematic Mapping Review of Surrogate Safety Assessment Using Traffic Conflict Techniques. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 153, 2021, p. 106016.
