Spatiotemporal Variation of Traffic Conflict at Signalized Intersections under Non-Lane-Based Traffic Condition

Abstract

The majority of accidents observed at signalized intersections comprise rear-end collisions resulting from a diversity of actions happening during signal change. This study explores the spatial and temporal variation of rear-end conflict in non-lane-based multi-class traffic conditions. Precise positions of the vehicles extracted from traffic video data collected from two major cities in India are utilized to identify critical vehicle interactions. Multiple surrogate safety measures (time to collision and deceleration rate to avoid crash) are used to identify the rear-end conflicts. More than 9,000 vehicle trajectories extracted from four signalized intersections were used to develop heat maps showing space-time variation of rear-end conflict at varying threshold values. Results showed that the majority of rear-end conflicts happened at the beginning of red time and green time at the upstream side of signalized intersections. Separate heat maps were developed to explore the variation in rear-end conflict caused by different vehicle types and lateral movement of vehicles. In addition, this study develops conflict-based safety models to investigate how changes in traffic parameters including traffic volume, vehicle speed, platoon ratio, queue length, and signal control affect the conflict hotspot (most intense conflict location) at the signalized intersections. The results showed that the higher the vehicle speed and queue length the greater the shift of the conflict hotspot away from the stop line in the upstream direction. The developed models can give insight into how changes in the traffic parameters and the signal cycle time affect the safety of signalized intersections.

Keywords

operations traffic control devices traffic signals traffic signal systems signal phase signal priority signal system signal timing signalized intersection traffic signal sustainability and resilience transportation and society transportation in the developing countries traffic safety and traffic management traffic conflict rear end conflict trajectory data

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

MoRTH. Road Accidents in India 2019. Transport Research Wing of Ministry of Road Transport and Highways of India, 2020. https://Morth.Nic.in/Road-Accident-in-India.

Sayed

Zein

. Traffic Conflict Standards for Intersections. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 1060, 1999, pp. 308–323.

Archer

Indicators for Traffic Safety Assessment and Prediction and Their Application in Micro-Simulation Modelling: A Study of Urban and Suburban Intersections. Doctoral thesis. KTH, Stockholm, Sweden, 2005.

Hyden

Traffic Conflict Technique: State-of-the-Art. Proc., 1st Workshop on Traffic Conflicts, Institute of Economics, Oslo, 1997.

Kanagaraj

Asaithambi

Toledo

Lee

T. C.

. Trajectory Data and Flow Characteristics of Mixed Traffic. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Vol. 2491, 2015, pp. 1–11.

Anjana

Anjaneyulu

M. V. L. R.

. Safety Analysis of Urban Signalized Intersections Under Mixed Traffic. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 52, 2015, pp. 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2014.11.001.

Dandona

Kumar

G. A.

Ameer

M. A.

Reddy

G. B.

Dandona

. Under-Reporting of Road Traffic Injuries to the Police: Results from Two Data Sources in Urban India. Injury Prevention, Vol. 14, No. 6, 2008, pp. 360–365. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2008.019638.

Hayward

J. C.

Near-Miss Determination Through Use of a Scale of Danger. Highway Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1972, pp. 24–35.

Machiani

S. G.

Abbas

. Safety Surrogate Histograms (SSH): A Novel Real-Time Safety Assessment of Dilemma Zone Related Conflicts at Signalized Intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 96, 2016, pp. 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.024.

10.

Vogel

A Comparison of Headway and Time to Collision as Safety Indicators. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2003, pp. 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00022-2.

11.

Essa

Sayed

. Traffic Conflict Models to Evaluate the Safety of Signalized Intersections at the Cycle Level. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 89, 2018, pp. 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.02.014.

12.

Behbahani

Nadimi

Naseralavi

S. S.

. New Time-Based Surrogate Safety Measure to Assess Crash Risk in Car-Following Scenarios. Transportation Letters, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2015, pp. 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1179/1942787514Y.0000000051.

13.

Highway Safety Manual 2010 . American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2010.

14.

Wang

Abdel-Aty

. Temporal and Spatial Analyses of Rear-End Crashes at Signalized Intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, No. 6, 2006, pp. 1137–1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.04.022.

15.

Sawalha

Sayed

. Traffic Accident Modeling: Some Statistical Issues. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 33, No. 9, 2006, pp. 1115–1124. https://doi.org/10.1139/L06-056.

16.

Yan

Radwan

Abdel-Aty

. Characteristics of Rear-End Accidents at Signalized Intersections Using Multiple Logistic Regression Model. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 37, No. 6, 2005, pp. 983–995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2005.05.001.

17.

El-Basyouny

Sayed

. Safety Performance Functions Using Traffic Conflicts. Safety Science, Vol. 51, No. 1, 2013, pp. 160–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.04.015.

18.

Sacchi

Sayed

. Conflict-Based Safety Performance Functions for Predicting Traffic Collisions by Type. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2016. 2583: 50–55.

19.

Essa

Sayed

. Full Bayesian Conflict-Based Models for Real Time Safety Evaluation of Signalized Intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 129, 2018, pp. 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.09.017.

20.

Charly

Mathew

T. V.

. Estimation of Traffic Conflicts Using Precise Lateral Position and Width of Vehicles for Safety Assessment. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 132, 2019, pp. 1–10.

21.

Tageldin

Sayed

Wang

. Can Time Proximity Measures be Used as Safety Indicators in all Driving Cultures? Case Study of Motorcycle Safety in China. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015. 2520: 165–174.

22.

Tageldin

Sayed

Shaaban

. Comparison of Time-Proximity and Evasive Action Conflict Measures Case Studies from Five Cities. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2017. 2661: 19–29.

23.

Pathivada

B. K.

Perumal

. Analyzing Dilemma Driver Behavior at Signalized Intersection Under Mixed Traffic Conditions. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 60, 2019, pp. 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.10.010.

24.

Munigety

C. R.

Vicraman

Mathew

T. V.

. Semiautomated Tool for Extraction of Microlevel Traffic Data from Videographic Survey. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2014. 2443: 88–95.

25.

Indian Highway Capacity Manual (Indo-HCM) . CSIR-Central Road Research Institute, New Delhi, 2017.

26.

Toledo

Koutsopoulos

H. N.

Ahmed

K. I.

. Estimation of Vehicle Trajectories With Locally Weighted Regression. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007. 1999: 161–169.

27.

Highway Capacity Manual 2000 . Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000.

28.

Huang

Liu

Wang

. Identifying if VISSIM Simulation Model and SSAM Provide Reasonable Estimates for Field Measured Traffic Conflicts at Signalized Intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 50, 2013, pp. 1014–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2012.08.018.

29.

van der Horst

Hogema

. Time-to-Collision and Collision Avoidance Systems. Proc., 6th ICTCT Workshop, Salzburg, 1993.

30.

Van der Horst

A. R. A

. A Time Based Analysis of Road User Behaviour in Normal and Critical Encounters. Doctoral thesis. Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands, 1990.

31.

Shekhar Babu

Vedagiri

. Traffic Conflict Analysis of Unsignalised Intersections Under Mixed Traffic Conditions. European Transport, Vol. 66, No. 10, 2017, pp. 1–12.