Trends and Impacts of Local Access Road Investment in Appalachia

Abstract

This study evaluates the trends and investments in Local Access Road (LAR) projects in Appalachia, U.S., over 20 years between 2001 and 2020. Information about 135 federally funded LAR projects is obtained from various data sources and classified by project type. Then, online surveys are designed for individual grantees or appropriate partners to verify realized performance measures and learn about the project successes, challenges, and experiences of project implementation. Follow-up in-depth interviews for selected projects are conducted with selected grantees, which provided more detailed information than the previous surveyed responses and firsthand stories from the grantees or involved stakeholders. About 65% of survey responses show differences between proposed and realized project outcomes (e.g., jobs created and leveraged private investment). The surveys and interviews suggest several reasons why grantees could not meet the targeted outcomes, including (1) changes in the macroeconomy, (2) effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, or (3) unpredictable challenges. While the LAR projects increase market access and business opportunities, create jobs, and leverage private investment, higher project costs do not always produce better outcomes. In addition, the interviewees share ideas about project funding and the characteristics of rural businesses. Lastly, some recommendations are offered for post-project evaluations and improvements to the LAR program.

Keywords

Post-project evaluations local access road project evaluation lessons learned

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Highway Statistics . Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2020. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policyinformation/statistics/2020/.

Congressional Research Service. Rural Highways. Report No. R45250. 2018. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45250/4.

Petrella

Chajka-Cadin

Rainville

Pierce

Keen

Nodine

Noel

et al. Evaluation Methods and Techniques: Advanced Transportation and Congestion Management Technologies Deployment Program. Report No. FHWA-HOP-19-053. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2019. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop19053/fhwahop19053.pdf.

Alzahrani

Emsley

The Impact of Contractors’ Attributes on Construction Project Success: A Post Construction Evaluation. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2013, pp. 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.06.006.

Baylor

Esper

Fatehi

de Garcia

Griswold

Herrington

Belhoussein

Plotkin

Yamron

Implementing Developmental Evaluation: A Practical Guide for Evaluators and Administrators. U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, D.C., 2019. https://2017-2020.usaid.gov/sites/default/files/documents/15396/ImplementingDE_Admin_20.pdf.

Dozois

Langlois

Blanchet-Cohen

A Practitioner’s Guide to Developmental Evaluation. International Institute for Child Rights and Development, University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, 2010. https://mcconnellfoundation.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/DE-201-EN.pdf.

Vallett

McRae

McCutcheon-Schour

Transportation Education Development Pilot Program at University of Vermont Transportation Research Center: Developmental Evaluation Practices and Principles. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2014. 2414: pp. 63–68.

Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. The Program Manager’s Guide to Evaluation. 2010. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED566135.pdf.

Volk

M. J.

Jeong

R. S.

Shane

J. S.

Effective Post-Construction Evaluation Practices for Work Zone Management Strategies. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2018. 2672: 106–113.

10.

Appalachian Regional Commission. Guide to ARC Project Performance Measures. 2020. https://www.arc.gov/resource/guide-to-arc-project-performance-measures/.

11.

Resende

C. B.

Volk

Shane

J. S.

Post-Project Evaluation and Lessons Learned. Proc., Construction Research Congress: Project Management and Controls, Materials, and Contracts, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2020.

12.

Nsonwu

Baukert

Mitchell

Nunnally

EconWorks Tools for Assessing Wider Economic Benefits of Transportation. Final Report. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 2016. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1025&context=jtrpaffdocs.

13.

Chacon-Hurtado

Bardaka

Yang

Gkritza

Fricker

J. D.

Tools for the Wider Economic Impact Assessment of Corridor Improvements: Lessons Learned from the FHWA Implementation Assistance Program in Indiana. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems. Vol. 143, No. 5. 2017. p. 05017001. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000051.

14.

National Highway Construction Cost Index (NHCCI), and Component Contributions to Its Quarterly Changes. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2021. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/policy/otps/nhcci/.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.02 MB