Among traffic crashes, truck crashes are usually more severe and cause greater harm to other involved traffic participants, particularly vulnerable road users such as the drivers of two-wheelers. Automatic emergency braking (AEB), also known as autonomous emergency braking, has been demonstrated to be a safe, efficient, and high benefit–cost ratio advanced driving assistance system that can reduce driver errors and collisions, but at present, AEB research is mainly carried out for passenger cars with little specific attention to trucks. In this study, a three-stage AEB algorithm was designed to control longitudinal collision scenarios between trucks and two-wheelers. A total of 121 crashes were collected from the China In-Depth Accident Study Database (CIDAS). The crashes were reconstructed and verified in the MATLAB/Simulink simulation platform. The experimental results show that our proposed method avoided 35% of the collisions. Analysis of the simulation results showed that the scenarios in which the proposed system failed to avoid collisions mainly had the characteristics of rapid increase in the urgency of the conflict, insufficient truck deceleration time, and insufficient braking distance. Random forest was used to analyze the factors affecting the AEB’s collision avoidance, and it was found that collision angle, reflecting the urgency of two-wheeler lane changing, was the most significant factor. The results have at least two practical implications. It is of significance to (1) educate two-wheeler drivers to carefully observe the road conditions before making decisions and (2) develop multi-sensor AEB systems for trucks.
XuT.JiangR.ZhaoL.QiL.ZhangY.Analysis of Truck-Related Crashes of Freeways in China. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2019, p. 1687814018822186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018822186.
2.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Traffic Safety Facts 2019: Overview of Motor Vehicle Crashes in 2019. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/Publication/813060. Accessed July 28, 2022.
3.
ShaoX.MaX.ChenF.SongM.PanX.YouK.A Random Parameters Ordered Probit Analysis of Injury Severity in Truck Involved Rear-End Collisions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2020, p. 395. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020395.
4.
Xinhuanet. The Social Ownership of Electric Bicycles in China Is Close to 300 Million. The State Council of the People’s Republic of China. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-11/20/content_5562997.htm. Accessed July 30, 2022.
5.
Xinhuanet. The Social Ownership of Bicycles in China Is Nearly 400 Million, Ranking First in the World. The State Council of the People’s Republic of China. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2019-11/22/content_5454675.htm. Accessed July 30, 2022.
6.
National Bureau of Statistics. Road Traffic Accidents Statistical Annual Report of the People’s Republic of China 2021. National Bureau of Statistics, Beijing, China. https://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01. Accessed July 30, 2022.
7.
BartolomeosK.ElkingtonJ.HarveyA.IversR.KhayesiM.PedenM.ToroyanT.Powered Two- and Three-Wheeler Safety: A Road Safety Manual for Decision-Makers and Practitioners. 2017. https://trid.trb.org/view/1466127
8.
FildesB.KeallM.BosN.LieA.PageY.PastorC.PennisiL.RizziM.ThomasP.TingvallC.Effectiveness of Low Speed Autonomous Emergency Braking in Real-World Rear-End Crashes. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 81, 2015, pp. 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.029.
9.
CicchinoJ. B.Effectiveness of Forward Collision Warning and Autonomous Emergency Braking Systems in Reducing Front-to-Rear Crash Rates. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 99, 2017, pp. 142–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.11.009.
10.
TreatJ. R.TumbasN. S.McDonaldS. T.ShinarD.HumeR. D.MayerR. E.StansiferR. L.CastellanN. J.Tri-Level Study of the Causes of Traffic Accidents: Final Report. Executive Summary. Institute for Research in Public Safety, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 1979.
11.
SinghS.Critical Reasons for Crashes Investigated in the National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey. Traffic Safety Facts—Crash Stats, 2018. https://trid.trb.org/view/1507603
12.
HricaJ. K.BellancaJ. L.BenbourenaneI.CarrJ. L.HomerJ.StabrylaK. M.A Rapid Review of Collision Avoidance and Warning Technologies for Mining Haul Trucks. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, Vol. 39, No. 4, 2022, pp. 1357–1389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42461-022-00633-w.
13.
CafisoS.Di GrazianoA.Evaluation of the Effectiveness of ADAS in Reducing Multi-Vehicle Collisions. International Journal of Heavy Vehicle Systems, Vol. 19, No. 2, 2012, pp. 188–206.
14.
AndersonR.DoeckeS. D.MackenzieJ. R. R.PonteG.PaineD.PaineM.Potential Benefits of Forward Collision Avoidance Technology. Injury, Vol. 44, No. 15, 2012, p. 24.
15.
LiuL.YeX.WangT.YanX.ChenJ.RanB.Key Factors Analysis of Severity of Automobile to Two-Wheeler Traffic Accidents Based on Bayesian Network. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 19, No. 10, 2022, p. 6013. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106013.
ChenQ.DaiB.Characteristics and Casualty Analysis of Two- Wheeler Accidents in China, Data Source: The China In-Depth Accident Study (CIDAS). SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-1052. SAE International, Warrendale, PA, 2018.
18.
OtteD.JänschM.HaasperC.Injury Protection and Accident Causation Parameters for Vulnerable Road Users Based on German In-Depth Accident Study GIDAS. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 44, No. 1, 2012, pp. 149–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.12.006.
19.
LiG.LyonsM.WangB.YangJ.OtteD.SimmsC.The Influence of Passenger Car Front Shape on Pedestrian Injury Risk Observed from German In-Depth Accident Data. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 101, 2017, pp. 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.012.
20.
GlassbrennerD.MorganA.KreebR.SvensonA.LiddellH.BarickmanF.A Target Population for Automatic Emergency Braking in Heavy Vehicles. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC, 2017.
21.
GaussC.Comparative Test of Advanced Emergency Braking Systems. ADAC Internal Test Report. ADAC Technik Zentrum, Germany, 2012.
22.
LiG.YangY.ZhangT.QuX.CaoD.ChengB.LiK.Risk Assessment Based Collision Avoidance Decision-Making for Autonomous Vehicles in Multi-Scenarios. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 122, 2021, p. 102820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102820.
23.
WardJ.AgamennoniG.WorrallS.NebotE.Vehicle Collision Probability Calculation for General Traffic Scenarios under Uncertainty. Proc., IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium Proceedings, Dearborn, MI, IEEE, New York, 2014.
24.
VogelK.A Comparison of Headway and Time to Collision as Safety Indicators. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2003, pp. 427–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00022-2.
25.
KimJ.KumD.Collision Risk Assessment Algorithm via Lane-Based Probabilistic Motion Prediction of Surrounding Vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 19, No. 9, 2018, pp. 2965–2976. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2017.2768318.
26.
LiG.YangY.LiS.QuX.LyuN.LiS. E.Decision Making of Autonomous Vehicles in Lane Change Scenarios: Deep Reinforcement Learning Approaches with Risk Awareness. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 134, 2022, p. 103452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103452.
27.
RajaramV.SubramanianS. C.Heavy Vehicle Collision Avoidance Control in Heterogeneous Traffic Using Varying Time Headway. Mechatronics, Vol. 50, 2018, pp. 328–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2017.11.010.
28.
NohS.Decision-Making Framework for Autonomous Driving at Road Intersections: Safeguarding against Collision, Overly Conservative Behavior, and Violation Vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 66, No. 4, 2019, pp. 3275–3286. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2018.2840530.
29.
LiX.LordD.ZhangY.XieY.Predicting Motor Vehicle Crashes Using Support Vector Machine Models. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2008, pp. 1611–1618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2008.04.010.
30.
DelenD.ShardaR.BessonovM.Identifying Significant Predictors of Injury Severity in Traffic Accidents Using a Series of Artificial Neural Networks. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2006, pp. 434–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2005.06.024.
31.
XieY.LordD.ZhangY.Predicting Motor Vehicle Collisions Using Bayesian Neural Network Models: An Empirical Analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 39, No. 5, 2007, pp. 922–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.12.014.
32.
ChangL.-Y.ChienJ.-T.Analysis of Driver Injury Severity in Truck-Involved Accidents Using a Non-Parametric Classification Tree Model. Safety Science, Vol. 51, No. 1, 2013, pp. 17–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.06.017.
33.
YanM.ShenY.Traffic Accident Severity Prediction Based on Random Forest. Sustainability, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2022, p. 1729. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031729.
34.
HamadK.Al-RuzouqR.ZeiadaW.Abu DabousS.KhalilM. A.Predicting Incident Duration Using Random Forests. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2020, pp. 1269–1293. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2020.1733132.
35.
DogruN.SubasiA.Traffic Accident Detection Using Random Forest Classifier. Proc., 15th Learning and Technology Conference (L&T), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, IEEE, New York, 2018.
36.
KomolM. M. R.HasanM. M.ElhenawyM.YasminS.MasoudM.RakotonirainyA.Crash Severity Analysis of Vulnerable Road Users Using Machine Learning. PLoS One, Vol. 16, No. 8, 2021, p. e0255828. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255828.
CaoY.XiaoL.DongH.WangY.WuX.LiP.QiuY.Typical Pre-Crash Scenarios Reconstruction for Two-Wheelers and Passenger Vehicles and Its Application in Parameter Optimization of AEB System Based on NAIS Database. p. 15. https://www-esv.nhtsa.dot.gov/Proceedings/26/26ESV-000272.pdf
39.
BokareP. S.MauryaA. K.Acceleration-Deceleration Behaviour of Various Vehicle Types. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 25, 2017, pp. 4733–4749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.486.
40.
ZhuM.WangY.PuZ.HuJ.WangX.KeR.Safe, Efficient, and Comfortable Velocity Control Based on Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 117, 2020, p. 102662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102662.
41.
ChaiC.ZengX.WuX.WangX.Evaluation and Optimization of Responsibility-Sensitive Safety Models on Autonomous Car-Following Maneuvers. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2020. 2674: 662–673.
42.
HarwoodD. W.Review of Truck Characteristics as Factors in Roadway Design. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2003.
