Surrogate safety measure (SSM)-based proactive safety assessment in developing economies like India with weak lane discipline mixed traffic conditions is limited and often lacks qualitative aspects of reliability. On further investigation, challenges of data acquisition, the viability of a specific SSM, the corresponding threshold value for the identification of conflict, and availability of reliable road crash data are observed to be the key hurdles in achieving robust results and proposing measures for mitigating rear-end conflicts and risks of crashes. The present study highlights the hurdles in performing the safety assessment for rear-end conflicts in mixed traffic conditions with weak lane discipline and proposes possible measures to overcome these hurdles.
DandonaR.KumarG. A.AmeerM. A.ReddyG. B.DandonaL.Under-Reporting of Road Traffic Injuries to the Police: Results From Two Data Sources in Urban India. Injury Prevention, Vol. 14, No. 6, 2008, pp. 360–365. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2008.019638.
5.
SinghP.LakshmiP. V. M.PrinjaS.KhandujaP.Under-Reporting of Road Traffic Accidents in Traffic Police Records-A Cross Sectional Study From North India. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2018, p. 579. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20180232.
6.
ChauhanR.DhamaniyaA.ArkatkarS.Spatiotemporal Variation of Rear-End Conflicts at Signalized Intersections Under Disordered Traffic Conditions. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, Vol. 147, No. 11, 2021, P. 14. https://doi.org/10.1061/jtepbs.0000589.
7.
CavadasJ.AzevedoC. L.FarahH.Extreme Value Theory Approach to Analyze Safety of Passing Maneuvers Considering Drivers’ Characteristics. IATSS Research, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2017, pp. 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2016.07.001.
8.
MahmudS. M. S.FerreiraL.HoqueM. S.TavassoliA.Application of Proximal Surrogate Indicators for Safety Evaluation: A Review of Recent Developments and Research Needs. IATSS Research, Vol. 41, 2017, pp. 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2017.02.001.
9.
AmundsenF. H.HydenC.Proceeding of First Workshop on Traffic Conflicts. Institute of Transport Economics, Oslo/Lund Institute of Technology, 1977, p. 138.
10.
ArunA.HaqueM. M.BhaskarA.WashingtonS.SayedT.A Systematic Mapping Review of Surrogate Safety Assessment Using Traffic Conflict Techniques. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 153, 2021, p. 106016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2021.106016.
CharlyA.MathewT. V.Estimation of Traffic Conflicts Using Precise Lateral Position and Width of Vehicles for Safety Assessment. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 132, 2019, p. 105264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.105264.
13.
TageldinA.SayedT.ShaabanK.Comparison of Time-Proximity and Evasive Action Conflict Measures Case Studies From Five Cities. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2017. 2661: 19–29.
14.
WeiY.LiK.TangK.Trajectory-Based Identification of Critical Instantaneous Decision Events at Mixed-Flow Signalized Intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 123, 2019, pp. 324–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.11.019.
15.
SayedT.ZeinS.Traffic Conflict Standards for Intersections. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 22, No. 4, 1999, pp. 309–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081069908717634.
16.
StipancicJ.St-AubinP. G.Ledezma-NavarroB.LabbeA.SaunierN.Miranda-MorenoL. Evaluating Safety-Influencing Factors at Stop-Controlled Intersections Using Automated Video Analysis. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 77, 2021, pp. 311–323. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2021.03.006.
17.
MunigetyC. R.VicramanV.MathewT. V.Semiautomated Tool for Extraction of Microlevel Traffic Data From Videographic Survey. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2014. 2443: 88–95.
18.
ChauhanR.DhamaniyaA.ArkatkarS.Driving Behavior at Signalized Intersections Operating Under Disordered Traffic Conditions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2021. 2675: 1356–1378.
19.
KanagarajV.AsaithambiG.ToledoT.LeeT.-C.Trajectory Data and Flow Characteristics of Mixed Traffic. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015. 2491: 1–11.
20.
MontaninoM.PunzoV.Trajectory Data Reconstruction and Simulation-Based Validation Against Macroscopic Traffic Patterns. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 80, 2015, pp. 82–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2015.06.010.
21.
PunzoV.BorzacchielloM. T.CiuffoB.On the Assessment of Vehicle Trajectory Data Accuracy and Application to the Next Generation SIMulation (NGSIM) Program Data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 19, No. 6, 2011, pp. 1243–1262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2010.12.007.
22.
TiwariG.MohanD.FazioJ.Conflict Analysis for Prediction of Fatal Crash Locations in Mixed Traffic Streams. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 30, No. 2, 1998, pp. 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(97)00082-1.
23.
TageldinA.SayedT.WangX.Can Time Proximity Measures be Used as Safety Indicators in all Driving Cultures? Case Study of Motorcycle Safety in China. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015. 2520: 165–174.
24.
ShinarD. The Traffic Conflict Technique: A Subjective vs. Objective Approach. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 15, No. 4, 1984, pp. 153–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4375(84)90046-X.
25.
AASHTO. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2001.
26.
ZhengL.SayedT.Comparison of Traffic Conflict Indicators for Crash Estimation Using Peak Over Threshold Approach. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2019. 2673: 493–502.
27.
ArcherJ.Indicators for Traffic Safety Assessment and Prediction and Their Application in Micro-Simulation Modelling: A Study of Urban and Suburban Intersections. Doctoral dissertation. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2005. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:7295/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
28.
GuidoG.SaccomannoF.VitaleA.AstaritaV.FestaD.Comparing Safety Performance Measures Obtained From Video Capture Data. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 137, No. 7, 2011, pp. 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000230.
El-basyounyK.SayedT.Safety Performance Functions Using Traffic Conflicts. Safety Science, Vol. 51, No. 1, 2013, pp. 160–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.04.015.
31.
EssaM.SayedT.ReyadP.Transferability of Real-Time Safety Performance Functions for Signalized Intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 129, 2019, pp. 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.05.029.
32.
SongchitruksaP.TarkoA. P.The Extreme Value Theory Approach to Safety Estimation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2006, pp. 811–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.02.003.
33.
BorsosA.FarahH.LaureshynA.HagenziekerM.Are Collision and Crossing Course Surrogate Safety Indicators Transferable? A Probability Based Approach Using Extreme Value Theory. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 143, 2020, p. 105517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105517.
34.
CuntoF.SaccomannoF. F.Calibration and Validation of Simulated Vehicle Safety Performance at Signalized Intersections. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2008, pp. 1171–1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2008.01.003.
