Ruggedness Evaluation of Dynamic Modulus Test Using Small-Scale Test Specimens for Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester

Abstract

The small specimen dynamic modulus test (AASHTO TP 132-19) is of paramount importance for the asphalt community since it can be used to characterize and compare asphalt mixtures and the test outcomes can be used as input for pavement performance predictions. Even though the small specimen dynamic modulus test is broadly used, acceptable limits for controlling critical experimental factors still need to be developed. This paper presents the method and outcomes of a ruggedness evaluation of the Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester (AMPT) dynamic modulus test using small-scale test specimens. Three mixtures were evaluated and seven experimental factors were selected: strain peak-to-peak magnitude, specimen perpendicularity, platen-to-specimen diameter difference, specimen height, temperature, compensation springs, and end friction reducers. The analysis identified the statistically significant factors and it was found that the strain peak-to-peak magnitude and temperature were the most statistically significant factors. The specimen height and the type of end friction reducer were not found to be statistically significant factors. Also, higher strain levels and the use of compensation springs resulted in the overestimation of modulus at higher temperatures. Finally, tolerance limits were determined for each ruggedness factor and modifications to the small specimen dynamic modulus test and related standards were proposed.

Keywords

infrastructure materials asphalt mixture evaluation and performance asphalt materials asphalt mixture performance tests

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Underwood

B. S.

Kim

Y. R.

Guddati

Characterization and Performance Prediction of ALF Mixtures Using a Viscoelastoplastic Continuum Damage Model. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 75, 2006, pp. 577–636.

Choi

Y. T.

Kim

Y. R.

Implementation and Verification of a Mechanistic Permanent Deformation Model (Shift Model) to Predict Rut Depths of Asphalt Pavement. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 15, No. S1, 2014, pp. 195−218. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680629.2014.927085.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Determining the Dynamic Modulus and Flow Number for Asphalt Mixtures Using the Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester (AMPT). AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2017.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Determining the Dynamic Modulus of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA). AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2019.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Determining the Dynamic Modulus of Asphalt Mixtures Using the Indirect Tension Test. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2019.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Determining the Dynamic Modulus for Asphalt Mixtures Using Small Specimens in the Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester (AMPT). AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2019.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Preparation of Small Cylindrical Performance Test Specimens Using the Superpave Gyratory Compactor (SGC) or Field Cores. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2019.

Castorena

Underwood

B. S.

Kim

Y. R.

Lee

Tran

Taylor

Ruggedness and Interlaboratory Studies for Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester (AMPT) Cyclic Fatigue Test: Phase I Report. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2020.

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Determining the Damage Characteristic Curve and Failure Criterion Using Small Specimens in the Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester (AMPT) Cyclic Fatigue Test. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2019.

10.

Norouzi

Kim

Y. R.

Numerical Evaluation of Pavement Design Parameters for the Fatigue Cracking and Rutting Performance of Asphalt Pavements. Materials and Structures, Vol. 49, 2016, pp. 3619–3634. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-015-0744-x.

11.

Wang

Y. D.

Keshavarzi

Kim

Y. R.

Fatigue Performance Prediction of Asphalt Pavements with FlexPAVE^TM, the S-VECD Model, and D^R Failure Criterion. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2018. 2672: 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118756873.

12.

Ghanbari

Underwood

B. S.

Kim

Y. R.

Development of a Rutting Index Parameter Based on the Stress Sweep Rutting Test and Permanent Deformation Shift Model. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2022, pp. 387–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2020.1748190.

13.

Underwood

B. S.

Baek

Kim

Y. R.

Simplified Viscoelastic Continuum Damage Model as Platform for Asphalt Concrete Fatigue Analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2012. 2296: 36–45. https://doi.org/10.3141/2296-04.

14.

Zhou

Development of an IDEAL Cracking Test for Asphalt Mix Design, Quality Control and Quality Assurance. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 18, 2017, pp. 405–427.

15.

Norouzi

Kim

Y. R.

Ruggedness Study of Dynamic Modulus Testing of Asphalt Concrete in Indirect Tension Mode. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, Vol. 45, No, 2, 2016, pp. 601–612. https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20150118.

16.

Seitllari

Kutay

M. E.

Ruggedness Investigation of the 3-Point Bending Cylinder (3PBC) Test for Fatigue Characterization of Asphalt Mixtures. Presented at 100th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2021.

17.

Hand

A. J. T.

Boz

Piratheepan

Hierholzer

Diefenderfer

B. K.

Jones

Habbouche

Louw

Ruggedness Evaluation and Precision Estimates for Newly Developed Test Methods for Asphalt-Treated Cold Recycled Pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2021. 2675(11): 348–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211017142.

18.

Bonaquist

Ruggedness Testing of the Dynamic Modulus and Flow Number Tests with the Simple Performance Tester. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2008. https://doi.org/10.17226/14200.

19.

ASTM E1169. Standard Practice for Conducting Ruggedness Tests. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014.

20.

ASTM C1067. Standard Practice for Conducting Ruggedness Evaluation or Screening Program for Test Methods for Construction Materials. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2020.

21.

Castorena

Underwood

B. S.

Kim

Y. R.

Lee

Tran

Taylor

Ruggedness and Interlaboratory Studies for Asphalt Mixture Performance Tester (AMPT) Cyclic Fatigue Test: Phase II Study. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D. C., 2022.

22.

Uzan

Levenberg

Advanced Testing and Characterization of Asphalt Concrete Materials in Tension. International Journal of Geomechanics, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2007, pp. 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1532-3641(2007)7:2(158).

23.

Underwood

B. S.

Kim

Y. R.

Nonlinear Viscoelastic Behavior of Asphalt Concrete and Its Implication for Fatigue Modeling. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2013. 2373(1): 100–108. https://doi.org/10.3141/2373-11.