Conventionally, public transportation has been the responsibility of the government. In developing countries, however, government-provided public transportation is often inadequate: people’s mobility needs are best met by private modes, such as shared auto-rickshaws. In India, auto-rickshaws serve as a popular last-mile transportation alternative as well as a public transportation substitute. The mode share of auto-rickshaws in major Indian cities is significant. Electrifying this mode will certainly result in a significant reduction in air pollution levels. It is therefore imperative to identify the factors which influence rickshaw operators (ROs)’ willingness to adopt battery-operated rickshaws (BORs) in India. The present study aims to identify and explore the factors that contribute to the adaptability of battery electric vehicles in India and measure the satisfaction level of ROs with the selected factors. By using structural equation modeling, the present research found that, from the viewpoint of 478 ROs, vehicle-related attributes and economy-related attributes are most influential on the adaptability of BORs. Furthermore, the one-way analysis of variance revealed that willingness to adopt BORs is significantly related to the age of the ROs. From the standpoint of government, as well as electric vehicle manufacturers, this study would be helpful in understanding the tastes, expectations, and needs of ROs if they adopt BORs.
CochraneC.MuneerT.FraserB.Design of an Electrically Powered Rickshaw, for Use in India. Energies, Vol. 12, No. 17, 2019, p. 3346.
2.
RamachandraT. V., and Shwetmala. Emissions From India’s Transport Sector: Statewise Synthesis. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 43, No. 34, 2009, pp. 5510–5517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.07.015.
3.
SaxenaA.ShrivastavaB.Developing a Hypothetical Scenario for Assessing the Impact of Modal Shift Towards Public Transport in Delhi. International Journal of Enhanced Research in Science Technology & Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 6, 2021, pp. 39–48.
4.
SaxenaA.Is Street Design and Infrastructure Perceived Differently by Persons of Different Ages, Genders, and Hierarchy of Street?Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, Vol. 7, 2022, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-022-00880-2.
5.
SaxenaA.GuptaV.ShrivastavaB.An Assessment of Public Transport Accessibility Levels for Slums in Bhopal. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, Vol. 10, No. 5, 2021, pp. 252–258.
6.
SantosG.Urban Congestion Charging: A Comparison Between London and Singapore. Transport Reviews, Vol. 25, No. 5, 2005, pp. 511–534.
7.
MayeresI.OchelenS.ProostS.The Marginal External Costs of Urban Transport. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1996, pp. 111–130.
8.
SaxenaA.ChoudhuryB.Internalizing the Externalities of Urban Private Transport–A Case of Gurugram, National Capital Region, India. Case Studies on Transport Policy, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2022, pp. 1885–1897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.08.002.
9.
SaxenaA.YadavA. K.Clustering Pedestrians ‘Perceptions Towards Road Infrastructure and Traffic Characteristics. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 2022, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300.2022.2112234.
10.
KumarA.MishraR. K.Human Health Risk Assessment of Major Air Pollutants at Transport Corridors of Delhi, India. Journal of Transport & Health, Vol. 10, 2018, pp. 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2018.05.013.
11.
NITI Aayog, Rocky Mountain Institute and ORF. Moving Forward Together: Enabling Shared Mobility in India. Government of India, 2018.
12.
PandeyA.BrauerM.CropperM. L.BalakrishnanK.MathurP.DeyS.TurkguluB., et al. Health and Economic Impact of Air Pollution in the States of India: The Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet Planetary Health, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2021, pp. e25–e38.
13.
TiwariG.NishantS.Travel to Work in India: Current Patterns and Future Concerns. Transport Research & Injury Prevention Program, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, 2018.
14.
MajumdarD.JashT.Merits and Challenges of E-Rickshaw as an Alternative Form of Public Road Transport System: A Case Study in the State of West Bengal in India. Energy Procedia, Vol. 79, 2015, pp. 307–314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.492.
15.
ShandilyaN.SainiV.GhorpadeA. R.Handbook: E-Rickshaw Deployment in Indian Cities. ICLEI- Local Governments for Sustainability, South Asia, New Delhi, 2019.
16.
SaxenaS. N.Revolution in Growth of Three-Wheeler Electric Vehicles in India. Journal of Global Tourism Research, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2019, pp. 117–126.
17.
ManiA.Case Study of the Auto-Rickshaw Sector in Mumbai Methodology: Thematic Areas. Proc., 3rd Research Symposium on Urban Transport, Urban Mobility, India, 2012.
ZhuL.SongQ.ShengN.ZhouX.Exploring the Determinants of Consumers’ WTB and WTP for Electric Motorcycles Using CVM Method in Macau. Energy Policy, Vol. 127, 2019, pp. 64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.12.004.
24.
KerdlapP.GheewalaS. H.Electric Motorcycles in Thailand: A Life Cycle Perspective. Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 20, No. 6, 2016, pp. 1399–1411.
25.
Campello-VicenteH.Peral-OrtsR.Campillo-DavoN.Velasco-SanchezE.The Effect of Electric Vehicles on Urban Noise Maps. Applied Acoustics, Vol. 116, 2017, pp. 59–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.09.018.
26.
IwanS.NürnbergM.JedlińskiM.KijewskaK.Efficiency of Light Electric Vehicles in Last Mile Deliveries–Szczecin Case Study. Sustainable Cities and Society, Vol. 74, 2021, p. 103167.
27.
CoxB. L.MutelC. L.The Environmental and Cost Performance of Current and Future Motorcycles. Applied Energy, Vol. 212, 2018, pp. 1013–1024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.100.
28.
KumarN. S.Increasing the Cruise Range and Reducing the Capital Cost of Electric Vehicles by Integrating Auxiliary Unit With the Traction Drive. International Journal of Vehicular Technology, Vol. 2016, 2016, pp. 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7617692.
29.
BorlaugB.SalisburyS.GerdesM.MuratoriM.Levelized Cost of Charging Electric Vehicles in the United States. Joule, Vol. 4, No. 7, 2020, pp. 1470–1485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2020.05.013.
30.
TuJ. C.YangC.Key Factors Influencing Consumers’ Purchase of Electric Vehicles. Sustainability, Vol. 11, No. 14, 2019, p. 3863.
31.
ChoiW.YunS.A Comparative Study of Initial Cost Recuperation Period of Plug-in Series Hybrid Electric Two-Wheel Vehicles in Southeast Asian Countries. Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 24, 2020, pp. 1–10.
32.
AyodeleB. V.MustapaS. I.Life Cycle Cost Assessment of Electric Vehicles: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 6, 2020, pp. 1–17.
33.
LebeauK.LebeauP.MacharisC.Van MierloJ.How Expensive are Electric Vehicles? A Total Cost of Ownership Analysis. World Electric Vehicle Journal, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2013, pp. 996–1007.
34.
HagmanJ.RitzénS.StierJ. J.SusiloY.Total Cost of Ownership and its Potential Implications for Battery Electric Vehicle Diffusion. Research in Transportation Business & Management, Vol. 18, 2016, pp. 11–17.
MitropoulosL. K.PrevedourosP. D.KopeliasP.Total Cost of Ownership and Externalities of Conventional, Hybrid and Electric Vehicle. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 24, 2017, pp. 267–274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.117.
37.
LiuK.YamamotoT.MorikawaT.Impact of Road Gradient on Energy Consumption of Electric Vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 54, 2017, pp. 74–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.05.005.
38.
PetzoldtT.SchleinitzK.HeilmannS.GehlertT.Traffic Conflicts and Their Contextual Factors When Riding Conventional vs. Electric Bicycles. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 46, 2017, pp. 477–490. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.06.010.
39.
DongJ.LiuC.LinZ.Charging Infrastructure Planning for Promoting Battery Electric Vehicles: An Activity-Based Approach Using Multiday Travel Data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 38, 2014, pp. 44–55.
40.
GnannT.FunkeS.JakobssonN.PlötzP.SpreiF.BennehagA.Fast Charging Infrastructure for Electric Vehicles: Today’s Situation and Future Needs. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 62, 2018, pp. 314–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.03.004.
41.
Al-HanahiB.AhmadI.HabibiD.MasoumM. A. S.Charging Infrastructure for Commercial Electric Vehicles: Challenges and Future Works. IEEE Access, Vol. 9, 2021, pp. 121476–121492.
42.
GoswamiR.TripathiG. C.Augmentation of Charging Infrastructure for Electric Vehicles Growth in India. International Journal of Electric and Hybrid Vehicles, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2020, pp. 44–58.
43.
VermaM.VermaA.KhanM.Factors Influencing the Adoption of Electric Vehicles in Bengaluru. Transportation in Developing Economies, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2020, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-020-0100-x.
44.
BurgessM.KingN.HarrisM.LewisE.Electric Vehicle Drivers’ Reported Interactions With the Public: Driving Stereotype Change?Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 17, 2013, pp. 33–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2012.09.003.
45.
PatilM.MajumdarB. B.An Investigation on the Key Determinants Influencing Electric Two-Wheeler Usage in Urban Indian Context. Research in Transportation Business & Management, Vol. 43, 2021, p. 100693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2021.100693.
46.
JaiswalD.KaushalV.KantR.SinghP. K.Consumer Adoption Intention for Electric Vehicles: Insights and Evidence From Indian Sustainable Transportation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 173, 2021, p. 121089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121089.
47.
SankaranG.VenkatesanS.PrabhaharM.Range Anxiety on Electric Vehicles in India-Impact on Customer and Factors Influencing Range Anxiety. Materials Today: Proceedings, Vol. 33, 2020, pp. 895–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.423.
48.
PatilM.MajumdarB. B.Prioritizing Key Attributes Influencing Electric Two-Wheeler Usage: A Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Approach–A Case Study of Hyderabad, India. Case Studies on Transport Policy, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2021, pp. 913–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.04.011.
49.
LievenT.MühlmeierS.HenkelS.WallerJ. F.Who Will Buy Electric Cars? An Empirical Study in Germany. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2011, pp. 236–243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2010.12.001.
50.
LaneB.PotterS.The Adoption of Cleaner Vehicles in the UK: Exploring the Consumer Attitude-Action Gap. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 15, No. 11–12, 2007, pp. 1085–1092.
51.
PatyalV. S.KumarR.KushwahS.Modeling Barriers to the Adoption of Electric Vehicles: An Indian Perspective. Energy, Vol. 237, 2021, p. 121554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.121554.
52.
ChhikaraR.GargR.ChhabraS.KarnatakU.AgrawalG.Factors Affecting Adoption of Electric Vehicles in India: An Exploratory Study. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 100, 2021, p. 103084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103084.
53.
TareiP. K.ChandP.GuptaH.Barriers to the Adoption of Electric Vehicles: Evidence From India. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 291, 2021, p. 125847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125847.
54.
SapundzhievM.EvtimovI.IvanovR.Determination of the Needed Power of an Electric Motor on the Basis of Acceleration Time of the Electric Car. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Vol. 252, No. 1, 2017, p. 012063.
55.
GalvinR.Energy Consumption Effects of Speed and Acceleration in Electric Vehicles: Laboratory Case Studies and Implications for Drivers and Policymakers. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 53, 2017, pp. 234–248. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.04.020.
56.
Arfa GrunditzE.ThiringerT.Electric Vehicle Acceleration Performance and Motor Drive Cycle Energy Efficiency Trade-Off. Proc., 2018 XIII International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM), 2018, pp. 717–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICELMACH.2018.8507201.
57.
LiL.LiuQ.Acceleration Curve Optimization for Electric Vehicle Based on Energy Consumption and Battery Life. Energy, Vol. 169, 2019, pp. 1039–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.065.
58.
KrishnaG.Understanding and Identifying Barriers to Electric Vehicle Adoption Through Thematic Analysis.Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 10, 2021, p. 100364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100364.
59.
SinghD. R.MishraS.TripathiK.Analysing Acceptability of E-Rickshaw as a Public Transport Innovation in Delhi: A Responsible Innovation Perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 170, 2021, p. 120908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120908.
60.
HardingS. E.BadamiM. G.ReynoldsC. C. O.KandlikarM.Auto-Rickshaws in Indian Cities: Public Perceptions and Operational Realities. Transport Policy, Vol. 52, 2016, pp. 143–152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.07.013.
61.
ChandranN.BrahmachariS. K.Technology, Knowledge and Markets: Connecting the Dots—Electric Rickshaw in India as a Case Study. Journal of Frugal Innovation, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2015, pp. 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40669-015-0003-5.
62.
PriyeS.ManojM.RanjanR.Understanding the Socioeconomic Characteristics of Paratransit Drivers and Their Perceptions Toward Electric Three-Wheeled Rickshaws in Delhi, India. IATSS Research, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2021, pp. 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2021.03.002.
63.
AdhikariM.GhimireL. P.KimY.AryalP.KhadkaS. B.Identification and Analysis of Barriers Against Electric Vehicle Use. Sustainability, Vol. 12, No. 12, 2020, pp. 1–20.
64.
KumarR.JhaA.DamodaranA.BangwalD.DwivediA.Addressing the Challenges to Electric Vehicle Adoption via Sharing Economy: An Indian Perspective. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2021, pp. 82–99.
65.
KumarP.ChakrabartyS.Total Cost of Ownership Analysis of the Impact of Vehicle Usage on the Economic Viability of Electric Vehicles in India. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2020. 2674: 563–572.
66.
KhuranaA.KumarV. V. R.SidhpuriaM.A Study on the Adoption of Electric Vehicles in India: The Mediating Role of Attitude. Vision, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2020, pp. 23–34.
67.
KumarA. G.AnmolM.AkhilV. S.A Strategy to Enhance Electric Vehicle Penetration Level in India. Procedia Technology, Vol. 21, 2015, pp. 552–559. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2015.10.052.
68.
QamarS.JainA.HarikumarA.ThakurP.MookherjeeP.PalS.Road Map For Electrification of Urban Freight in India (Part-I). The Energy and Resources Institute, New Delhi, 2020.
69.
GoelP.SharmaN.MathiyazhaganK.VimalK. E. K.Government is Trying but Consumers are not Buying: A Barrier Analysis for Electric Vehicle Sales in India. Sustainable Production and Consumption, Vol. 28, 2021, pp. 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.029.
70.
ChaturvediB. K.NautiyalA.KandpalT. C.YaqootM.Projected Transition to Electric Vehicles in India and its Impact on Stakeholders. Energy for Sustainable Development, Vol. 66, 2022, pp. 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2021.12.006.
71.
SinghV.SinghV.VaibhavS.Analysis of Electric Vehicle Trends, Development and Policies in India. Case Studies on Transport Policy, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2021, pp. 1180–1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.06.006.
72.
DharS.PathakM.ShuklaP. R.Electric Vehicles and India’s Low Carbon Passenger Transport: A Long-Term Co-Benefits Assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 146, 2017, pp. 139–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.111.
73.
ChandrashekarC.AgrawalP.ChatterjeeP.PawarD. S.Development of E-Rickshaw Driving Cycle (ERDC) Based on Micro-Trip Segments Using Random Selection and K-Means Clustering Techniques. IATSS Research, Vol. 45, No. 4, 2021, pp. 551–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2021.07.001.
74.
VeetilS. V.ShahV.LokhandeM.Improvised E-Rickshaws for Indian Roads by Effective Battery-Ultracapacitor Hybridization. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, Vol. 5, No. 5, 2020, pp. 1162–1171.
Ministry of Urban Development (MoUD). Final Operations Document for Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority in Lucknow: Developing Operations Documents for Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority (UMTA) and Urban Transport Fund (UTF). Government of India, 2016, pp. 1–102. http://mohua.gov.in/upload/uploadfiles/files/UMTA_Lucknow_v13.pdf.
77.
MayoF. L.TaboadaE. B.Ranking Factors Affecting Public Transport Mode Choice of Commuters in an Urban City of a Developing Country Using Analytic Hierarchy Process: The Case of Metro Cebu, Philippines. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 4, 2020, p. 100078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2019.100078.
78.
GadepalliR.Role of Intermediate Public Transport in Indian Cities. Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 51, No. 9, 2016, pp. 46–49.
79.
UsecheS. A.CendalesB.LijarcioI.LlamazaresF. J.Validation of the F-DBQ: A Short (and Accurate) Risky Driving Behavior Questionnaire for Long-Haul Professional Drivers. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 82, 2021, pp. 190–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.08.013.
80.
AkinwandeM. O.DikkoH. G.SamsonA.Variance Inflation Factor: As a Condition for the Inclusion of Suppressor Variable(s) in Regression Analysis. Open Journal of Statistics, Vol. 5, No. 7, 2015, pp. 754–767.
81.
DaoudJ. I.Multicollinearity and Regression Analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 949, No. 1, 2018, p. 012009.
82.
SharmeenF.ArentzeT.TimmermansH.An Analysis of the Dynamics of Activity and Travel Needs in Response to Social Network Evolution and Life-Cycle Events: A Structural Equation Model. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 59, 2014, pp. 159–171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.11.006.
83.
NovikovaS. I.RichmanD. M.SupekarK.Barnard-BrakL.HallD.NDAR: A Model Federal System for Secondary Analysis in Developmental Disabilities Research. International Review of Research in Developmental Disabilities, Vol. 45, 2013, pp. 123–153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407760-7.00003-7.
84.
ShahB. A.ZalaL. B.DesaiN. A.Structural Equation Modelling for Segmentation Analysis of Latent Variables Responsible for Environment-Friendly Feeder Mode Choice. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijtst.2022.01.003.
85.
GerberP.ThériaultM.EnauxC.Carpentier-PostelS.Modelling Impacts of Beliefs and Attitudes on Mode Choices. Lessons From a Survey of Luxembourg Cross-Border Commuters. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 32, 2018, pp. 513–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.10.037.
86.
HadiuzzamanM.FaraziN. P.HossainS.BaruaS.RahmanF.Structural Equation Approach to Investigate Trip-Chaining and Mode Choice Relationships in the Context of Developing Countries. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 42, No. 4, 2019, pp. 391–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2019.1600244.
87.
BordagarayM.dell’OlioL.IbeasA.CecínP.Modelling User Perception of Bus Transit Quality Considering User and Service Heterogeneity. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, Vol. 10, No. 8, 2014, pp. 705–721.
88.
JavidM. A.AbdullahM.AliN.DiasC.Structural Equation Modeling of Public Transport Use With COVID-19 Precautions: An Extension of the Norm Activation Model. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 12, 2021, p. 100474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100474.
89.
RahmanF.Exploring Paratransit Service Quality Based on Low-Income Women’s Perception: A Case Study in Dhaka City by Structural Equation Model (SEM). IATSS Research, Vol. 46, No. 2, 2022, pp. 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2021.11.009.
90.
DinhD. D.KubotaH.Speeding Behavior on Urban Residential Streets With a 30km/h Speed Limit Under the Framework of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Transport Policy, Vol. 29, 2013, pp. 199–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.06.003.
91.
PanJ. Y.LiuD.Mask-Wearing Intentions on Airplanes During COVID-19 – Application of Theory of Planned Behavior Model. Transport Policy, Vol. 119, 2022, pp. 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.01.023.
92.
AhmedF.CatchpoleJ.EdirisingheT.Understanding Young Commuters’ Mode Choice Decision to Use Private Car or Public Transport From an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2020. 2675: 200–211.
93.
Arevalo-TamaraA.CaicedoA.Orozco-FontalvoM.UsecheS. A.Distracted Driving in Relation to Risky Road Behaviors and Traffic Crashes in Bogota, Colombia. Safety Science, Vol. 153, 2022, p. 105803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105803.
94.
PapantoniouP.Structural Equation Model Analysis for the Evaluation of Overall Driving Performance: A Driving Simulator Study Focusing on Driver Distraction. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2018, pp. 317–325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2017.1398825.
95.
AnsarM. S.MaY.ChenS.TangK.ZhangZ.Investigating the Trip Configured Causal Effect of Distracted Driving on Aggressive Driving Behavior for E-Hailing Taxi Drivers. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 5, 2021, pp. 725–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2020.12.001.
96.
BhatF. A.VermaM.VermaA.Measuring and Modelling Electric Vehicle Adoption of Indian Consumers. Transportation in Developing Economies, Vol. 8, No. 1, 2022, pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40890-021-00143-2.
97.
LiW.LongR.ChenH.GengJ.Household Factors and Adopting Intention of Battery Electric Vehicles: A Multi-Group Structural Equation Model Analysis Among Consumers in Jiangsu Province, China. Natural Hazards, Vol. 87, No. 2, 2017, pp. 945–960.
98.
AliI.NaushadM.A Study to Investigate What Tempts Consumers to Adopt Electric Vehicles. World Electric Vehicle Journal, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2022, pp. 1–15.
99.
NazariF.MohammadianA. K.StephensT.Modeling Electric Vehicle Adoption Considering a Latent Travel Pattern Construct and Charging Infrastructure. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 72, 2019, pp. 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.04.010.
100.
TiwariV.AditjandraP.DissanayakeD.Public Attitudes Towards Electric Vehicle Adoption Using Structural Equation Modelling. Transportation Research Procedia, Vol. 48, 2020, pp. 1615–1634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.08.203.
101.
PapantoniouP.YannisG.ChristofaE.Which Factors Lead to Driving Errors? A Structural Equation Model Analysis Through a Driving Simulator Experiment. IATSS Research, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2019, pp. 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2018.09.003.
102.
Maydeu-OlivaresA.Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Structural Equation Models for Continuous Data: Standard Errors and Goodness of Fit. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2017, pp. 383–394.
103.
ChoudharyP.PawarN. M.VelagaN. R.PawarD. S.Overall Performance Impairment and Crash Risk due to Distracted Driving: A Comprehensive Analysis Using Structural Equation Modelling. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 74, 2020, pp. 120–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.08.018.
104.
MarshH. W.HauK. T.BallaJ. R.GraysonD.Is More Ever too Much? The Number of Indicators per Factor in Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, Vol. 33, No. 2, 1998, pp. 181–220.
105.
WestlandJ. C.Lower Bounds on Sample Size in Structural Equation Modeling. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol. 9, No. 6, 2010, pp. 476–487. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2010.07.003.
106.
WolfE. J.HarringtonK. M.ClarkS. L.MillerM. W.Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 73, No. 6, 2013, pp. 913–934.
107.
ShiD.LeeT.Maydeu-OlivaresA.Understanding the Model Size Effect on SEM Fit Indices. Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 79, No. 2, 2019, pp. 310–334.
108.
ZhaoX.XuW.MaJ.LiH.ChenY.An Analysis of the Relationship Between Driver Characteristics and Driving Safety Using Structural Equation Models. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 62, 2019, pp. 529–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.02.004.
109.
FanY.ChenJ.ShirkeyG.JohnR.WuS. R.ParkH.ShaoC.Applications of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) in Ecological Studies: An Updated Review. Ecological Processes, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2016, pp. 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13717-016-0063-3.
110.
PeughJ.FeldonD. F.“How Well Does Your Structural Equation Model Fit Your Data?”: Is Marcoulides and Yuan’s Equivalence Test the Answer?CBE—Life Sciences Education, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2020, pp. 1–8.
111.
ChoG.HwangH.SarstedtM.RingleC. M.Cutoff Criteria for Overall Model Fit Indexes in Generalized Structured Component Analysis. Journal of Marketing Analytics, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2020, pp. 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-020-00089-1.
112.
PavlovG.Maydeu-OlivaresA.ShiD.Using the Standardized Root Mean Squared Residual (SRMR) to Assess Exact Fit in Structural Equation Models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 81, No. 1, 2021, pp. 110–130.
113.
WangK.XuY.WangC.TanM.ChenP.A Corrected Goodness-of-Fit Index (CGFI) for Model Evaluation in Structural Equation Modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, Vol. 27, No. 5, 2020, pp. 735–749. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1695213.
114.
XiaY.YangY.RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in Structural Equation Modeling With Ordered Categorical Data: The Story They Tell Depends on the Estimation Methods. Behavior Research Methods, Vol. 51, No. 1, 2019, pp. 409–428.
115.
Van CauwenbergJ.SchepersP.DeforcheB.de GeusB.Effects of E-Biking on Older Adults’ Biking and Walking Frequencies, Health, Functionality and Life Space Area: A Prospective Observational Study. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 156, 2022, pp. 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.12.006.
116.
JohnT.ScottJ.Factor Analysis and Regression. Econometrica, Vol. 34, No. 3, 1996, pp. 552–562.
117.
KalitaM.HussainG. I.Opportunities and Challenges of Electric Vehicles in India. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, Vol. 9, No. 11, 2021, pp. 139–142.
118.
KokateV. L.BankarD. S.HolmukheR. M.KarkariaV. N.KarandikarP. B.E-Rickshaw Present Past and Future With Reference to Current Transportation in India. Proc., 1st International Conference on Recent Innovations in Electrical, Electronics & Communication Engineering-(ICRIEECE), Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT), Bhubaneswar, India, 2018, pp. 1–15.
119.
BanerjeeS.Project “RAMBO”: An Initiative to Improve Rickshaw Pullers’ Earnings. Development in Practice, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2010, pp. 57–69.
120.
KirkorowiczJ.SapukotanaP.De SilvaP.NodaM.De OliveiraJ.ØstbyeT.Work-Related Stress and Substance Use as Risk Factors for Chronic Disease Among Three-Wheel Drivers in Galle, Sri Lanka: A Qualitative Study. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Health, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2014, pp. 21–24.
121.
VaportzisE.ClausenM. G.GowA. J.Older Adults Perceptions of Technology and Barriers to Interacting With Tablet Computers: A Focus Group Study. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 8, 2017, pp. 1–11.
122.
BroadbentG. H.AllenC. I.WiedmannT.MetternichtG. I.Accelerating Electric Vehicle Uptake: Modelling Public Policy Options on Prices and Infrastructure. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 162, 2022, pp. 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.05.012.
123.
ShekharH.SharmaS.PatelU.SawantV.Exploring Cost-Reduction Strategies for Electric Vehicle (EV) Batteries. Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation, and ICRIER, New Delhi, 2019.
124.
DasP. K.BhatM. Y.Global Electric Vehicle Adoption: Implementation and Policy Implications for India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, Vol. 29, No. 27, 2022, pp. 40612–40622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18211-w.
125.
KarabelliD.SinghS.KiemelS.KollerJ.KonarovA.StubhanF.MieheR.WeeberM.BakenovZ.BirkeK. P.Sodium-Based Batteries: In Search of the Best Compromise Between Sustainability and Maximization of Electric Performance. Frontiers in Energy Research, Vol. 8, 2020, pp. 1–16.
126.
SinghN.MishraT.BanerjeeR.Analysis of Retrofit and Scrappage Policies for the Indian Road Transport Sector in 2030. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2021. 2675: 233–246.
127.
BernardM. R.HallD.LutseyN.Charging Infrastructure to Support the Electric Mobility Transition in France. International Council on Clean Transportation, 2021. http://www.theicct.org.
128.
ZhangX.XieJ.RaoR.LiangY.Policy Incentives for the Adoption of Electric Vehicles Across Countries. Sustainability, Vol. 6, No. 11, 2014, pp. 8056–8078.
129.
DaraioC.DianaM.Di CostaF.LeporelliC.MatteucciG.NastasiA.Efficiency and Effectiveness in the Urban Public Transport Sector: A Critical Review With Directions for Future Research. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 248, No. 1, 2016, pp. 1–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.059.
130.
National Institute of Urban Affairs. E-Rickshaw Deployment in Indian Cities. ICLEI, New Delhi, 2019. http://southasia.iclei.org/.
131.
WerthmannE.KothariV.Pole-Mounted Electric Vehicle Charging: Preliminary Guidance for a Low-Cost and More Accessible Public Charging Solution for U.S. Cities. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C., 2021.
132.
WolbertusR.van den HoedR.KroesenM.ChorusC.Charging Infrastructure Roll-Out Strategies for Large Scale Introduction of Electric Vehicles in Urban Areas: An Agent-Based Simulation Study. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 148, 2021, pp. 262–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.04.010.
133.
MorrisseyP.WeldonP.O’MahonyM.Informing the Strategic Rollout of Fast Electric Vehicle Charging Networks With User Charging Behavior Data Analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2016. 2572: 9–19.
134.
BarterG. E.TamorM. A.ManleyD. K.WestT. H.Implications of Modeling Range and Infrastructure Barriers to Adoption of Battery Electric Vehicles. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015. 2502: 80–88.
135.
DianaM.Measuring the Satisfaction of Multimodal Travelers for Local Transit Services in Different Urban Contexts. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2012, pp. 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.018.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
