The present study explores the effects of coarse aggregate shape characteristics on the performance of stone matrix asphalt (SMA) mixes. The aggregates were produced with two commonly using different crushing mechanisms, namely JH (jaw-horizontal shaft impactor) and JJV (jaw-jaw-vertical shaft impactor). The digital image based Aggregate Image Measurement System was used to capture aggregate shape parameters. The effects of aggregate shape on the SMA mix were captured via various indicators, such as workability, design (resilient and dynamic modulus), and performance parameters (i.e., shear, rutting, and fracture). The shape characterization showed that aggregate produced from JH had significantly higher angularity, texture, and flat and elongated particles compared to JJV. However, the JJV-produced aggregate had significantly higher sphericity/cubicity compared to JH. Moreover, the SMA mix derived from JJV offered better rutting and shear resistance, and modulus values, while both mixes (i.e., JH and JJV) showed a similar fracture resistance behavior. Conclusively, it was perceived that aggregates having high cubicity with moderate angularity and texture offered significantly improved performance. Therefore, it can be inferred that the type of crusher can significantly affect aggregate shape characteristics and the subsequent performance of SMA mixes.
ProwellB. D.ZhangJ.BrownE. R.Aggregate Properties and the Performance of Superpave Designed Hot Mix Asphalt. NCHRP Report No. 539. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2005.
2.
PanT.TutumluerE.CarpenterS. H.Effect of Coarse Aggregate Morphology on Permanent Deformation Behavior of Hot Mix Asphalt. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 132, No. 7, 2006, pp. 580–589.
MishraV.SinghD.Impact of Short-Term Aging Temperatures of Asphalt Binder and Aggregate Roughness Levels on Bond Strength. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 218, 2019, pp. 295–307.
5.
LiuY.HuangY.SunW.NairH.LaneD. S.WangL.Effect of Coarse Aggregate Morphology on the Mechanical Properties of Stone Matrix Asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 152, 2017, pp. 48–56.
6.
LiB.ZhangC.XiaoP.WuZ.Evaluation of Coarse Aggregate Morphological Characteristics Affecting Performance of Heavy-Duty Asphalt Pavements. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 225, 2019, pp. 170–181.
7.
GaoJ.WangH.BuY.YouZ.ZhangX.IrfanM.Influence of Coarse-Aggregate Angularity on Asphalt Mixture Macroperformance: Skid Resistance, High-Temperature, and Compaction Performance. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 32, No. 5, 2020, p. 04020095
8.
HafeezI.JuniadF.KamalM. A.HussainJ.Influence of Single-and Two-Stage Aggregate Manufacturing Mechanisms on Asphalt Mixture Performance. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2015, p. 04015180.
9.
RajanB.SinghD.Comparison of Shape Parameters and Laboratory Performance of Coarse Aggregates Produced From Different Types of Crushing Operations. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering: ASCE, Vol. 29, No. 7, 2017, p. 04017044.
10.
RajanB.SinghD.Understanding Influence of Crushers on Shape Characteristics of Fine Aggregates Based on Digital Image and Conventional Techniques. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 150, 2017, pp. 833–843.
11.
RajanB.SinghD.Investigation on Effects of Different Crushing Stages on Morphology of Coarse and Fine Aggregates. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2020, pp. 177–195.
12.
DiógenesL. M.BessaI. S.Castelo BrancoV. T. F.MahmoudE.The Influence of Stone Crushing Processes on Aggregate Shape Properties. Road Materials and Pavement Design, Vol. 20, No. 4, 2019, pp. 877–894.
13.
KamaniM.AjalloeianR.The Effect of Rock Crusher and Rock Type on the Aggregate Shape. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 230, 2020, p. 117016.
14.
HuberG. A.JonesJ. C.MessersmithP. E.JacksonN. M.Contribution of Fine Aggregate Angularity and Particle Shape to Superpave Mixture Performance. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1998. 1609: 28–35.
15.
GatesL.MasadE.PyleR.BusheeD.Aggregate Imaging Measurement System 2 (AIMS2). No. FHWA-HIF-11-030. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2011.
16.
RajanB.SinghD.An Image-Based Approach to Capture Influence of Production Mechanism on Aggregate Dimension Distribution and Breakage Potential. Advances in Civil Engineering Materials, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2020, pp. 152–168.
17.
RajanB.SinghD.Effects of Orientation on Angularity of Aggregate Using Digital Image Technique. Proc., 18th AAPA International Flexible Pavements Conference, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2019.
18.
National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). Mechanistic-Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures. NCHRP Project 1-37A. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2004.
19.
SinghD.RajanB.GutaH. G.Effects of Aggregate Shape on Performance of Gravel-Aggregate Hot-Mix Asphalt Using Digital Image-Based Approach. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 31, No. 11, 2019, p. 04019260.
20.
FranckenL.Pavement Deformation Law of Bituminous Road Mixes in Repeated Load Triaxial Compression. Proc., 4th International Conference on the Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements, Vol. 1, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1977, pp. 483–496.
21.
BiligiriK. P.KaloushK. E.MamloukM. S.WitczakM. W.Rational Modeling of Tertiary Flow for Asphalt Mixtures. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007. 2001: 63–72.
22.
OzerH.Al-QadiI. L.BarberE.OkteE.ZhuZ.WuS.Evaluation of I-FIT Results and Machine Variability Using MnRoad Test Track Mixtures. Illinois Center for Transportation/Illinois Department of Transportation, Urbana, 2017.
23.
AwedA.KassemE.MasadE.LittleD.Method for Predicting the Laboratory Compaction Behavior of Asphalt Mixtures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol. 27, No. 11, 2015, p. 04015016.
24.
PellinenT. K.WitczakM. W.BonaquistR. F.Asphalt Mix Master Curve Construction Using Sigmoidal Fitting Function With Non-Linear Least Squares Optimization. In Recent Advances in Materials Characterization and Modeling of Pavement Systems (TutumluerE.NajjarY. M.MasadE., eds.), American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, 2004, pp. 83–101.
25.
WitczakM. W.KaloushK.PellinenT.El-BasyounyM.Von QuintusH.NCHRP Report 465 Simple Performance Test for Superpave Mix Design. National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002.
26.
GaoJ.WangH.BuY.YouZ.HasanM. R. M.IrfanM.Effects of Coarse Aggregate Angularity on the Microstructure of Asphalt Mixture. Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 183, 2018, pp. 472–484.
27.
BonaquistR. F.And National Cooperative Highway Research Program. NCHRP Report 629: Ruggedness Testing of the Dynamic Modulus and Flow Number Tests With the Simple Performance Tester. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2008.
