Bumpy Rides: An Extensive Accelerometer-Based Cycling Infrastructure Survey

Abstract

Comfortable cycleways are key to the success of a cycling network. However, evaluating comfort on many cycleway links can prove challenging with regard to resource requirements. This paper evaluates cycling comfort using GPS- and accelerometer-equipped bicycles in Montréal, Laval, and Longueuil (Canada). The objective of the study was threefold. First, to present a framework for efficiently evaluating cycling comfort of many cycling infrastructure links (segments), by accounting for various sampling conditions (speed and cyclist characteristics). Second, we aimed to analyze how cycling comfort relates to cycling infrastructure type. Third, we sought to identify hot spots and cold spots of comfortable cycleway links within the study area. The results showed that the dynamic comfort index was significantly influenced by the characteristics of the cyclists themselves and by the speed at which they were traveling. Off-street bike paths were significantly less comfortable than shared lanes, bike lanes, and streets without cycling facilities. Laval had more than its share of high-comfort clusters, whereas Montréal had significantly more low-comfort clusters than its counterparts. These results should be used to improve cycleway planning and quality monitoring.

Keywords

bicycles bicycle transportation bicycle lanes planning and analysis transportation-related noise and vibration vibration

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Pucher

Buehler

Seinen

Bicycling Renaissance in North America? An Update and Re-Appraisal of Cycling Trends and Policies. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 45, No. 6, 2011, pp. 451–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.03.001.

Oja

Titze

Bauman

De Geus

Krenn

Reger-Nash

Kohlberger

Health Benefits of Cycling: A Systematic Review. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2011, pp. 496–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01299.x.

Rojas-Rueda

de Nazelle

Tainio

Nieuwenhuijsen

M. J.

The Health Risks and Benefits of Cycling in Urban Environments Compared with Car Use: Health Impact Assessment Study. British Medical Journal, Vol. 343, 2011, P. d4521. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4521.

Garrard

Rissel

Bauman

Health Benefits of Cycling. In City Cycling ( Pucher

Buehler

eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2012, pp. 31–55.

Dill

McNeil

Four Types of Cyclists? Examination of Typology for Better Understanding of Bicycling Behavior and Potential. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2013. 2387: 129–138.

Winters

Davidson

Kao

Teschke

Motivators and Deterrents of Bicycling: Comparing Influences on Decisions to Ride. Transportation, Vol. 38, No. 1, 2011, pp. 153–168.

Thigpen

C. G.

Handy

S. L.

Harvey

Modeling the Impact of Pavement Roughness on Bicycle Ride Quality. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015. 2520: 67–77. https://doi.org/10.3141/2520-09.

Hölzel

Höchtl

Senner

Cycling Comfort on Different Road Surfaces. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 34, 2012, pp. 479–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.04.082.

Ministère des Transports du Québec. La Protection Du Réseau Routier: Une Priorité. Gouvernement du Québec, Québec, 2020.

10.

Ville de Montréal. Indicateurs de Condition Des Chaussées Du Réseau Routier. https://donnees.montreal.ca/ville-de-montreal/condition-chaussees-reseau-routier.

11.

Rocha

Quel Est l’état Des Rues à Montréal?, 2017. http://ici.radio-canada.ca/nouvelles/special/2017/07/etat-chaussee-rues-routes-ville-montreal/index.html.

12.

Gadsby

Watkins

Instrumented Bikes and Their Use in Studies on Transportation Behaviour, Safety, and Maintenance. Transport Reviews, Vol. 40, 2020, pp. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1769227.

13.

Olieman

Marin-Perianu

Measurement of Dynamic Comfort in Cycling Using Wireless Acceleration Sensors. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 34, 2012, pp. 568–573.

14.

Nuñez

J. Y. M.

Bisconsini

D. R.

Rodrigues da Silva

A. N.

Combining Environmental Quality Assessment of Bicycle Infrastructures with Vertical Acceleration Measurements. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 137, 2020, pp. 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.10.032.

15.

Taylor

M. D.

Edgar

Raine

Scottish Cycling Pavement Assessment Using Hand–Arm Vibration Exposure. Infrastructure Asset Management, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2019, pp. 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1680/jinam.17.00014.

16.

Neto

G. V. A.

Viana

J. D. F.

Braga

R. B.

Oliveira

C. T.

Surfaces Categorization Based on Data Collected by Bike Sensors. Presented at the ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, Fortaleza ,Brazil, 2018.

17.

Calvey

J. C.

Shackleton

J. P.

Taylor

M. D.

Llewellyn

Engineering Condition Assessment of Cycling Infrastructure: Cyclists’ Perceptions of Satisfaction and Comfort. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 78, 2015, pp. 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.031.

18.

Gao

Sha

Huang

Tong

Jiang

Evaluating the Cycling Comfort on Urban Roads Based on Cyclists’ Perception of Vibration. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 192, 2018, pp. 531–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.275.

19.

Harvey

Chen

Holland

T. J.

Price

McClain

Measurement of Pavement Treatment Macrotexture and its Effect on Bicycle Ride Quality. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015. 2525: 43–53. https://doi.org/10.3141/2525-05.

20.

Bíl

Andrášik

Kubeček

How Comfortable are Your Cycling Tracks? A New Method for Objective Bicycle Vibration Measurement. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 56, 2015, pp. 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.05.007.

21.

Statistics Canada. Census Profile, Census of2016. 2017. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp-pd/prof/index.cfm?Lang=F.

22.

Houde

Apparicio

Séguin

A.-M.

A Ride for Whom: Has Cycling Network Expansion Reduced Inequities in Accessibility in Montreal, Canada?

Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 68, 2018, pp. 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.02.005.

23.

Furth

P. G.

Bicycling Infrastructure for Mass Cycling: A Trans-Atlantic Comparison. In City Cycling ( Pucher

Buehler

eds.), MIT Press Cambridge, MA, 2012, pp. 105–140.

24.

Ministère des Transports. Classification Fonctionnelle, Gouvernement du Québec, 2008.

25.

Ministère de l’Énergie et des Ressources naturelles. Adresses Québec: Guide de l’utilisateur, Gouvernement du Québec, 2019.

26.

Garmin. Flexible and Interoperable Data Transfer (FIT) Protocol. https://developer.garmin.com/fit/protocol/. Accessed October 13, 2021.

27.

Wood

S. N.

Fast Stable Restricted Maximum Likelihood and Marginal Likelihood Estimation of Semiparametric Generalized Linear Models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), Vol. 73, No. 1, 2011, pp. 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00749.x.

28.

R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2021.

29.

Hastie

T. J.

Generalized Additive Models. In Statistical Models in S ( Chambers

J. M.

Hastie

T. J.

eds.), Routledge, New York, 2017, pp. 249–307.

30.

Yamada

Thill

J. -C.

Local Indicators of Network-Constrained Clusters in Spatial Patterns Represented by a Link Attribute. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 100, No. 2, 2010, pp. 269–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045600903550337.

31.

Anselin

Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA. Geographical Analysis, Vol. 27, No. 2, 1995, pp. 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x.

32.

Bivand

R. S.

Wong

D. W. S.

Comparing Implementations of Global and Local Indicators of Spatial Association. TEST, Vol. 27, No. 3, 2018, pp. 716–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11749-018-0599-x.

33.

Gelb

SpNetwork: Spatial Analysis on Network. The R Journal, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2021, pp. 561–577.

34.

Lusk

A. C.

Furth

P. G.

Morency

Miranda-Moreno

L. F.

Willett

W. C.

Dennerlein

J. T.

Risk of Injury for Bicycling on Cycle Tracks versus in the Street. Injury Prevention, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2011, pp. 131–135. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2010.028696.

35.

Jarry

Apparicio

Ride in Peace: How Cycling Infrastructure Types Affect Traffic Conflict Occurrence in Montréal, Canada. Safety, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2021, P. 63. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety7030063.

36.

Gelb

Apparicio

Cyclists’ Exposure to Atmospheric and Noise Pollution: A Systematic Literature Review. Transport Reviews, 2021, pp. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2021.1895361.

37.

Sener

I. N.

Eluru

Bhat

C. R.

An Analysis of Bicycle Route Choice Preferences in Texas, US. Transportation, Vol. 36, No. 5, 2009, pp. 511–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-009-9201-4.

38.

Boisjoly

Lachapelle

El-Geneidy

Bicycle Network Performance: Assessing the Directness of Bicycle Facilities through Connectivity Measures, a Montreal, Canada Case Study. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 17, No. 2,2019, pp. 1–15.

39.

Vélo Québec. À Vélo En Milieu Urbain: Trucs et Conseils. 2020. https://www.velo.qc.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/a-velo-en-milieu-urbain-trucs-conseils.pdf.

40.

Gössling

Urban Transport Justice. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 54, 2016, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.05.002.

41.

Ministère des Transports du Québec. Rapport Annuel 2020-2021. Gouvernement du Québec, Québec, 2021.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.06 MB