Analysis of Washington State Department of Transportation Risks

Abstract

Risk management is an important part of ensuring the successful delivery of major transportation projects. The first step in the risk management process is to identify the risks facing the project team so they can proactively complete the remaining steps: analyzing the severity; choosing how to respond; and controlling the level of risk throughout the lifecycle of the project. Although some state agencies have been practicing risk management for nearly two decades, little analysis of the risks identified during project development has been done. This study analyzes the risk registers pertaining to 51 major transportation projects undertaken by the Washington State Department of Transportation valued at approximately $7.7 billion to determine the distribution of risks among categories in the risk breakdown structure and find the most common risks in each category. The findings were then explored through interviews with industry professionals to gain insight into the results, add context, and illustrate the importance of identified risks. The results contribute to a better understanding of the risks facing transportation departments and lay the foundation for a more comprehensive risk identification step at the project level.

Keywords

construction construction management executive management issues infrastructure policy and organization risk risk management transportation asset management

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chapman

R. J.

The Controlling Influences on Effective Risk Identification and Assessment for Construction Design Management. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2001, pp. 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00070-8.

Siraj

N. B.

Fayek

A. R.

Risk Identification and Common Risks in Construction: Literature Review and Content Analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 145, No. 9, 2019, Article 03119004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001685.

Molenaar

K. R.

Diekmann

J. E.

Ashley

D. B.

Risk Assessment and Allocation for Highway Construction Management. Report No. FHWA-PL-06-032. FHWA. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2006, p. 73.

Strategic Analysis and Estimating Office. Project Risk Management Guide. Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, 2018.

Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide). Project Management Institute, Inc, Newtown Square, PA, 2017.

Al-Bahar

J. F.

Crandall

K. C.

Systematic Risk Management Approach for Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 116, No. 3, 1990, pp. 533–546. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1990)116:3(533).

Banaitiene

Banaitis

Risk Management in Construction Projects. In Risk Management – Current Issues and Challenges ( Banaitiene

, ed.), InTech, Rijeka, 2012, pp. 429–448.

Baumann

Erber

Gattringer

Selection of Risk Identification Instruments. ACRN Oxford Journal of Finance and Risk Perspective, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2016, pp. 27–41.

Sarvari

Valipour

Yahya

Noor

N. M.

Beer

Banaitiene

Approaches to Risk Identification in Public–Private Partnership Projects: Malaysian Private Partners’ Overview. Administrative Sciences, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2019, P. 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci9010017.

10.

Maytorena

Winch

Freeman

Kiely

The Influence of Experience and Information Search Styles on Project Risk Identification Performance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 54, 2007, pp. 315–326. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2007.893993.

11.

Tavakolan

Etemadinia

Fuzzy Weighted Interpretive Structural Modeling: Improved Method for Identification of Risk Interactions in Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 143, No. 11, 2017, p. 04017084. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001395.

12.

Setiawan

Riantini

L. S.

Risk Evaluation Causes of Contract Change Order to Improve Cost Performance on Railway Construction Project. United International Journal for Research & Technology, Vol. 2, No. 9, 2021, pp. 10–14.

13.

Batson

R. G.

Project Risk Identification Methods for Construction Planning and Execution. Proc., Construction Research Congress, Seattle, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 746–755. https://doi.org/10.1061/41020(339)76.

14.

El-Sayegh

S. M.

Mansour

M. H.

Risk Assessment and Allocation in Highway Construction Projects in the UAE. Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 31, No. 6, 2015, p. 04015004. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000365.

15.

Creedy

G. D.

Skitmore

Wong

J. K. W.

Evaluation of Risk Factors Leading to Cost Overrun in Delivery of Highway Construction Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 136, No. 5, 2010, pp. 528–537. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000160.

16.

Krippendorff

Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. SAGE Publications, Beverly Hills, CA, 2018.

17.

Oppenheim

A. N.

Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement. Pinter Publishers, London, 1992.

18.

Tran

D. Q.

Molenaar

K. R.

Exploring Critical Delivery Selection Risk Factors for Transportation Design and Construction Projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 21, No. 6, 2014, pp. 631–647. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-11-2013-0103.

19.

Kartam

N. A.

Kartam

S. A.

Risk and its Management in the Kuwaiti Construction Industry: A Contractors’ Perspective. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 19, No. 6, 2001, pp. 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(00)00014-4.

20.

El-Sayegh

S. M.

Risk Assessment and Allocation in the UAE Construction Industry. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2008, pp. 431–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.07.004.

21.

Molenaar

K. R.

Programmatic Cost Risk Analysis for Highway Megaprojects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 131, No. 3, 2005, pp. 343–353. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:3(343).