Accessibility-Based Location of International Multimodal Logistics Hubs: A Case in China

Abstract

This paper presents an approach to address the problem of location of international multimodal logistics hubs (IMLHs) in the international multimodal network from the perspective of accessibility. The approach has three phases: constructing multiple accessibility indices, identifying the candidate IMLHs, and determining the optimal IMLHs. First, seven accessibility indices are constructed considering multiple transport segments and modes in the international transportation chain. Second, several candidate IMLHs are identified according to the integrated accessibility calculated by a modified GRA-TOPSIS (grey relational analysis technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution). Third, an accessibility-based gravity p-median model is established to determine optimal IMLHs. Finally, the approach is applied to IMLHs in China. The results show that the distribution of the identified 28 candidate IMLHs is reasonable, and the 15 optimal IMLHs can serve most of the cargo origins in China. The study provides support for decision-makers in the location of multimodal transportation hubs.

Keywords

freight systems intermodal freight transport logistics multimodal urban freight transportation freight facility location and land use

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chen

Cheung

Chu

Transshipment Hub Selection From a Shipper’s and Freight Forwarder’s Perspective. Expert Systems With Applications, Vol. 83, 2017, pp. 396–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.04.044.

Lin

Two-Stage Approach to the Intermodal Terminal Location Problem. Computers & Operations Research, Vol. 67, 2016, pp. 113–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2015.09.009.

Rao

Goh

Zhao

Zheng

Location Selection of City Logistics Centers Under Sustainability. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 36, 2015, pp. 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.02.008.

Dukkanci

Peker

Kara

B. Y.

Green Hub Location Problem. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 125, 2019, pp. 116–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.03.005.

Essaadi

Grabot

Fenies

Location of Global Logistic Hubs Within Africa Based on a Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 132, 2019, pp. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.03.046.

Wang

G. W. Y.

Zeng

K. X.

Yang

Port Connectivity in a Logistic Network: The Case of Bohai Bay, China. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 95, No. 11, 2016, pp. 341–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2016.04.009.

Ghaffari-Nasab

Ghazanfari

Saboury

Fathollah

The Single Allocation Hub Location Problem: A Robust Optimisation Approach. European Journal of Industrial Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2015, pp. 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIE.2015.068648.

Pasagic Skrinjar

Rogic

Stankovic

Location of Urban Logistic Terminals as Hub Location Problem. Promet-Traffic & Transportation, Vol. 24, No. 5, 2012, pp. 433–440. https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v24i5.1179.

Shahparvari

Nasirian

Mohammadi

Noori

Chhetri

A GIS-LP Integrated Approach for the Logistics Hub Location Problem. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 146, 2020, pp. 106488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2020.106488.

10.

Hwang

Y. H.

Lee

Y. H.

Uncapacitated Single Allocation P-Hub Maximal Covering Problem. Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 63, No. 2, 2012, pp. 382–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2012.03.014.

11.

Mokhtar

Redi

A. A. N. P.

Krishnamoorthy

An Intermodal Hub Location Problem for Container Distribution in Indonesia. Computers & Operations Research, Vol. 104, 2019, pp. 415–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2018.08.012.

12.

Zhao

Stoeter

Cheng

Wang

European Hub Location Problem for China Railway Express in the Context of the Belt and Road Initiative. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, Vol. 23, No. 6, 2020, pp. 561–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2020.1777955.

13.

Zhao

Sun

Mao

Xue

Location Selection of Intra-City Distribution Hubs in the Metro-Integrated Logistics System. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 80, 2018, pp. 246–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.06.024.

14.

Zhao

Stoeter

Evaluation of Consolidation Center Cargo Capacity and Locations for China Railway Express. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 117, 2018, pp. 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2017.09.007.

15.

Chang

Notteboom

A Two-Phase Model for Dry Port Location With an Application to the Port of Dalian in China. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 38, No. 4, 2015, pp. 442–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2015.1026103.

16.

Alumur

S. A.

Yaman

Kara

B. Y.

Hierarchical Multimodal Hub Location Problem With Time-Definite Deliveries. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 48, No. 6, 2012, pp. 1107–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2012.04.001.

17.

Ambrosino

Sciomachen

A Capacitated Hub Location Problem in Freight Logistics Multimodal Networks. Optimization Letters, Vol. 10, No. 5, 2016, pp. 875–901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-016-1022-8.

18.

Hansen

W. G.

How Accessibility Shapes Land-Use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Vol. 25, No. 2, 1959, pp. 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944365908978307.

19.

Bruinsma

Rietveld

The Accessibility of European Cities: Theoretical Framework and Comparison of Approaches. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 30, 1998, pp. 499–521. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72232-5_5.

20.

Thill

J. C.

Lim

Intermodal Containerized Shipping in Foreign Trade and Regional Accessibility Advantages. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 18, 2010, pp. 530–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.010.

21.

Guo

Yang

Evaluation of Foreign Trade Transport Accessibility for Mainland China. Maritime Policy & Management, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2018, pp. 34–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2017.1333168.

22.

Chang

Chen

Public Transportation and the Spatial Inequality of Urban Park Accessibility: New Evidence From Hong Kong. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 76, 2019, pp. 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.09.012.

23.

Coppola

Carbone

Aveta

Stangherlin

Assessing Transport Policies for Tourist Mobility Based on Accessibility Indicators. European Transport Research Review, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2020, pp. 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-020-00444-4.

24.

Luo

Cats

van Lint

Currie

Integrating Network Science and Public Transport Accessibility Analysis for Comparative Assessment. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 80, 2019, pp. 102505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102505.

25.

Holl

Mariotti

The Geography of Logistics Firm Location: The Role of Accessibility. Networks & Spatial Economics, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2018, pp. 337–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-017-9347-0.

26.

Jiang

Zhang

Transportation Accessibility and Location Choice of Japanese-Funded Electronic Information Manufacturing Firms in Shanghai. Sustainability, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2018, pp. 390. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020390.

27.

Verhetsel

Kessels

Goos

Zijlstra

Location of Logistics Companies: A Stated Preference Study to Disentangle the Impact of Accessibility. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 42, 2015, pp. 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.12.002.

28.

Head

Mayer

Market Potential and the Location of Japanese Investment in the European Union. The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 86, No. 4, 2004, pp. 959–972. https://doi.org/10.1162/0034653043125257.

29.

Holl

Manufacturing Location and Impacts of Road Transport Infrastructure: Empirical Evidence From Spain. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2004, pp. 341–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0462(03)00059-0.

30.

Van den Heuvel

F. P.

Rivera

van Donselaar

K. H.

de Jong

Sheffi

de Langen

P. W.

Fransoo

J. C.

Relationship Between Freight Accessibility and Logistics Employment in US Counties. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 59, 2014, pp. 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.11.002.

31.

Limão

Venables

Infrastructure, Geographical Disadvantages, Transport Costs, and Trade. The World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2001, pp. 451–479. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/15.3.451.

32.

Alanon-Pardo

Arauzo-Carod

J. M.

Agglomeration, Accessibility and Industrial Location: Evidence From Spain. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, Vol. 25, No. 3–4, 2013, pp. 135–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2012.710263.

33.

Ding

J. S. Y.

Zhang

Accessibility Measure of Bus Transit Networks. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, Vol. 12, No. 7, 2018, pp. 682–688. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2017.0286.

34.

Hasnine

M. S.

Graovac

Camargo

Habib

K. N.

A Random Utility Maximization (RUM) Based Measure of Accessibility to Transit: Accurate Capturing of the First-Mile Issue in Urban Transit. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 74, 2019, pp. 313–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.12.007.

35.

Kelobonye

Zhou

McCarney

Xia

J. H.

Measuring the Accessibility and Spatial Equity of Urban Services Under Competition Using the Cumulative Opportunities Measure. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 85, 2020, Pp. 102706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102706.

36.

Ertugay

Duzgun

GIS-based Stochastic Modeling of Physical Accessibility Using GPS-Based Floating Car Data and Monte Carlo Simulation. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, Vol. 25, No. 9, 2011, pp. 1491–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2010.528419.

37.

Zeng

Wang

G. W. Y.

K. X.

Impact of the Carat Canal on the Evolution of Hub Ports Under China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 117, 2018, pp. 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2017.05.009.

38.

Shi

Wang

Optimum Service Area of an Infrastructure System Based on its Temporal Features. Industrial Engineering Journal, Vol. 12, No. 5, 2009, pp. 82–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00205-2_9.

39.

Quan

Wei

Personalized Product Evaluation Based on GRA-TOPSIS and Kansei Engineering. Symmetry, Vol. 7, No. 11, 2019, pp. 867. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11070867.

40.

Tang

Zhu

Liu

Jia

Zheng

Urban Sustainability Evaluation Under the Modified TOPSIS Based on Grey Relational Analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 2, No. 16, 2019, pp. 256. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16020256.

41.

Liu

Zhu

Zhang

Abrar Faiz

Khan

M. I.

Cui

A Resilience Evaluation Method for a Combined Regional Agricultural Water and Soil Resource System Based on Weighted Mahalanobis Distance and a Gray-TOPSIS Model. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 229, 2019, pp. 667–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.406.

42.

Chan

J. W. K.

Tong

T. K. L.

Multi-Criteria Material Selections and End-of-Life Product Strategy: Grey Relational Analysis Approach. Materials & Design, Vol. 28, No. 5, 2007, pp. 1539–1546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2006.02.016.

43.

Drezner

The Gravity p-Median Model. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 179, No. 3, 2007, pp. 1239–1251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.054.