This paper describes and models the behavioral response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland. The MOBIS-COVID GPS tracking dataset, which includes a pre-pandemic reference base, is used. Trip-level data are transformed in weekly distance proportions per mode per week, and the data are modeled using a mixed multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MMDCEV) model. Four distinct segments are derived, from September 2019 until the end of 2020, and used to uncover natural and forced behavioral adaptations. The descriptive and model estimation results confirm the trends partly observed around the globe, that is, a large decrease in public transport usage, recovered car usage, and a cycling boom. Behavioral insights are further provided as well as policy recommendations.
Federal Office of Public Health. Situationsbericht zur epidemiologischen Lage in der Schweiz und im Fuerstentum Liechtenstein. Weekly Report 2020-2021. FOPH, Liebefeld, Switzerland, 2020.
2.
MolloyJ.SchatzmannT.SchoemanB.TchervenkovC.HintermannB.AxhausenK. W.Observed Impacts of the Covid-19 First Wave on Travel Behaviour in Switzerland Based on a Large GPS Panel. Transport Policy, Vol. 104, 2021, pp. 43–51.
3.
Intervista. Mobilitaets-Monitoring COVID-19. Tech. Report. Statistical Office of Kanton Zuerich, 2020.
4.
BhatC. R.A Multiple Discrete-Continuous Extreme Value Model: Formulation and Application to Discretionary Time-Use Decisions. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 39, 2005, pp. 679–707.
5.
PleningerR.StreicherS.SturmJ.-E.Do COVID-19 Containment Measures Work? Evidence From Switzerland. KOF Working Papers, Vol. 494. KOF Swiss Economic Institute, Zurich, 2021.
6.
BajardiP.PolettoC.RamascoJ. J.TizzoniM.ColizzaV.VespignaniA.Human Mobility Networks, Travel Restrictions, and the Global Spread of 2009 H1N1 Pandemic. PLoS One, Vol. 6, 2011, p. e16591.
7.
PragerF.Beeler AsayG. R.LeeB.von Winterfeldt.D.Exploring Reductions in London Underground Passenger Journeys Following the July 2005 Bombings. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, Vol. 31, 2011, pp. 773–786.
8.
López-RousseauA.Avoiding the Death Risk of Avoidng a Dread Risk: The Aftermath of March 11 in Spain. Psychological Science, Vol. 16, 2005, pp. 426–428.
9.
MuleyD.ShahinM.DiasC.AbdullahM.Role of Transport During Outbreak of Infectious Diseases: Evidence From the Past. Sustainability, Vol. 12, 2020, p. 7367.
10.
BadrH. S.DuH.MarshallM.DongE.SquireM. M.GardnerL. M.Association Between Mobility Patterns and COVID-19 Transmission in the USA: A Mathematical Modelling Study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, Vol. 20, 2020, pp. 1247–1254.
11.
BeckM. J.HensherD. A.Insights Into the Impact of COVID-19 on Household Travel and Activities in Australia–The Early Days Under Restrictions. Transport Policy, Vol. 96, 2020, pp. 76–93.
12.
AloiA.AlonsoB.BenaventeJ.CorderaR.EchánizE.GonzálezF.LadisaC., et al. Effects of the COVID-19 Lockdown on Urban Mobility: Empirical Evidence From the City of Santander (Spain). Sustainability, Vol. 12, 2020, p. 3870.
13.
BucskyP.Modal Share Changes due to COVID-19: The Case of Budapest. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 8, 2020, p. 100141.
14.
de HaasM.FaberR.HamersmaM.How COVID-19 and the Dutch Intelligent Lockdown Change Activities, Work and Travel Behaviour: Evidence From Longitudinal Data in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 6, 2020, p. 100150.
15.
BhaduriE.ManojB.WadudZ.GoswamiA. K.ChoudhuryC. F.Modelling the Effects of COVID-19 on Travel Mode Choice Behaviour in India. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 8, 2020, p. 100273.
16.
AlmlöfE.RubenssonI.CebecauerM.JeneliusE.Who Is Still Travelling by Public Transport During COVID-19? Socioeconomic Factors Explaining Travel Behaviour in Stockholm Based on Smart Card Data. SSRN, September8, 2020.
17.
ScorranoM.DanielisR.Active Mobility in an Italian City: Mode Choice Determinants and Attitudes Before and During the Covid-19 Emergency. Research in Transportation Economics, Vol. 86, 2021, p. 101031.
18.
LoderA.AxhausenK. W.Mobility Tools and Use. Journal of Transport and Land Use, Vol. 11, 2018, pp. 367–385.
19.
BFS. Verkehrsverhalten der Bevülkerung. Bundesamt für Statistik, Neuchâtel, Switzerland, 2017.
20.
BhatC. R.SenS.Household Vehicle Type Holdings and Usage: An Application of the Multiple Discrete-Continuous Extreme Value (MDCEV) Model. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 40, 2006, pp. 35–53.
21.
JianS.RashidiT. H.DixitV.An Analysis of Carsharing Vehicle Choice and Utilization Patterns Using Multiple Discrete-Continuous Extreme Value (MDCEV) Models. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 103, 2017, pp. 362–376.
22.
PalmaD.EnamA.HessS.CalastriC.Crastes dit SourdR.Modelling Multiple Occurrences of Activities During a Day: An Extension of the MDCEV Model. Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics, Vol. 9, 2021, pp. 456–478.
23.
CalastriC.PawlakJ.BatleyR.Participation in Online Activities While Travelling: An Application of the MDCEV Model in the Context of Rail Travel. Transportation, Vol. 49, No. 1, 2021, pp. 1–27.
24.
CalastriC.HessS.DalyA.ManessM.KowaldM.AxhausenK.Modelling Contact Mode and Frequency of Interactions With Social Network Members Using the Multiple Discrete-Continuous Extreme Value Model. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 76, 2017, pp. 16–34.
25.
MüggenburgH.Busch-GeertsemaA.LanzendorfM.Mobility Biographies: A Review of Achievements and Challenges of the Mobility Biographies Approach and a Framework for Further Research. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 46, 2015, pp. 151–163.
26.
ChatterjeeK.SherwinH.JainJ.Triggers for Changes in Cycling: The Role of Life Events and Modifications to the External Environment. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 30, 2013, pp. 183–193.
