Systemic Opportunities to Improve Older Pedestrian Safety: Merging Crash Data Analysis and a Stakeholder Workshop

Abstract

This paper presents a framework for improving older pedestrian safety in regard to serious (fatal and incapacitating) crashes, using Oregon as a case study. On review of state and federal practices pertaining to older pedestrian safety, 4 years of crash data identified 112 older (≥65 years) pedestrian serious injury crashes. These data were explored for factors that might be addressed systemically using two methods. First, raw frequencies in the crash data were assessed to determine trends and crash-related factors that are overrepresented. Second, a random forest analysis was conducted to determine important variables for predicting older pedestrian serious injury crashes. Using these crash-related factors, a workshop was held with 18 local stakeholders and experts. As part of the workshop, key crash trends, potential causations, and potential countermeasures by priority of implementation were determined based on perspectives from workshop participants. Three key systemic solutions were identified to improve older pedestrian safety, including improving pedestrian visibility and illumination, implementing treatments for left turns, and shortening pedestrian crossing distances across the state. The framework presented in the current study could be adopted by other agencies to systemically address a wide variety of safety concerns.

Keywords

pedestrians bicycles human factors planning and policy safety

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

NHTSA. Traffic Safety Facts: Older Population. U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.2019.

Cottrell

W. D.

Pal

Evaluation of Pedestrian Data Needs and Collection Efforts. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2003. 1828: 12–19.

Levi

De Leonardis

D. M.

Antin

Angel

Identifying Countermeasure Strategies to Increase Safety of Older Pedestrians. Report No. DOT-HS-811-798. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C., 2013.

Lobjois

Benguigui

Cavallo

The Effects of Age and Traffic Density on Street-Crossing Behavior. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 53, 2013, pp. 166–175.

Kothuri

Smaglik

Kading

Sobie

Koonce

Guidance on Signal Control Strategies for Pedestrians to Improve Walkability. ITE Journal, Vol. 88, No. 5, 2018, pp. 35–39.

Hewitt

Evans

Elderly Mobility and Safety - The Michigan Approach: Literature Review and Resource Inventory. Southest Michigan Council of Governments, Detroit, 1999.

Kwigizile

J.-S.

Van Houten

Prieto

Boateng

Rodriguez

Ceifetz

Yassin

Bagdad

Andridge

Evaluation of Michigan’s Engineering Improvements for Older Drivers. Report No. RC 1636. Michigan Department of Transportation, Lansing, 2015.

Boot

Charness

Stothart

Fox

Mitchum

Lupton

Landbeck

Aging Road User, Bicyclist, and Pedestrian Safety: Effective Bicycling Signs and Preventing Left-Turn Crashes. Report No. BDK83 977-15. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, 2013.

Federal Highway Administration. Older Drivers and Pedestrians Special Rule. https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/hsip/older/. Accessed November 16, 2021.

10.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Traffic Safety Facts: Occupant Protection in Passenger Vehicles. https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812691.

11.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Traffic Safety Facts: Speeding. https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812687.

12.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Traffic Safety Facts: Young Drivers. https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812753.

13.

University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center. Crash Modification Factors Clearinghouse. UNC HSRC, Chapel Hill, 2021.

14.

Oregon Department of Transportation. All Roads Transportation Safety: Crash Reduction Factors. ODOT, Salem, 2020.

15.

Monsere

Anderson

J. C.

Kothuri

Hurwitz

Chand

Addressing Oregon’s Rise in Deaths and Serious Injuries for Senior Drivers and Pedestrians. Report No. FHWA-OR-RD-20-07. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, 2020.

16.

ODOT Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit. 2017 Motor Vehicle Traffic Crash Analysis and Code Manual. Oregon Department of Transportation Data Section, Salem, 2018.

17.

Mokhtarimousavi

Anderson

J. C.

Hadi

Azizinamini

A Temporal Investigation of Crash Severity Factors in Worker-Involved Work Zone Crashes: Random Parameters and Machine Learning Approaches. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 10, 2021, p. 100378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2021.100378.

18.

Zhou

Zheng

Tolliver

Keramati

Accident Prediction Accuracy Assessment for Highway-Rail Grade Crossings Using Random Forest Algorithm Compared With Decision Tree. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 200, 2020, p. 106931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2020.106931.

19.

Hua

Wang

Evaluating the Nonlinear Correlation Between Vertical Curve Features and Crash Frequency on Highways Using Random Forests. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, Vol. 146, No. 10, 2020, p. 04020115. https://doi.org/10.1061/jtepbs.0000410.

20.

Prato

C. G.

Wang

Ranking Contributors to Traffic Crashes on Mountainous Freeways From an Incomplete Dataset: A Sequential Approach of Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations and Random Forest Classifier. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 146, 2020, p. 105744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105744.

21.

Abdel-Aty

Haleem

Analyzing Angle Crashes at Unsignalized Intersections Using Machine Learning Techniques. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2011, pp. 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.002.

22.

Wang

Kim

S. H.

Prediction and Factor Identification for Crash Severity: Comparison of Discrete Choice and Tree-Based Models. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2019. 2673: 640–653.

23.

Ranjitkar

Zhao

Rashidi

Analyzing Pedestrian Crash Injury Severity Under Different Weather Conditions. Traffic Injury Prevention, Vol. 18, No. 4, 2017, pp. 427–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2016.1207762.

24.

Zhang

Comparing Prediction Performance for Crash Injury Severity Among Various Machine Learning and Statistical Methods. IEEE Access, Vol. 6, 2018, pp. 60079–60087. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2874979.

25.

Chen

M. M.

Chen

M. C.

Modeling Road Accident Severity With Comparisons of Logistic Regression, Decision Tree and Random Forest. Information, Vol. 11, No. 5, 2020, p. 270. https://doi.org/10.3390/INFO11050270.

26.

Mokhtarimousavi

Anderson

J. C.

Azizinamini

Hadi

Improved Support Vector Machine Models for Work Zone Crash Injury Severity Prediction and Analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2019. 2673: 680–692.

27.

Liu

Wang

Using Support Vector Machine Models for Crash Injury Severity Analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 45, 2012, pp. 478–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.08.016.

28.

Alkheder

Taamneh

Severity Prediction of Traffic Accident Using an Artificial Neural Network. Journal of Forecasting, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2017, pp. 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.2425.

29.

Mafi

Abdelrazig

Doczy

Analysis of Gap Acceptance Behavior for Unprotected Right and Left Turning Maneuvers at Signalized Intersections Using Data Mining Methods: A Driving Simulation Approach. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2018. 2672: 160–170.

30.

Abdel-Aty

Anlyzing Crash Injury Severity for a Mountainous Freeway Incorporating Real-Time Traffic and Weather Data. Safety Science, Vol. 63, 2014, pp. 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.012.

31.

Hoare

How is Variable Importance Calculated for a Random Forest. https://www.displayr.com/how-is-variable-importance-calculated-for-a-random-forest/.Accessed June 6, 2019.

32.

Dinsdale Lab. Random Forests. https://dinsdalelab.sdsu.edu/metag.stats/code/randomforest.html.Accessed June 6, 2019.

33.

Harb

Yan

Radwan

Exploring Precash Maneuvers Using Classification Trees and Random Forests. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2009, pp. 98–107.

34.

Alteryx. Seeing the Forest: An Introduction to Random Forest. https://community.alteryx.com/t5/Alteryx-Knowledge-Base/Seeing-the-Forest-for-the-Trees-An-Introduction-to-Random-Forest/ta-p/158062. Accessed June 6, 2019.

35.

FHWA. Handbook for Designing Roadways for the Aging Population. Report No. FHWA-SA-14-015. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2014.

36.

Federal Highway Administration. Crash Modification Factors Clearinghouse. http://www.cmfclearinghouse.org/index.cfm.

37.

Monsere

Kothuri

Anderson

Best Practices for Installation of Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons With and Without Median Refuge Islands. Report No. FHWA-OR-RD-20-06. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, 2020.

38.

Jashami

Hurwitz

D. S.

Monsere

Kothuri

Evaluation of Driver Comprehension and Visual Attention of the Flashing Yellow Arrow Display for Permissive Right Turns. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2019. 2673: 397–407.