The coronavirus pandemic changed paratransit service dramatically, with most operators eliminating shared rides to halt disease transmission. This paper applies an estimate of disease contact exposure to actual data from New York City’s Access-A-Ride (AAR) paratransit system. Scenario analyses performed using insertion heuristic trip construction showed that eliminating rideshare on the AAR system increased operating miles by 70%. We also showed contact exposure can be significantly limited (by ∼50% to 60%) by reducing vehicle capacity from 4 to 2 passengers. Manipulating the maximum ride time factor also showed the potential to reduce contact exposure, with a 50% increase of the ratio from 2 to 3 leading to a 40% increase in contact exposure. Contact exposure was relatively insensitive to changes in the maximum wait time policy.
DaganzoC. F.OuyangY.A General Model of Demand-Responsive Transportation Services: From Taxi to Ridesharing to Dial-a-Ride. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 126, 2019, pp. 213-224.
2.
KaufmanS. M.SmithA.O’ConnellJ.MarulliD.Intelligent Paratransit. Rudin Center for Transportation Policy and Management, New York, NY, 2016.
3.
KaneJ.TomerA.PuentesR.How Lyft and Uber can Improve Transit Agency Budgets. The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., 2016.
4.
Citizen’s Budget Commission. Access-a-Ride, Ways to do the Right Thing More Efficiently. CBC, New York, NY, 2016.
5.
Chira-ChavalaT.VenterC.Cost and Productivity Impacts of a “Smart” Paratransit System. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1997. 1571: 81-87.
6.
JungJ.JayakrishnanR.ChoiK.Dually Sustainable Urban Mobility Option: Shared-Taxi Operations With Electric Vehicles. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, Vol. 11, No. 8, 2017, pp. 567-581.
7.
Alonso-MoraJ.SamaranayakeS.WallarA.FrazzoliE.RusD.On-Demand High-Capacity Ride-Sharing via Dynamic Trip-Vehicle Assignment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 114, No. 3, 2017, pp. 462-467.
8.
FagnantD. J.KockelmanK. M.Dynamic Ride-Sharing and Fleet Sizing for a System of Shared Autonomous Vehicles in Austin, Texas. Transportation, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2018, pp. 143-158.
9.
RasulkhaniS.ChowJ. Y. J.Route-Cost-Assignment With Joint User and Operator Behavior as a Many-to-One Stable Matching Assignment Game. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 124, 2019, pp. 60-81.
10.
HylandM.MahmassaniH. S.Operational Benefits and Challenges of Shared-Ride Automated Mobility-on-Demand Services. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 134, 2020, pp. 251-270.
11.
EdelsonP. J.PhypersM.TB Transmission on Public Transportation: A Review of Published Studies and Recommendations for Contact Tracing. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2011, pp. 27-31.
12.
BótaA.GardnerL. M.KhaniA.Identifying Critical Components of a Public Transit System for Outbreak Control. Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2017, pp. 1137-1159.
ThunströmL.NewboldS. C.FinnoffD.AshworthM.ShogrenJ. F.The Benefits and Costs of Using Social Distancing to Flatten the Curve for COVID-19. Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2020, pp. 179-195.
LuoQ.GeeM.PiccoliB.WorkD.SamaranayakeS.Managing Public Transit During a Pandemic: The Trade-Off Between Safety and Mobility. SSRN3757210, 2020.
17.
WilsonN. H. M.SussmanJ. M.GoodmanL. A.HignnetB. T.Simulation of a Computer Aided Routing System (CARS). Proc., 3rd Conference on Applications of Simulation, Los Angeles, CA, Winter Simulation Conference, December, 1969, pp. 171-183.
18.
DaganzoC. F.An Approximate Analytic Model of Many-to-Many Demand Responsive Transportation Systems. Transportation Research, Vol. 12, No. 5, 1978, pp. 325-333.
19.
CordeauJ. F.LaporteG.The Dial-a-Ride Problem: Models and Algorithms. Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 153, No. 1, 2007, pp. 29-46.
20.
JawJ. J.OdoniA. R.PsaraftisH. N.WilsonN. H.A Heuristic Algorithm for the Multi-Vehicle Advance Request Dial-a-Ride Problem With Time Windows. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 20, No. 3, 1986, pp. 243-257.
21.
SayarshadH. R.ChowJ. Y. J.A Scalable Non-Myopic Dynamic Dial-a-Ride and Pricing Problem. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 81, 2015, pp. 539-554.
22.
JungJ.JayakrishnanR.ParkJ. Y.Dynamic Shared-Taxi Dispatch Algorithm With Hybrid-Simulated Annealing. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 31, No. 4, 2016, pp. 275-291.
23.
GschwindT.DrexlM.Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search With a Constant-Time Feasibility Test for the Dial-a-Ride Problem. Transportation Science, Vol. 53, No. 2, 2019, pp. 480-491.
24.
HunsakerB.SavelsberghM.Efficient Feasibility Testing for Dial-a-Ride Problems. Operations Research Letters, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2002, pp. 169–173.
25.
TangJ.KongY.LauH.IpA. W. H.A Note on “Efficient Feasibility Testing for Dial-a-Ride Problems. Operations Research Letters, Vol. 38, No. 5, 2010, pp. 405–407.
26.
HauglandD.HoS. C.Feasibility Testing for Dial-a-Ride Problems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 6124, 2010, pp. 170–179.
27.
ShenC. W.QuadrifoglioL.Evaluating Centralized Versus Decentralized Zoning Strategies for Metropolitan ADA Paratransit Services. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 139, No. 5, 2013, pp. 524-532.
28.
MasmoudiM. A.HosnyM.BraekersK.DammakA.Three Effective Metaheuristics to Solve the Multi-Depot Multi-Trip Heterogeneous Dial-a-Ride Problem. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 96, 2016, pp. 60-80.
29.
SteinD. M.An Asymptotic, Probabilistic Analysis of a Routing Problem. Mathematics of Operations Research, Vol. 3, No. 2, 1978, pp. 89-101.
ChangS. K.SchonfeldP. M.Optimization Models for Comparing Conventional and Subscription Bus Feeder Services. Transportation Science, Vol. 25, No. 4, 1991, pp. 281-298.
32.
AmirgholyM.GonzalesE. J.Demand Responsive Transit Systems With Time-Dependent Demand: User Equilibrium, System Optimum, and Management Strategy. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 92, 2016, pp. 234-252.
33.
DaganzoC. F.OuyangY.YangH.Analysis of Ride-Sharing With Service Time and Detour Guarantees. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 140, 2020, pp. 130-150.
34.
ShenS.OuyangY.RenS.ChenM.ZhaoL.Design and Implementation of Zone-to-Zone Demand Responsive Transportation Systems. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2021. 2675: 275-287.
35.
BalcanD.ColizzaV.GonçalvesB.HuH.RamascoJ. J.VespignaniA.Multiscale Mobility Networks and the Spatial Spreading of Infectious Diseases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 106, No. 51, 2009, pp. 21484-21489.
36.
SalathéM.KazandjievaM.LeeJ. W.LevisP.FeldmanM. W.JonesJ. H.A High-Resolution Human Contact Network for Infectious Disease Transmission. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 107, No. 51, 2010, pp. 22020-22025.
37.
KumarP.KhaniA.LindE.LevinJ.Estimation and Mitigation of Epidemic Risk on a Public Transit Route Using Automatic Passenger Count Data. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2021. 2675: 94-106.
38.
WangD.TayaraniM.HeB. Y.GaoJ.ChowJ. Y. J.GaoH. O.OzbayK.Mobility in Post-Pandemic Economic Reopening Under Social Distancing Guidelines: Congestion, Emissions, and Contact Exposure in Public Transit. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 153, 2021, pp. 151-170.
QianX.SunL.UkkusuriS. V.Scaling of Contact Networks for Epidemic Spreading in Urban Transit Systems. Scientific Reports, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2021, pp. 1-12.
41.
HajduL.BótaA.KrészM.KhaniA.GardnerL. M.Discovering the Hidden Community Structure of Public Transportation Networks. Networks and Spatial Economics, Vol. 20, 2019, pp. 1-23.
42.
MoB.FengK.ShenY.TamC.LiD.YinY.ZhaoJ.Modeling Epidemic Spreading Through Public Transit Using Time-Varying Encounter Network. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 122, 2021, p. 102893.
43.
BeaudryA.LaporteG.MeloT.NickelS.Dynamic Transportation of Patients in Hospitals. OR Spectrum, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2010, pp. 77–107.
44.
CordeauJ. F.LaporteG.A Tabu Search Heuristic for the Static Multi-Vehicle Dial-a-Ride Problem. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 37, No. 6, 2003, pp. 579-594.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Microtransit or General Public Demand Response Transit Services: State of the Practice. The National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2019. https://doi.org/10.17226/25414.
