Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to provide a robust process to statistically analyze reflective cracking field performance data. There is often a lack of consistency and transparency in statistical analysis of pavement field performance data, which may not satisfy ANOVA or regression modeling assumptions. Twelve full-scale asphalt concrete (AC) overlay pavement test sections located at the MnROAD test facility are used to demonstrate the statistical framework. The percentage of cracking reported at joint locations (%RC) is used to represent reflective cracking performance, and its relationships to pre-overlay load transfer efficiency (LTE), truck traffic, overlay thickness, and common performance indices determined from laboratory tests are investigated. The three laboratory tests considered in this study are the disk-shaped compact tension (DCT), semi-circular bend (SCB) and overlay tester (OT). Logistic regression models are used for estimation. Predictive abilities of various models are compared in relation to the percentage odds (%odds) of reflective cracking. Model output is binary: it estimates not the relative amount of reflective cracking but instead the probability of a given pavement structure cracking. Varying ability to perform asphalt mixture laboratory performance testing is assumed. One such model, where no laboratory performance testing variables are included, shows that a one-unit increase (1-in.) in AC overlay thickness may result in approximately a third decrease in the %odds of reflective cracking. A logistic regression model developed that considers laboratory performance data from DCT, SCB, and OT results in the optimal model balancing best fit and best prediction properties without overfitting.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
