Determining the strategy and planning for maintenance operations on railway tracks is important given the increasing demand from both freight and passengers. An important prerequisite of maintenance planning is the ability to predict the overall and geometric conditions of the railway in the near future. It is, therefore, necessary to develop a degradation model and consider the effect of various maintenance operations using a recovery model. According to EN 13848-5, the alert limit (AL) can be used as an indicator to plan maintenance operations. The current paper benefits from this index as well as the effect of its changes on important parameters such as maintenance costs, availability, and reliability to present a maintenance decision support model. This model allows infrastructure managers to plan maintenance interventions under the conditions of their intended usage strategy. The results of this paper indicate that choosing suitable AL could affect total maintenance cost and availability by up to 57% and 33% respectively.
KasraeiA.ZakeriJ. A.BakhtiaryA.Optimal Track Geometry Maintenance Limits Using Machine Learning: A Case Study. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Vol. 235, No. 7, 2020, pp. 876–886.
2.
ZakeriJ. A.EsmaeiliM.KasraeiA.BakhtiaryA.A Numerical Investigation on the Lateral Resistance of Frictional Sleepers in Ballasted Railway Tracks. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Vol. 230, No. 2, 2016, pp. 440–449.
3.
BurrowM. p. N.NaitoS.EvdoridesH. T.Network-Level Railway Track Maintenance Management Model. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2009. 2117: 66–76.
4.
WangD.ZhanS.PengQ.ZhouW.Integrated Overnight Train Scheduling and Maintenance Planning for High-Speed Railway Lines. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2020. 2675: 222–237.
5.
AndradeA. R.TeixeiraP. F.Uncertainty in Rail-Track Geometry Degradation: Lisbon-Oporto Line Case Study. Journal of Transport Engineering, Part A: Systems, Vol. 137, 2011, pp. 193–200.
6.
AndradeA. R.TeixeiraP. F.A Bayesian Model to Assess Rail Track Geometry Degradation Through its Lifecycle. Research in Transportation Economics, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2012, pp. 1–8.
7.
AndradeA. R.TeixeiraP. F.Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling of Rail Track Geometry Degradation. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Vol. 227, No. 4, 2013, pp. 364–375.
8.
AnR.SunQ.WangF.BaiW.ZhuX.LiuR.Improved Railway Track Geometry Degradation Modeling for Tamping Cycle Prediction. Journal of Transport Engineering, Part A: Systems, Vol. 144, No. 7, 2018, p. 04018025. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000149.
9.
KhajeheiH.AhmadiA.SoleimanmeigouniI.NissenA.Allocation of Effective Maintenance Limit for Railway Track Geometry. Journal of Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 15, No. 12, 2019, pp. 1597–1612.
10.
KasraeiA.ZakeriJ. A.Effective Time Interval for Railway Track Geometry Inspection. Archives of Transport, Vol. 53, No. 1, 2020, pp. 53–65.
11.
ZhaoJ.ChanA. H. C.StirlingA. B.MadelinK. B.Optimizing Policies of Railway Ballast Tamping and Renewal. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2006. 1943: 50–56.
12.
KhouyI. A.LarssonP. O.NissenA.JunttiU.SchunnessonH.Optimization of Track Geometry Inspection Interval. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Vol. 228, No. 5, 2014, pp. 545–556.
13.
HuangH.MoaveniM.SchmidtS.TutumluerE.HartJ. M.Evaluation of Railway Ballast Permeability Using Machine Vision–Based Degradation Analysis. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2018. 2672: 62–73.
14.
CaetanoL. F.TeixeiraP. F.Predictive Maintenance Model for Ballast Tamping. Journal of Transport Engineering, Part A: Systems, Vol. 142, No. 4, 2016, p. 04016006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000825.
15.
AnderssonM.Marginal Cost Pricing of Railway Infrastructure Operation, Maintenance, and Renewal in Sweden: From Policy to Practice Through Existing Data. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2006. 1943: 1–11.
16.
AndrewsJ.PrescottD.De RozieresF.A Stochastic Model for Railway Track Asset Management. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 130, 2014, pp. 76–84.
17.
PrescottD.AndrewsJ.A Track Ballast Maintenance and Inspection Model for a Rail Network. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Vol. 227, No. 3, 2013, pp. 251–266.
18.
BakhtiaryA.ZakeriJ. A.MohammadzadehS.An Opportunistic Preventive Maintenance Policy for Tamping Scheduling of Railway Tracks. International Journal of Rail Transportation, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2020, pp. 1–22.
19.
ZhangY. J.MurrayM. H.FerreiraL.Modelling Rail Track Performance: An Integrated Approach. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Transport, Vol. 141, 2000, pp. 187–194.
20.
AlemazkoorN.RuppertC. J.MeidaniH.Survival Analysis at Multiple Scales for the Modeling of Track Geometry Deterioration. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Vol. 232, No. 3, 2018, pp. 842–850.
21.
FerreiraL.MurrayM. H.Modelling Rail Track Deterioration and Maintenance: Current Practices and Future Needs. Transport Reviews, Vol. 17, 1997, pp. 207–221.
22.
ShentonM.Ballast Deformation and Track Deterioration. Proc., Conference on Track Technology, Thomas Telford Limited, University of Nottingham, London, 1984.
23.
SatoY.Japanese Studies on Deterioration of Ballasted Track. Vehicle System Dynamics, Vol. 24, No. 1, 1995, pp. 197–208.
24.
HeQ.LiH.BhattacharjyaD.ParikhD. P.HampapurA.Track Geometry Defect Rectification Based on Track Deterioration Modelling and Derailment Risk Assessment. Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 66, 2014, pp. 392–404.
25.
ChrismerS.SeligE.Computer Model for Ballast Maintenance Planning. Proc., 5th International Heavy Haul Railway Conference, Beijing, China, International Heavy Haul Association, VA, 1993.
26.
GulerH.JovanovicS.EvrenG.Modelling Railway Track Geometry Deterioration. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Transport, Vol. 164, 2011, pp. 65–75.
27.
SadeghiJ.AskarinejadH.Development of Improved Railway Track Degradation Models. Journal of Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 6, 2010, pp. 675–688.
28.
FamurewaS. M.XinT.RantataloM.KumarU.Comparative Study of Track Geometry Quality Prediction Models. Proc., 10th International Conference on Condition Monitoring and Machinery Failure Prevention Technologies, Vol. 2, Krakow, Poland, 2013, pp. 1057–1068.
29.
LyngbyN.Railway Track Degradation: Shape and Influencing Factors. International Journal of Performability Engineering, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2009, pp. 177–186.
30.
WestgeestF.DekkerR.FischerR.Predicting Rail Geometry Deterioration by Regression Models. In Advances in Safety, Reliability and Risk Management ESREL (BerenguerC.GrallA.SoaresC. G., eds.), Taylor & Francis, France, 2011.
31.
SimsonS. A.FerreiraL.MurrayM. H.Rail Track Maintenance Planning: An Assessment Model. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2000. 1713: 29–35.
32.
EN 13848-5. Railway Applications – Track – Track Geometry Quality–Part 5: Geometric Quality Levels –Plain Line. The European Standard, 2010.
33.
KhouyI. A.Cost-Effective Maintenance of Railway Track Geometry: A Shift From Safety Limits to Maintenance Limits. PhD thesis. Luleå University of Technology, Sweden, 2013.
34.
KhajeheiH.HaddadzadeM.AhmadiA.SoleimanmeigouniI.NissenA.Optimal Opportunistic Tamping Scheduling for Railway Track Geometry. Journal of Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 10, 2021, pp. 1299–1314. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1809467.
35.
ValeC.RibeiroI. M.CalçadaR.Integer Programming to Optimize Tamping in Railway Tracks as Preventive Maintenance. Journal of Transportation Engineering-Part A: Systems, Vol. 138, 2012, pp. 123–131.
36.
Meier-HirmerC.RibouletG.SourgetF.RoussignolM.Maintenance Optimization for a System With a Gamma Deterioration Process and Intervention Delay: Application to Track Maintenance. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Vol. 223, No. 3, 2009, pp. 189–198.
37.
SanchoL. C. B.BragaJ. A. P.AndradeA. R.Optimizing Maintenance Decision in Rails: A Markov Decision Process Approach. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2021, p. 04020051. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001101.
38.
CaetanoL. F.TeixeiraP. F.Optimization Model to Schedule Railway Track Renewal Operations: A Life-Cycle Cost Approach. Journal of Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 11, No. 11, 2014, pp. 1524–1536.
39.
NeuholdJ.LandgrafM.MarschnigS.VeitP.Measurement Data-Driven Life-Cycle Management of Railway Track. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2020. 2674: 685–696.
40.
SoleimanmeigouniI.AhmadiA.KumarU.Track Geometry Degradation and Maintenance Modelling: A Review. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Vol. 232, No. 1, 2018, pp. 73–102.
41.
NeuholdJ.VidovicI.MarschnigS.Preparing Track Geometry Data for Automated Maintenance Planning. Journal of Transportation Engineering-Part A: Systems, Vol. 146, No. 5, 2020, p. 04020032. https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000349.
42.
GerumP. C. L.AltayA.Baykal-GursoyM.Data-Driven Predictive Maintenance Scheduling Policies for Railways. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 107, 2019, pp. 137–154.
43.
EN 50126. Railway Applications-The Specification and Demonstration of Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety (RAMS). The European Standard, 1999.
44.
QuirogaL. M.SchniederE.Modelling High Speed Railroad Geometry Ageing as a Discrete-Continuous Process. Proc., Stochastic Modeling Techniques and Data Analysis International Conference, Chania, Greece, 2010.
45.
QuirogaL. M.SchniederE.Monte Carlo Simulation of Railway Track Geometry Deterioration and Restoration. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers- Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, Vol. 226, 2012, pp. 274–282.
46.
LewisR. B.Cost-Effective Measurement of Track for Maintenance Planning. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport, Vol. 100, No. 4, 1993, pp. 231–236.
