Hazardous material transportation is a significant issue in relation to both environment and humanity. In recent years, studies and attempts to minimize the risks of hazardous material transportation or selection of transportation mode to reduce potential hazards have increased. This study aims to evaluate the hazards arising from each stage of hazardous material transport modes and the risks arising from these hazards with an integrated approach simultaneously. Fault tree analysis (FTA) is used to evaluate hazardous material transportation modes with their stage components; probabilities of potential hazards are calculated for the risks arising from those hazards and evaluated with The Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) approach. Last, to determine the critical levels of transportation modes, calculated risk scores and parameters that affect those transportation modes, such as speed, cost, and capacity, are assessed with Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) and DEMATEL approach. Ultimately, critical levels of transportation modes are ranked as highway, marine and inland, airway, and railway.
ÖzerB. B.Türkiye’de Karayolu İle Tehlikeli Madde Taşımacılığının Avrupa Anlaşması (adr)’na Geçiş Kapsamında Analizi. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2011.
2.
Transportation Research Board, Committee for a Study of the Feasibility of a Hazardous Materials Transportation Cooperative Research Program. Cooperative Research for Hazardous Materials Transportation: Defining the Need, Converging on Solutions. Special Report 283. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005.
3.
FabianoB.CurròF.ReverberiA. P.PastorinoR.Dangerous Good Transportation by Road: From Risk Analysis to Emergency Planning. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. 18, No. 4–6, 2005, pp. 403–413.
4.
BubbicoR.MaschioG.MazzarottaB.MilazzoM. F.ParisiE.Risk Management of Road and Rail Transport of Hazardous Materials in Sicily. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2006, pp. 32–38.
5.
VermaM.VerterV.Railroad Transportation of Dangerous Goods: Population Exposure to Airborne Toxins. Computers & Operations Research, Vol. 34, No. 5, 2007, pp. 1287–1303.
6.
PaltrinieriN.LanducciG.MolagM.BonviciniS.SpadoniG.CozzaniV.Risk Reduction in Road and Rail LPG Transportation by Passive Fire Protection. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 167, No. 1–3, 2009, pp. 332–344.
7.
LozanoA.MuñozÁ.MacíasL.AntúnJ. P.Hazardous Materials Transportation in Mexico City: Chlorine and Gasoline Cases. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 19, No. 5, 2011, pp. 779–789.
8.
DadkarY.JonesD.NozickL.Identifying Geographically Diverse Routes for the Transportation of Hazardous Materials. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 44, No. 3, 2008, pp. 333–349.
9.
DadkarY.NozickL.JonesD.Optimizing Facility Use Restrictions for the Movement of Hazardous Materials. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 44, No. 2, 2010, pp. 267–281.
10.
BonviciniS.SpadoniG.A Hazmat Multi-Commodity Routing Model Satisfying Risk Criteria: A Case Study. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2008, pp. 345–358.
11.
CaramiaM.GiordaniS.IovanellaA.On the Selection of K Routes in Multiobjective Hazmat Route Planning. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2010, pp. 239–251.
12.
XieY.LuW.WangW.QuadrifoglioL.A Multimodal Location and Routing Model for Hazardous Materials Transportation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 227, 2012, pp. 135–141.
13.
PradhanangaR.TaniguchiE.YamadaT.Ant Colony System Based Routing and Scheduling for Hazardous Material Transportation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2010, pp. 6097–6108.
14.
PradhanangaR.TaniguchiE.YamadaT.QureshiA. G.Bi-Objective Decision Support System for Routing and Scheduling of Hazardous Materials. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2014, pp. 135–148.
15.
SzetoW.Routing and Scheduling Hazardous Material Shipments: Nash Game Approach. Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2013, pp. 237–260.
16.
ChakrabartiU.ParikhJ.Risk-Based Route Evaluation Against Country-Specific Criteria of Risk Tolerability for Hazmat Transportation Through Indian State Highways. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2013, pp. 723–736.
17.
RenC.YuanX.WangJ.ZhangX.LiJ.Study on Emergency Response Rank Mode of Flammable and Explosive Hazardous Materials Road Transportation. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 45, 2012, pp. 830–835.
18.
PlanasE.PastorE.PresuttoF.TixierJ.Results of the MITRA Project: Monitoring and Intervention for the Transportation of Dangerous Goods. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 152, No. 2, 2008, pp. 516–526.
19.
VerterV.KaraB. Y.A Path-Based Approach for Hazmat Transport Network Design. Management Science, Vol. 54, No. 1, 2008, pp. 29–40.
20.
BiancoL.CaramiaM.GiordaniS.A Bilevel Flow Model for Hazmat Transportation Network Design. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2009, pp. 175–196.
21.
KazantziV.KazantzisN.GerogiannisV.C.Risk Informed Optimization of a Hazardous Material Multi-Periodic Transportation Model. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. 24, No. 6, 2011, pp. 767–773.
22.
GzaraF.A Cutting Plane Approach for Bilevel Hazardous Material Transport Network Design. Operations Research Letters, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2013, pp. 40–46.
23.
ZhaoL.WangX.QianY.Analysis of Factors That Influence Hazardous Material Transportation Accidents Based on Bayesian Networks: A Case Study in China. Safety Science, Vol. 50, No. 4, 2012, pp. 1049–1055.
24.
PesicD. J.BlagojevicM. D.GlisovicS. M.The Model of Air Pollution Generated by Fire Chemical Accident in An Urban Street Canyon. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2011, pp. 321–326.
25.
EllisJ.Analysis of Accidents and Incidents Occurring During Transport of Packaged Dangerous Goods by Sea. Safety Science, Vol. 49, No. 8–9, 2011, pp. 1231–1237.
26.
YangJ.LiF.ZhouJ.ZhangL.HuangL.BiJ.A Survey on Hazardous Materials Accidents During Road Transport in China from 2000 to 2008. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 184, No. 1–3, 2010, pp. 647–653.
27.
ErkutE.VerterV.A Framework for Hazardous Materials Transport Risk Assessment. Risk Analysis, Vol. 15, No. 5, 1995, pp. 589–601.
28.
VerterV.KaraB. Y.A GIS-Based Framework for Hazardous Materials Transport Risk Assessment. Risk Analysis, Vol. 21, No. 6, 2001, pp. 1109–1120.
29.
CozzaniV.BonviciniS.SpadoniG.ZanelliS.Hazmat Transport: A Methodological Framework for the Risk Analysis of Marshalling Yards. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 147, No. 1–2, 2007, pp. 412–423.
30.
GlickmanT. S.ErkutE.Assessment of Hazardous Material Risks for Rail Yard Safety. Safety Science, Vol. 45, No. 7, 2007, pp. 813–822.
31.
KawprasertA.Quantitative Analysis of Options to Reduce Risk of Hazardous Materials Transportation by Railroad. Doctoral dissertation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2011.
32.
ReniersG. L.De JonghK.GorrensB.LauwersD.LeestVanWitloxF.Transportation Risk Analysis Tool for hazardous Substances (TRANS)–A User-Friendly, Semi-Quantitative Multi-Mode Hazmat Transport Route Safety Risk Estimation Methodology for Flanders. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 15, No. 8, 2010, pp. 489–496.
33.
López-AtamorosL. G.Fernández-VillagómezG.Cruz-GómezM. J.Durán-de-BazúaC.Development of a Relative Ranking Risk Index for Risk Assessment in the Transportation of Liquefied Petroleum Gas in Mexico City’s Metropolitan Area. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, Vol. 17, No. 6, 2011, pp. 1193–1209.
34.
ChakrabartiU. K.ParikhJ. K.Applying HAZAN Methodology to Hazmat Transportation Risk Assessment. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, Vol. 90, No. 5, 2012, pp. 368–375.
35.
ReniersG.DullaertW.A Method to Assess Multi-Modal Hazmat Transport Security Vulnerabilities: Hazmat Transport SVA. Transport Policy, Vol. 28, 2013, pp. 103–113.
36.
LiuX.SaatM. R.BarkanC. P.Integrated Risk Reduction Framework to Improve Railway Hazardous Materials Transportation Safety. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 260, 2013, pp. 131–140.
37.
SaatM. R.WerthC. J.SchaefferD.YoonH.BarkanC. P.Environmental Risk Analysis of Hazardous Material Rail Transportation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 264, 2014, pp. 560–569.
38.
WangX.ZhuJ.MaF.LiC.CaiY.YangZ.Bayesian Network-Based Risk Assessment for Hazmat Transportation on the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Transfer Project in China. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2016, pp. 841–857.
39.
GöçmenE.ErolR.The Problem of Sustainable Intermodal Transportation: A Case Study of an International Logistics Company, Turkey. Sustainability, Vol. 10, No. 11, 2018, pp. 4268.
40.
GhalehS.OmidvariM.NassiriP.MomeriM.LavasaniS. M. M.Pattern of Safety Risk Assessment in Road Fleet Transportation of Hazardous Materials (Oil Materials). Safety Science, Vol. 116, 2019, pp. 1–12.
41.
DerseO.GöçmenE.Transportation Mode Choice Using Fault Tree Analysis and Mathematical Modeling Approach. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, Vol. 13, No. 6, 2021, pp. 642–660.
42.
ZhouK.HuangG.WangS.FangK.Research on Transportation Safety of Hazardous Chemicals Based on Fault Tree Analysis (FTA). Proc., 9th International Conference on Industrial Technology and Management (ICITM). Oxford, UK, IEEE, 2020, pp. 206–209.
43.
ÇetinyokuşS.MertA.Denizyolu tehlikeli madde taşımacılığına yönelik kazaların analizi. Journal of Humanities and Tourism Research, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2020, pp. 41–54.
44.
YuanC.CuiH.TaoB.WangW.Fault Tree Analysis for Emergency Process of Fire Accident in Oil-Gas Storage and Transportation. Journal of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2018, p. 04018011.
45.
GabusA.FontelaE.World Problems, An Invitation to Further Thought Within the Framework of DEMATEL. Battelle Geneva Research Center, Geneva, Switzerland, 1972, pp. 1–8.
46.
HwangC.-L.YoonK.Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making, in Multiple Attribute Decision Making. In Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Vol. 186, 1981, pp. 58–191.
