Ethical and privacy challenges of artificial intelligence information services among librarians in Thailand

Abstract

The adoption of artificial intelligence in library services introduces significant ethical and privacy challenges, particularly in contexts shaped by emerging data protection regulations. This study examines how librarians in Thailand perceive and navigate ethical issues related to artificial-intelligence-based information services, with particular attention to transparency, fairness, accountability, and data privacy under the Personal Data Protection Act. Using a qualitative approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 librarians from academic and public libraries. The findings reveal that while artificial intelligence tools enhance service efficiency, librarians face persistent challenges related to limited transparency, unclear governance structures, and insufficient institutional guidance. Privacy concerns—intensified by requirements to comply with the Personal Data Protection Act—emerge as a dominant ethical issue influencing decision-making and user trust. The study contributes empirically by demonstrating how global ethical principles, particularly UNESCO's framework, are interpreted and operationalized in a developing-country context. Based on these findings, the study proposes a contextualized implementation model to support the responsible adoption of artificial intelligence in libraries. The results highlight the need for clearer governance mechanisms, enhanced ethical literacy, and context-sensitive policy development.

Keywords

artificial intelligence AI libraries ethical governance privacy protection user trust librarians Thailand AI ethics Personal Data Protection Act PDPA compliance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahmed

(2025) Sample size for saturation in qualitative research: Debates, definitions, and strategies. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health 5: Article 100171.

American Library Association (2021) Code of ethics of the American Library Association. https://www.ala.org/tools/ethics (accessed 20 October 2025)

Avuglah

Asamoah

Lamptey

(2020) Attitudes and concerns of academic librarians and university students regarding privacy in Ghana. College and Research Libraries 81(6): 905–929.

Barocas

Selbst

(2016) Big data’s disparate impact. California Law Review 104(3): 671–732.

Barsha

Munshi

(2024) Implementing artificial intelligence in library services: A review of current prospects and challenges of developing countries. Library Hi Tech News 41(1): 7–10.

Birkstedt

Aroles

Vakkuri

(2023) AI governance: Themes, knowledge gaps and future agendas. Internet Research 33(7): 133–166.

Braun

Clarke

(2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101.

Bunpot

(2023) Librarianship in the age of artificial intelligence. Journal of the Library Association of Thailand 67(2): 18–27.

Cheong

(2024) Transparency and accountability in AI systems: Safeguarding wellbeing in the age of algorithmic decision-making. Frontiers in Human Dynamics 6: 1421273.

10.

Cox AM and De Brasdefer M (2025) IFLA AI entry point for libraries and AI. Available at: https://repository.ifla.org/items/f197f327-dc49-4743-bb57-0a373505da8b (accessed 14 October 2025).

11.

Davis

(2025) Disinformation in the era of generative AI: Challenges, detection strategies, and countermeasures. In: Luttrell R and Wallace AA (eds) Public Relations and the Rise of AI. Routledge, pp. 242–269.

12.

Dinev

Hart

(2006) An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Information Systems Research 17(1): 61–80.

13.

Ferguson

Thornley

Gibb

(2016) Beyond codes of ethics: How library and information professionals navigate ethical dilemmas in a complex and dynamic information environment. International Journal of Information Management 36(4): 543–556.

14.

Gefen

Karahanna

Straub

(2003) Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly 27(1): 51–90.

15.

Helmiatin

Kahar

(2024) Investigating the adoption of AI in higher education: A study of public universities in Indonesia. Cogent Education 11(1): Article 2380175.

16.

Hodonu-Wusu

(2025) The rise of artificial intelligence in libraries: The ethical and equitable methodologies, and prospects for empowering library users. AI and Ethics 5(2): 755–765.

17.

IFLA (2012) IFLA code of ethics for librarians and other information workers. Available at: https://www.ifla.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/assets/faife/publications/IFLA%20Code%20of%20Ethics%20-%20Long_0.pdf (accessed 14 October 2025).

18.

Islam

Ahmad

Aqil

, et al. (2025) Application of artificial intelligence in academic libraries: A bibliometric analysis and knowledge mapping. Discover Artificial Intelligence 5: Article 59.

19.

Jobin

Ienca

Vayena

(2019) The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence 1(9): 389–399.

20.

Jones

Salo

(2018) Learning analytics and the academic library: Professional ethics commitments at a crossroads. College and Research Libraries 79(3): 304–323.

21.

(2024) Evaluating AI literacy in academic libraries: A survey study. College and Research Libraries 85(5): 635–668.

22.

Martínez-Camacho

Saavedra-Alamillas

Pacheco-Mendoza

, et al. (2025) Generative artificial intelligence and university libraries in Latin America. IFLA Journal 51(3): 647–659.

23.

Mayer

Davis

Schoorman

(1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review 20(3): 709–734.

24.

McKnight

Choudhury

Kacmar

(2002) Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce. Information Systems Research 13(3): 334–359.

25.

Miller

(2019) Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. Artificial Intelligence 267: 1–38.

26.

Mutia

Masrek

Baharuddin

, et al. (2024) An exploratory comparative analysis of librarians’ views on AI support for learning experiences, lifelong learning, and digital literacy in Malaysia and Indonesia. Publications 12(3): Article 21.

27.

Ngulube

Vincent Mosha

(2025) Integrating artificial intelligence-based technologies “safely” in academic libraries: An overview through a scoping review. Technical Services Quarterly 42(1): 46–67.

28.

Nguyen

Suthiprapa

(2024) Management of library services during the pandemic crisis in university libraries of Thailand and Vietnam. Journal of Academic Librarianship 50(2): Article 102850.

29.

Nissenbaum

(2010) Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford University Press.

30.

Paladhi

Maruthaveeran

(2024) Evaluating AI literacy proficiency among LIS researchers in ASEAN. Library Hi Tech News 41(4): 6–8.

31.

Pavlou

(2003) Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 7(3): 101–134.

32.

Pitithanabodee

(2025) Use of ChatGPT in library services. TLA Bulletin 69(1): 1–20.

33.

Sousa

(2025) Ethical and practical implications of AI in academic library research. IFLA Journal. Epub ahead of print 10 November 2025. DOI: 10.1177/03400352251391753.

34.

UNESCO (2021) Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. UNESCO. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137 (accessed 12 September 2025).

35.

Wheatley

Hervieux

(2019) Artificial intelligence in academic libraries: An environmental scan. Information Services and Use 39(4): 347–356.

36.

Yoon

Andrews

Ward

(2022) Perceptions on adopting artificial intelligence and related technologies in libraries: Public and academic librarians in North America. Library Hi Tech 40(6): 1893–1915.