This study examined the influence of demographic characteristics and technological skills on students’ perceived search self-efficacy and their actual search performance. A printed questionnaire was used to collect data on students’ demographic backgrounds and technological skills, search self-efficacy, and search performance on a set of task-based questions. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the demographic data and technological skills, self-efficacy levels, and task performance scores, while inferential statistics were conducted to compare the self-efficacy and task performance scores across the groups. Additionally, Pearson's correlation was used to examine the relationships between various aspects of search self-efficacy and total task scores. The findings revealed that while students exhibited moderate search self-efficacy, they performed poorly on task-based questions. Significant differences in self-efficacy and task performance were observed based on demographic backgrounds and technological skill levels. Pearson's correlation identified weak but significant positive relationships between search self-efficacy and task scores, and strong positive correlations among the self-efficacy measures.
AdaherASerinO (2012) Teacher candidates’ information literacy and self-efficacy. Online Journal of Science and Technology2(2): 71–78.
2.
AharonyNGazitT (2019) Factors affecting students’ information literacy self-efficacy. Library Hi Tech37(2): 170–183.
3.
AharonyNGazitT (2020) Students’ information literacy self-efficacy: An exploratory study. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science52(1): 224–236.
4.
AharonyNGurH (2017) The relationships between personality, perceptual, cognitive and technological variables and students’ level of information literacy. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science51(2): 527–544.
5.
AhmedSMZMcKnightCOppenheimC (2004) A study of users’ performance and satisfaction with the Web of Science IR interface. Journal of Information Science30(5): 459–468.
6.
AhmedSMZMcKnightCOppenheimC (2005) A study of learning and retention with a web-based IR interface. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science37(1): 7–16.
7.
AjisebutuAEAdetayoAOkedijiOG, et al. (2024) Information technology self-efficacy and library portal use in Nigerian universities. Journal of Digital Learning and Education4(3): 223–236.
8.
AkterTAhmedSMZ (2024) University students’ information literacy skills and impact of training in Bangladesh. IFLA Journal50(3): 620–632.
9.
AlbionP (2007) Student teachers’ confidence and competence for finding information on the Internet. In: Proceedings of SITE 2007 – Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference(ed R Carlsen, K McFerrin, J Price, R Weber and D Willis), pp.1244–1249. San Antonio, Texas: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
10.
AliyuMB (2017) Efficiency of Boolean search strings for information retrieval. American Journal of Engineering Research6(11): 216–222.
11.
Al-MaskariASandersonM (2011) The effect of user characteristics on search effectiveness in information retrieval. Information Processing and Management47(5): 719–729.
AtikuzzamanMAhmedSMZ (2023) Investigating the impact of demographic and academic variables on assessing students’ perceived information literacy self-efficacy. Journal of Academic Librarianship49(4): Article 102733.
14.
BaldwinANGaddEBalatsoukasP (2010) A study of students’ information searching strategies. CEBE Transactions7(2): 3–25.
15.
BanduraA (1977) Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychology Review84(2): 191–215.
16.
BorgmanCL (1986) Why are online catalogs hard to use? Lessons learned from information-retrieval studies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science37(6): 387–400.
17.
BorgmanCL (1989) All users of information retrieval systems are not created equal: An exploration into individual differences. Information Processing and Management25(3): 237–251.
18.
BøyumIAabøS (2015) The information practices of business PhD students. New Library World116(3–4): 187–200.
19.
BradleyRLBrowneBLKelleyHM (2017) Examining the influence of self-efficacy and self-regulation in online learning. College Student Journal51(4): 518–530.
20.
BronsteinJ (2014) The role of perceived self-efficacy in the information seeking behavior of library and information science students. Journal of Academic Librarianship40(2): 101–106.
21.
BrymanA (2008) Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.
22.
ChangCJTsengJMLiuCC (2013) The effect of semantic technologies on the exploration of the Web of Knowledge by female and male users. Electronic Library31(3): 376–398.
23.
ChuSKWLawN (2007) Development of information search expertise: Postgraduates’ knowledge of searching skills. Portal: Libraries and the Academy7(3): 295–316.
24.
ConwayK (2011) How prepared are students for postgraduate study? A comparison of the information literacy skills of commencing undergraduate and postgraduate information studies students at Curtin University. Australian Academic and Research Libraries42(2): 121–135.
25.
DannBJDrabbleAMartinJ (2022) Reading between the lines: An examination of first-year university students’ perceptions of and confidence with information literacy. Journal of Information Literacy16(1): 50–69.
26.
De MeulemeesterA (2013) The “Information Literacy Self-Efficacy Scale” and the medical curriculum at Ghent University. In: Worldwide commonalities and challenges in information literacy research and practice: European conference on information literacy, ECIL 2013(ed S Kurbanoğlu, E Grassian, D Mizrachi, R Catts and S Špiranec), Istanbul, Turkey, 22–25 October, 2013, pp.465–470. Heidelberg: Springer.
27.
DemirelMAkkoyunluB (2017) Prospective teachers’ lifelong learning tendencies and information literacy self-efficacy. Educational Research and Reviews12(6): 329–337.
28.
DempseyMValentiAM (2016) Student use of keywords and limiters in web-scale discovery searching. Journal of Academic Librarianship42(3): 200–206.
29.
DinetJFavartMPasseraultJM (2004) Searching for information in an online public access catalogue (OPAC): The impacts of information search expertise on the use of Boolean operators. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning20(5): 338–346.
30.
DingRMaF (2013) Assessment of university student web searching competency by a task-based online test: A case study at Wuhan University, China. Electronic Library31(3): 359–375.
31.
DubickiE (2015) Writing a research paper: Students explain their process. Reference Services Review43(4): 673–688.
32.
EbijuwaASMabawonkuI (2019) Computer self-efficacy as a predictor of undergraduates’ use of electronic library resources in federal universities in south-west Nigeria. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication68(4–5): 323–336.
33.
FerdowsJAhmedSMZ (2015) An empirical investigation of information skills among undergraduate students at Dhaka University. Library Review64(4–5): 274–284.
34.
FordNMillerDMossN (2001) The role of individual differences in Internet searching: An empirical study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology52(12): 1049–1066.
35.
FridayJJoshuaM (2019) Assessment of information literacy competency among students of College of Nursing and Midwifery, Kafanchan, Kaduna State, Nigeria. International Journal of Library and Information Science11(5): 58–65.
36.
GriffithsJRBrophyP (2005) Student searching behaviour and the web: Use of academic resources and google. Library Trends53(4): 539–554.
37.
Gutierrez-AngelNSanchez-GarciaJNMercader-RubioI, et al. (2022) Digital literacy in the university setting: A literature review of empirical studies between 2010 and 2021. Frontiers in Psychology13: Article 896800.
38.
HinchliffeLJRandACollierJ (2018) Predictable information literacy misconceptions of first-year college students. Communications in Information Literacy12(1): 4–18.
39.
HollidayAR (2007) Doing and Writing Qualitative Research. Sage.
40.
KeshavarzHEsmaeili GiviMVafaeianA (2016) Students’ sense of self-efficacy in searching information from the web: A PLS approach. Webology13(2): 16–31.
41.
KorobiliSMalliariAZapounidouS (2011) Factors that influence information-seeking behavior: The case of Greek graduate students. Journal of Academic Librarianship37(2): 155–165.
42.
KurbanogluSAkkoyunluBUmayA (2006) Developing the information literacy self-efficacy scale. Journal of Documentation62(6): 730–743.
43.
KwonNSongH (2011) Personality traits, gender, and information competency among college students. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science16(1): 87–107.
44.
LangeMHenkelRMüllerW, et al. (2014) Information retrieval in life sciences: A programmatic survey. In: ChenMHofestädtR (eds) Approaches in Integrative Bioinformatics. Springer, pp.73–109.
45.
LiNKirkupG (2007) Gender and cultural differences in Internet use: A study of China and the UK. Computers and Education48(2): 301–317.
46.
LiuCZhangLSongX (2016) Are self-assessment of search ability and performance reliable?Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology53(1): 1–4.
47.
LorigoLPanBHembrookeH, et al. (2006) The influence of task and gender on search and evaluation behavior using Google. Information Processing and Management42(4): 1123–1131.
48.
LoweMSStoneSMMaxsonBK, et al. (2020) Boolean redux: Performance of advanced versus simple Boolean searches and implications for upper-level instruction. Journal of Academic Librarianship46(6): Article 102234.
49.
MahmoodK (2013) Relationship of students’ perceived information literacy skills with personal and academic variables. Libri63(3): 232–239.
50.
MahmoodK (2017) Reliability and validity of self-efficacy scales assessing students’ information literacy skills: A systematic review. Electronic Library35(5): 1035–1051.
51.
MakondoFNKanyengoCWKakanaF (2018) Online search behaviour of University of Zambia library and information studies students. Library Hi Tech36(4): 720–732.
52.
MeadSESitRARogersWA, et al. (2000) Influences of general computer experience and age on library database search performance. Behaviour and Information Technology19(2): 107–123.
53.
MichalakRRysavyMDWesselA (2017) Students’ perceptions of their information literacy skills: The confidence gap between male and female international graduate students. Journal of Academic Librarianship43(2): 100–104.
54.
MittermeyerD (2005) Incoming first year undergraduate students: How information literate are they?Education for Information23(4): 203–232.
55.
MonoiSO'HanlonNDiazKR (2005) Online searching skills: Development of an inventory to assess self-efficacy. Journal of Academic Librarianship31(2): 98–105.
56.
MunejaPS (2025) Assessing electronic resource searching competency among postgraduate students. Information Discovery and Delivery53(4): 470–480.
57.
NakhaieMRPikeRM (1998) Social origins, social statuses, and home computer access and use. Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie23(4): 427–450.
58.
NaveedMAMahmoodM (2019) Information literacy self-efficacy of business students in Pakistan. Libri69(4): 303–314.
59.
NaveedMAMahmoodM (2021) Correlatives of business students’ perceived information literacy self-efficacy in the digital information environment. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science54(2): 294–305.
60.
OgoEPUchenduBO (2024) Information needs and seeking behaviour of final year students of a specialized university in Nigeria. Information Impact15(1): 129–142.
61.
PalmquistRAKimKS (2000) Cognitive style and on-line database search experience as predictors of web search performance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science51(6): 558–566.
62.
PetterssonK (2022) Teaching information literacy in the humanities: Engaging students with primary sources and cultural heritage material. Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education13(1): 56–62.
63.
ReisoğluİÇebiABahçekapılıT (2022) Online information searching behaviours: Examining the impact of task complexity, information searching experience, and cognitive style. Interactive Learning Environments30(3): 417–434.
64.
RenWH (2000) Library instruction and college student self-efficacy in electronic information searching. Journal of Academic Librarianship26(5): 323–328.
65.
SengCCarlonMKJCrossJS (2021) Undergraduate information literacy self-efficacy: A cross-sectional study of Cambodian provincial universities. Information Research26(3): Article 903.
66.
ShonfeldMAharonyNNadel-KritzN (2021) Teachers’ perceived information literacy self-efficacy. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science54(3): 494–507.
67.
SoroyaSHIqbalMMYSoroyaMS, et al. (2021) Predictors of information literacy self-efficacy among medical students: PLS-SEM analysis. Library Hi Tech39(2): 670–689.
68.
TalimMCendόnBSérgioT (2016) The impact of online searching training on information behavior. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries5(4): 777–785.
69.
TariqMMahmoodKRehmanSU, et al. (2018) Online information searching skills of business students. Pakistan Journal of Information Management and Libraries20: 39–59.
70.
TasmimSAtikuzzamanM (2025) Differences in university students’ perceived and actual information literacy self-efficacy: A comparative study in a developing country setting. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. Epub ahead of print 26 September 2025. DOI: 10.1177/09610006251369124.
71.
TellaAOyeniranSIbironkeES (2021) Predictors of web search effectiveness from the perspective of library and information science students. Regional Journal of Information and Knowledge Management6(2): 36–53.
72.
TsaiCCChuangSCLiangJC, et al. (2011) Self-efficacy in Internet-based learning environments: A literature review. Journal of Educational Technology and Society14(4): 222–240.
73.
TsaiMJLiangJCHouHT, et al. (2012) University students’ online information searching strategies in different search contexts. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology28(5): 881–895.
74.
TsaiMJTsaiCC (2003) Information searching strategies in web-based science learning: The role of Internet self-efficacy. Innovations in Education and Teaching International40(1): 43–50.
75.
WaqasMRafiqSYaC, et al. (2024) Assessing the relationship between mobile devices usage, self-efficacy and online information seeking behavior: A demographic analysis in academic rural context. Aslib Journal of Information Management. Epub ahead of print 21 June 2024. DOI: 10.1108/AJIM-10-2023-0446.
76.
WeberHBeckerDHillmertS (2019) Information-seeking behaviour and academic success in higher education: Which search strategies matter for grade differences among university students and how does this relevance differ by field of study?Higher Education77(4): 657–678.
77.
WoodRAtkinsPTaberneroC (2000) Self-efficacy and strategy on complex tasks. Applied Psychology49(3): 430–446.
78.
YanYZhaDYanA, et al. (2016) Exploring the effect of individual differences on self-efficacy in getting information. Information Development32(4): 1097–1108.
79.
YauHKChengALF (2012) Gender difference of confidence in using technology for learning. Journal of Technology Studies38(2): 74–79.
80.
ZhouM (2014) Gender difference in web search perceptions and behavior: Does it vary by task performance?Computers and Education78: 174–184.
81.
ZhouM (2023) Students’ metacognitive judgments in online search: A calibration study. Education and Information Technologies28(3): 2619–2638.
