This study aims to explore and identify competency development needs among library and information science educators. A qualitative research methodology was employed, with data collected through semi-structured interviews with lecturers from a Vietnamese library and information science faculty. Educators’ needs related to competencies and forms of development were analysed. The study identifies four main areas of competency requiring development: professional expertise, teaching skills, research capabilities, and support competencies such as soft skills and foreign language proficiency. Applying advanced technologies, attending formal and informal training activities, and self-learning, with the institution's support playing a vital role, were recognized as crucial for faculty development. Based on these findings, the study proposes flexible and continuing training programmes, personalized for each faculty group, while emphasizing the importance of technology integration in teaching within developing countries.
AbubakarBM (2021) Sustainable development of library and information science (LIS) education in Nigeria in the 21st century. In: NwokochaUIbenneSK (eds) Dynamics of Library and Information Science Practices in the 21st Century. Lagos, Nigeria: Zeh Communications, 98–108.
2.
AhaiuzuBENyemezuCONsirimO (2020) Assessment of ICT skills of LIS educators for the adoption of blended learning in Rivers State, Nigeria. Information Impact11(3): 51–62.
3.
AhmadKSheikhARafiM (2020) Scholarly research in library and information science: An analysis based on ISI Web of Science. Performance Measurement and Metrics21(1): 18–32.
4.
AjiboyeOOAramideOOOketunjiI (2022) Knowledge acquisition practices among library and information science educators in universities in South-West, Nigeria. Integrity Journal of Education and Training6(5): 101–105.
5.
AjuDT (2019) Relationship between subject specialist knowledge and job satisfaction of library and information science educators in Nigerian universities. Library and Information Perspectives and Research1: 16–25.
6.
AkwangNEEdetGT (2018) Building library and information science (LIS) educators’ competencies in the digital era for sustainable development in Nigeria. International Journal of Applied Technologies in Library and Information Management4(3): 37–46.
BirdNJ (2021) LIS education responds to the evolving field. In: CrumptonMABirdNJ (eds) Emerging Human Resource Trends in Academic Libraries. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield., 73–88.
9.
BuiLT (2004) Về năng lực nghiên cứu khoa học của đội ngũ GV tại các cơ sở đào tạo thư viện - thông tin. Thong tin & Tu lieu3: 1–6. Avalable at https://vjol.info.vn/index.php/VJIAD/article/view/615/525 (accessed 5 April 2025).
DanielEMehoLIMoranBB (2015) Education for library and information science in the Arab states. In: ClickABAhmedSHillJ, et al. (eds) Library and Information Science in the Middle East and North Africa. Berlin: De Gruyter, 173–234.
12.
Darling-HammondL (2017) Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice?European Journal of Teacher Education40(3): 291–309.
13.
DerakhshanMHassanzadehMNazariM (2015) Developing information literate librarians: A study of LIS academics pedagogical approaches in the development of information literacy competencies. Journal of Academic Librarianship41(6): 777–785.
14.
FergusonCHarringtonC (2020) NASIG core competencies: Building a bridge to the LIS curricula and job responsibilities. Serials Librarian78(1–4): 162–167.
15.
GanaieSA (2014) Perception of Indian LIS faculty about the importance of service-related competencies: An analytical study. Journal of Advances in Library and Information Science3(1): 11–15.
16.
JainP (2017) Delivery of library and information science curriculum: A joint endeavour among LIS educators and library practitioners at the University of Botswana. Library Review66(6–7): 482–504.
17.
JamaliHRNabaviM (2021) Scholarship of teaching and learning: Evolution of research on library and information science education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science62(3): 287–302.
18.
KennedyMRBrancoliniKR (2012) Academic librarian research: A survey of attitudes, involvement, and perceived capabilities. College and Research Libraries73(5): 431–448.
19.
KennedyMRBrancoliniKR (2018) Academic librarian research: An update to a survey of attitudes, involvement, and perceived capabilities. College and Research Libraries79(6): 822–851.
20.
KhanAHussainA (2023) A bibliometric study of collaborative research productivity among library and information science academicians in Pakistan 1975–2021. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication72(8–9): 753–764.
21.
LathamDGrossMWitteS (2013) Preparing teachers and librarians to collaborate to teach 21st century skills: Views of LIS and education faculty. School Library Research16: 1–23. Available at http://www.ala.org/aasl/slr/volume16/latham-gross-witte (accessed 26 November 2024).
22.
LundBDWangTShamsiA, et al. (2023) Barriers to scholarly publishing among library and information science researchers: International perspectives. Information Development39(2): 376–389.
23.
MaestroRSRamos-EcleviaMEcleviaCL, et al. (2018) Teaching diversity, becoming inclusive: Perspectives and possibilities in ASEAN library and information science schools. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association67(2): 96–115.
24.
MalikAAmeenK (2021) Appraising the current status, issues and challenges of library and information faculty members in the universities of Pakistan. International Information and Library Review53(2): 187–198.
25.
MauryaSKShuklaANgurtinkhumaRK (2021) Exploring research performance of library and information science faculties in Google Scholar: A scientometric assessment. Journal of Indian Library Association57(3): 121–138.
26.
MuthuMSivaramanMASinghK (2015) LIS education issues and challenges in the present era. Gyankosh6(1): 46–60.
27.
NeshatNAlamiZS (2019) Scientific output by faculty members of library and information science in governmental research centers in Iran. Journal of Studies in Library and Information Science11(2): 197–222.
28.
Nguyen+TTNguyenTT (2023) Improving higher education faculty’s research and language competence in Vietnam. Vietnam Journal of Education7(2): 146–156. DOI: 10.52296/vje.2023.271.
29.
OnuohaJAkidiAChukwuekeA (2019) Effects of ICT skills in knowledge sharing: A focus on library and information science educators in Michael Okpara University of Agriculture. Information and Knowledge Management9(8): 21–31.
30.
OsuchukwuNPWagwuV (2020) The library and information science educator: Nurturing for strategic learning experiences. Folia Toruniensia20: 165–180.
31.
PandaJPandaSP (2019) Role of LIS education and competency building for LIS profession in the 21st century. In: CALIBER 2019: 12th convention on automation of libraries in education and research institutions, Bhubaneswar, India, 28–30 November 2019.
32.
Prime Minister of Vietnam (2019) Decision no. 89/QD-TTg of the Prime Minister: Approving the proposal for enhancing the competencies of lecturers and administrators of higher education institutions meeting requirements for radical changes in education and training during the period of 2019–2030. Available at https://vanban.chinhphu.vn/default.aspx?pageid=27160&docid=196014 (accessed 05 April 2025).
33.
RafiqMJabeenMArifM (2017) Continuing education (CE) of LIS professionals: Need analysis and role of LIS schools. Journal of Academic Librarianship43(1): 25–33.
34.
RajuJ (2020) Future LIS education and evolving global competency requirements for the digital information environment: An epistemological overview. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science61(3): 342–356.
35.
RajuJ (2021) Shaping LIS education for blended professionals in a pluralist information environment: Global reflections. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science62(4): 366–382.
36.
RajuJChuCMCunninghamC (2023) The IFLA guidelines for professional LIS education programmes: Competencies toward excellence in professional practice. In: ALISE annual conference: Bridge the gap: Teaching, learning, practice and competencies, Milwaukee, WI, USA, 2–5 October 2023.
37.
SalamiRSakaKBitagiM, et al. (2021) The role of academic social media in enhancing collaborative research activities of library and information science educators in Nigerian. International Journal of Information Management Sciences5(1): 15–24.
38.
SaundersL (2015) Professional perspectives on library and information science education. Library Quarterly85(4): 427–453.
39.
SaundersLBajjalyS (2022) The importance of soft skills to LIS education. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science63(2): 187–215.
40.
ShahSHPeiLChenT (2023) Evaluation of factors determining the development and progress of library and information science in different Pakistani universities. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication74(1–2): 598–611.
41.
ShahSHShahNUJbeenA (2024) Exploration of LIS professionals efforts in Pakistan towards the improvements of technological competencies in 21st century. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication73(4–5): 596–613.
42.
ShulmanL (1987) Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review57(1): 1–23.
43.
SiddiqueNUr RehmanSKhanMA, et al. (2021) Library and information science research in Pakistan: A bibliometric analysis, 1957–2018. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science53(1): 89–102.
44.
ThapaN (2021) Building competencies in LIS students – focusing beyond core LIS and ICT skills: What LIS educators have to say. International Journal of Research in Library Science7(1): 229–242.
45.
Ur RehmanS (2008) Developing new competencies among LIS professionals: Challenges for educators. Pakistan Journal of Information Management and Libraries9(1): 52–66.
46.
WalshJACobbPJDe FremeryW, et al. (2022) Digital humanities in the iSchool. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology73(2): 188–203.
47.
XueCWuXZhuL, et al. (2019) Challenges in LIS education in China and the United States. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science60(1): 35–61.
