This study explores student satisfaction with artificial intelligence chatbots in Ethiopian academia, examining their usage patterns, satisfaction levels, benefits, concerns and recommendations for improvement. A quantitative survey was conducted among 367 Ethiopian students from various educational levels and regions. The survey collected data on artificial intelligence chatbot usage, satisfaction, benefits, concerns and improvement recommendations. The findings reveal that artificial intelligence chatbots are frequently used for academic purposes, with students primarily using them for research assistance, assignment help and exam preparation. The students reported moderate to high satisfaction with chatbots, particularly regarding responsiveness, accuracy and adaptability. The benefits included time-saving, improved academic performance and 24/7 access to information. Concerns focused on access to technology, privacy and data security. The students also provided recommendations for enhancing chatbots, such as localisation, cultural sensitivity, affordability and security.
AbbasNPickardTAtwellE, et al. (2021) University student surveys using chatbots: Artificial intelligence conversational agents. In: ZaphirisPIoannouA (eds) Learning and Collaboration Technologies: Games and Virtual Environments for Learning. Cham: Springer, 155–169.
2.
AbbasNWhitfieldJAtwellE, et al. (2022) Online chat and chatbots to enhance mature student engagement in higher education. International Journal of Lifelong Education41(3): 308–326.
3.
AdiguzelTKayaMHCansuFK (2023) Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT. Contemporary Educational Technology15(3): Article ep429.
4.
AithalPSAithalS (2023) Predictive analysis on future impact of ubiquitous education technology in higher education and research. International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters7(3): 88–108.
5.
AlamA (2021) Possibilities and apprehensions in the landscape of artificial intelligence in education. In: 2021 international conference on computational intelligence and computing applications, Nagpur, India, 26–27 November 2021. Available at: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9697272 (accessed 26 October 2023).
6.
AlamriHLowellVWatsonW, et al. (2020) Using personalized learning as an instructional approach to motivate learners in online higher education: Learner self-determination and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education52(3): 322–352.
7.
Al-EmranMAlQudahAAAbbasiGA, et al. (2024) Determinants of using AI-based chatbots for knowledge sharing: Evidence from PLS-SEM and fuzzy sets (fsQCA). IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management71: 4985–4999.
8.
Al-MughairiHBhaskarP (2024) Exploring the factors affecting the adoption of AI techniques in higher education: Insights from teachers’ perspectives on ChatGPT. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning. Epub ahead of print 19 January 2024. DOI: 10.1108/JRIT-09-2023-0129.
9.
AlshahraniA (2023) The impact of ChatGPT on blended learning: Current trends and future research directions. International Journal of Data and Network Science7(4): 2029–2040.
10.
AntonySRamnathR (2023) A phenomenological exploration of students’ perceptions of AI chatbots in higher education. IAFOR Journal of Education11(2): 7–38.
11.
Aydinİ (2024) Ethical issues in educational technology. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi32(1): 138–158.
12.
BhutoriaA (2022) Personalized education and artificial intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a Human-In-The-Loop model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence3: Article 100068.
13.
BilquiseGIbrahimSSalhiehSM (2024) Investigating student acceptance of an academic advising chatbot in higher education institutions. Education and Information Technologies29: 6357–6382.
14.
ChakaC (2023) Fourth industrial revolution – a review of applications, prospects, and challenges for artificial intelligence, robotics and blockchain in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning18: Article 002.
15.
ChangDHLinMP-CHajianS, et al. (2023) Educational design principles of using AI chatbot that supports self-regulated learning in education: Goal setting, feedback, and personalization. Sustainability15(17): Article 12921.
16.
ChembeCNasileleNBMsendoR (2023) The fuss about artificial intelligence in education sector: Should we worry?Zambia ICT Journal7(2): 30–35.
17.
ChenYJensenSAlbertLJ, et al. (2023) Artificial intelligence (AI) student assistants in the classroom: Designing chatbots to support student success. Information Systems Frontiers25(1): 161–182.
18.
ChocarroRCortiñasMMarcos-MatásG (2023) Teachers’ attitudes towards chatbots in education: A technology acceptance model approach considering the effect of social language, bot proactiveness, and users’ characteristics. Educational Studies49(2): 295–313.
19.
ChumkaewS (2023) The development of chatbot provided registration information services for students in distance learning. ABAC Journal43(4): 97–112.
20.
CromptonHJonesMVBurkeD (2022) Affordances and challenges of artificial intelligence in K–12 education: A systematic review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education56(3): 248–268.
21.
ElbannaSArmstrongL (2023) Exploring the integration of ChatGPT in education: Adapting for the future. Management and Sustainability: An Arab Review3(1): 16–29.
22.
FauziFTuhuteruLSampeF, et al. (2023) Analysing the role of ChatGPT in improving student productivity in higher education. Journal on Education5(4): 14886–14891.
23.
ForoughiBSenaliMGIranmaneshM, et al. (2023) Determinants of intention to use ChatGPT for educational purposes: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. Epub ahead of print 29 June 2023. DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2023.2226495.
24.
GillSSXuMPatrosP, et al. (2024) Transformative effects of ChatGPT on modern education: Emerging era of AI chatbots. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems4: 19–23.
25.
GoliMSahuAKBagS, et al. (2023) Users’ acceptance of artificial intelligence-based chatbots: An empirical study. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction19(1): 1–18.
26.
GustiloLOngELapinidMR (2024) Algorithmically-driven writing and academic integrity: Exploring educators’ practices, perceptions, and policies in AI era. International Journal for Educational Integrity20: Article 3.
27.
HallalKHamdanRTlaisS (2023) Exploring the potential of AI-chatbots in organic chemistry: An assessment of ChatGPT and Bard. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence5: Article 100170.
28.
HannanELiuS (2021) AI: New source of competitiveness in higher education. Competitiveness Review33(2): 265–279.
29.
HewKFHuangWDuJ, et al. (2023) Using chatbots to support student goal setting and social presence in fully online activities: Learner engagement and perceptions. Journal of Computing in Higher Education35(1): 40–68.
30.
HuangWHewKFFryerLK (2022) Chatbots for language learning – are they really useful? A systematic review of chatbot-supported language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning38(1): 237–257.
31.
IfelebueguAOKulumePCherukutP (2023) Chatbots and AI in education (AIEd) tools: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching6(2): 332–345.
32.
JavaidMHaleemASinghRP, et al. (2023) Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT tool towards ameliorating the education system. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations3(2): Article 100115.
33.
JiaFSunDLooiC (2024) Artificial intelligence in science education (2013–2023): Research trends in ten years. Journal of Science Education and Technology33: 94–117.
34.
KalimUBibiS (2023) Understanding data-driven decision making approach in Chinese higher education through the lens of Bakers model. International Journal of Chinese Education12(1). DOI: 10.1177/2212585X231162120.
35.
KaryotakiMDrigasASkianisC (2022) Chatbots as cognitive, educational, advisory and coaching systems. Technium Social Sciences Journal30: 109–126.
36.
KasneciESesslerKKüchemannS, et al. (2023) ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences103: Article 102274.
37.
KhanRGuptaNSinhababuA, et al. (2023) Impact of conversational and generative AI systems on libraries: A use case large language model (LLM). Science and Technology Libraries. Epub ahead of print 11 September 2023. DOI: 10.1080/0194262X.2023.2254814.
38.
KuhailMAAl KatheeriHNegreirosJ, et al. (2023a) Engaging students with a chatbot-based academic advising system. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction39(10): 2115–2141.
39.
KuhailMAAlturkiNAlramlawiS, et al. (2023b) Interacting with educational chatbots: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies28(1): 973–1018.
40.
KurniMMohammedMSSrinivasaKG (2023) Chatbots for education. In: KurniMMohammedMSSrinivasaKG (eds) A Beginner’s Guide to Introduce Artificial Intelligence in Teaching and Learning. Cham: Springer, 173–198.
41.
LeeY-FHwangG-JChenP-Y (2022) Impacts of an AI-based chatbot on college students’ after-class review, academic performance, self-efficacy, learning attitude, and motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development70(5): 1843–1865.
42.
LinX (2023) Exploring the role of ChatGPT as a facilitator for motivating self-directed learning among adult learners. Adult Learning. Epub ahead of print 20 June 2023. DOI: 10.1177/10451595231184928.
43.
LoLS (2023) AI policies across the globe: Implications and recommendations for libraries. IFLA Journal49(4): 645–649.
44.
LubingaSMaramuraTCMasiyaT (2023) The Fourth Industrial Revolution adoption: Challenges in South African higher education institutions. Journal of Culture and Values in Education6(2): 1–17.
45.
MaXHuoY (2023) Are users willing to embrace ChatGPT? Exploring the factors on the acceptance of chatbots from the perspective of AIDUA framework. Technology in Society75: Article 102362.
46.
Michel-VillarrealRVilalta-PerdomoESalinas-NavarroDE, et al. (2023) Challenges and opportunities of generative AI for higher education as explained by ChatGPT. Education Sciences13(9): Article 856.
47.
MirandaJNavarreteCNoguezJ, et al. (2021) The core components of Education 4.0 in higher education: Three case studies in engineering education. Computers and Electrical Engineering93: Article 107278.
48.
Moral-SánchezSNReyFJRCebrián-de-la-SernaM (2023) Analysis of artificial intelligence chatbots and satisfaction for learning in mathematics education. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation20: 1–14.
49.
NgDTKLeeMTanRJY, et al. (2023) A review of AI teaching and learning from 2000 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies28(7): 8445–8501.
50.
OkonkwoCWAde-IbijolaA (2021) Chatbots applications in education: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence2: Article 100033.
51.
PandaSChakravartyR (2022) Adapting intelligent information services in libraries: A case of smart AI chatbots. Library Hi Tech News39(1): 12–15.
52.
PandaSKaurN (2023) Exploring the viability of ChatGPT as an alternative to traditional chatbot systems in library and information centers. Library Hi Tech News40(3): 22–25.
53.
PhiriMMunoriyarwaA (2023) Health chatbots in Africa: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research25(1): Article e35573.
54.
PottleJ (2019) Virtual reality and the transformation of medical education. Future Healthcare Journal6(3): 181–185.
55.
RayPP (2023) ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems3: 121–154.
56.
RongGMendezABou AssiE, et al. (2020) Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Review and prediction case studies. Engineering6(3): 291–301.
57.
Sabraz NawazSFathima SanjeethaMBAl MurshidiG, et al. (2024) Acceptance of ChatGPT by undergraduates in Sri Lanka: A hybrid approach of SEM-ANN. Interactive Technology and Smart Education. Epub ahead of print 30 January 2024. DOI: 10.1108/ITSE-11-2023-0227.
58.
Sáiz-ManzanaresMCMarticorena-SánchezRMartín-AntónLJ, et al. (2023) Perceived satisfaction of university students with the use of chatbots as a tool for self-regulated learning. Heliyon9(1): Article e12843.
59.
SakulwichitsintuS (2023) ParichartBOT: A chatbot for automatic answering for postgraduate students of an open university. International Journal of Information Technology15(3): 1387–1397.
60.
SmithC (2022) Automating intellectual freedom: Artificial intelligence, bias, and the information landscape. IFLA Journal48(3): 422–431.
61.
SrinivasaKGKurniMSarithaK (2022) Harnessing the power of AI to education. In: SrinivasaKGKurniMSarithaK (eds) Learning, Teaching, and Assessment Methods for Contemporary Learners: Pedagogy for the Digital Generation. Singapore: Springer Nature, 311–342.
62.
TengYZhangJSunT (2023) Data-driven decision-making model based on artificial intelligence in higher education system of colleges and universities. Expert Systems40(4): Article e12820.
63.
TiwariCKBhat MohdAKhanST, et al. (2023) What drives students toward ChatGPT? An investigation of the factors influencing adoption and usage of ChatGPT. Interactive Technology and Smart Education. Epub ahead of print 29 August 2023. DOI: 10.1108/ITSE-04-2023-0061.
64.
TliliAShehataBAdarkwahMA, et al. (2023) What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments10: Article 15.
65.
TzavaraALavidasKKomisV, et al. (2023) Using personal learning environments before, during and after the pandemic: The case of ‘e-Me’. Education Sciences13(1): Article 87.
66.
Vázquez-CanoEMengual-AndrésSLópez-MenesesE (2021) Chatbot to improve learning punctuation in Spanish and to enhance open and flexible learning environments. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education18: Article 33.
67.
Villegas-ChWArias-NavarreteAPalacios-PachecoX (2020) Proposal of an architecture for the integration of a chatbot with artificial intelligence in a smart campus for the improvement of learning. Sustainability12(4): Article 1500.
68.
WangMWangMXuX, et al. (2023) Unleashing ChatGPT’s power: A case study on optimizing information retrieval in flipped classrooms via prompt engineering. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies17: 629–641.
69.
WuRYuZ (2024) Do AI chatbots improve students’ learning outcomes? Evidence from a meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology55(1): 10–33.
70.
XiaQChiuTKFChaiCS, et al. (2023) The mediating effects of needs satisfaction on the relationships between prior knowledge and self-regulated learning through artificial intelligence chatbot. British Journal of Educational Technology54(4): 967–986.
71.
YesminS (2023) Redesigning tertiary educational evaluation with AI: A task-based analysis of LIS students’ assessment on written tests and utilizing ChatGPT at NSTU. Science and Technology Libraries. Epub ahead of print 26 October 2023. DOI: 10.1080/0194262X.2023.2269230.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
