Undergraduates’ assessment of Science,Technology,Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) information literacy instruction

Abstract

Information literacy instruction is of value to the educational process and is an important contributor to the academic library’s efforts to communicate its value. Similarly, Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) is an important contributor to development. Recognizing the value in information literacy instruction and STEM, the University of the West Indies Mona, Science Branch Library delivers embedded STEM information literacy instruction to students. An assessment of this is instructive on many levels; consequently, this paper seeks to determine undergraduates’ perception of (a) the curriculum delivered and the extent to which it provided the opportunity to learn new information and skills and (b) the facilitators’ performance. A self-reported measure (survey) was used to capture these perceptions. A direct testing measure (test) was administered to add value to students’ reported perception. This paper reveals students have a positive perception of the facilitators’ performance, the STEM information literacy instruction curriculum and the opportunities it provided for learning new information and skills. The findings also provide recommendations for improvement. The paper does not seek to measure the effectiveness of STEM information literacy instruction nor does it seek to measure whether learning has occurred. This paper is of value as assessment provides useful information for monitoring the effectiveness of what is being taught, how it is being delivered, for improving performance and providing benchmarking. Given STEM’s and information literacy instruction’s importance to higher education, its assessment can direct the success of future sessions and ultimately impact the quality of higher education. Additionally, given STEM is a bourgeoning concept in Jamaica and that the resultant literature on STEM in Jamaica is in a developing stage, any documented work on STEM-related activities has value and this paper is the first of its kind in Jamaica.

Keywords

Information literacy instruction Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics STEM

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bennett

Brothen

(2010) Citation analyses as a prioritization tool for instruction program development. Journal of Library Administration 50(5/6): Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2010.488585 (accessed 8 December 2015).

Biggs

Tang

(2011) Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. 4th edn. Berkshire: McGraw Hill.

Blevens

(2012) Catching up with information literacy assessment resources for program evaluation. College & Research Libraries News 73(4): 202–206. Available at: http://crln.acrl.org/content/73/4/202.full (accessed 8 December 2015).

Booth

Lowe

Tagge

. (2014) Degrees of impact: Analysing the effects of progressive librarian course collaborations on student performance. College & Research Libraries. Available at: http://crl.acrl.org/content/early/2014/07/22/crl14-621 (accessed 8 December 2015).

Carbery

Leahy

(2015) Evidence-based instruction: Assessing student work using rubrics and citation analysis to inform instructional design. Journal of Information Literacy 9(1): 74–90. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.11645/9.1.1980 (accessed 8 December 2015).

Crebert

Patrick

C-J

Cragnolini

. (2011) Information Literacy Toolkit. 2nd edn. Available at: http://www.griffith.edu.au/gihe/resources-%20support/graduate-attributes (accessed 10 May 2016).

Dunaway

Orblych

(2011) Formative assessment: Transforming information literacy instruction. Reference Services Review 39(1): 24–41.

Harris

(2013) Enhancing awareness of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) in academic libraries: A Jamaican case study. IFLA Journal 39(3): 251–261.

Jarson

(2010) Information literacy and higher education: A toolkit for curricular integration. College & Research Libraries News 71(10): 534–38. Available at: http://crln.acrl.org/content/71/10/534.full (accessed 10 May 2016).

10.

Kasowitz-Scheer

Pasqualoni

(2002) Information literacy instruction in higher education: Trends and issues. Libraries’ and Librarians’ Publications 34. Available at: http://surface.syr.edu/sul/34 (accessed 11 July 2016).

11.

Mueller

(2014) Authentic Assessment Toolbox. Available at: http://jfmueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/index.htm (accessed 10 May 2016).

12.

National Commission on Science and Technology; Government of Jamaica, Office of Science and Technology: Organization of American States (2004) Final report of the workshop science and technology for social development, Kingston Jamaica, March 3–5, 2004. Available at: file://lib-sc-sta98001/Users/10030109/Desktop/Dell%202/Pubs/STEM%20Academic%20Libs/Article%2010%20Ja%20Scitech%20workshop.pdf (accessed 8 December 2015).

13.

Northern Illinois University (2016) Formative and Summative Assessments. Faculty Development and Instructional Design Center. Available at: https://www.azwestern.edu/learning_services/instruction/assessment/resources/downloads/formative%20and_summative_assessment.pdf (accessed 10 May 2016).

14.

Oakleaf

(2008) Dangers and opportunities: A conceptual map of information literacy approaches. Libraries and the Academy 8(3): 233–253.

15.

Pausch

Popp

(2015) Assessment of Information Literacy: Lessons from the Higher Education Assessment Movement. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries, American Library Association. Available at: http://www.ala.org/acrl/publications/whitepapers/nashville/pauschpopp (accessed 10 May 2016).

16.

Rinto

(2013) Developing and applying an information literacy rubric to student annotated bibliographies. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 8(3): 5–18. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.11645/7.1.1813 (accessed 8 December 2015).

17.

Scharf

Elliot

Huey

. (2007) Direct assessment of information literacy using writing portfolios. Journal of Academic Librarianship 33(4): 462–477. Available at: http://www3.qcc.cuny.edu/WikiFiles/file/Assessment%20of%20Information%20Literacy.pdf (accessed 10 May 2016).

18.

Schilling

Applegate

(2007) Evaluating library instruction: Measures for assessing educational quality and impact. In: ACRL thirteenth national conference. Baltimore, MD, USA, 29 March–1 April 2007, pp. 206–214. Available at: http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/conferences/confsandpreconfs/national/baltimore/papers/206.pdf (accessed 10 May 2016).

19.

Strauss

(1987) Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

20.

Subramaniam

Ahn

Fleischmann

(2012) The role of school libraries in STEM education: Creating hybrid spaces for exploration. Library Quarterly 82(2): 161–182.

21.

Tewell

Angell

(2015) Far from a trivial pursuit: assessing the effectiveness of games in information literacy instruction. Evidence Based Library & Information Practice 10(1): 20–33. Available at: https://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/EBLIP/article/view/22887 (accessed 10 May 2016).

22.

University of Pittsburgh (2014) Information Literacy Test Subcommittee of the Teaching and Learning Working Group to Provide a Review of Information Literacy (IL) Assessment at ULS. Report. Available at: https://www.library.pitt.edu/other/files/pdf/hillman/IL%20assessment%20recommendations.pdf (accessed 8 December 2015).

23.

Ventura

(2005) Science technology and poverty a potent mix. Jamaica Gleaner, 14 September 2006. Available at: http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20060914/eyes/eyes1.Html (accessed 15 March 2013).

24.

Walsh

(2009) Information literacy assessment: Where do we start? Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 4(1): 19–28. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0961000608099896 (accessed 8 December 2015).

25.

Williams

(2013) Measuring student learning in library information literacy instruction programs. Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Libraries (QQML) 2: 119–24. Available at: http://www.qqml.net/papers/June_2013_Issue/222QQML_Journal_2013_Williams_2_119_124.pdf (accessed 8 December 2015).