The Impact of Electronic Communications on the Science Communication Process — investigating crystallographers in South Africa

Abstract

The author adopts the premise that effective communication of scientific and technological information is pivotal to the success of technological innovation and sustained economic growth and that this applies particularly to South Africa. Many factors are, however, currently impacting on the information communication process, not least of which are the burgeoning information industry, globalization, and rapid technological advances. This factor motivated the author to investigate the impact of electronic modes of communication and this article is based on the research project. The community of scientists engaged in crystallographic research in South Africa was selected as the study population. It clearly emerged from the study that the significant increase in the use of electronic modes and systems, while not affecting the inherent structure of the communication process, did create a far wider range of modes of communication and did have a positive influence on the ease of communication and collaboration. This was particularly manifested as far as cooperation with the international research community was concerned. It was also clear that this impact varied according to the scientists' work environment.

Keywords

electronic communication scientific communication crystallographers South Africa

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen, R.S. (1991) Physics information and scientific communication: information sources and communication patterns. In Information seeking and communication behavior of scientists and engineers. C. Steinke , Ed. New York: Haworth Press. pp. 27—37.

Bichteler, J. and Ward, D. (1989) Information-seeking behavior of geoscientists. Special Libraries, 80(3): 169—178.

Bonthron, K. et al. (2003) Trends in use of electronic journals in higher education in the UK — views of academic staff and students. D-Lib Magazine, 9(6). [Online]. Available: http:/www.dlib.org/dlib/june03/urquhart/06/urquhart.html [2006, January 30].

Brown, C.M. (1999) Information seeking behavior of scientists in the electronic information age: astronomers, chemists, mathematicians, and physicists . Journal of the American Society for Information Science , 50: 929—943.

Bush, V. (1945) As we may think. The Atlantic Monthly , 101—108. [Electronic]. Available: http://www.umassd.edu/Webreportgs/aswemaythink.html

Correia, A.M.R. and Teixeira, J.C. (2005) Reforming scholarly publishing and knowledge communication: from the advent of the scholarly journal to the challenges of open access . Online Information Review, 29(4): 349—364. [Electronic]. Available: www.emaraldinsight.com/0022-0418.htm. [2006, May 11].

Crawford, S. and Stucki, L. (1990) Peer review and the changing research record. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(3): 223—228.

Cronin, B. (1982) Invisible colleges and information transfer: a review and commentary with particular reference to the social sciences. Journal of Documentation, 38(3): 212—236.

Davis, P.M. (2004) Information-seeking behavior of chemists: a transaction log analysis of referral URLs. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(4): 326—332.

10.

De Gooijer, J. (1993) Science information and communication in the new world of electronic delivery. In Changes in scholarly communication patterns. J. Mulvaney and C. Steele , Eds. Canberra: Australia Academy of the Humanities. pp. 122—127.

11.

Eisend, M. (2002) The internet as a new medium for the sciences? The effects of internet use on traditional scientific communication media among social scientists in Germany. Online Information Review , 26(5): 307—317. [Electronic] Available: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/1469—4527.htm .

12.

Gläser, J. (2003) What Internet use does and does not change in scientific communities. Science Studies, 16(1): 38—51.

13.

Hallmark, J. (2003) Information-seeking behavior of meteorologists and other atmospheric scientists: access and retrieval of cited references . Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 39, Summer. [Online] Available: http://www.istl.org/03-summer/article1.html [2005, August 24].

14.

Hallmark, J. (2004) Access and retrieval of recent journal articles: a comparative study of chemists and geoscientists. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 40, Summer. [Online]. Available: http://www.istl.org/04-summer/article1.html [2005, December 08].

15.

Hurd, J.M. (2000) The transformation of scientific communication: a model for 2020. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(14): 1279—1283.

16.

International Union of Crystallography. (1986 ) World directory of crystallographers. 7th ed. edited by A.L. Bednowitz. Dordrecht, Neth.: Reidel.

17.

International Union of Crystallography. (1995 ) World directory of crystallographers. 10th ed. edited by Y. Epelboin. Dordrecht, Neth.: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

18.

Mahé, A. (2004) Beyond usage: understanding the use of electronic journals on the basis of information activity analysis. Information Research, 9(4). [Online]. Available: http: //informationr.net/ir/9-4/paper186.html [2005, July 12].

19.

O'Dell, C. et al. (2004) Fifty years of experience in making grey literature available: matching the expectations of the Particle Physics Community . Publishing Research Quarterly, 20(1): 84—91. [Online]. Available: http://search.epnet.com/login.aspx?direct=trueanddb=ufhandan=13586437 [ 2005, September 10]

20.

Paisley, W.J. (1968) Information needs and uses. In Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. Chicago : William Benton. 3: 1—30.

21.

Paisley, W.J. (1980) Information and work. In Progress in communication sciences. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 2: 113—166.

22.

Price, D.J. De Solla. (1963) Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.

23.

Talja, S. et al. (2004) Field differences in the use and perceived usefulness of scholarly mailing lists. Information Research , 10(1). [Online]. Available: http://informationr.net/ir/10-1/paper200.html [2005, June 12].

24.

Tenopir, C. et al. (2003) Patterns of journal use by scientists through three evolutionary phases. D-Lib Magazine, 9(5). [Online]. Available: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/may03/king/05/king.html [ 2006, January 30].