Studies about the patterns of use and diffusion of scientific information by researchers have been numerous in recent years, but very few of them have focused on developing countries. The objective of this study is to determine the patterns of use of scientific journals and the publication-related practices of Cuban researchers in the biomedical sector, clearly the best developed field in the country. To this end a survey was directed at researchers of the national health institutes of Cuba. The results point to patterns of use involving journals and publication practices similar to those of researchers from other world regions (predominating use of online journals, but a preference for the printed format, associations between the preference of format and different age brackets and scientific qualifications). At the same time, most researchers in Cuba believe that they have access to very few or only a part of the articles they consider necessary, which can be explained not only by the financial limitations of the country but also by the limited informational abilities and scarce familiarization with open access publications.
Bradford, M.L. ( 2006) The critical incident technique and the qualitative evaluation of the connecting libraries and schools projects. Library Trends, 55(1) 46-64.
2.
De Beer, J.A. ( 2005) Open access scholarly communication in South Africa: a role for national information policy in the national system of innovation . Master Thesis, University of Stellenbosch (South Africa). Online. Available at: http://www.jenniferdebeer.net/research/DeBeerJenniferThesisMPhil2004.pdf (Accessed 10 July 2009)
3.
Delgado, A. and Gorry, C. ( 2008) Cuba’s National eHealth Strategy. MEDICC Review, 10(1) 6-8.
4.
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. (2005) Publishing strategies in transformation? Results of a study on publishing habits and information acquisition with regard to open access. Bonn, Germany: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. Online. Available at: http://www.dfg.de/dfg_im_profil/zahlen_und_fakten/statistisches_berichtswesen/open_access/download/oa_report_eng.pdf (Accessed 10 July 2009)
5.
Friedlander, A. and Bessette, R.S. ( 2003) The implications of information technology for scientific journal publishing: A literature review. NSF 03-323. Washington, DC, National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. Online. Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf03323/pdf/nsf03323.pdf (Accessed 10 July 2009)
6.
Griffiths, J.M. and King, D.W. ( 1991) A manual on the evaluation of information centers and services. New York: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics.
7.
Hess, T., Wigand, R.T., Mann, F., and von Walter, B. ( 2007) Open access and science publishing - Results of a study on researchers’ acceptance and use of open access publishing. Munich, Germany: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität . Online. Available at: http://openaccess-study.com/Hess_Wigand_Mann_Walter_2007_Open_Access_Management_Report.pdf (Accessed 10 July 2009)
8.
International Telecommunication Union (2008 ) Cuba. ICT Statistics. Online. Available at: http://www.itu.int/ITUD/icteye/DisplayCountry.aspx?countryId=63 (Accessed 22 July 2009)
9.
King, D.W. and Tenopir, C. ( 1999) Using and reading scholarly literature. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, 423-77.
10.
Palmer, C.L., Teffeau, L.C. and Pirmann, C.M. ( 2009) Scholarly information practices in the online environment: Themes from the literature and implications for library service development . Report commissioned by OCLC Research. Online. Available at: www.oclc.org/programs/publications/reports/2009-02.pdf (Accessed 10 July 2009).
11.
Parent, I. and Cruickshank, N. ( 2009) The growth of the Internet and knowledge networks, and their impact in the developing world. Information Development , 25(2) 91-98.
12.
Pellegrini, A., Goldbaum, M. and Silvi, J. ( 1997) Producción de artículos científicos sobre salud en seis países de América Latina, 1973 a 1992. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 1(1) 23-34.
13.
Pullinger, D. and Baldwin, C. ( 2002) Electronic journal and user behaviour: Learning for the future from the SuperJournal Project. Cambridge, UK: Deedot Press.
14.
Rojas Ochoa, F. ( 1998) Panorámica general de las revistas biomédicas de Cuba. Presente y futuro. Acimed, 6(1). Online. Available at: http://www.bvs.sld.cu/revistas/aci/vol6_1_98/aci06198.htm (Accessed 16 Jul 2009)
15.
Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D. and Huntingdon, P. ( 2004) Scholarly communication in the digital environment: what do authors want? Findings of an international survey of author opinion: project report. London: City University, Centre for Information Behaviour and the Evaluation of Research. Online. Available at: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ciber/ciber-pa-report.pdf (Accessed 10 July 2009)
16.
Sánchez-Tarragó N. and Fernández-Molina , J.C. (2008) Open access journals: Knowledge and attitudes among Cuban health Researchers . MEDICC Review, 10(1) 18-21.
17.
Sánchez-Tarragó N. and Fernández-Molina J.C. (2009) The open access movement and Cuban health research work: an author survey . Health Information and Libraries Journal. 26 (In press)
18.
Sathe, N.A., Grady, J.L., and Giuse, N.B. ( 2002) Print versus electronic journals: A preliminary investigation into the effect of journal format on research processes. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 90(2) 235-243.
19.
Señor García, R.F. (2000) La informática médica en Cuba. Revista de Ciencias Médicas La Habana, 6 (2). Online. Available at: http://www.cpicmha.sld.cu/hab/vol6_2_00/hab070200.htm (Accessed 22 July 2009)
20.
Séror, A.C. ( 2006) A case analysis of INFOMED: The Cuban national health care telecommunications network and portal. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 8(1) e1. Online. Available at: http://www.jmir.org/2006/1/e1 (Accessed 10 July 2009)
21.
Swan, A. and Brown, S. ( 2005) Open access self-archiving: An author study. Truro, UK: Key Perspectives. Online. Available at: http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/10999/1/jisc2.pdf (Accessed 10 July 2009)
22.
Tenopir, C. and King, D.W. ( 2000) Towards electronic journals. Realities for scientists, librarians, and publishers. Washington DC: Special Libraries Association.
23.
Tenopir, C. and King. D.W. ( 2002) Reading Behaviour and Electronic Journals. Learned Publishing15(4): 259-65.
24.
Tenopir, C. and King, D.W. ( 2008) Electronic journals and changes in scholarly article seeking and reading patterns. D-Lib Magazine, 14(11/12). Online. Available at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november08/tenopir/11tenopir.html (Accessed 10 July 2009)
25.
Tenopir, C., King, D.W. and Bush, A. ( 2004) Medical faculty’s use of print and electronic journals: changes over time and in comparison with scientists. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 92(2) 233-241.
26.
Tenopir, C., King, D.W., Clarke, M.T., Na, K. and Zhou, X. ( 2007) Journal reading patterns and preferences of paediatricians . Journal of the Medical Library Association, 95(1) 56-63.
27.
Urquhart, C., Light, A., Barker, A., Yeoman, A., Cooper, J. and Armstrong, C. ( 2003) Critical incident technique and explicitation interviewing in studies of information behaviour. Library and Information Science Research, 25(1) 63-88.
28.
Urra, P. ( 2008) Cuba and ICTs: Real crisis leads to virtual innovation . MEDICC Review, 10 (1) 52. Online. Available at http://www.medicc.org/mediccreview/articles/mr_52.pdf (Accessed 22 July 2009)
29.
Vega Almeida, R.L., Arencibia Jorge, R. and Araújo Ruiz, J.A. ( 2007) Producción científica de los institutos de salud de Cuba en el Web of Science en el periodo 2000-2004. Online. Acimed16(3). Available at: http://bvs.sld.cu/revistas/aci/vol16_3_07/aci03907.htm (Accessed 22 July 2009)
