Abstract
Background
Retinal migraine is defined by fully reversible monocular visual phenomena. We present two cases that were complicated by permanent monocular vision deficits.
Cases
A 57-year-old man with history of retinal migraine experienced persistent monocular vision loss after one stereotypical retinal migraine, progressing to finger-count vision over 4 days. He developed paracentral acute middle maculopathy that progressed to central retinal artery occlusion. A 27-year-old man with history of retinal migraine presented with persistent right eye superotemporal scotoma after a retinal migraine. Relative afferent pupillary defect and superotemporal visual field defect were noted, consistent with ischemic optic neuropathy.
Conclusion
Retinal migraine can complicate with permanent monocular visual loss, suggesting potential migrainous infarction of the retina or optic nerve. A thorough cerebrovascular evaluation must be completed, which was unrevealing in our cases. Acute and preventive migraine therapy may be considered in retinal migraine patients, to mitigate rare but potentially permanent visual loss.
Keywords
Introduction
Retinal migraine is defined by The International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD) as an aura consisting of fully reversible monocular visual phenomena with at least two of the following characteristics: Spreading gradually over ≥5 min, symptoms lasting 5–60 min, accompanied, or followed within 60 min, by headache (1). The scientific literature reports a large spectrum of ocular complications from retinal migraine (2,3). Whereas the incidence of permanent loss of visual acuity or visual field from retinal migraine is not known, it may be underreported and underestimated (4). We report two patients with retinal migraine with persistent monocular phenomena lasting beyond 60 min that were complicated by permanent visual loss. These presentations suggest migrainous infarction of the retina and optic nerve and raise into question the most appropriate acute and preventive treatment approach in this patient population.
Discussion
We describe two patients with a self-reported history of retinal migraine that developed persistent monocular vision loss, either disabling monocular visual acuity loss or a monocular visual field defect, following a typical attack of retinal migraine. The patients differ in age, vascular risk factors, migraine semiology and ocular symptomatology. Neither were smokers or using illicit drugs, and thorough cerebrovascular and thrombophilia evaluations were unrevealing in bot.
Although ICHD-3 diagnostic criteria for retinal migraine requires vision loss that is reversible, these cases suggest that irreversible vision loss is part of the retinal migraine spectrum of complications (4). In fact, the clinical course of our cases resembles monocular migrainous infarction, though restricted to the retina and optic nerve. This indicates that aura of the retina can be complicated with infarcts of the retina and optic nerve. Migrainous infarction is defined by the ICHD-3 as “a migraine attack occurring in a patient with migraine with aura and typical of previous attacks except that one or more aura symptoms persists for >60 minutes, and that neuroimaging demonstrates ischemic infarction in a relevant area” (1). We propose that the definition of retinal migraine and migrainous infarction could potentially be expanded to include ocular forms of migrainous infarction, highlighting that visual aura can be associated with permanent monocular visual deficits with ischemic infarction demonstrated on ophthalmologic evaluation.
CRAO and ION have been previously described in association with retinal migraine (2,5). The pathophysiology of CRAO and ION involves damage to blood vessels that supply either the retina or the optic nerve, and therefore theories that attempt to explain these complications include migraine-associated vasospasm of the retinal or ciliary vasculature, occlusive thrombosis as a result of endothelial dysfunction, abnormal platelet aggregability or plasma hypercoagulability (6–8). In support of this proposed mechanism, retinal migraine has been documented photographically with fundoscopic examination in real time during an attack, demonstrating multiple areas of vasoconstriction involving the branch retinal arteries and veins (7). Another proposed mechanism is neuronal spreading depression involving the retina, which has been demonstrated in an animal model (9).
Our cases also highlight the importance of safe preventive and acute medications for patients with retinal migraine, to avert the rare but potentially disabling complication of permanent vision loss. To prevent future ischemic events, we prescribed both preventive and acute migraine therapy. Our first patient was given acute therapy in the form of sublingual nitroglycerin, a vasodilator, thus employing a medication that may counteract the vasoconstriction that has been described in this disorder. Aspirin 500 mg should also be considered in these patients. We also had suggested lasmiditan should the above approach fail, as it is a 5-HT1F receptor agonist that does not cause vasoconstriction. Triptans would be contraindicated given the potential for vasoconstriction and gepants may not be an optimal choice because of their blockade of CGRP, a potent vasodilator that may be important for the compensatory dilation of retinal arteries. Recall, CRAO is acute ischemic stroke of the retina and these patients need long term anti-platelet therapy for secondary stroke prevention. The second patient was instructed to take naproxen 500 mg and aspirin 325 mg as soon as he began experiencing aura to reduce platelet aggregation and inflammation, which may be contributing to acute ION. Preventive therapy for patients with retinal migraine may be trialled to prevent disabling visual loss in the fellow eye, even if patients have only infrequent attacks, especially if patients have monocular vision at baseline. Therapies used for the prevention of migraine with aura, including magnesium, lamotrigine, topiramate, and aspirin, could be considered given the potential to inhibit glutamate-mediated spreading depression (10,11). Although Al-Moujahed et al. demonstrated improvement in retinal ischemia in vaso-occlusive retinal vasculitis with use of nicotinic acid and infliximab; the benefit of nicotinic acid with retinal migraine patients has yet to be determined, however is appealing given its vasodilatory mechanism (12).
In summary, retinal migraine can be associated with ischemic monocular complications causing permanent visual loss, with a clinical course resembling migrainous infarction of the retina and optic nerve. We recommend considering preventive and acute migraine therapy to prevent vision loss, especially in patients with baseline monocular vision. We propose that the ICHD-3 criteria of retinal migraine and migrainous infarction could potentially be expanded to include these unusual ischemic complications. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the utility of prophylaxis in retinal migraine to prevent disabling vision loss.
Clinical implications
Retinal migraine can be complicated by ischemic insults of the retina or optic nerve, with permanent and disabling visual loss. Migraine preventive and readily available acute therapy should be considered to help prevent vision loss in patients with retinal migraine, especially in cases with monocular vision.
Footnotes
Declaration of conflicting interests
The authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: DWD reports the following conflicts within the past 12 months: Consulting: Amgen, Atria, Cerecin, Cooltech, Ctrl M, Allergan, Biohaven, GSK, Lundbeck, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Impel, Satsuma, Theranica, WL Gore, Nocira, Perfood, Praxis, AYYA Biosciences, Revance. Honoraria: Vector Psychometric Group, Clinical Care Solutions, CME Outfitters, Curry Rockefeller Group, DeepBench, Global Access Meetings, KLJ Associates, Academy for Continued Healthcare Learning, Majallin LLC, Medlogix Communications, MJH Lifesciences, Miller Medical Communications, WebMD Health/Medscape, Wolters Kluwer, Oxford University Press, Cambridge University Press. Research support: Department of Defense, National Institutes of Health, Henry Jackson Foundation, Sperling Foundation, American Migraine Foundation, Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). Stock options/shareholder/patents/Board of Directors: Ctrl M (options), Aural analytics (options), ExSano (options), Palion (options), Healint (options), Theranica (options), Second Opinion/Mobile Health (options), Epien (options/board), Nocira (options), Matterhorn (shares/board), Ontologics (shares/board), King-Devick Technologies (options/board), Precon Health (options/board), AYYA Biosciences (options). Patent 17189376.1-1466:vTitle: Botulinum Toxin Dosage Regimen for Chronic Migraine Prophylaxis.
The other Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
