This paper examines the relationship between the size of a target and the market's reaction to the announcement of a takeover offer. Using the constrained (0,1) market model to estimate abnormal returns, results from a sample of takeovers from 1984-88 indicate size effects for takeover targets at announcement date. While this outcome is consistent with both infor Mation asymmetry and liquidity explanations for the size effect, examination of the extent to which our whole-sample result is robust to a classification of the sample into sub-samples on the basis of outcome shows that the target size premium is explained by firms which are subject to a subsequent takeover. Sensitivity tests are conducted to establish the robustness of this result. We conclude that it is unlikely that a statistically significant target size effect is present in takeovers although the results are ambiguous.
Anderson, D., A.W. Lynch, and N. Mathiou, 1990, Behaviour of CAPM anomalies in smaller firms, Australian Journal of Management, 15, 1, June, 1–38.
2.
Alchian, A.A., 1969, Infor Mation costs, pricing and resources unemployment, Western Economic Journal, 7, 2, June, 109–128.
3.
Ball, R., 1978, Anomalies in relationships between securities' yields and yield surrogates, Journal of Financial Economics, 6, 103–126.
4.
Ball, R.J. and J. Bowers, 1987, A corrected statex-actuaries daily accumulation index, Australian Journal of Management, 12, 1, June, 1–8.
5.
Banz, R., 1981, The relationship between return and market value of common stocks, Journal of Financial Economics, 9, 3–18.
6.
Barry, C.B. and S.J. Brown, 1984, Differential infor Mation and the small firm effect, Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 3–29.
7.
Bishop, S.R., P. Dodd, and R.R. Officer, 1987, Takeovers: the Australian evidence (Sydney, Centre for Independent Studies).
8.
Bradley, M., 1986, The economic consequences of mergers and tender offers from the Berkley Conference, in: J.M. Stern and D.H. Chew Jr., eds., The Revolution in Corporate Finance (Oxford, Blackwell) pp. 368–379.
9.
Brauer, G.A., 1986, Using jump-diffusion models to measure differential infor Mation by firm size, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 21, 4, December, 447–458.
10.
Brown, P., D.B. Keim, A.W. Kleidon, T.A. Marsh, 1983, Stock return seasonalities and the tax-loss selling hypotheses analysis of the arguments and Australian evidence, Journal of Financial Economics, 12, 105–127.
11.
Cook, T.J. and M.S. Rozeff, 1984, Size and earnings/price ratio anomalies: one effect or two?Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 19, 4, December, 449–464.
12.
Dodd, P., 1976, Company takeovers and Australian equity markets, Australian Journal of Management, 1, 1, June, 15–35.
13.
Dimson, E., 1979, Risk measurement when shares are subject to infrequent trading, Journal of Financial Economics, 7, 197–226.
14.
Gultekin, M. and N.B. Gultekin, 1983, Stock market seasonality: international evidence, Journal of Financial Economics, December, 469–481.
15.
Jacobs, B.I. and K.N. Levy, 1988, Calendar anomalies: abnormal returns at calendar turning points, Financial Analysts Journal, November-December, 28–39.
16.
Jensen, M.C. and R. Ruback, 1983, The market for corporate control: the scientific evidence, Journal of Financial Economics, 11, 5–50.
17.
Keim, D.B., 1983, Size-related anomalies and stock return seasonality: further empirical evidence, Journal of Financial Economics, 12, 13–32.
18.
Klein, R. and V.S. Bawa, 1977, The effect of limited infor Mation and estimation risk on optimal portfolio diversification, Journal of Financial Economics, 5, 89–111.
19.
Lakonishok, J. and S. Smidt, 1986, Trading bargains in small firms at year-end, Journal of Portfolio Management, Spring, 24–28.
20.
Melicher, R., J. Ledolter and L. D'Antonio, 1983, A time series analysis of aggregate merger activity, Review of Economics and Statistics, 65, 423–430.
21.
Officer, R.R., 1975, Seasonality in Australian capital markets: market efficiency and empirical issues, Journal of Financial Economics, 2, 29–52.
22.
Reinganum, M.R., 1981, Mis-specification of capital asset pricing: empirical anomalies based on earnings, yields and market values, Journal of Financial Economics, 9, 19–46.
23.
Reinganum, M.R., 1983, The anomalous stock market behaviour of small firms in January: empirical tests for tax-loss selling effects, Journal of Financial Economics, 12, 80–104.
24.
Roll, R., 1977, A critique of the asset pricing theory's tests (Part 1): On past and potential testability of the theory, Journal of Financial Economics, 4, 129–176.
25.
Roll, R., 1983, Vas ist das? The turn of the year effect and the return premium of small firms, Journal of Portfolio Management, Winter, 18–28.
26.
Rozeff, M.S. and W.R. Kinney, 1976, Capital market seasonality: the case of stock returns, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 379–402.
27.
Scholes, M. and J. Williams, 1977, Estimating betas from nonsynchronous data, Journal of Financial Economics, 5, 309–327.
28.
Sinclair, N.A., 1981, An empirical examination of the required number of leading and lagged variables for ACM beta estimation, Australian Journal of Management, 6, 2. December, 119–126.
29.
Walter, T.S., 1984, Australian takeovers: capital market efficiency and shareholder risk and returns, Australian Journal of Management, 9, 1, June, 63–118.
30.
Zeghal, D., 1984, Firm size and the infor Mational content of financial statements, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 19, 3, September, 299–310.
