The rate of return to capital employed is the most common of the control and perfor Mance measures used in the private sector. It is often suggested that public sector enterprises, particularly statutory trading authorities, should be compelled to adopt a target rate of return to encourage the efficient allocation of resources by such enterprises. This paper outlines the problem of such a control measure for public sector enterprises. It is difficult to conceive of any single line measure of perfor Mance for control that can be adopted for a non-competitive public sector enterprise that does not risk creating more problems than it solves.
Albon, R., 1985a, “The Effects of Financial Targets on the Behaviour of Monopoly Public Enterprise,”Australian Economic Papers, 54–64.
2.
Albon, R., 1985b, Private Correspondence: Competition or Monopoly in Australia's Postal Services (Sydney, Centre for Independent Studies).
3.
Arrow, K.J. and R.C. Lind, 1970, “Uncertainty and the Evaluation of Public Investment Decisions”, American Economic Review, 52, 364–78.
4.
Averch, H. and L. Johnson, 1962, “Behaviour of the Firm under Regulatory Constraint”, American Economic Review, 52, 1053–69.
5.
Bailey, E.E. and J.C. Malone, 1970, “Resource Allocation and the Regulatory Firm,”Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Spring, 127–142.
6.
Bailey, E.E., 1973, Economic Theory of Regulatory Constraint (Lexington Books).
7.
Bailey, M.J. and M.C. Jensen, 1972, Risk and the Discount Rate of Public Investment, in: M.C. Jensen, ed., Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets, (New York, Praeger).
8.
Baron, D.P. and R.A. Taggart, 1977, “A Model of Regulation Under Uncertainty and Test of Regulatory Bias,”Bell Journal of Economics, Spring, 151–67.
9.
Baumol, W.J., 1968, “On the Social Rate of Discount”, American Economic Review, 58, 788–802.
10.
Baumol, W.J. and A. Klevorick, 1970, “Input Choices and Rate of Return Regulation: An Overview of the Discussion”, The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 1, 162–90.
11.
Boyes, W.J., 1976, “An Empirical Examination of Averch and Johnson Effect”, Economic Inquiry, 14, 25–35.
12.
Courville, L., 1974, “Regulation and Efficiency in the Electric Utility Industry,”The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Spring, 53–74.
13.
Foley Committee, 1981, Public Bodies Review Committee (Victorian Parliament) (Melbourne, F.D. Atkinson, Government Printer).
14.
Gravelle, H., 1976, “Public Enterprises under Rate of Return Financial Targets”, Manchester School, 44, 1–16.
15.
Gravelle, H., 1977, “Marginal Cost Pricing under Rate of Return Financial Targets”, Manchester School, 45, 236–40.
16.
Gravelle, H.S.E. and E. Katz, 1976, “Financial Targets and X-Efficiency in Public Enterprises”, Public Finance, 2, 218–234.
17.
Heald, D., 1980, “The Economic and Financial Control of U.K. Nationalised Industries”, The Economic Journal, 90, 234–265.
18.
Lind, R.C., 1982, “A Primer on the Major Issues Relating to the Discount Rate for Evaluating National Energy Options,” in: R.C. Lind, ed., Discounting for Time and Risk in Energy Policy (Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press).
19.
Officer, R.R., 1980, “Perfor Mance Measurement,” in: Ball, Brown, Finn and Officer, eds., Share Markets and Portfolio Theory (University of Queensland Press).
20.
Officer, R.R., 1981, “Measurement of a Firm's Cost of Capital”, Accounting and Finance, 21, 31–61.
21.
Petersen, H., 1975, “An Empirical Test of Regulatory Effects,”The Bell Journal of Economics, Spring, 111–126.
22.
Price Commission, 1978, South of Scotland Electricity Board - Price Increases in the Supply of Electricity, HC535 (London, HMSO).
23.
Rees, R., 1979, “The Pricing Policies of the Nationalised Industries”, Three Banks Review, 122, 3–31.
24.
Spann, R., 1974, “Rate of Return Regulation and Efficiency in Production: An Empirical Test of the Averch and Johnson Thesis,”The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Spring, 38–52.
25.
Swan, P., 1983, “The Marginal Cost of Base-Load Power: An Application to Alcoa's Portland Smelter,”The Economic Record, December, 332–44.
26.
White Paper, U.K. Treasury, 1967, “Nationalised Industries: A Review of Economic and Financial Objectives,” Cmnd. 3437 (London, HMSO).
27.
White Paper, U.K. Treasury, 1978, “The Nationalised Industries,” Cmnd. 7131 (London, HMSO).
