We apply a neo-institutional theoretical lens to interpret the extent of any significant similarities or differences in doctoral programmes across business schools in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ). Overall, we characterise the state of doctoral education in business as lacking adequate funding, primarily attracting students with limited professional or industrial experience but having diverse approaches to the role of formal training as part of the doctoral programme. Although we view these findings as somewhat inevitable given institutional and isomorphic pressures, they are of concern if ANZ business schools are to produce research that is both rigorous and relevant beyond the academy. Comparisons across institutional groupings and discipline areas largely suggest relatively common approaches to doctoral programme design and administration across and within institutions.
AltbachPG (2011) The past, present, and future of the research university. Economic and Political Weekly46: 65–73.
2.
BeardenWOEllenPSNetemeyerRG (2000) Challenges and prospects facing doctoral education in marketing. Marketing Education Review10: 1–14.
3.
BedeianAGCavazosDEHuntJG, et al. (2010) Doctoral degree prestige and the academic marketplace: A study of career mobility within the management discipline. Academy of Management Learning & Education9: 11–25.
4.
BerdahlR (1985) Strategy and government: US State systems and institutional role and mission. International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education9: 301–307.
5.
BerryLL (1989) Becoming a marketing academician: A strategic career planning seminar for doctoral students. Journal of Marketing Education11: 2–6.
6.
BoddyCR (2007) Academia marketing myopia and the cult of the PhD. Marketing Intelligence & Planning25: 217–228.
7.
BurgstahlerDC (2019) Promoting research relevance. Accounting Horizons33: 1–2.
8.
CornerPDPioE (2017) Supervising international students’ theses and dissertations. Academy of Management Learning & Education16: 23–38.
9.
DillmanDASmythJDChristianLM (2014) Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
10.
DiMaggioPJPowellWW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review48: 147–160.
11.
DiMaggioPJPowellWW (1991) The iron cage revisited. In: PowellWWDiMaggioPJ (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 63–82.
DoogarR (2003) What should accounting doctoral programs focus on? An economic perspective. In: SchwartzBNKetzJE (eds) Advances in Accounting Education Teaching and Curriculum Innovations. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 199–209.
14.
EverettJE (1994) Sex, rank and qualifications at Australian universities. Australian Journal of Management19: 159–175.
15.
FairweatherJS (1993) Faculty reward structures: Toward institutional and professional homogenization. Research in Higher Education34: 603–623.
16.
FengTTaylorSL (2021) How excellent is research in Australian business schools? Lessons from past ERA assessments. UTS working paper, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Broadway, NSW, Australia.
17.
FisherJEGarrettDE (1984) The marketing educator shortage: A supply side perspective. Journal of Marketing Education6: 7–13.
18.
FligsteinN (2001) The Architecture of Markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
FlynnPMCavanaghKVBilimoriaD (2017) Gender equality in business schools: The elephant in the room. In: FlynnPMHaynesKKilgourMA (eds) Integrating Gender Equality into Business and Management Education. London: Routledge, pp. 26–54.
20.
FordEWDuncanWJBedeianAG, et al. (2006) People, places, and life transitions: Consequential experiences in the lives of management laureates. Academy of Management Learning & Education5: 408–421.
21.
FraserK (2014) Position paper: Defeating the ‘paradigm wars’ in accounting: A mixed-methods approach is needed in the education of PhD scholars. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches8: 49–62.
22.
GrottkeMPelgerCSchmiedebergC (2013) Firm or faculty? Evidence on characteristics of German-speaking accounting PhD students and their career preferences. Accounting Education22: 66–84.
23.
HansenWL (1991) The education and training of economics doctorates: Major findings of the executive secretary of the American Economic Association’s commission on graduate education in economics. Journal of Economic Literature29: 1054–1087.
24.
JacksonAB (2022) A call for policy relevant research. Australian Journal of Management47: 399–400.
25.
JohnstonTCKellerRHLinnhoffS (2014) Mentoring in doctoral programs and preparedness of early career marketing educators. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal18: 15–22.
26.
KaplanRS (2019) Reverse the curse of the top-5. Accounting Horizons33: 17–24.
27.
KruegerAO (1991) Report of the commission on graduate education in economics. Journal of Economic Literature29: 1035–1053.
28.
McCoyJPMilkmanMI (2010) Do recent PhD economists feel prepared to teach economics?The Journal of Economic Education41: 211–215.
29.
McKiernanPTsuiAS (2019) Responsible management research: A senior scholar legacy in doctoral education. Academy of Management Learning & Education18: 310–313.
30.
MeyerJW (1980) Institutional and Technical Sources of Organizational Structure Explaining the Structure of Educational Organizations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
31.
MeyerJWRowanB (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology83: 340–363.
32.
MillerANTaylorSGBedeianAG (2011) Publish or perish: Academic life as management faculty live it. Career Development International16: 422–445.
33.
MillerJIJr (1975) Evaluation and political reality. New Directions for Institutional Research1975: 47–54.
34.
MitchellTR (2007) The academic life: Realistic changes needed for business school students and faculty. Academy of Management Learning & Education6: 236–251.
35.
MorphewCCHuismanJ (2002) Using institutional theory to reframe research on academic drift. Higher Education in Europe27: 491–506.
36.
OliverC (1988) The collective strategy framework: An application to competing predictions of isomorphism. Administrative Science Quarterly33: 543–561.
37.
OseiET (2013) The dissertation process in obtaining philosopher doctorate in business administration. American International Journal of Contemporary Research3: 106–112.
38.
PearsonMEvansTMacauleyP (2008) Growth and diversity in doctoral education: Assessing the Australian experience. Higher Education55: 357–372.
39.
PerryCZuber-SkerrittO (1994) Doctorates by action research for senior practising managers. Management Learning25: 341–364.
40.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJ-Y, et al. (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88: 879–903.
41.
PodsakoffPMPodsakoffNPMishraP, et al. (2018) Can early-career scholars conduct impactful research? Playing ‘small ball’ versus ‘swinging for the fences’. Academy of Management Learning & Education17: 496–531.
42.
SandhuSPereraSSardeshmukhSR (2019) Charted courses and meandering trails: Crafting success and impact as business school academics. Academy of Management Learning & Education18: 153–185.
43.
SchwartzBNWilliamsSWilliamsPF (2005) US doctoral students’ familiarity with accounting journals: Insights into the structure of the US academy. Critical Perspectives on Accounting16: 327–348.
44.
ScottWR (1987) The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly32: 493–511.
45.
ScottWR (2001) Institutions and Organizations. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
46.
ScottWR (2008) Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society37: 427–442.
47.
SharminiSSpronken-SmithR (2020) The PhD – Is it out of alignment?Higher Education Research & Development39: 821–833.
48.
SmartDTConantJS (1990) Marketing dissertations: Profiling the successful thesis candidate. Journal of Marketing Education12: 2–8.
49.
StewartMMWilliamsonIOKingJEJr (2008) Who wants to be a business PhD? Exploring minority entry into the faculty ‘pipeline’. Academy of Management Learning & Education7: 42–55.
50.
StockWAFineganTASiegfriedJJ (2009) Completing an economics PhD in five years. American Economic Review99: 624–629.
51.
StockWASiegfriedJJFineganTA (2011) Completion rates and time-to-degree in economics PhD programs (with comments by David Colander, N. Gregory Mankiw, Melissa P. McInerney, James M. Poterba). American Economic Review101: 176–188.
52.
SwansonEPWolfeCJZardkoohiA (2007) Concentration in publishing at top-tier business journals: Evidence and potential explanations. Contemporary Accounting Research24: 1255–1289.
53.
TaylorBJWebberKLJacobsGJ (2013) Institutional research in light of internationalization, growth, and competition. New Directions for Institutional Research2013: 5–22.
54.
TightM (2015) Theory development and application in higher education research: The case of academic drift. Journal of Educational Administration and History47: 84–99.
55.
TrapnellJEMeroNPWilliamsJR, et al. (2009) The accounting doctoral shortage: Time for a new model. Issues in Accounting Education24: 427–432.
56.
UsherR (2002) A diversity of doctorates: Fitness for the knowledge economy?Higher Education Research & Development21: 143–153.
57.
WrightAMurrayJPGealeP (2007) A phenomenographic study of what it means to supervise doctoral students. Academy of Management Learning & Education6: 458–474.
