Using resource dependence theory, this study examines the determinants of firm performance among business groups’ new venture affiliates using a sample of 1512 new venture affiliates associated with 104 large-sized business groups in Taiwan. The empirical findings reveal that improved affiliate postentry performance is linked to the relative size of a business group’s new venture affiliate and the level of autonomy inherent in decision-making. Furthermore, when the product market of a new venture affiliate is resource-related to its affiliated business group’s main business, this affiliate may benefit from resource relatedness with an improved return on equity.
AgarwalRAudretschDB (2001) Does entry size matter? The impact of the life cycle and technology on firm survival. Journal of Industrial Economics49: 21–43.
2.
AlmeidaHVWolfenzonD (2006) A theory of pyramidal ownership and family business groups. Journal of Finance61: 2637–2680.
3.
AmitRLivantJ (1988) Diversification and the risk-return trade-off. Academy of Management Journal31: 154–166.
4.
ArrighettiAVivarelliM (1999) The role of innovation in the postentry performance of new small firms: Evidence from Italy. Southern Economic Journal65: 927–939.
5.
AsoniASanandajiT (2016) Identifying the effect of college education on business and employment survival. Small Business Economics46: 311–324.
6.
AudretschDBMahmoodT (1995) New firm survival: New results using a hazard function. Review of Economics and Statistics77: 97–103.
7.
AudretschDBSantarelliEVivarelliM (1999) Start up size and industrial dynamics: Some evidence from Italian manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization17: 965–983.
8.
BarneyJB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management17: 99–120.
9.
BecchettiLTrovatoG (2002) The determinants of growth for small and medium sized firms: The role of availability of external finance. Small Business Economics19: 291–306.
10.
BirdRHuangPLuY (2018) Board independence and the variability of firm performance: Evidence from an exogenous regulatory shock. Australian Journal of Management43: 3–26.
11.
BirkinshawJ (1997) Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: The characteristics of subsidiary initiatives. Strategic Management Journal18: 207–229.
12.
BirkinshawJHoodN (1998) Multinational subsidiary evolution: Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies. Academy of Management Review23: 773–795.
13.
BonnI (2004) Board structure and firm performance: Evidence from Australia. Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management10: 14–24.
14.
BrushTH (1996) Predicted change in operational synergy and post-acquisition performance of acquired businesses. Strategic Management Journal17: 1–24.
15.
CainelliGIacobucciD (2011) Business groups and the boundaries of the firm. Management Decision49: 1549–1573.
16.
CampbellAGooldMAlexanderM (1995) Corporate strategy: The quest for parenting advantage. Harvard Business Review73: 120–132.
17.
CasciaroTPiskorskiMJ (2005) Power imbalance, mutual dependence, and constraint absorption: A closer look at resource dependence theory. Administrative Science Quarterly50: 167–199.
18.
CefisEMarsiliO (2006) Survivor: The role of innovation in firm’s survival. Research Policy35: 626–641.
19.
ChandlerAD (1990) Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Belknap of Harvard University Press.
20.
ChangSJ (1996) An evolutionary perspective on diversification and corporate restructuring. Strategic Management Journal17: 587–611.
21.
ChangSJ (2003) Ownership structure, expropriation, and performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea. Academy of Management Journal46: 238–253.
22.
ChangYThomasH (1989) The impact of diversification strategy on risk-return performance. Strategic Management Journal10: 271–284.
23.
ChenX (2015) The determinants behind Chinese companies’ incremental equity issue decisions. Australian Journal of Management40: 701–723.
24.
ChenhallRH (1979) Some elements of organizational control in Australian divisionalised firms. Australian Journal of Management4: 1–36.
25.
ChoeCDeyTMishraV (2014) Corporate diversification, executive compensation and firm value: Evidence from Australia. Australian Journal of Management39: 395–414.
26.
ChoiJPCowingTG (2002) Diversification, concentration and economic performance: Korean business groups. Review of Industrial Organization21: 271–282.
27.
ChuW (2001) Contingency organizations and shared values: Multiple logics in managing diversification. Asia Pacific Journal of Management18: 83–99.
28.
ChungHMChanST (2012) Ownership structure, family leadership, and performance of affiliate firms in large family business groups. Asia Pacific Journal of Management29: 303–329.
29.
ClaessensSDjankovSLangLHP (2000) The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics58: 81–112.
30.
ColombelliAKrafftJVivarellM (2016) To be born is not enough: The key role of innovative startups. Small Business Economics47: 277–291.
31.
ColomboMGGrilliL (2010) On growth drivers of high-tech start-ups: Exploring the role of founders’ human capital and venture capital. Journal of Business Venturing25: 610–626.
32.
CubbinJLeechD (1983) The effect of shareholding dispersion on the degree of control in British companies: Theory and measurement. Economic Journal93: 351–369.
33.
DreesJMHeugensPP (2013) Synthesizing and extending resource dependence theory: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management39: 1666–1698.
34.
DwyerLMellorR (1993) Product innovation strategies and performance of Australian firms. Australian Journal of Management18: 159–180.
35.
GarnierGH (1982) Context and decision making autonomy in foreign affiliates of U.S. multinational corporations. Academy of Management Journal25: 893–908.
36.
GeorgeRKabirR (2012) Heterogeneity in business groups and the corporate diversification–firm performance relationship. Journal of Business Research65: 412–420.
37.
GeroskiPA (1995) What do we know about entry?International Journal of Industrial Organization13: 421–440.
38.
GhemawatPCavesRE (1986) Capital commitment and profitability: An empirical investigation. Oxford Economic Papers38: 94–110.
39.
GhoshK (2017) Corporate reputation, social performance, and organizational variability in an emerging country perspective. Journal of Management & Organization23: 545–565.
40.
GonzálezMGuzmánAPomboCet al. (2012) Family firms and financial performance: The cost of growing. Emerging Markets Review13: 626–649.
41.
GranovetterM (2005) Business groups and social organization. In: SmelserNJSwedbergR (eds) The Handbook of Economic Sociology. 2nd ed.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 429–450.
42.
GreeneWH (1997) Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
43.
GuillénMF (2000) Business groups in emerging economies: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal43: 362–380.
44.
HallEHJr (1995) Corporate diversification and performance: An investigation of causality. Australian Journal of Management20: 25–42.
45.
HamiltonRTShergillGS (1993) Extent of diversification and company performance: The New Zealand evidence. Managerial and Decision Economics14: 47–52.
46.
HechavarríaDMMatthewsCHReynoldsPD (2016) Does start-up financing influence start-up speed? Evidence from the panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics. Small Business Economics46: 137–167.
47.
HoskissonREJohnsonRATihanyiLet al. (2005) Diversified business groups and corporate refocusing in emerging economies. Journal of Management31: 941–965.
48.
HussinFSaidinN (2012) Economic growth in ASEAN-4 countries: A panel data analysis. International Journal of Economics and Finance4: 119–129.
49.
JohnstonSMengucB (2007) Subsidiary size and the level of subsidiary autonomy in multinational corporations: A quadratic model investigation of Australian subsidiaries. Journal of International Business Studies38: 787–801.
50.
KhannaTPalepuK (1997) Why focused strategies may be wrong for emerging markets. Harvard Business Review75: 41–51.
51.
KhannaTPalepuK (2000) Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. Journal of Finance55: 867–891.
52.
KhannaTRivkinJW (2006) Interorganizational ties and business group boundaries: Evidence from an emerging economy. Organization Science17: 333–352.
53.
KhannaTYafehY (2007) Business groups in emerging markets: Paragons or parasites?Journal of Economic Literature45: 331–372.
54.
KimHHoskissonREWanWP (2004) Power dependence, diversification strategy, and performance in keiretsu member firms. Strategic Management Journal25: 613–636.
55.
KimSJKimWYangDR (2015) Infant firms in emerging market: An analysis of stand-alones vs. subsidiaries. Emerging Markets Review25: 30–52.
56.
LiHZubielquiGCO’ConnorA (2015) Entrepreneurial networking capacity of cluster firms: A social network perspective on how shared resources enhance firm performance. Small Business Economics45: 523–541.
57.
LiSXGreenwoodR (2004) The effect of within-industry diversification on firm performance: Synergy creation, multi-market contact and market structuration. Strategic Management Journal25: 1131–1153.
58.
LocorotondoRDewaelheynsNVan HulleC (2014) Cash holdings and business group membership. Journal of Business Research67: 316–323.
59.
LuoXChungCN (2005) Keeping it all in the family: The role of particularistic relationships in business group performance during institutional transition. Administrative Science Quarterly50: 404–439.
60.
LuoXChungCNSobczakM (2009) How do corporate governance model differences affect foreign direct investment in emerging economies?Journal of International Business Studies40: 444–567.
61.
LuoY (1997) Performance implications of international strategy. Group & Organization Management22: 87–116.
62.
MadhokA (1997) Cost value and foreign market entry mode: The transaction and the firm. Strategic Management Journal18: 39–61.
63.
MahoneyJTPandianJR (1992) The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal13: 363–380.
64.
MarkidesCCWilliamsonPJ (1996) Corporate diversification and organizational structure: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal39: 340–367.
65.
MataJPortugalPGuimaraesP (1995) The survival of new plants: Start-up conditions and post-entry evolution. International Journal of Industrial Organization13: 459–482.
66.
MedcofJW (2001) Resource-based strategy and managerial power in networks of internationally dispersed technology units. Strategic Management Journal22: 999–1012.
67.
MontgomeryCA (1985) Product-market diversification and market power. Academy of Management Journal28: 789–798.
68.
MudambiRPedersenTAnderssonU (2014) How subsidiaries gain power in multinational corporations. Journal of World Business49: 101–113.
69.
MugošaA (2015) The determinants of capital structure choice: Evidence from Western Europe. Business and Economic Horizons11: 76–95.
70.
MundtPAlfaranoSMilakovicM (2016) Gibrat’s law redux: Think profitability instead of growth. Industrial and Corporate Change25: 549–571.
71.
OliverC (1991) Network relations and loss of organizational autonomy. Human Relations44: 943–961.
72.
PanYLiSTseDK (1999) The impact of order and mode of market entry on profitability and market share. Journal of International Business Studies30: 81–103.
73.
PatersonSLBrockDM (2002) The development of subsidiary-management research: Review and theoretical analysis. International Business Review11: 139–163.
74.
PatrisiaDDastgirS (2017) Diversification and corporate social performance in manufacturing companies. Eurasian Business Review7: 121–139.
75.
PengMW (2003) Institutional transitions and strategic choices. Academy of Management Review28: 275–296.
76.
PenroseE (1959) The Theory of Growth of the Firm. New York: John Wiley.
77.
PerényiÁYukhanaevA (2016) Testing relationships between firm size and perceptions of growth and profitability: An investigation into the practices of Australian ICT SMEs. Journal of Management & Organization22: 680–701.
78.
PfefferJ (1992) Understanding power in organizations. California Management Review34: 29–50.
79.
PfefferJSalancikGR (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
80.
PhamPKSuchardJAZeinJ (2011) Corporate governance and alternative performance measures: Evidence from Australian firms. Australian Journal of Management36: 371–386.
81.
PorterME (1987) From competitive advantage to corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review65(13): 43–59.
82.
PowellJShiJSmithTet al. (2009) Common divisors, payout persistence, and return predictability. International Review of Finance9: 335–357.
83.
QuatraroFVivarelliM (2015) Drivers of entrepreneurship and post-entry performance of newborn firms in developing countries. World Bank Research Observer30: 277–305.
84.
RamachandranJManikandanKSPantA (2013) Why conglomerates thrive (outside the US). Harvard Business Review91: 110–119.
85.
RehmanNU (2016) Network alliances and firm’s performance: A panel data analysis of Pakistani SMEs. Eurasian Business Review6: 37–52.
86.
RumeltRP (1986) Strategy, Structure, and Economic Performance. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
87.
SakhartovAV (2017) Economies of scope, resource relatedness, and the dynamics of corporate diversification. Strategic Management Journal38: 2168–2188.
88.
SambharyaRBBanerjiK (2006) The effect of keiretsu affiliation and resource dependencies on supplier firm performance in the Japanese automobile industry. Management International Review46: 7–37.
89.
SengulMGimenoJ (2013) Constrained delegation limiting subsidiaries’ decision rights and resources in firms that compete across multiple industries. Administrative Science Quarterly58: 420–471.
90.
ShaneS (2001) Technological opportunities and new firm creation. Management Science47: 205–220.
91.
SharmaA (1998) Mode of entry and ex-post performance. Strategic Management Journal19: 879–900.
92.
SharmaAKesnerI (1996) Diversifying entry: Some ex ante explanations for postentry survival and growth. Academy of Management Journal39: 635–677.
93.
ShiJBilsonCPowellJGet al. (2010) Foreign direct investment and international stock market integration. Australian Journal of Management35: 265–290.
94.
SinghchawlaWEvansRTEvansJP (2011) Board independence, sub-committee independence and firm performance: Evidence from Australia. Asia Pacific Journal of Economics & Business15: 1–15.
VivarelliM (2013) Is entrepreneurship necessarily good? Microeconomic evidence from developed and developing countries. Industrial and Corporate Change22: 1453–1495.
97.
WatsonJDickinsonJP (1981) International diversification: An ex post and ex ante analysis of possible benefits. Australian Journal of Management6: 125–134.
98.
WoodEKhavulSPerez-NordtvedtLet al. (2011) Strategic commitment and timing of internationalization from emerging markets: Evidence from China, India, Mexico, and South Africa. Journal of Small Business Management49: 252–282.
99.
YasudaT (2005) Firm growth, size, age, and behavior in Japanese manufacturing. Small Business Economics24: 1–15.
100.
YiuDBrutonGDLuY (2005) Understanding business group performance in an emerging economy: Acquiring resources and capabilities in order to prosper. Journal of Management Studies42: 183–206.
101.
YoungSTavaresAT (2004) Centralization and autonomy: Back to the future. International Business Review13: 215–237.
102.
ZhuY (2012) Capital structure: The case of firms issuing debt. Australian Journal of Management37: 283–295.
