Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Revised auditing standards and a focus by regulators on the detection of financial statement fraud have resulted in calls for research to examine alternative forms of fraud brainstorming. We examine the effect of using extended brainstorming guidelines, developed in the psychology literature as part of facilitator training, on auditors’ individual brainstorming performance prior to attending the team brainstorming meeting. We find that these additional brainstorming guidelines help auditors identify a greater quantity and quality of potential frauds. Our findings suggest an easy to implement approach to enhance auditors’ performance in fraud brainstorming.

JEL Classification: C91; C92; M42

Keywords

Audit planning brainstorming guidelines fraud identification individual brainstorming

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) (2002) Statement on Auditing Standards (SAS) No. 99: Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit. New York: AICPA.

American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) (2003) AICPA Practice Aid Series, Fraud Detection in a GAAS Audit. SAS No. 99 Implementation Guide. New York: AICPA.

Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC) (2015) Report 461: Audit inspection program report for 2014–15. Available at: http://download.asic.gov.au/media/3491241/rep-461-published-15-december-2015.pdf (accessed November 2016).

Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC) (2017) Report 534: Audit inspection program report for 2015–16. Available at: http://download.asic.gov.au/media/4331127/rep534-published-29-june-2017.pdf (accessed July 2017).

Baruah

Paulus

(2008) Effects of training on idea generation in groups. Small Group Research 39: 523–541.

Beasley

Jenkins

(2003) A primer for brainstorming fraud risks. Journal of Accountancy 196: 32–38.

Benson

Clarkson

Smith

et al . (2015) A review of accounting research in the Asia Pacific region. Australian Journal of Management 40: 36–88.

Brazel

Carpenter

Jenkins

(2010) Auditors’ use of brainstorming in the consideration of fraud: Reports from the field. Accounting Review 85: 1273–1301.

Brown

Tumeo

Larey

et al . (1998) Modeling cognitive interactions during group brainstorming. Small Group Research 29: 495–526.

10.

Carcello

Nagy

(2004) Client size, auditor specialization and fraudulent financial reporting. Managerial Auditing Journal 19: 651–668.

11.

Carpenter

(2007) Audit team brainstorming, fraud risk identification, and fraud risk assessment: Implications of SAS No. 99. Accounting Review 82: 1119–1140.

12.

Centre for Audit Quality (CAQ) (2010) Report on deterring and detecting financial reporting fraud: A plan for action. Available at: http://www.thecaq.org/reports-and-publications/deterring-and-detecting-fraud/deterring-and-detecting-financial-reporting-fraud (accessed February 2014).

13.

Chen

Trotman

Zhou

(2015a) Nominal versus interacting electronic fraud brainstorming in hierarchical audit teams. Accounting Review 90: 175–198.

14.

Chen

Khalifa

Trotman

(2015b) Facilitating brainstorming: Impact of task representation on auditors’ identification of potential frauds. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 34: 1–22.

15.

Coram

Ferguson

Moroney

(2008) Internal audit, alternative internal audit structures and the level of misappropriation of assets fraud. Accounting and Finance 48: 543–559.

16.

Dennis

Johnstone

(2016) Audit partner leadership tone and professional scepticism in fraud brainstorming. Working paper, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI.

17.

Diehl

Stroebe

(1987) Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of the riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53: 497–509.

18.

Financial Reporting Council (FRC) (2013) Audit quality thematic review: Materiality. Available at: https://www.frc.org.uk/Our-Work/Publications/Audit-Quality-Review/Audit-Quality-Thematic-Review-Materiality.pdf (accessed May 2014).

19.

Hammersley

(2011) A review and model of auditor judgments in fraud-related planning tasks. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 30: 101–128.

20.

Hammersley

Bamber

Carpenter

(2010) The influence of documentation specificity and priming on auditors’ fraud risk assessments and evidence evaluation decisions. Accounting Review 85: 547–571.

21.

Harding

Trotman

(2017) The effect of partner communications of fraud likelihood and sceptical orientation on auditors’ professional scepticism. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 36: 111–131.

22.

Hoffman

Zimbelman

(2009) Do strategic reasoning and brainstorming help auditors change their standard audit procedures in response to fraud risk? Accounting Review 84: 811–837.

23.

International Forum of Independent Audit Regulators (IFIAR) (2015) International Forum of Independent Audit Regulators: Report on 2015 Survey of Inspection Findings. Available at: https://www.ifiar.org/IFIAR/media/Documents/IFIARMembersArea/PlenaryMeetings/September%202012%20(London)/2016-Survey-report-final-for-posting.pdf

24.

International Standard on Auditing 240 (ISA) (2004) The auditor’s responsibility to consider fraud in an audit of financial statements. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. Available at: http://www.ifac.org/system/files/downloads/a012-2010-iaasb-handbook-isa-240.pdf

25.

International Standard on Auditing 315 (ISA) (2004) Understanding the entity and its environment and assessing the risks of material misstatement. International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. Available at: http://www.ifac.org/system/files/downloads/a017-2010-iaasb-handbook-isa-315.pdf

26.

Kerr

Tindale

(2004) Group performance and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology 55: 623–655.

27.

KPMG (2011) Evaluating professional judgment in auditing and accounting: The KPMG profession judgment framework. KPMG. Available at: http://www.drlillie.com/a544/kpmg/jdgmt/KPMG_ProfJudgment_Monograph.pdf

28.

Libby

(1989) Expert measurement and mechanical combination in control reliance decisions. Accounting Review 64: 729–747.

29.

Lynch

Murthy

Engle

(2009) Fraud brainstorming using computer-mediated communication: The effects of brainstorming technique and facilitation. Accounting Review 84(4): 1209–1232.

30.

Nelson

(2009) A model and literature review of professional scepticism in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 28: 1–34.

31.

Nijstad

Diehl

Stroebe

(2003) Cognitive stimulation and interference in idea-generating groups. In: Paulus

Nijstad

(eds) Group Creativity. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 100–136.

32.

Offner

Kramer

Winter

(1996) The effects of facilitation, recording, and pauses on group brainstorming. Small Group Research 27: 283–298.

33.

Osborn

(1957) Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking. 2nd ed. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

34.

Oxley

Dzindolet

Paulus

(1996) The effects of facilitators on the performance of brainstorming groups. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 11: 633–646.

35.

Paulus

Brown

(2003) Enhancing ideational creativity in groups: Lessons from research in brainstorming. In: Paulus

Nijstad

(eds) Group Creativity. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 100–136.

36.

Paulus

Nakui

Putman

et al . (2006) Effects of task instructions and brief breaks on brainstorming. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 10: 206–219.

37.

Peecher

Solomon

Trotman

(2013) An accountability framework for financial statement auditors and related research questions. Accounting, Organizations and Society 38: 596–620.

38.

Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) (2013) Report on 2007–2010 inspections of domestic firms that audit 100 or fewer public companies. Available at: http://pcaobus.org/Inspections/Documents/02252013_Release_2013_001.pdf (accessed July 2016).

39.

Putman

(2001) Effects of additional rules and dominance on brainstorming and decision-making. PhD Thesis, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX.

40.

Trotman

Bauer

Humphreys

(2015) Group judgment and decision making in auditing: Past and future research. Accounting, Organizations and Society 47: 56–72.

41.

Trotman

Simnett

Khalifa

(2009) Impact of the type of audit team discussions on auditors’ generation of material frauds. Contemporary Accounting Research 26: 1115–1142.

42.

Trotman

Tan

Ang

(2011) Fifty-year overview of judgment and decision-making research in accounting. Accounting & Finance 51: 278–360.

The effect of brainstorming guidelines on individual auditors’ identification of potential frauds

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References