We examine the form and channels of the association between effective tax rates (ETRs) and audit fees. We find that both low and high ETRs are positively related to audit fees, indicating a nonlinear (U-shaped) function. The results hold after controlling for ETR volatility, firm performance, ex-ante risk of misstatement, and internal control weaknesses. To better understand the role of taxes on audit pricing, we conduct interviews with audit and tax partners. The findings further support the idea that firms’ tax strategies affect audit fees. We then utilize path analysis and find evidence that tax volatility and employee competence serve as a mediating path between high ETRs and audit fees, whereas operating complexity, tax volatility, internal control weaknesses, and the presence of tax havens mediate the relation between low ETR and audit fees.
AbbottL. J.BarberR.BusleppW. L.SapkotaP. (2023). Is audit partner identification useful? Evidence from the KPMG “steal the exam” scandal. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 42(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-2021-049
2.
AbernathyJ. L.FinleyA. R.RapleyE. T.StekelbergJ. (2021). External auditor responses to tax risk. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 36(3), 489–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558x19867821
3.
AdamsM. T.IngerK. K.MeckfesselM. D.MaherJ. (2022). Tax-related restatements and tax avoidance behaviour. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance.
4.
ArmstrongC. S.BlouinJ. L.JagolinzerA. D.LarckerD. F. (2015). Corporate governance, incentives, and tax avoidance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2015.02.003
AsayH. S.GuggenmosR.KadousK.KoonceL.LibbyR. (2022). Theory testing and process evidence in accounting experiments. The Accounting Review, 97(6), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2019-1001
BalakrishnanK.BlouinJ. L.GuayW. (2019). Tax aggressiveness and corporate transparency. The Accounting Review, 94(1), 45–69. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52130
9.
BauerA. M. (2016). Tax avoidance and the implications of weak internal controls. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(2), 449–486. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12151
10.
BauerA. M.FangX.PittmanJ. (2021). The importance of IRS enforcement to stock price crash risk: The role of CEO power and incentives. The Accounting Review, 96(4), 81–109. https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2018-0375
11.
BeardsleyE.ImdiekeA.OmerT. (2018). Evidence of a nonlinear association between auditor-provided non-audit services and audit quality. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3114395
BillsK. L.JeterD. C.SteinS. E. (2015). Auditor industry specialization and evidence of cost efficiencies in homogenous industries. The Accounting Review, 90(5), 1721–1754. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51003
14.
BloomfieldR.NelsonM. W.SoltesE. (2016). Gathering data for archival, field, survey, and experimental accounting research. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(2), 341–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.12104
BozanicZ.HoopesJ. L.ThornockJ. R.WilliamsB. M. (2017). IRS attention. Journal of Accounting Research, 55(1), 79–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.12154
17.
BrooksL. Z.ChengC. S. A.JohnstonJ. A.ReicheltK. J. (2016). Estimates of optimal audit firm tenure across different legal regimes. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 32(1), 3–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558x16641864
18.
ChengC.HennesK. M.SapkotaP. (2022). The non-linear relation between abnormal effective tax rates and tax-related restatements. Accounting Horizons, 36(4), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.2308/horizons-19-195
19.
ChyzJ. A.GaertnerF. (2018). Can paying ‘‘too much’’ or ‘‘too little’’ tax contribute to forced CEO turnover?The Accounting Review, 93(1), 103–130. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51767
20.
ChyzJ. A.Gal-OrR.NaikerV.SharmaD. S. (2021). The association between auditor provided tax planning and tax compliance services and tax avoidance and tax risk. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 43(2), 7–36. https://doi.org/10.2308/jata-19-041
21.
DebrecenyR. S.FarewellS. M.PiechockiM.FeldenC.GräningA.d’EriA. (2011). Flex or break? Extensions in XBRL disclosures to the SEC. Accounting Horizons, 25(4), 631–657. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-50068
22.
DechowP. M.HuttonA. P.KimJ. H.SloanR. G. (2012). Detecting earnings management: A new approach. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(2), 275–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2012.00449.x
23.
DeFondM. L.QiB.SiY.ZhangJ. (2023). Do signatory auditors with tax expertise reduce tax aggressiveness?Working Paper.
DemerjianP. R.LevB.McVayS. (2012). Quantifying managerial ability: A new measure and validity tests. Management Science, 58(7), 1229–1248. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1487
26.
DhaliwalD. S.KaplanS. E.LauxR. C.WeisbrodE. (2013). The information content of tax expense for firms reporting losses. Journal of Accounting Research, 51(1), 135–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2012.00466.x
27.
DonohoeM. P.KnechelR. W. (2014). Does corporate tax aggressiveness influence audit pricing?Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(1), 284–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12027
28.
DrakeK. D.HamiltonR.LuschS. J. (2020). Are declining effective tax rates indicative of tax avoidance? Insight from effective tax rate reconciliations. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 70(1), 101317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2020.101317
29.
DrakeK. D.LuschS. J.StekelbergJ. (2017). Does tax risk affect investor valuation of tax avoidance?Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 34(1), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558x17692674
30.
DuH.VasarhelyiM. A.ZhengX. (2013). XBRL mandate: Thousands of filing errors and so what?Journal of Information Systems, 27(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-50399
DyrengS. D.LindseyB. P. (2009). Using financial accounting data to examine the effect of foreign operations located in tax havens and other countries on U.S. multinational firms’ tax rates. Journal of Accounting Research, 47(5), 1283–1316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679x.2009.00346.x
33.
EagleshamJ. (2022). EY faces knotty split of its lucrative tax business. The Wall Street Journal.
34.
FeloA. J.KimJ. W.LimJ.-H. (2018). Can XBRL detailed tagging of footnotes improve financial analysts’ information environment?International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 28(March), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2017.12.003
35.
FinleyA. R.StekelbergJ. (2022). Measuring tax authority monitoring. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 44(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.2308/jata-2020-026
36.
FrancisJ. R.GunnJ. L. (2014). Industry accounting complexity and earnings properties: Does auditor industry expertise matter?Working Paper - University of Missouri and Univesity of Pittsburgh (November 24 version).
37.
FrankM. M.LynchL. J.RegoS. O. (2009). Tax reporting aggressiveness and its relation to aggressive financial reporting. The Accounting Review, 84(2), 467–496. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.2.467
38.
GallemoreJ.LabroE. (2015). The importance of the internal information environment for tax avoidance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(1), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.005
39.
GoldmanN. C.HarrisM. K.OmerT. (2022). Does task-specific knowledge improve audit quality: Evidence from audits of income tax accounts. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 99(May), 101320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2021.101320
40.
GuentherD. A.KrullL. K.WilliamsB. (2021). Identifying different types of tax avoidance: Implications for empirical research. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 43(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.2308/jata-17-044
41.
HaansR. F. J.PietersC.HeZ.-L. (2016). Thinking about U: Theorizing and testing U‐ and inverted u‐shaped relationships in strategy research. Strategic Management Journal, 37(7), 1177–1195. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2399
42.
HanlonM. (2005). The persistence and pricing of earnings, accruals, and cash flows when firms have large book-tax differences. The Accounting Review, 80(1), 137–166. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2005.80.1.137
HanlonM.KrishnanG.MillsL. (2012). Audit fees and book-tax differences. Journal of the American Taxation Association, 34(1), 55–86. https://doi.org/10.2308/atax-10184
45.
HerzR. H. (2013). XBRL trends and challenges. Compliance week.
46.
HonakerK.SharmaD. S. (2017). Does schedule UTP have uniform long-run effects on corporate tax planning?The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 39(2), 63–79. https://doi.org/10.2308/atax-51800
KimJ.-B.KimJ. W.LimJ.-H. (2019). Does XBRL adoption constrain earnings management? Early evidence from mandated U.S. filers. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(4), 2610–2634. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12493
51.
KothariS. P.LeoneA. J.WasleyC. E. (2005). Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1), 163–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.11.002
52.
KrishnanG. V.VisvanathanG. (2008). Does the SOX definition of an accounting expert matter? The association between audit committee directors’ accounting expertise and accounting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(3), 827–857. https://doi.org/10.1506/car.25.3.7
53.
KubicM. (2021). Examining the examiners: SEC error detection rates and human capital allocation. The Accounting Review, 96(3), 313–341. https://doi.org/10.2308/tar-2017-0581
54.
KubickT. R.LynchD. P.MayberryM. A.OmerT. (2016). The effects of regulatory scrutiny on tax avoidance: An examination of SEC comment letters. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1751–1780. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51433
55.
LindJ. T.MehlumH. (2010). With or without U? The appropriate test for a u‐shaped relationship. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 72(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2009.00569.x
56.
LoboG. J.ZhaoY. (2013). Relation between audit effort and financial report misstatements: Evidence from quarterly and annual restatements. The Accounting Review, 88(4), 1385–1412. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50440
MayewW. J.SethuramanM.VenkatachalamM. (2015). MD&A disclosure and the firm’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Accounting Review, 90(4), 1621–1651.
59.
MooreR. D. (2021). The concave association between tax reserves and equity value. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 43(1), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.2308/jata-17-109
60.
MorganS.WinshipC. (2007). Counterfactuals and causal inference: Methods and principles for social research. Cambridge University Press.
61.
NelsonM. W.ElliottJ. A.TarpIeyR. L. (2002). Evidence from auditors about managers’ and auditors’ earnings management decisions. The Accounting Review, 77(4), 175–202. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.s-1.175
62.
O’DwyerM.FoleyS. (2023). EY split paused amid partner infighting over fate of tax experts. Financial Times.
RapleyE. T.SapkotaP.StekelbergJ. (2024). Do public disclosures of investments in tax planning attract monitoring by tax authorities?Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 46(July-August), 107224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2024.107224
66.
RichardsonV. J. (2000). Information asymmetry and earnings management: Some evidence. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 15(4), 325–347. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1012098407706
67.
RobinsonJ. R.SikesS. A.WeaverC. D. (2010). Performance measurement of corporate tax departments. The Accounting Review, 85(3), 1035–1064. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.3.1035
SchwabC.StombergB.XiaJ. (2021). What determines effective tax rates? The relative influence of tax and other factors. Contemporary Accounting Research, 39(1), 459–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12720
SeetharamanA.GulF. A.LynnS. G. (2002). Litigation risk and audit fees: Evidence from UK firms cross-listed on US markets. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(1), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4101(01)00046-5
SimunicD. A. (1980). The pricing of audit services: Theory and evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 161–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/2490397
74.
SimunicD. A.SteinM. T. (1996). The impact of litigation risk on audit pricing: A review of the economics and the evidence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 15(2), 119–134.
75.
SmithA. L.ZhangY. J.KippP. C. (2019). Cloud-computing risk disclosure and ICFR material weakness: The moderating role of accounting reporting complexity. Journal of Information Systems, 33(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-52134
76.
SterinM. (2020). The influence of audit committee expertise on firms’ internal controls: Evidence from mergers and acquisitions. Accounting Horizons, 34(3), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.2308/horizons-19-076
77.
StreinerD. L. (2005). Finding our way: An introduction to path analysis. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie, 50(2), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370505000207
TuckerJ. (2010). Selection bias and econometric remedies in accounting and finance research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 29(Winter), 31–57.
80.
VenkataramanR.WeberJ. P.WillenborgM. (2008). Litigation risk, audit quality, and audit fees: Evidence from initial public offerings. The Accounting Review, 83(5), 1315–1345. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.5.1315
81.
WildeJ. H.WilsonR. (2018). Perspectives on corporate tax planning: Observations from the past decade. The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 40(2), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.2308/atax-51993
ZhaoY.BedardJ. C.HoitashR. (2017). Sox 404, Auditor Effort, and the Prevention of Financial Report Misstatements. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 36(4), 151–177. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51687
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
