Foreign currency denominated loans (FCDLs) are an important part of corporate funding as well as an operational risk management tool. We show that domestic borrowers use FCDLs to hedge their foreign exchange risk exposure. FCDLs are found to carry an interest rate premium over domestic currency loans after controlling for borrower characteristics, loan characteristics, and macroeconomic conditions. We argue that borrowers are willing to pay this premium since the marginal benefit of FCDLs as a natural hedge outweighs the marginal cost. From a lender’s perspective, this premium reflects a compensation for additional foreign exchange risk exposure and intensified monitoring efforts. These results are robust to endogeneity-corrected estimations.
Australian Bureau of Statistics (2009) Foreign currency exposure, Australia, MarchQuarter, Catalogue number 5308.0. Available at: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/5308.0
2.
BarclayMSmithC (1995) The maturity structure of corporate debt. Journal of Finance50: 609–631.
BergerANUdellGF (1990) Collateral, loan quality and bank risk. Journal of Monetary Economics25: 21–42.
5.
BharathSTDahiyaSSaundersAet al. (2011) Lending relationships and loan contract terms. Review of Financial Studies24: 1141–1203.
6.
BlackSKirkwoodJRaiAet al. (2012) A history of Australian corporate bonds. Reserve Bank of Australia research discussion paper no. RDP 2012-09, December. Sydney, NSW, Australia: Reserve Bank of Australia.
7.
BlenmanLP (1991) A model of covered interest arbitrage under market segmentation. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking23: 706–717.
8.
BrownCDoVTrevarthenO (2016) Liquidity shock management: Lessons from Australian Banks. Australian Journal of Management. Epub ahead of print 17November. DOI: 10.1177/0312896216656720.
9.
BrownMOngenaSYeşinP (2011) Foreign currency borrowing by small firms in the transition economies. Journal of Financial Intermediation20: 285–302.
10.
DennisSNandyDSharpeIG (2000) The determinants of contract terms in bank revolving credit agreements. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis35: 87–110.
11.
DennisSAMullineauxDJ (2000) Syndicated loans. Journal of Financial Intermediation9: 404–426.
12.
DruckerSPuriM (2005) On the benefits of concurrent lending and underwriting. Journal of Finance60: 2763–2799.
13.
EshoNSharpeIGWebsterKH (2007) Hedging and choice of currency denomination in international syndicated loan markets. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal15: 195–212.
14.
GéczyCMintonBASchrandC (1997) Why firms use currency derivatives. Journal of Finance52: 1323–1354.
15.
GottesmanARobertsG (2004) Maturity and corporate loan pricing. Financial Review39: 55–77.
HagelinN (2003) Why firms hedge with currency derivatives: An examination of transaction and translation exposure. Applied Financial Economics13: 55–69.
HeckmanJJIchimuraHToddPE (1997) Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Review of Economic Studies64: 605–654.
20.
HeckmanJJIchimuraHToddPE (1998) Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. Review of Economic Studies65: 261–294.
21.
HietalaPT (1989) Asset pricing in partially segmented markets: Evidence from the Finnish market. Journal of Finance44: 697–718.
22.
HubbardRGKuttnerKNPaliaDN (2002) Are there bank effects in borrowers’ costs of funds? Evidence from a matched sample of borrowers and banks. Journal of Business75: 559–581.
23.
IvashinaV (2009) Asymmetric information effects on loan spreads. Journal of Financial Economics92: 300–319.
24.
JorionPSchwartzE (1986) Integration vs. segmentation in the Canadian stock market. Journal of Finance41: 603–614.
25.
KediaSMozumdarA (2003) Foreign currency—Denominated debt: An empirical examination. Journal of Business76: 521–546.
26.
KeloharjuMNiskanenM (2001) Why do firms raise foreign currency denominated debt? Evidence from Finland. European Financial Management7: 481–496.
27.
MaddalaGS (1983) Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
MishkinFS (1999) Lessons from the Asian crisis. Journal of International Money and Finance18: 709–723.
29.
NandyDK (2010) Why do firms denominate bank loans in foreign currencies? Empirical evidence from Canada and U.K. Journal of Economics and Business62: 577–603.
30.
NydahlS (1999) Exchange rate exposure, foreign involvement and currency hedging of firms: Some Swedish evidence. European Financial Management5: 241–257.
31.
RajanRWintonA (1995) Covenants and collateral as incentives to monitor. Journal of Finance50: 1113–1146.
32.
RossDG (2010) The “dominant bank effect:” How high lender reputation affects the information content and terms of bank loans. Review of Financial Studies23: 2730–2756.
33.
SaundersASteffenS (2011) The costs of being private: Evidence from the loan market. Review of Financial Studies24: 4091–4122.
34.
VuTDoV (2014) Should Australian syndicated loan contracts be standardised?JASSA: The FINSIA Journal of Applied Finance1: 19–23.
35.
VuTDoVSkullyM (2015) Local versus foreign banks: A home market advantage in loan syndications. International Review of Financial Analysis37: 29–39.
36.
WooldridgeJM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
37.
YagoGMcCarthyD (2004) The US Leveraged Loan Market: A Primer. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Institute.
