This study finds that stronger market control (measured as fewer anti-takeover provisions) and more effective boards (measured as boards that are more independent and for which independent directors have more outside directorships) are both associated with higher R&D valuation. Furthermore, stronger market control (more effective board governance) is associated with higher R&D valuation only in the presence of weaker board governance (market control). Taken together, the results are consistent with the interpretation that both the market for corporate control and effective boards mitigate agency conflicts arising from R&D investments and improve the market valuation of R&D. Furthermore, the two mechanisms act as substitutes in doing so.
AboodyDLevB (2000) Information asymmetry, R&D, and insider gains. Journal of Finance55: 2747–2766.
2.
AbrahamsTSidhuBK (1998) The role of R&D capitalisations in firm valuation and performance measurement. Australian Journal of Management23: 169–183.
3.
AdamsRBSantosJAC (2006) Identifying the effect of managerial control on firm performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics41: 55–85.
4.
AhmedASDuellmanS (2007) Accounting conservatism and board of director characteristics: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics43: 411–437.
5.
AndersonRCReebDM (2003) Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance58: 1301–1328.
6.
BalachandranBFaffR (2015) Corporate governance, firm value and risk: Past, present, and future. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal35: 1–12.
7.
BaysingerBKosnikRTurkT (1991) Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate R&D strategy. Academy of Management Journal34: 205–214.
8.
BebchukLCohenAFerrellA (2009) What matters in corporate governance?Review of Financial Studies22: 783–827.
9.
BebchukLAStoleLA (1993) Do short-term objectives lead to under- or overinvestment in long-term projects?Journal of Finance48: 719–729.
10.
Becker-BleaseJR (2011) Governance and innovation. Journal of Corporate Finance17: 947–958.
11.
BrickleyJAColesJLTerryRL (1994) Outside directors and the adoption of poison pills. Journal of Financial Economics35: 371–390.
12.
BrownPBeekesWVerhoevenP (2011) Corporate governance, accounting and finance: A review. Accounting and Finance51: 96–172.
13.
BusheeBJ (1998) The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. Accounting Review73: 305–333.
14.
ChakrabortyARzakhanovZSheikhS (2014) Antitakeover provisions, managerial entrenchment and firm innovation. Journal of Economics and Business72: 30–43.
15.
ChanLKCLakonishokJSougiannisT (2001) The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures. Journal of Finance56: 2431–2456.
16.
ChenHLHsuWT (2009) Family ownership, board independence, and R&D investment. Family Business Review22: 347–362.
17.
ChoJLeeJ (2013) The venture capital certification role in R&D: Evidence from IPO underpricing in Korea. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal23: 83–108.
18.
ColesJLDanielNDNaveenL (2008) Boards: Does one size fit all?Journal of Financial Economics87: 329–356.
19.
CremersKJMNairVB (2005) Governance mechanisms and equity prices. Journal of Finance60: 2859–2894.
20.
DaleyJ (2001) The intangible economy and Australia. Australian Journal of Management26: 3–19.
21.
DenisDJKruseTA (2000) Managerial discipline and corporate restructuring following performance declines. Journal of Financial Economics55: 391–424.
22.
DeutschY (2007) The influence of outside directors’ stock-option compensation on firms’ R&D. Corporate Governance: An International Review15: 816–827.
23.
DittmarAMahrt-SmithJ (2007) Corporate governance and the value of cash holdings. Journal of Financial Economics83: 599–634.
24.
DongJGouY (2010) Corporate governance structure, managerial discretion, and the R&D investment in China. International Review of Economics & Finance19: 180–188.
FaleyeO (2007) Classified boards, firm value, and managerial entrenchment. Journal of Financial Economics83: 501–529.
27.
FichEMShivdasaniA (2006) Are busy boards effective monitors?Journal of Finance61: 689–724.
28.
GillanSHartzellJCStarksLT (2003) Explaining corporate governance: Boards, bylaws, and charter provisions. Working paper no. 2003-03, 21 August. Newark, DE: Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance.
29.
GompersPIshiiJMetrickA (2003) Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics118: 107–156.
30.
HallBH (1993) The stock market’s valuation of R&D investment during the 1980’s. American Economic Review83: 259–264.
31.
HallBHJaffeATrajtenbergM (2005) Market value and patent citations. RAND Journal of Economics36: 16–38.
32.
HillCWLSnellSA (1988) External control, corporate strategy, and firm performance in research-intensive industries. Strategic Management Journal9: 577–590.
33.
HusonMRParrinoRStarksLT (2001) Internal monitoring mechanisms and CEO turnover: A long-term perspective. Journal of Finance56: 2265–2297.
34.
IchijoKNonakaI (2007) Knowledge Creation and Management: New Challenges for Managers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
JensenM (1993) The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance48: 831–880.
36.
JirapornPKimYDavidsonWIII (2008) Multiple directorships and corporate diversification. Journal of Empirical Finance15: 418–435.
37.
KeFYPhamTFargherN (2004) The relevance to firm valuation of capitalised research and development expenditures. Australian Accounting Review14: 72–76.
38.
KnyazevaAKnyazevaDMasulisRW (2013) The supply of corporate directors and board independence. Review of Financial Studies26: 1561–1605.
39.
KohPSLaplanteSKTongYH (2007) Accountability and value enhancement roles of corporate governance. Accounting and Finance47: 305–333.
40.
KorY (2006) Direct and interaction effects of top management team and board compositions on R&D investment strategy. Strategic Management Journal27: 1081–1099.
41.
KumarPLangbergNSivaramakrishnanK (2012) Voluntary disclosures, corporate control, and investment. Journal of Accounting Research50: 1041–1076.
42.
LaevenLLevineR (2009) Bank governance, regulation and risk taking. Journal of Financial Economics93: 259–275.
LinCMaYMalatestaPet al. (2011) Ownership structure and the cost of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics100: 1–23.
45.
LinckJSNetterJMYangT (2008) The determinants of board structure. Journal of Financial Economics87: 308–328.
46.
MeulbroekLKMitchellMLMulherinJHet al. (1990) Shark repellents and managerial myopia: An empirical test. Journal of Political Economy98: 1108–1117.
47.
MikkelsonWHPartchMM (1997) The decline of takeovers and disciplinary managerial turnover. Journal of Financial Economics44: 205–228.
48.
MitrioneLTanewskiGBirtJ (2013) The relevance to firm valuation of research and development expenditure in the Australian health-care industry. Australian Journal of Management39: 425–452.
49.
MorckRYeungB (2002) The economic determinants of innovation. In: SomeshwarRAndrewS (eds) Productivity Issues in Canada. Calgary, AB, Canada: University of Calgary Press, pp. 361–418.
50.
OsmaBG (2008) Board independence and real earnings management: The case of R&D expenditure. Corporate Governance: An International Review16: 116–131.
51.
PanditSWasleyCEZachT (2011) The effect of Research and Development (R&D) inputs and outputs on the relation between the uncertainty of future operating performance and R&D expenditures. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance26: 121–144.
52.
PindadoJDe QueirozVDe La TorreC (2010) How do firm characteristics influence the relationship between R&D and firm value?Financial Management39: 757–782.
53.
RitterAWellsP (2006) Identifiable intangible asset disclosures, stock prices and future earnings. Accounting and Finance46: 843–863.
54.
RogersM (2002) The influence of diversification and market structure on the R&D intensity of large Australian firms. Australian Economic Review35: 155–172.
55.
SalimRABlochH (2009) Business expenditures on R&D and trade performances in Australia: Is there a link?Applied Economics41: 351–361.
56.
SapraHSubramanianASubramanianKV (2014) Corporate governance and innovation: Theory and evidence. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis49: 957–1003.
57.
SrinidhiBNHeSFirthM (2014) The effect of governance on specialist auditor choice and audit fees in U.S. family firms. Accounting Review89: 2297–2329.
58.
SteinJC (1988) Takeover threats and managerial myopia. Journal of Political Economy96: 61–80.
59.
SubramanyamKRVenkatachalamM (2007) Earnings, cash flows, and ex post intrinsic value of equity. Accounting Review82: 457–481.
60.
TongJYZhangF (2014) More evidence that corporate R&D investment (and effective boards) can increase firm value. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance26: 94–100.
