We provide an overview of the empirical literature on the politics of accounting standard-setting, focusing on the US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). Although it is clear from casual observation that politics sometimes plays a first-order role in the determination of accounting standards, we argue that more can be done to improve our understanding of this important topic. Based on our review, we outline what we see to be a number of potentially fruitful directions for future research.
AmershiAHDemskiJSWolfsonMA (1982) Strategic behavior and regulation research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy1: 19–32.
7.
AndrePCazavan-JenyADickW. (2009) Fair value and the banking crisis in 2008: Shooting the messenger. Accounting in Europe6: 3–24.
8.
BallR (2009) Market and political/regulatory perspectives on the recent accounting scandals. Journal of Accounting Research47: 277–323.
9.
BallRFosterG (1982) Corporate financial reporting: A methodological review of empirical research. Journal of Accounting Research20: 161–234.
10.
BeresfordDR (1993) Frustrations of a Standard Setter. Accounting Horizons7: 70–76.
11.
BeresfordDR (1997) How to succeed as a standard setter by trying really hard. Accounting Horizons11: 79–90.
12.
BeresfordDR (2001) Congress looks at accounting for business combinations. Accounting Horizons15: 73–86.
13.
BertomeuJCheynelE (2013) Towards a positive theory of disclosure regulation: In search of institutional foundations. Accounting Review88: 789–824.
14.
BertomeuJMageeRP (2011) From low-quality reporting to financial crises: Politics of disclosure regulation along the economic cycle. Journal of Accounting & Economics52: 209–227.
15.
BischofJBruggemannUDaskeH (2013) Fair value classification of financial assets during the financial crisis. Unpublished paper, University of Chicago.
16.
BrownPR (1981) A descriptive analysis of select input bases of the Financial Accounting Standards Board. Journal of Accounting Research19: 232–246.
17.
CollinsDWDentWT (1979) The proposed elimination of the full cost method in the petroleum extraction industry. Journal of Accounting & Economics1: 3–44.
18.
DeakinEB (1989) Rational economic behavior and lobbying on accounting issues: Evidence from the oil and gas industry. Accounting Review64: 137–151.
19.
DechowPMHuttonAPSloanRG (1996) Economic consequences of accounting for stock-based compensation. Journal of Accounting Research34: 1–20.
20.
FarberDBJohnsonMFPetroniKR (2007) Congressional intervention in the standard-setting process: An analysis of the stock option accounting reform act of 2004. Accounting Horizons21: 1–22.
21.
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) (1974) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 2: Accounting for Research and Development Costs. Stamford: FASB.
22.
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) (1975) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 8: Accounting for the Translation of Foreign Currency Transactions and Foreign Currency Financial Statements. Stamford: FASB.
23.
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) (1977) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 19: Financial Accounting and Reporting by Oil and Gas Producing Companies. Stamford: FASB.
24.
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) (1985a) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 86: Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased, or Otherwise Marketed. Stamford: FASB.
25.
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) (1985b) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 87: Employers’ Accounting for Pensions. Stamford: FASB.
26.
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) (1998) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133: Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Norwalk: FASB.
27.
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) (2001a) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141: Business Combinations. Norwalk: FASB.
28.
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) (2001b) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142: Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Norwalk: FASB.
FrancisJR (1987) Lobbying against proposed accounting standards: The case of employers; pension accounting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy6: 35–57.
31.
GonedesNJDopuchN (1974) Capital market equilibrium, information production, and selecting accounting techniques: Theoretical framework and review of empirical work. Journal of Accounting Research12: 48–129.
32.
HaringJR (1979) Accounting rules and “The Accounting Establishment.”Journal of Business52: 507–519.
33.
HerzR (2013) Accounting Changes. Durham, NC: American Institute of CPAs.
34.
HillNTSheltonSWStevensKT (2002) Corporate lobbying behaviour on accounting for stock-based compensation: Venue and format choices. Abacus38: 78–90.
35.
HolthausenRWLeftwichRW (1983) The economic consequences of accounting choice: Implications of costly contracting and monitoring. Journal of Accounting & Economics5: 77–117.
36.
HowiesonBA (2009) Agenda formation and accounting standard-setting: Lessons from the standard setters. Accounting and Finance49: 577–598.
37.
International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) (1998) International Accounting Standard 39: Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. London: IFRS Foundation.
38.
JohnsonLTSwieringaRJ (1996) Anatomy of an agenda decision: Statement no. 115. Accounting Horizons10: 149–179.
39.
JohnstonDJonesD (2006) How does accounting fit into a firm’s political strategy?Journal of Accounting and Public Policy25: 195–228.
40.
KaltJPZupanMA (1984) Capture and ideology in the economic theory of politics. American Economic Review74: 279–300.
41.
KauJBRubinPH (1979) Self-interest, ideology, and logrolling in congressional voting. Journal of Law & Economics22: 365–384.
42.
KellyL (1982) Corporate lobbying and changes in financing or operating activities in reaction to FAS no. 8. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy1: 153–173.
43.
KellyL (1985) Corporate management lobbying on FAS no. 8: Some further evidence. Journal of Accounting Research23: 619–632.
44.
KingRDO’KeefeTB (1986) Lobbying activities and insider trading. Accounting Review61: 76–90.
45.
KothariSPRamannaKSkinnerDJ (2010) Implications for GAAP from an analysis of positive research in accounting. Journal of Accounting & Economics50: 246–286.
46.
LeftwichR (1980) Market failure fallacies and accounting information. Journal of Accounting & Economics2: 193–211.
47.
LeftwichR (1990) Aggregation of test statistics: Statistics vs. economics. Journal of Accounting & Economics12: 37–44.
48.
LeftwichR (1995) The agenda of the Financial Accounting Standards Board. Working paper, University of Chicago, November.
49.
MillsLFNutterSESchwabCM (2013) The effect of political sensitivity and bargaining power on taxes: Evidence from federal contractors. Accounting Review88: 977–1005.
50.
NdubizuGAChoiYCJainR (1993) Corporate lobbying strategy and pension accounting deliberations: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance8: 277–287.
51.
PeltzmanS (1976) Toward a more general theory of regulation. Journal of Law & Economics19: 211–240.
52.
PosnerRA (1974) Theories of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics5: 335–358.
53.
PuroM (1984) Audit firm lobbying before the Financial Accounting Standards Board: An empirical study. Journal of Accounting Research22: 624–646.
54.
RamannaK (2008) The implications of unverifiable fair value accounting: Evidence from the political economy of goodwill accounting. Journal of Accounting & Economics45: 253–281.
55.
SaemannGR (1995) The accounting standard-setting due process, corporate consensus, and FASB responsiveness: Employers’ accounting for pensions. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance10: 541–554.
56.
SchipperK (1989) Commentary on earnings management. Accounting Horizons3: 91–102.
57.
SidhuBKWhittredG (2003) The role of political costs in the deferred tax policy choice. Australian Journal of Management28: 63–82.
58.
SkinnerDJ (2008a) Discussion of ‘The implications of unverifiable fair value accounting: Evidence from the political economy of goodwill accounting’. Journal of Accounting & Economics45: 282–288.
59.
SkinnerDJ (2008b) The rise of deferred tax assets in Japan: The role of deferred tax accounting in the Japanese banking crisis. Journal of Accounting & Economics46: 218–239.
60.
StiglerGJ (1971) The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science2: 3–21.
61.
SunderS (1988) Political economy of accounting standards. Journal of Accounting Literature7: 31–41.
62.
US Congress (1976) The Accounting Establishment, a staff study (Metcalf Report). Subcommittee on Reports, Accounting and Management, 94th Congress, Second Sessions.
63.
US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) (1999) SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin: No. 101 - Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements. Washington: SEC. Available at: www.sec.gov/interps/account/sab101.htm
64.
WalkerRGRobinsonP (1993) A critical assessment of the literature on political activity and accounting regulation. Research in Accounting Regulation7: 3–40.
65.
WattsRL (1974) Accounting objectives. Unpublished working paper, University of Rochester, April.
66.
WattsRL (1977) Corporate financial statements: A product of the market and political processes. Australian Journal of Management2: 53–75.
67.
WattsRL (2006) What has the invisible hand achieved?Accounting and Business Research36: 51–61.
68.
WattsRLZimmermanJL (1978) Towards a positive theory of the determination of accounting standards. Accounting Review53: 112–134.
69.
WattsRLZimmermanJL (1979) The demand for and supply of accounting theories: The market for excuses. Accounting Review54: 273–305.
70.
WattsRLZimmermanJL (1982) Auditors and the determination of accounting standards. Unpublished manuscript, University of Rochester.
71.
WattsRLZimmermanJL (1983) Agency problems, auditing, and the theory of the firm: Some evidence. Journal of Law & Economics26: 613–634.
