This paper will investigate the suitability of existing performance measures under the assumption of a clearly defined benchmark. A range of measures are examined including the Sortino Ratio, the Sharpe Selection ratio (SSR), the Student's t-test and a decay rate measure. A simulation study is used to assess the power and bias of these measures based on variations in sample size and mean performance of two simulated funds. The Sortino Ratio is found to be the superior performance measure exhibiting more power and less bias than the SSR when the distribution of excess returns are skewed.
Bawa, V. S., & Lindenberg, E. B.1977, ‘Capital market equilibrium in a mean-lower partial moment framework’, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 5, pp. 189–200.
2.
Chaudhry, A., & Johnson, H. L.2006, ‘Power and bias of benchmarked performance measures’, working paper, Queensland University of Technology.
3.
Foster, F. D., & Stutzer, M.2003, ‘Performance and risk aversion of funds with benchmarks: A large deviations approach’, University of Otago Department of Finance Seminar Series, Department of Finance, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
4.
Lo, A. W.2002, ‘The statistics of sharpe ratios’, Financial Analyst Journal, vol. 58, no. 4, 36–52.
5.
Miller, R. E., & Gehr, A. D.1978, ‘Sample size bias and sharpe's performance measure: A note’, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, vo1. 3, no. 5, pp. 943–6.
6.
Sharpe, W. F.1994, ‘The Sharpe ratio’, Journal of Portfolio Management, vol. 21, pp. 49–59.
7.
Sortino, F. A., & Price, L. N.1994, ‘Performance measurement in a downside risk framework’, Journal of Investing, vol. 3, pp. 50–8.
