Advances in manufacturing technology have led to the wider availability and affordability of narrow gauge atraumatic spinal needles. The use of these needles is the most effective method available for anaesthetists to reduce the incidence of post dural puncture headache. Their use in all circumstances however, may not be appropriate in light of the problems which may be associated. These problems are illustrated here by four case reports and a review of the literature.
Alfred LeeJ.Twenty years ago.Anaesthesia1967; 22(2): 342–346.
3.
VandamL.D., DrippsR.D.Long term follow up of patients who received 10,098 spinal anesthetics: III. Syndrome of decreased intracranial pressure (headache and ocular and auditory difficulties).JAMA1956; 161: 586.
4.
BareshP.G., CullenB.F., StieltingR.K.Clinical Anesthesia.Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott1992; 832.
5.
BonicaJ.The Management of Pain.Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger1953; 223.
KaneR.E.Neurological deficits following epidural or spinal anesthesia.Anesth Analg1981; 60(3): 150–161.
8.
ReynoldsF.Dural puncture and headache.Br Med J1993; 306(6882): 874–876.
9.
AtkinsonR.S., RushmanG.B., Alfred LeeJ.A Synopsis of Anaesthesia,Wright PSG, 1993; 16–17, 749, 752.
10.
ReadyL.B., CuplinS., HaschkeR.H., NesslyM.Spinal needle determinants of rate of transdural fluid leak.Anesth Analg1989; 69(4): 457–460.
11.
BuettnerJ., WreschK.P., KloseR.Postdural puncture headache: comparison between Whitacre and Quincke needles.Reg Anesth1993; 18: 166–169.
12.
MihicD.N.Postspinal headache and relationship of needle bevel to longitudinal dural fibres.Reg Anesth1985; 10: 76–81.
13.
CorbeyM.P., BergP., QuaynorH.Classification and severity of postdural puncture headache. Comparison of 26 gauge and 27 gauge Quincke needle for spinal anaesthesia in day-care surgery in patients under 45 years.Anaesthesia1993; 48(9): 776–781.
CousinsM.J., BridenbaughP.D.Neural blockade.Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott1988; 238.
16.
LyonsG., LesserP., BembridgeM.Lessons from in vitro testing of spinal needles.Anaesthesia Nov1995; 50(11): 964–968.
17.
DittmanM.N.Anatomical re-evaluation of lumbar dura mater with regard to postspinal headache. Effect of dural puncture.Anaesthesia1988; 43: 635–637.
18.
FrankssonC., GordhT.Headache after spinal puncture and a technique for lessening its frequency.Acta Chir Scand1951; 94: 443–454.
19.
WestbrookJ.L., UnclesD.R., SitzmanB.T., CarrieL.E.S.Comparison of the force required for dural puncture with different spinal needles and subsequent leakage of cerebrospinal fluid.Anesth Analg1994; 79(4): 769–772.
20.
CruikshankR.H., HopkinsonJ.M.Fluid flow through dural puncture sites. An in vitro comparison of needle point types.Anaesthesia1989; 44: 415–418.
21.
TarkillaP.J., HeineH., TervoR-R. Comparison of Sprotte and Quincke needles with repect to postdural puncture headache and backache.Reg Anesth1992; 17: 283–287.
22.
DahlJ.B.Spinal anaesthesia in young patients using a 29 gauge needle: technical considerations and an evaluation of postoperative complaints compared with general anaesthesia.Br J Anaesth1990; 64(2): 178–182.
23.
MulroyM.F., WillsR.P.Spinal anaesthesia for outpatients: appropriate agents and techniques.J Clin Anesth1995; 7: 622–627.
24.
LesserP., BenbridgeB., LyonsG., MacdonaldR.Evaluation of a 30 gauge spinal needle for caesarean section.Anaesthesia1990; 45: 767–769.
25.
TarkillaP., HuhtalaJ., SalminenU.Difficulties in spinal needle use. Insertion characteristics and failure rates associated with 25–, 27- and 29-gauge Quincke type spinal needles.Anaesthesia1994; 49(8): 723–725.
26.
KokkiH., HendolinH.Comparison of 25G and 29G Quincke spinal needles in paediatric day case surgery: a prospective randomized study of the puncture characteristics, success rate and postoperative complaints.Paed Anaesth1996; 6: 115–119.
27.
FlaattenH.A comparison between 26 and 29 gauge needles in young patients.Anaesthesia1989; 44: 147–149.
28.
EldorJ.Inventors of the pencil point spinal needle.Reg Anesth1994; 19(5): 363.
29.
SharmaS.K., GamblingD.R., JoshiG.P., SidawiJ.E., HerreraE.R.Comparison of 26 gauge Atraucan and 25 gauge Whitacre needles: insertion characteristics and complications.Can J Anaesth1995; 42(8): 706–710.
30.
HartJ.R., WhitacreR.G.Pencil-point needle in prevention of post spinal headache.JAMA1951; 147: 657–658.
31.
LipovE.G., SosisM.B., McCarthyR.J., IvankovichA.D.Does the design of the Sprotte spinal needle reduce the force needed to deform the tip?J Clin Anesth1994; 6(5): 411–413.
32.
BratteboT.Is the pencil point spinal needle a better choice in younger patients? A comparison of 24G Sprotte with 27G Quincke needles in an unselected group of general surgical patients below 46 years of age.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand1995; 39: 535–538.
33.
CampbellD.C.Comparison of the 25 gauge Whitacre with the 24 gauge Sprotte spinal needle for elective caesarean section: cost implications.Can J Anaesth1993; 40(12): 1131–1135.
34.
CesariniM.Sprotte needle for intrathecal anaesthesia for caesarean section: incidence of postdural puncture headache.Anaesthesia1990; 45: 656–658.
35.
CroneL.L., VogelW.Failed spinal anaesthesia with the Sprotte needle.Anesthesiology1991; 75: 717–718.
36.
AglanM.Y., StansbyP.K.There is a need to modify the Sprotte needle.Anaesthesia1993; 48(6): 534.
37.
WieselS., TesslerM.J., EasdownM.J.Postdural puncture headache: a randomised prospective comparison of the 24 gauge Sprotte and the 27 gauge Quincke needles in young patients.Can J Anaesth1993; 40(7): 607–611.
38.
ShuttL.E.Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: comparison of 22 gauge and 25 gauge Whitacre needles with 26 gauge Quincke needles.Br J Anaesth1992; 69(6): 589–594.
39.
LynchJ.The use of Quincke and Whitacre 27 gauge needles in orthopaedic patients: incidence of failed spinal anaesthesia and postdural puncture headache.Anesth Analg1994; 79(1): 124–128.
40.
KangS.B.Comparison of 26 and 27G needles for spinal anesthesia for ambulatory surgery patients.Anesthesiology1992; 76(5): 734–738.
41.
MessahelF.M., RobinsonJ.S., MathewsE.T.Factors affecting CSF flow in two spinal needles.Br J Anaesth1983; 55(S): 69–75.
42.
CarsonD.F., SerpellM.G.Clinical characteristics of commonly used spinal needles.Anaesthesia1995; 50(6): 523–525.
43.
PatelM.Flow characteristics of long spinal needles.Anaesthesia1994; 49(3): 223–225.
44.
SmithE.A.A comparison of 25 G and 27 G Whitacre needles for caesarean section.Anaesthesia1994; 49(10): 859–862.
45.
ToomeyP.J.Resistance to fluid through two spinal needles.Anaesthesia1990; 45(9): 751–753.
46.
HoelT.M., LindB.Spinal needles, gauge and headache.Br J Anaesth1987; 59: 808–809.
47.
AbidinM.R.Biomechanics of curved surgical needle bending.J Biomed Mater Res1989; 23(A1 suppl): 129–143.
48.
SitzmanB.T., UnclesD.R.The effects of needle type, gauge, and tip bend on spinal needle deflection.Anesth Analg1996; 82(2): 297–301.
49.
DrummondG.B., ScottD.H.T.Deflection of spinal needles by the bevel.Anaesthesia1980; 35: 854–857.
50.
KopaczD.J., AllenH.W.Comparison of needle deviation during regional anesthetic techniques in a laboratory model.Anesth Analg1995; 81(3): 630–633.
51.
KwanW.F., LeeC., ChenB.J.Severe deformation of a 25-gauge Whitacre spinal needle.Reg Anaesth1994; 19(4): 293–294.
52.
DresnerM., HallW.An experience with the Sprotte needle.Anaesthesia1994; 49(11): 1014.
53.
ChaneyM.A., BreyS.J.Severe deformation of a small gauge spinal needle.Anesth Analg1993; 77(2): 401–402.
UnclesD.R., WestbrookJ.L.Needle compatibility and combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia.Anaesthesia1994; 49: 646.
78.
BrighouseD., WilkinsA.Failure of pencil point spinal needles to enter the subarachnoid space.Anaesthesia1994; 49(2): 176.
79.
BeardsleyD.Transient neurological deficit after spinal anesthesia: local anesthetic maldistribution with pencil point needles?Anesth Analg1995; 81(2): 314–320.
BratteboG., WisborgT., RodtS.A., BjerkanB.Intrathecal anaesthesia in patients under 45 years: incidence of postdural puncture symptoms after spinal anaesthesia with 27G needles.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand1993; 37(6): 545–548.
82.
DouglasM.J.Potential complications of spinal and epidural anesthesia for obstetrics.Seminar Perinatol1991; 15: 368–374.
83.
BareshP.G., CullenB.F., StoeltingR.K.Clinical Anesthesia. Philadelphia, J. B.Lippincott Company1992; 834.
84.
CousinsM.J., BridenbaughP.D.Neural blockade. Philadelphia, J. B.Lippincott Company1988; 226.
85.
RiglerM.L.Cauda equina syndrome after continuous spinal anesthesia.Anesth Analg1991; 72: 275–281.
86.
LambertL.A., LambertD.H., StrichartzD.R.Irreversible conduction block in isolated nerve by high concentrations of local anesthetics.Anesthesiology1994; 80: 1082–1093.
87.
BaintonC., WingroveD., StrichartzG.Irreversible conduction block in isolated peripheral nerve by high concentrations of lidocaine.Anesthesiology1993; 79(3A): A872.
88.
RossB., CodaB., HealthC.Local anesthetic distribution in a spinal model: a possible mechanism of neurological injury after continuous spinal anesthesia.Reg Anesth1992; 17: 69–77.
89.
RiglerM., DrasnerK.Distribution of catheter injected local anesthetic in a model of the subarachnoid space.Anes-thesiology1991; 81: 314–320.
90.
de JongR.H.Last round for a “heavyweight”?Anesth Analg1994; 78: 3–4.
91.
SchneiderM., EttlinT., KaufmannM.Transient neurological toxicity after hyperbaric subarachnoid anesthesia with 5% lidocaine.Anesth Analg1993; 76: 1154–1157.
92.
TarkkillaP., HuhtalaJ., TuominenM.Transient radicular irritation after spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric lignocaine.Br J Anaesth1995; 74: 328–329.
93.
PollockJ.E., NealJ.M., StephensonC.A., WileyC.E.Prospective study of the incidence of transient radicular irritation in patiients undergoing spinal anesthesia.Anesthesiology1996; 84: 1361–1367.
94.
FenertyJ.Transient radicular pain following spinal anesthesia: review of the literature and report of a case involving 2% lidocaine.Intl J Obstet Anesth1996; 5: 32–35.
95.
PinczowerG., SchneiderM.Transient neurological symptoms after spinal anesthesia.Anesth Analg1995; 81: 1148–1153.
96.
RamasamyD., EadieR.Transient dysaesthesia following spinal anaesthesia with 2% lignocaine.Anaesth Intens Care1997; 25(1): 90–91.
97.
GrangeC.Radicular irritation with 2% lignocaine spinal.Anaesth Intens Care1997; 25(1): 89–90.
RasmussenB.S.Postspinal headache in young and elderly patients. Two randomised, double blinded studies that compare 20- and 25-gauge needles.Anaesthesia1995; 44(7): 571–573.
