Transoesophageal Doppler cardiac output measurement was evaluated against the thermodilution method in eleven patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery. A total of 106 pairs of Doppler and thermodilution values were obtained. Cardiac output was measured over a range of 2.3 l.min−1 to 11.5 l.min−1, The mean difference between the Doppler and thermodilution measures was −1.0 l.min−1 (thermodilution minus Doppler). Standard deviation was 1.8 l.min−1. This is a significant difference. It is concluded that these techniques do not agree when measuring cardiac outputs.
ShahK.B., RaoT.L.K., LaughlinS., El-EtrA.A.A review of pulmonary artery catheterization in 6245 patients. Anesthesiology1984; 61(3): 271–275.
2.
RowleyK.M., ClubbK., Soni, SmithG.J., Walker, CabinH.S.Right-sided infective endocarditis as a consequence of flow-directed pulmonary artery catheterization. N Engl J Med1984; 311(18): 1152–1156.
3.
FreundP.R.Transesophageal Doppler scanning versus thermodilution during general anaesthesia. An initial comparison of cardiac output techniques. Am J Surg1987; 153: 490–494.
4.
ElkayamU., GardinJ.M., BerkleyR., HughesC.A., HenryW.L.The use of Doppler flow velocity measurement to assess the hemodynamic response to vasodilators in patients with heart failure. Circulation1983; 67(2): 377–383.
5.
LeeW., RokeyR., CottonD.B.Noninvasive maternal stroke volume and cardiac output determinations by pulsed Doppler echocardiography. Am J Obstet Gynecol1988; 158(3 Pt 1): 505–510.
6.
BlandJ.M., AltmanD.G.Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet1986; (i): 307–310.
7.
AltmanD.G., BlandJ.M.Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician1983; 32: 307–317.
8.
RuncimanW.B., IlsleyA.H., RobertsJ.G.An evaluation of thermodilution cardiac output measurement using the Swan-Ganz catheter. Anaesth Intens Care1981; 9: 208–220.
9.
NadeauS., NobleW.H.Limitations of cardiac output measurements by thermodilution. Can J Anaesth1986; 33: 780–784.
10.
LevettJ.M., ReplogleR.L.Thermodilution cardiac output: A critical analysis and review of the literature. J Surg Res1979; 27: 392–404.
11.
SchusterA.H., NandaN.C.Doppler echocardiographic measurement of cardiac output: Comparison with a non-golden standard. Am J Cardiol1984; 53: 257–259.
12.
HuntsmanL.L., StewartD.K., BarnesS.R., FranklinS.B., ColocousisJ.S., HesselE.A.Noninvasive Doppler determination of cardiac output in man. Clinical validation. Circulation1983; 67: 593–602.
13.
RobsonS.C., DunlopW., MooreM., HunterS.Combined Doppler and echocardiographic measurement of cardiac output: theory and application in pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol1987; 94: 1014–1027.
14.
AlversonD.C., EldridgeM., DillonT., YabekS.M., BermanW.Jr.Noninvasive pulsed Doppler determination of cardiac output in neonates and children. J Pediat1982; 101(1): 46–50.
15.
TibballsJ., OsborneA., HockmannM.A comparative study of cardiac output measurement by dye dilution and pulsed doppler ultrasound. Anaesth Intens Care1988; 16: 272–277.
16.
TibballsJ.Doppler measurement of cardiac output. A critique. Anaesth Intens Care1988; 16: 475–477.
17.
ReinAJJT, HsiehK.S., ElixonM.Cardiac output estimates in the pediatric intensive care unit using a continuous-wave Doppler computer: Validation and limitations of the technique. Am Heart J1986; 112(1): 97–103.
18.
ChristieJ., SheldahlL.M., TristaniF.E., SagarK.B., PtacinM.J., WannS.Determination of stroke volume and cardiac output during exercise: comparison of two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography, Fick oximetry, and thermodilution. Circulation1987; 76(3): 539–547.
19.
DonovanK.D., DobbG.J., NewmanM.A., HockingsB.E.S., IrelandM.Comparison of pulsed Doppler and thermodilution methods for measuring cardiac output in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med1987; 15(9): 853–87.
20.
DonnersteinR.L., MarxG.R.Simplified method for estimation of Doppler cardiac output in the great arteries. Am J Cardiol1988; 62(1): 155–156.
21.
FagardR., StaessenJ., AmeryA.The use of Doppler echocardiography to assess the acute haemodynamic response to felodipine and metoprolol in hypertensive patients. J Hypertens1987; 5(2): 143–149.
22.
LoeberC.P., GoldbergS.J., MarxG.R., CarrierM., EmeryR.W.How much does aortic and pulmonary artery area vary during the cardiac cycle?Am Heart J1987; 113(1): 95–100.
23.
FreundP.R.Modifications in the transesophageal Doppler: Comparison with thermodilution measurement during cardiac output in anesthetized man. Anesthesiology1986; 65(3A): A144.
24.
BojanowskiL.M.R., TimmisA.D., NajmY.C., GoslingR.G.Pulsed Doppler ultrasound compared with thermodilution for monitoring cardiac output responses to changing left ventricular function. Cardiovasc Res1987; 21(4): 260–268.
25.
GuzA., InnesJ.A., MurphyK.Model validation and application of a range-gated ultrasound system for measuring ascending aortic blood velocity in man. J Physiol1984; 357: 83P.
26.
WesselH.U., PaulM.H., JamesG.W., GrahnA.R.Limitations of thermal dilution curves for cardiac output determinations. J Appl Physiol1971; 30(5): 643–652.
27.
BernsteinD.P.Noninvasive cardiac output, Doppler flowmetry and gold-plated assumptions. Crit Care Med1987; 15(9): 886–888.
28.
ColleyP.S., BarnesS.R.Feasibility of transesophageal measurement of cardiac output during surgery using Doppler ultrasound. Anesthesiology1985; 63(3A): A170.
29.
KumarA., MinagoeS., ThangathuraiD.Noninvasive measurement of cardiac output during general anesthesia by continuous wave Doppler esophageal probe: Comparison with simultaneous thermodilution cardiac output. Anesthesiology1985; 63(3A): A68.
30.
JohnsonB., DaviesG., EamalG., StarrJ.Comparison of continuous esophageal Doppler cardiac output with continuous Fick cardiac output during haemorrhage in pigs. Crit Care Med; 15(4): 365.
31.
SiegelL.C., ShaferS.L., MartinezG.M., ReamA.K., ScottJ.C.Simultaneous measurements of cardiac output by thermodilution, esophageal Doppler, and electrical impedance in anesthetized patients. J Cardiothorac Anesth1988; 2(5): 590–595.
