This research provides a data-driven methodology to choose optimal NACA airfoils suitable for small HAWTs operating at low Reynolds numbers. 36 airfoils at four different Reynolds numbers (421116–673866) were analyzed based on two important parameters: lift-to-drag ratio (Cl/Cd) and its standard deviation. Objective weighting was ensured before evaluation based on three multi-criteria decision-making methodologies: TOPSIS, AHP, and VIKOR. Borda Score was used to aggregate the rankings, and the consistency of the model was checked using Spearman’s correlation. NACA 4521, 4518, and 4421 emerged as high-performance candidates in all scenarios, with high aerodynamic performance and stability according to the results. The method developed in this research is a replicable method to choose the proper airfoil and will enhance the direction towards further optimization incorporating the structural and manufacturing aspects as well.
Allen GardnerBSeligMS (2003) Airfoil design using a genetic algorithm and an inverse method. In: 41st Aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, NV, 6–9 January 2003.
2.
BatuTLemuHGNegashB, et al. (2024) Optimal airfoil selection for small horizontal axis wind turbine blades: a multi-criteria approach. Advances in Mechanical and Materials Engineering41(1): 57–68.
3.
BougaaITenghiriL (2025) Small Horizontal Wind Turbine Blade Design, Optimization and Analysis of the Internal Layup Under Extreme Wind Conditions Respecting the IEC 61400 Series Norms (Thesis). Al Akhawayn University in Ifrane.
4.
GiguerePSeligMS (1997) Low Reynolds number airfoils for small horizontal axis wind turbines. Wind Engineering21(6): 367–380.
5.
GiguèrePSeligMS (1998) New airfoils for small horizontal axis wind turbines. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering120(2): 108.
6.
GopinathGSSMeherMVK (2018) Electricity a basic need for the human beings. AIP Conference Proceedings1992: 040024.
7.
GrassoFCoiroDBizzarriniN, et al. (2017) Design of advanced airfoil for stall-regulated wind turbines. Wind Energy Science2(2): 403–413.
8.
HansenMOL (2008) Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines. Earthscan.
9.
Henrik HansenT (2017) Aerodynamic Optimisation of Airfoils and Winglets for Wind Turbine Application. PhD Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
KassaBYBahetaATBeyeneA (2024) Aerodynamic performance characteristics of low re airfoils: a parametric and multi criteria decision study. Results in Engineering24: 103174.
14.
KimJHAhnBS (2019) Extended VIKOR method using incomplete criteria weights. Expert Systems with Applications126: 124–132.
15.
KonstantinosIGeorgiosTGaryfalosA (2019) A decision support system methodology for selecting wind farm installation locations using AHP and TOPSIS: case study in Eastern Macedonia and Thrace region, Greece. Energy Policy132: 232–246.
16.
KrishnanARoyS (2022) Aerodynamic profile modification of a NACA 0012 aerofoil for enhanced lift-drag characteristics at low Reynolds number. U Porto Journal of Engineering8(2): 156–168.
17.
LiuW (2016) Design and kinetic analysis of wind turbine blade-hub-tower coupled system. Renewable Energy94: 547–557.
18.
MadanchianMTaherdoostH (2023) A comprehensive guide to the TOPSIS method for multi-criteria decision making. Sustainable Social Development1(1): 2220.
MottaVGuardoneAQuarantaG (2015) Influence of airfoil thickness on unsteady aerodynamic loads on pitching airfoils. Journal of Fluid Mechanics774: 460–487.
21.
MouhsineSEOukassouKIchenialMM, et al. (2018) Aerodynamics and structural analysis of wind turbine blade. Procedia Manufacturing22: 747–756.
22.
OduG (2019) Weighting methods for multi-criteria decision making technique. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management23(8): 1449.
23.
OpricovicS (1998) Multicriteria Optimization of Civil Engineering Systems. PhD Thesis, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade, 302p.
24.
RajuSKSaravananNAlharbiAH, et al. (2024) AHP VIKOR framework for selecting wind turbine materials with a focus on corrosion and efficiency. Scientific Reports14(1): 24071.
25.
RehmanAUAbidiMHUmerU, et al. (2019) Multi-criteria decision-making approach for selecting wind energy power plant locations. Sustainability11(21): 6112.
26.
RoblesGLunaECTayactacRG, et al. (2023) Design and aerodynamic analysis of a bio-inspired HAWT with albatross and stork airfoil for low wind velocity using CFD. IEEE.
27.
Salgado FuentesVTroyaCMorenoG, et al. (2016) Airfoil selection methodology for small wind turbines. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research6(4): 1410–1415.
28.
SangLQTinnapobPDinhVT, et al. (2024) A method to design an efficient airfoil for small wind turbines in low wind speed conditions using XFLR5 and CFD simulations. Energies17(16): 4113.
29.
SaraivaP (2023) On Shannon entropy and its applications. Kuwait Journal of Science50(3): 194–199.
30.
SariF (2018) Comparison of TOPSIS and VIKOR multi criteria decision analysis techniques. Selcuk University Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology6(Özel (Special)): 825–831.
Seifi DavariHSeify DavariMBotezR, et al. (2023) Maximizing the peak lift-to-drag coefficient ratio of airfoils by optimizing the ratio of thickness to the camber of airfoils. Sustainable Earth Trends3(4): 46–61.
33.
SeligMSMcGranahanBD (2004) Wind tunnel aerodynamic tests of six airfoils for use on small wind turbines. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering126(4): 986–1001.
34.
ShahΗBhattaraiΝMathewS, et al. (2012) Low Reynolds number airfoil for small horizontal axis wind turbine blades. In: Sustainable future energy 2012 and 10th SEE Forum, Brunei, Darussalam, 21–23 November 2012.
35.
SharifMMAlaaTAminII, et al. (2015) Enzyme function classification based on sequence alignment. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing2: 409–418.
36.
SinghRKAhmedMRZullahMA, et al. (2012) Design of a low Reynolds number airfoil for small horizontal axis wind turbines. Renewable Energy42: 66–76.
37.
VafaeiNRibeiroRACamarinha-MatosLM (2016) Normalization techniques for multi-criteria decision making: analytical hierarchy process case study. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology470: 261–269.
38.
WangT-CChangT-H (2007) Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications33(4): 870–880.
39.
WinslowJOtsukaHGovindarajanB, et al. (2017) Basic understanding of airfoil characteristics at low Reynolds numbers (104–105). Journal of Aircraft55(3): 1–12.
40.
XuYLiYZhengL, et al. (2020) Site selection of wind farms using GIS and multi-criteria decision making method in Wafangdian, China. Energy207: 118222.
41.
YangHChenJPangX, et al. (2019) A new aero-structural optimization method for wind turbine blades used in low wind speed areas. Composite Structures207: 446–459.
42.
YazdaniMGraemlFR (2014) VIKOR and its applications. International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences5(2): 56–83.
43.
YossriWBen AyedSAbdelkefiA (2021) Airfoil type and blade size effects on the aerodynamic performance of small-scale wind turbines: computational fluid dynamics investigation. Energy229: 120739.
