This paper proposes a new in-situ damage detection approach for wind turbine blades, which leverages blade-internal non-stationary acoustic pressure fluctuations caused by the mechanical loading as the main source of excitation. This acoustic excitation was leveraged for the detection of fatigue-related damage modes on a full-scale wind turbine blade undergoing edgewise fatigue testing. An unsupervised, data-driven structural health monitoring strategy was developed to learn the normal cavity-internal acoustic sequences generated by the blade’s load cycles and to detect damage-related anomalies in the context of those sequences. A linear cepstral-coefficient based feature set was used to characterize the cavity-internal acoustics and LSTM-autoencoders were trained to accurately reconstruct healthy-case sequences. The reconstruction error was then used to characterize anomalous acoustic patterns within the blade cavity. The technique was able to detect a damage event earlier than a strain-based system by 120,000 load cycles.
AnaissiAZandaviSM (2010) Multi-object variational autoencoder: An application for smart infrastructure maintenance. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology9(4).
BayramBDumanTBInceG (2021) Real time detection of acoustic anomalies in industrial processes using sequential autoencoders. Expert Systems38(1).
4.
BealeCInalpolatMNiezreckiC (2020a) Active acoustic damage detection of structural cavities using internal acoustic excitations. Structural Health Monitoring19: 48–65.
5.
BealeCWillisDJNiezreckiC, et al. (2020b) Passive acoustic damage detection of structural cavities using flow-induced acoustic excitations. Structural Health Monitoring19: 751–764.
6.
BouzidOMTianGYCumananK, et al. (2015) Structural health monitoring of wind turbine blades: Acoustic source localization using wireless sensor networks. Journal of Sensors2015: 1–11.
7.
ChenXSemenovSMcGuganM, et al. (2021) Fatigue testing of a 14.3m composite blade embedded with artificial defects–Damage growth and structural health monitoring. .
8.
FazendaB (2011) Acoustic based condition monitoring of turbine blades. In: 18th International Congress on Sound and VibrationRio de Janeiro, Brazil.
9.
García MárquezFPBernalte SánchezPJSegovia RamírezI (2022) Acoustic inspection system with unmanned aerial vehicles for wind turbines structure health monitoring. Structural Health Monitoring21: 485–500.
10.
GoodfelllowIBengioYCourvilleA (2016) Deep Learning. Cambridge: MIT Press.
11.
GriffinD (2019) R&D Pathways for Supersized Wind Turbine Blades. Berkeley, CA: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
12.
IRENA (2012) Renewable Energy Technologies: Cost Analysis Series. Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency.
13.
IRENA (2019) Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2018. Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency.
14.
JiangZHuWDongW, et al. (2018) Structural reliability analysis of wind turbines: A review. Energies10: 2099.
15.
JungYKimYLimH, et al. (2017) Linear scale filterbank for deep neural network based voice activity detection. In: 20th conference of the oriental chapter of the international coordinating committee on speech databases and speech, pp.1–5. Seoul, South Korea: IEEE.
16.
KrauseTOstermannJ (2020) Damage detection for wind turbine rotor blades using airborne sound. International Association for Structural Control and Monitoring27: e2520.
17.
KrauseTPreihsSOstermannJ (2015) Acoustic emission damage detection for wind turbine rotor blades using airborne sound. Structural Health Monitoring.
18.
LeiHLopez-GonzaloEMel, linear, and anti-mel frequency cepstral coefficients in broad phonetic regions for telephone speaker recognition. In: 10th international conference of the international speech communication association. Brighton, UK, 2009.
19.
LiDHoSCMSongG, et al. (2015) A review of damage detection methods for wind turbine blades. Smart Materials and Structures24: 1–24.
20.
MarchiEVesperiniFEybenF, et al. (2015) A novel approach for automatic acoustic novelty detection using a denoising autoencoder with bidirectional LSTM neural networks. In: IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech, and signal processing (ICASSP), South Brisbane, QLD, Australia, pp.1996–2000.
21.
Martinez-LuengoMKoliosAWangL (2016) Structural health monitoring of offshore wind turbines: A review through the statistical pattern recognition paradigm. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews64: 91–105.
22.
McGuganMLarsenGCSorensenBF, et al. (2008) Fundamentals for Remote Condition Monitoring of Offshore Wind Turbines. Roskilde: Risoe National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy.
23.
MishnaevskyLBrannerKPetersenHN, et al. (2017) Materials for wind turbine blades: An overview. Materials10(11): 1285.
24.
OhDYYunID (2018) Residual error based anomaly detection using auto-encoder in SMD machine sound. Sensors18: 1–14.
25.
PearsonMPullinRSzigetiE (2018) Audible acoustics for detecting and locating damage in composite structures. In: 9th European workshop on structural health monitoring. Manchester, UK.
26.
PereiraJSilveiraM (2018) Unsupervised anomaly detection in energy time series data using variational recurrent autoencoders with attention. In: 17th IEEE international conference on machine learning and applications, Orlando, United States, 2018, pp.1275–1282.
27.
PrincipiERossettiDSquartiniS, et al. (2019) Unsupervised electric motor fault detection by using deep autoencoders. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica6: 441–451.
28.
RandallRB (2011) Vibration Based Condition Monitoring. Hoboken: Wiley.
29.
RandallRB (2017) A history of cepstrum analysis and its application to mechanical problems. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing97: 3–19.
30.
ReganTBealeCInalpolatM (2017) Wind turbine blade damage detection using supervised machine learning algorithms. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics139: 1–14.
31.
RISO/DNV (2002) Guidelines for Design of Wind Turbines, 2nd edn.Roskilde: Wind Energy Department, RISO National Laboratory.
32.
SanchezPJBRamirezISMarquezFPG (2021) Wind Turbines Acoustic Inspections performed with UAV and sound frequency domain analysis. In: 7th international conference on control, instrumentation, and automation.
33.
SolimineJInalpolatM (2022) An unsupervised data-driven approach for wind turbine blade damage detection under passive acoustics-based excitation. Wind Engineering46: 1311–1330.
34.
SolimineJNiezreckiCInalpolatM (2020) An experimental investigation into passive acoustic damage detection for structural health monitoring of wind turbine blades. Structural Health Monitoring19: 1711–1725.
35.
SorensenBFLadingLSendrupP, et al. (2002) Fundamentals for Remote Structural Health Monitoring of Wind Turbine Blades-a Preproject. Roskilde: Risoe.
36.
ThomsenOT (2009) Sandwich materials for wind turbine blades — Present and future. Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials11: 7–26.
37.
TraylorCDiPaolaMWillisDJ, et al. (2020) A computational investigation of airfoil aeroacoustics for structural health monitoring of wind turbine blades. Wind Energy23: 795–809.
38.
TsiapokiSKrauseTHackellM, et al. (2016) Combining a vibration-based SHM scheme and an airborne sound approach for damage detection on wind turbine rotor blades. In: 8th European workshop on structural health monitoring.
ZhouXGarcia-RomeroDDuraiswamiR, et al. (2011) Linear versus mel frequency cepstral coefficients for speaker recognition. In: IEEE workshop on automatic speech recognition and understanding, Waikoloa, HI2011, pp.559–564.
