The Savonius wind turbine is cost-effective, simple in structure, and potentially usable in urban areas but suffers from poor efficiency. Further, vortices emerges downward results in a higher rate of exergy loss and lower wind energy to power conversion rate. Thus, the objective of the present study is to enhance the performance of the Savonius wind turbine and reduction of generated friction entropy considering the novel design of airfoil-shaped blade. For this purpose, nine important design parameters of airfoil-shaped blade were chosen and dozen design points were designed based on the Plackett-burman method. After carrying out the screening analysis, the response surface methodology has been used to conduct sensitivity analysis and investigate the higher-order correlations to discover the optimal design of studied airfoil-shaped blade. The obtained results indicate that the optimal design could augment the power coefficient up to 12.89% at TSR = 0.8, compared to conventional semicircular rotor blade.
Al-BahadlyI (2009) Building a wind turbine for rural home. Energy for Sustainable Development13(3): 159–165.
2.
Al-GhriybahMZulkafliMFDidaneDH, et al. (2019) The effect of inner blade position on the performance of the Savonius rotor. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments36: 100534.
3.
AlomNSahaUK (2019) Influence of blade profiles on Savonius rotor performance: Numerical simulation and experimental validation. Energy Conversion and Management186: 267–277.
4.
AltanBDAtılganM (2008) An experimental and numerical study on the improvement of the performance of Savonius wind rotor. Energy Conversion and Management49(12): 3425–3432.
5.
ANSYS Inc (2013) ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide (Release 15.0). Canonsburg, PA: Ansys Inc.
6.
AntarEElkhouryM (2019) Parametric sizing optimization process of a casing for a Savonius vertical axis wind turbine. Renewable Energy136: 127–138.
7.
ChanCMBaiHLHeDQ (2018) Blade shape optimization of the Savonius wind turbine using a genetic algorithm. Applied Energy213: 148–157.
8.
DidaneDHRoslyNZulkafliMF, et al. (2019) Numerical investigation of a novel contra-rotating vertical axis wind turbine. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments31: 43–53.
9.
DragomirescuA (2011) Performance assessment of a small wind turbine with crossflow runner by numerical simulations. Renewable Energy36(3): 957–965.
10.
DrissZMlayehODrissS, et al. (2015) Study of the bucket design effect on the turbulent flow around unconventional Savonius wind rotors. Energy89: 708–729.
11.
D’AlessandroVMontelpareSRicciR, et al. (2010) Unsteady aerodynamics of a Savonius wind rotor: A new computational approach for the simulation of energy performance. Energy35(8): 3349–3363.
12.
FrikhaSDrissZAyadiE, et al. (2016) Numerical and experimental characterization of multi-stage Savonius rotors. Energy114: 382–404.
13.
FujisawaN (1992) On the torque mechanism of Savonius rotors. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics40(3): 277–292.
14.
FujisawaNGotohF (1994) Experimental study on the aerodynamic performance of a Savonius rotor. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering116(3): 148–152.
15.
FuMC (2015) Handbook of Simulation Optimization. New York, NY: Springer.
16.
GolechaKEldhoTIPrabhuSV (2011) Influence of the deflector plate on the performance of modified Savonius water turbine. Applied Energy88(9): 3207–3217.
17.
HayashiTLiYHaraY (2005) Wind tunnel tests on a different phase three-stage Savonius rotor. JSME International Journal Series B48(1): 9–16.
18.
IrabuKRoyJN (2007) Characteristics of wind power on Savonius rotor using a guide-box tunnel. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science32(2): 580–586.
19.
JinXWangYJuW, et al. (2018) Investigation into parameter influence of upstream deflector on vertical axis wind turbines output power via three-dimensional CFD simulation. Renewable Energy115: 41–53.
20.
KacprzakKLiskiewiczGSobczakK (2013) Numerical investigation of conventional and modified Savonius wind turbines. Renewable Energy60: 578–585.
21.
KerikousEThéveninD (2019) Optimal shape of thick blades for a hydraulic Savonius turbine. Renewable Energy134: 629–638.
22.
KirkeB (2020) Hydrokinetic turbines for moderate sized rivers. Energy for Sustainable Development58: 182–195.
23.
KumarASainiRP (2017) Performance analysis of a single stage modified Savonius hydrokinetic turbine having twisted blades. Renewable Energy113: 461–478.
24.
KumarDSarkarS (2016) Numerical investigation of hydraulic load and stress induced in Savonius hydrokinetic turbine with the effects of augmentation techniques through fluid-structure interaction analysis. Energy116: 609–618.
25.
KumbernussJChenJYangHX, et al. (2012) Investigation into the relationship of the overlap ratio and shift angle of double stage three bladed vertical axis wind turbine (VAWT). Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics107–108: 57–75.
26.
LiangXFuSOuB, et al. (2017) A computational study of the effects of the radius ratio and attachment angle on the performance of a Darrieus-Savonius combined wind turbine. Renewable Energy113: 329–334.
27.
LiJKleinstreuerC (2010) Entropy generation analysis for nanofluid flow in microchannels. Journal of Heat Transfer132(12): 122401.
28.
MahmoudNHEl-HarounAAWahbaE, et al. (2012) An experimental study on improvement of Savonius rotor performance. Alexandria Engineering Journal51(1): 19–25.
29.
Marinić-KragićIVučinaDMilasZ (2019) Concept of flexible vertical-axis wind turbine with numerical simulation and shape optimization. Energy167: 841–852.
30.
Marinić-KragićIVučinaDMilasZ (2020) Computational analysis of Savonius wind turbine modifications including novel scooplet-based design attained via smart numerical optimization. Journal of Cleaner Production262: 121310.
31.
MereuRFedericiDFerrariG, et al. (2017) Parametric numerical study of Savonius wind turbine interaction in a linear array. Renewable Energy113: 1320–1332.
32.
MohamedMHJanigaGPapE, et al. (2011) Optimal blade shape of a modified Savonius turbine using an obstacle shielding the returning blade. Energy Conversion and Management52(1): 236–242.
33.
MohammadiMLakestaniMMohamedMH (2018) Intelligent parameter optimization of Savonius rotor using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Energy143: 56–68.
34.
NaseemAUddinEAliZ, et al. (2020) Effect of vortices on power output of vertical axis wind turbine (VAWT). Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments37: 100586.
35.
NasefMHEl-AskaryWAAbdEL-hamidAA, et al. (2013) Evaluation of Savonius rotor performance: Static and dynamic studies. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics123: 1–11.
36.
PlackettRLBurmanJP (1946) The design of optimum multifactorial experiments. Biometrika33(4): 305–325.
37.
RoySDucoinA (2016) Unsteady analysis on the instantaneous forces and moment arms acting on a novel Savonius-style wind turbine. Energy Conversion and Management121: 281–296.
38.
RoySSahaUK (2013) Review on the numerical investigations into the design and development of Savonius wind rotors. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews24: 73–83.
39.
RoySSahaUK (2014) An adapted blockage factor correlation approach in wind tunnel experiments of a Savonius-style wind turbine. Energy Conversion and Management86: 418–427.
40.
SainiGSainiRP (2018) A numerical analysis to study the effect of radius ratio and attachment angle on hybrid hydrokinetic turbine performance. Energy for Sustainable Development47: 94–106.
41.
SarmaNKBiswasAMisraRD (2014) Experimental and computational evaluation of Savonius hydrokinetic turbine for low velocity condition with comparison to Savonius wind turbine at the same input power. Energy Conversion and Management83: 88–98.
42.
SharmaSSharmaRK (2017) CFD investigation to quantify the effect of layered multiple miniature blades on the performance of Savonius rotor. Energy Conversion and Management144: 275–285.
43.
SheldahlREBlackwellBFFeltzLV (1978) Wind tunnel performance data for two- and three-bucket Savonius rotors. Journal of Energy2(3): 160–164.
44.
TahaniMRabbaniAKasaeianA, et al. (2017) Design and numerical investigation of Savonius wind turbine with discharge flow directing capability. Energy130: 327–338.
45.
TalukdarPKSardarAKulkarniV, et al. (2018) Parametric analysis of model Savonius hydrokinetic turbines through experimental and computational investigations. Energy Conversion and Management158: 36–49.
46.
TartuferiMD’AlessandroVMontelpareS, et al. (2015) Enhancement of Savonius wind rotor aerodynamic performance: A computational study of new blade shapes and curtain systems. Energy79: 371–384.
47.
TianWMaoZZhangB, et al. (2018) Shape optimization of a Savonius wind rotor with different convex and concave sides. Renewable Energy117: 287–299.
48.
TongW (2010) Wind Power Generation and Wind Turbine Design. Boston, MA: WIT press.
49.
Witek-KrowiakAChojnackaKPodstawczykD, et al. (2014) Application of response surface methodology and artificial neural network methods in modelling and optimization of biosorption process. Bioresource Technology160: 150–160.
50.
WuBLangYZargariN, et al. (2011) Power Conversion and Control of Wind Energy Systems. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
