The smart grid concept is predicated upon the pervasive use of advanced digital communication, information techniques, and artificial intelligence for the current power system to be more characteristics on the real-time monitoring and controlling of the supply/demand. Therefore, in recent years, researchers increasingly couple distinct simulators to form novel “co-simulations.” In this article, we will present a survey of different electrical power and communication simulators, a literature survey of 20 smart grid co-simulations frameworks, and the characteristics of each platform applicable in the intelligent electrical network. Finally, we proposed multi-agent systems for controlling the microgrid that consists of wind power and storage system using MACSimJX co-simulation that combines Simulink simulator and JADE (Java Agent Development Environment).
AzeroualMEl MakriniAEl MoussaouiH, et al. (2018) Renewable energy potential and available capacity for wind and solar power in Morocco towards 2030. Journal of Engineering Science & Technology Review11(1): 189–198.
DedeJKuladinithiKForsterA, et al. (2015) OMNeT++ and Mosaik: Enabling Simulation of Smart Grid Communications (Sustainable Communication Networks Group). Bremen: University of Bremen.
9.
DongXLinHTanR, et al. (2015) Software-defined networking for smart grid resilience: Opportunities and challenges. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM workshop on cyber-physical system security, Singapore. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2732203
10.
EddyFGooiHBChenSX (2014) Multi-agent system for distributed management of microgrids. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems30: 24–34.
11.
FaschangMNöhrerMStöcklJ, et al. (2014) Extensible co-simulation framework for electric vehicle charging infrastructure testing. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on smart grid communications (SmartGridComm), Venice, 3–6 November, pp. 182–187. New York: IEEE.
12.
FathimaAHPalanisamyK (2015) Optimization in microgrids with hybrid energy systems—A review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews45: 431–446.
13.
GodfreyTMullenSGriffithDW, et al. (2010) Modeling smart grid applications with cosimulation. In: IEEE international conference on smart grid communications, Gaithersburg, MD, 4–6October.
14.
GungorVSahinDKocakT, et al. (2013) A survey on smart grid potential applications and communication requirements. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics9: 28–42.
15.
HopkinsonKWangXGiovaniniR, et al. (2006) EPOCHS: A platform for agent-based electric power and communication simulation built from commercial off-the-shelf components. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems21: 548–558.
JustoJJMwasiluFLeeJ, et al. (2013) AC-microgrids versus DC-microgrids with distributed energy resources: A review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews24: 387–405.
18.
KhamphanchaiWKuzluMPipattanasompornM (2013) A smart distribution transformer management with multi agent technologies. In: IEEE PES innovative smart grid technologies, Washington, DC, 24–27February.
19.
KohtamakiTPohjolaMBrandJ, et al. (2009) PiccSIM toolchain-design, simulation and automatic implementation of wireless networked control systems. In: International conference on networking, sensing and control (ICNSC’09), Okayama, Japan, 26–29 March 2009, pp. 49–54. New York: IEEE.
20.
LiWMontiALuoM, et al. (2011) VPNET: A co-simulation framework for analyzing communication channel effects on power systems. In: 2011 IEEE electric ship technologies symposium (ESTS), Alexandria, VA, 10–13 April, pp. 143–149. New York: IEEE.
21.
LiberatoreVAl-HammouriA (2011) Smart grid communication and co-simulation. In: Energytech, Cleveland, OH, 25–26 May, pp. 1–5. New York: IEEE.
22.
LinHVedaSSShuklaSS, et al. (2012) GECO: Global event-driven co-simulation framework for interconnected power system and communication network. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid3: 1444–1456.
23.
LugaricLKrajcarSSimicZ, et al. (2010) Smart city—Platform for emergent phenomena power system testbed simulator. In: IEEE/PES innovative smart grid technologies conference Europe 2010 (ISGT Europe ’10), Gothenberg, 11–13 October.
24.
MallouhiMAl-NashifYCoxD, et al. (2011) A testbed for analyzing security of SCADA control systems (TASSCS). In: IEEE/PES innovative smart grid technology, Anaheim, CA, 17–19January.
25.
MerabetGHEssaaidiMTaleiH, et al. (2014) Applications of multi-agent systems in smart grids: A survey. In: 2014 international conference on multimedia computing and systems (ICMCS), Marrakech, 14–16 April, pp. 1088–1094. New York: IEEE.
PanZXuQChenC, et al. (2016) NS3-MATLAB co-simulator for cyber-physical systems in smart grid. In: 2016 35th Chinese control conference (CCC), Chengdu, China, 27–29 July, pp. 9831–9836. New York: IEEE.
Rotger-GrifulSChatzivasileiadisSJacobsenRH, et al. (2016) Hardware-in-the-Loop co-simulation of distribution grid for demand response. In: Power systems computation conference, Genoa, 20–24 June.
30.
SunXChenYLiuJ, et al. (2014) A co-simulation platform for smart grid considering interaction between information and power systems. In: 2014 IEEE PES innovative smart grid technologies conference (ISGT), Washington, DC, 19–22 February, pp. 1–6. New York: IEEE.
31.
TanSSongW-ZDongQ, et al. (2012) Score: Smart-grid common open research emulator. In: 2012 IEEE third international conference on smart grid communications (SmartGridComm), Tainan, 5–8 November, pp. 282–287. New York: IEEE.
32.
TianHMancilla-DavidFEllisK, et al. (2012) A cell-to-module-to array detailed model for photovoltaic panels. Solar Energy86: 2695–2706.
VogtMMartenFBraunM (2018) A survey and statistical analysis of smart grid co-simulations. Applied Energy222: 67–78.
36.
WeingartnerEVom LehnHWehrleK (2009) A performance comparison of recent network simulators. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on communications, Dresden, 14–18 June.
37.
WooldridgeMJenningsNR (1995) Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. The Knowledge Engineering Review10(2): 115–152.
38.
WooldridgeMJenningsNRKinneyD (2000) The Gaia methodology for agent-oriented analysis and design. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems3(3): 285–312.
39.
ZhuKChenineMNordstormL, et al. (2011) ICT architecture impact on wide area monitoring and control systems’ reliability. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery26: 2801–2808.
