Impact of cyber dependencies in critical infrastructures: The reliability of grid splitting in power systems

Abstract

The growing presence of cyber interdependencies in critical infrastructures can be exemplified by grid splitting, which is an application in power system stability and control dependent on communication services. It involves the controlled separation of a power system into islands in reaction to an imminent instability. Communication is necessary for gathering system-wide synchronized measurements for state estimation as well as for the dispatch of line switch-opening signals. However, grid splitting may become ineffective due to a degradation in communication, which is accrued by the use of non-dedicated, open communication networks. To address this issue, this article aims to quantify the reliability of grid splitting under degraded communication conditions. A simulation framework is developed that allows the integration of a transient electrical model and a stochastic communication delay model that captures the effects of congestion and traffic uncertainty. The application to the IEEE 39-Bus Test System shows that the reliability of grid splitting is reduced under the influence of degraded communication leading to increased time delays. Furthermore, the results identify a critical transition range in the grid splitting reliability for a very narrow range of external interfering traffic and network data rate. Finally, the interdependency of the electric and the communication network is quantified by the expected efficiency of the communication network subject to degraded communication following the grid splitting action. The decrease in the expected communication efficiency under degraded communication is driven by increased congestion levels and by failures of electrical and co-located communication nodes and is related to the critical transition range for reliability. The developed methodology allows identifying the communication requirements for a reliable grid splitting execution under traffic uncertainty and congestion.

Keywords

Smart grid grid splitting cyber dependency complex networks critical infrastructures communication networks wide area measurements

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Rinaldi

Peerenboom

Kelly

. Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies. IEEE Contr Syst 2001; 21: 11–25.

Teixeira

Sou

Sandberg

et al . Secure control systems: a quantitative risk management approach. IEEE Contr Syst 2015; 35: 24–45.

Lasseter

. Smart distribution: coupled microgrids. P IEEE 2011; 99: 1074–1082.

Ulbig

Borsche

Andersson

. Impact of low rotational inertia on power system stability and operation. arXiv:13126435, December 2013. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

Vaiman

Bell

Chen

et al . Risk assessment of cascading outages: methodologies and challenges. IEEE T Power Syst 2012; 27: 631–641.

Berizzi

. The Italian 2003 blackout. In: 2004 IEEE Power Engineering Society general meeting, Denver, CO, 6–10 June 2004, pp.1673–1679. New York: IEEE.

Morgan

Apt

Lave

et al . The many meanings of ‘smart grid’, http://www.cmu.edu/epp/policy-briefs/briefs/Policy_Brief_Smart_Grid_July_09.pdf

Moslehi

Kumar

. A reliability perspective of the smart grid. IEEE T Smart Grid 2010; 1: 57–64.

De La Ree

Centeno

Thorp

et al . Synchronized phasor measurement applications in power systems. IEEE T Smart Grid 2010; 1: 20–27.

10.

Hespanha

Naghshtabrizi

. A survey of recent results in networked control systems. P IEEE 2007; 95: 138–162.

11.

Shi

. Network-based predictive control for constrained nonlinear systems with two-channel packet dropouts. IEEE T Ind Electron 2014; 61: 1574–1582.

12.

Kleinrock

. Queuing systems. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 1975.

13.

Mitra

Wang

. Stochastic traffic engineering for demand uncertainty and risk-aware network revenue management. IEEE ACM T Network 2005; 13: 221–233.

14.

Senroy

Heydt

. A conceptual framework for the controlled islanding of interconnected power systems. IEEE T Power Syst 2006; 21: 1005–1006.

15.

Chiang

Varaiya

. Foundations of direct methods for power system transient stability analysis. IEEE T Circuits Syst 1987; 34: 160–173.

16.

Senroy

Heydt

Vittal

. Decision tree assisted controlled islanding. IEEE T Power Syst 2006; 21: 1790–1797.

17.

Hashiesh

Mostafa

Khatib

et al . An intelligent wide area synchrophasor based system for predicting and mitigating transient instabilities. IEEE T Smart Grid 2012; 3: 645–652.

18.

Zhao

Sun

Zheng

et al . A study of system splitting strategies for island operation of power system: a two-phase method based on OBDDs. IEEE T Power Syst 2003; 18: 1556–1565.

19.

Ding

Gonzalez-Longatt

Wall

et al . Two-step spectral clustering controlled islanding algorithm. IEEE T Power Syst 2013; 28: 75–84.

20.

Tian

Sansavini

. Impact of degraded communication on interdependent power systems: the application of grid splitting. Electronics 2016; 5: 49.

21.

Stahlhut

Browne

Heydt

et al . Latency viewed as a stochastic process and its impact on wide area power system control signals. IEEE T Power Syst 2008; 23: 84–91.

22.

Daigle

. Queueing theory with applications to packet telecommunication. London: Springer, 2005.

23.

Gómez-Expósito

Conejo

Cañizares

. Electric energy systems: analysis and operation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2008.

24.

Bergen

Vittal

. Power systems analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2000.

25.

Chow

. Time-scale modeling of dynamic networks with applications to power systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1982.

26.

Henner

. A network separation scheme for emergency control. Int J Elec Power 1980; 2: 109–114.

27.

Gao

Havlin

. From a single network to a network of networks. Natl Sci Rev 2014; 1: 346–356.

28.

Zhao

Sanhedrai

et al . Spatio-temporal propagation of cascading overload failures in spatially embedded networks. Nat commun 2016; 7: 10094.

29.

Rosato

Issacharoff

Tiriticco

et al . Modelling interdependent infrastructures using interacting dynamical models. Int J Crit Infr 2008; 4: 63–79.

30.

Athay

Podmore

Virmani

. A practical method for the direct analysis of transient stability. IEEE T Power Ap Syst 1979; PAS-98: 573–584.

31.

Kundur

Balu

Lauby

. Power system stability and control. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.

32.

Zimmerman

Murillo-Sánchez

Thomas

. MATPOWER: steady-state operations, planning, and analysis tools for power systems research and education. IEEE T Power Syst 2011; 26: 12–19.

33.

Sun

Zheng

. A simulation study of OBDD-based proper splitting strategies for power systems under consideration of transient stability. IEEE T Power Syst 2005; 20: 389–399.

34.

Cao

Davis

Vander Wiel

et al . Time-varying network tomography: router link data. J Am Stat Assoc 2000; 95: 1063–1075.

35.

Cao

Wiel

et al . A scalable method for estimating network traffic matrices from link counts, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/B_Yu/publication/2519699_A_Scalable_Method_for_Estimating_Network_Traffic_Matrices_from_Link_Counts/links/547370180cf216f8cfaff5da.pdf, 2000.

36.

Morris

Lin

. Variance of aggregated web traffic. Nineteenth annual joint conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, Tel Aviv, Israel, 26–30 March 2000, pp.360–366. New York: IEEE.

37.

Medina

Taft

Salamatian

et al . Traffic matrix estimation: existing techniques and new directions. ACM SIGCOMM Comp Com 2002; 32: 161–174.