The adhesion between a rigid substrate and spline-defined elastic punches is investigated with focus on the asymptotic normal stress near the contact edge. Interfacial stress distributions are obtained from automated finite element simulations in Abaqus using Python scripting. Based on these results, a surrogate-based optimization framework is developed in which a narrow feedforward neural network predicts the characteristics of the asymptotic normal stress solution from the punch geometry. The asymptotic normal stress solution allows for the semi-analytical determination of the energy release rate for edge-initiated interfacial defects, which is a primary governing factor of adhesion strength. The optimization aims to minimize the asymptotic normal stress. The results show that the proposed approach accurately captures the highly nonlinear geometry-stress relationship and identifies spline-based punch geometries with improved adhesion performance compared to a straight cylindrical punch. This framework can be used to design new geometries with improved adhesion characteristics. The data and code will be provided in the Supplemental Material for reproducibility and further exploration.
GlickPSureshSARuffattoD, et al. A soft robotic gripper with gecko-inspired adhesive. IEEE Robot Autom Lett2018; 3: 903–910. https://doi.org/10.1109/lra.2018.2792688
4.
Ben-LarbiMKHenselRAtzeniG, et al. Orbital debris removal using micropatterned dry adhesives: review and recent advances. Prog Aerosp Sci2022; 134: 100850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2022.100850
5.
HenselRMohKArztE. Engineering micropatterned dry adhesives: from contact theory to handling applications. Adv Funct Mater2018; 28: 1800865. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201800865
6.
SamriMThiemeckeJPrinzE, et al. Predicting the adhesion strength of micropatterned surfaces using supervised machine learning. Mater Today2022; 53: 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2022.01.018
7.
WangSFangYHeH, et al. Wearable stretchable dry and self-adhesive strain sensors with conformal contact to skin for high-quality motion monitoring. Adv Funct Mater2021; 31: 2007495. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202007495
8.
ZhangXWangYTianZ, et al. A bioinspired snap-through meta structure for manipulating micro-objects. Sci Adv2022; 8(46): eadd4768. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.add4768
9.
ArztEQuanHMcMeekingRM, et al. Functional surface microstructures inspired by nature – from adhesion and wetting principles to sustainable new devices. Prog Mater Sci2021; 120: 100823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2021.100823
10.
SpuskanyukAVMcMeekingRMDeshpandeVS, et al. The effect of shape on the adhesion of fibrillar surfaces. Acta Biomater2008; 4(6): 1669–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2008.05.026
11.
CarboneGPierroE. A review of adhesion mechanisms of mushroom-shaped micro-structured adhesives. Meccanica2013; 48: 1819–1833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11012-013-9724-9
12.
AfferranteLCarboneG. The mechanisms of detachment of mushroom-shaped micro-pillars: from defect propagation to membrane peeling. Macromol React Eng2013; 7(11): 609–615. https://doi.org/10.1002/mren.201300125
GorbSVarenbergMPeressadkoA, et al. Biomimetic mushroom-shaped fibrillar adhesive microstructure. J R Soc Interface2007; 4: 271–275. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2006.0164
15.
CarboneGPierroEGorbSN. Origin of the superior adhesive performance of mushroom-shaped micro-structured surfaces. Soft Matter2011; 7: 5545–5552. https://doi.org/10.1039/c0sm01482f
16.
ZhangXWangYHenselR, et al. A design strategy for mushroom-shaped microfibrils with optimized dry adhesion: experiments and finite element analyses. J Appl Mech2021; 88: 1. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4049183
17.
BetegónCRodríguezCMartínez-PañedaE, et al. Pull-off strength of mushroom-shaped fibrils adhered to rigid substrates. arxiv 2506.20745. 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.20745
AksakBSahinKSittiM. The optimal shape of elastomer mushroom-like fibers for high and robust adhesion. Beilstein J Nanotechnol2014; 5: 630–638. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.5.74
BalijepalliRGFischerSCLHenselR, et al. Numerical study of adhesion enhancement by composite fibrils with soft tip layers. J Mech Phys Solids2017; 99: 357–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2016.11.017
22.
ChenSWWangGFCiavarellaM. Optimal grading of elastic modulus at contact corners with friction with application in fibrillar adhesives. European JMech- A/Solids2025; 113: 105673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechsol.2025.105673
23.
RiddochDJHillsDA. Necessary conditions for near-edge stick of complete contacts. J Strain Anal Eng Des2020; 55(5-6): 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309324720902873
24.
HillsDADiniDMagaduA, et al. A review of asymptotic procedures in stress analysis: known solutions and their applications. J Strain Anal Eng Des2004; 39(6): 553–568. https://doi.org/10.1243/0309324042379275
25.
KhaderiSNFleckNAArztE, et al. Detachment of an adhered micropillar from a dissimilar substrate. J Mech Phys Solids2015; 75: 159–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmps.2014.11.004
26.
BalijepalliRGBegleyMRFleckNA, et al. Numerical simulation of the edge stress singularity and the adhesion strength for compliant mushroom fibrils adhered to rigid substrates. Int J Solids Struct2016; 85-86: 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2016.02.018
27.
CarpinteriAPaggiM. On the asymptotic stress field in angularly nonhomogeneous materials. Int J Fract2005; 135(1-4): 267–283.
28.
HorváthALKossaA. Stability maps for the slightly compressible poker chip detachment problem. Finite Elem Anal Des2024; 242: 104257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2024.104257
KimYYangCKimY, et al. Designing an adhesive pillar shape with deep learning-based optimization. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces2020; 12: 24458–24465. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c04123
31.
KimYYeoJParkK, et al. Designing directional adhesive pillars using deep learning-based optimization, 3D printing, and testing. Mech Mater2023; 185: 104778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmat.2023.104778
LuoAZhangHTurnerKT. Machine learning-based optimization of the design of composite pillars for dry adhesives. Extrem Mech Lett2022; 54: 101695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eml.2022.101695
35.
ShojaeifardMFerraressoMLucantonioA, et al. Machine learning based optimal design of fibrillar adhesives. arxiv 2409.25928. 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.05928
36.
YuJRyuS. Deep reinforcement learning-based optimization for the shape of an adhesive pillar with enhanced adhesion strength. J Mech Des2025; 147(9): 091703. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4068747
37.
TeixeiraICastroICarvalhoV, et al. Polydimethylsiloxane mechanical properties: a systematic review. AIMS Mater Sci2021; 8(6): 952–973.
38.
SamriMKossaAHenselR. Effect of subsurface microstructures on adhesion of highly confined elastic films. J Appl Mech2021; 88(3): 031009. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4049182
HastieTTibshiraniRFriedmanJ. The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference, and prediction. Springer series in statistics. Springer, 2009.
49.
BishopC. Pattern recognition and machine learning. Information science and statistics. Springer, 2016.
50.
KeskarNSMudigereDNocedalJ, et al. On large-batch training for deep learning: generalization gap and sharp minima. arxiv 1609.04836. 2017. https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.04836
51.
PrecheltL. Early stopping - but when? In: OrrGBMüllerKR (eds) Neural Networks: Tricks of the Trade, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1998, pp. 55–69.
52.
StornRPriceK. Differential evolution – a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Glob Optim1997; 11: 341–359. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008202821328
53.
VirtanenPGommersROliphantTE, et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in python. Nat Methods2020; 17: 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2
54.
ViolanoGDibitontoSAfferranteL. Role of viscoelasticity in the adhesion of mushroom-shaped pillars. Bioinspir Biomim2024; 19(6): 066006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/ad839d
55.
JiRGYuanYYLiuXF, et al. Modeling the pull-off force of a mushroom-shaped fibrillar adhesive in dynamic detachment. Int J Solids Struct2025; 308: 113150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2024.113150
