Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
An empirical correlation for stress intensity factors in thick-walled pressure vessels with semi-elliptical surface cracks using a meshfree e-RPIM approach
Accurate estimation of Mode I stress-intensity factors (SIFs) is essential for evaluating the structural integrity and fracture resistance of thick-walled pressure vessels, where longitudinal semi-elliptical surface cracks often serve as primary failure sites. In this study, the Radial Point Interpolation Method (RPIM), a meshfree numerical technique, is employed to investigate the SIF distribution along the crack front of a thick-walled cylindrical vessel subjected to internal pressure and to develop an empirical correlation for the dimensionless SIF parameter T based on geometric and angular parameters. The displacement field is constructed using multiquadric (MQ) radial basis functions combined with first-order polynomial terms, ensuring smooth and accurate stress gradients without the need for meshing. Parametric analyses were conducted for aspect ratios a/b = 0.4, 0.5, and 0.6 and several crack-depth ratios b/t, with a constant thickness-to-inner-radius ratio (t/ri = 0.25). The MQ parameters were optimized through systematic calibration, yielding α = 3.0 and q = 1.03, which reduced the average relative error to below 4% compared with finite element (FEM) simulations and reference data. Validation of the RPIM results against Zheng’s numerical data demonstrated excellent agreement and numerical stability across all cases. Furthermore, an empirical correlation was developed to relate the dimensionless parameter T to geometric ratios (b/a, b/t, t/ri) and the crack-front angle (θ), achieving a determination coefficient of R2 = 0.97, with a maximum error of 12.1% and an average error of 3.3%. These findings confirm that RPIM, enhanced through optimized MQ parameters and empirical correlation modeling, provides an accurate and computationally efficient tool for analyzing fracture behavior in thick-walled pressure vessels.
HeFAlshammariYLAKhanM. The effect of printing parameters on crack growth rate of FDM ABS cantilever beam under thermo-mechanical loads. Procedia Struct Integr2021; 34: 59–64.
2.
SolimanESMM. Mode I stress intensity factor with various crack types. Fract Struct Integr2022; 16(59): 471–485.
3.
AlshoaibiA. A two dimensional simulation of crack propagation using adaptive finite element analysis. J Comput Appl Mech2018; 49(2): 335–341.
4.
RamezaniMKRameshSPurbolaksonoJ, et al. Closed-form solutions of stress intensity factors for semi-elliptical surface cracks in a cylindrical bar under pure tension. Acta Mech Solida Sin2022; 35(2): 344–356.
5.
KanthSALoneASHarmainGA, et al. Estimation of crack tip plastic zones in presence of material irregularities by extended finite element method. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2023; 45(6): 304.
6.
ChilamkuriKKoneV. Monitoring of Varadhi road bridge using accelerometer sensor. Mater Today Proc2020; 33: 367–371.
7.
ChavesVMadrigalCNavarroA. Non-propagating cracks in notched components at the fatigue limit analysed with a microstructural model. Theor Appl Fract Mech2018; 95: 119–126.
8.
dos Ramos de Sousa MendonçaFGómezWHVde Almeida PortelaAA. A local meshless numeric method applied in free and forced vibration analyses for elastic problems. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2022; 44(8): 313.
9.
MaWLiuGWangW. A coupled extended meshfree–smoothed meshfree method for crack growth simulation. Theor Appl Fract Mech2020; 107: 102572.
10.
BaniHaniSMAL-OqlaFMHayajnehM, et al. A new approach for dynamic crack propagation modeling based on meshless Galerkin method and visibility-based criterion. Appl Math Model2022; 107: 1–19.
11.
WenPHAliabadiMH. Evaluation of mixed-mode stress intensity factors by the mesh-free Galerkin method: static and dynamic. J Strain Anal Eng Des2009; 44(4): 273–286.
12.
KoohkanHBaradaranGHVaghefiR. A completely meshless analysis of cracks in isotropic functionally graded materials. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci2010; 224(3): 581–590.
13.
KumarRSinghMKumarC, et al. Assessment of radial basis function based meshfree method for the buckling analysis of rectangular FGM plate using HSDT and strong form formulation. J Comput Appl Mech2022; 53(3): 332–347.
14.
LiuMBLiuGRZongZ. An overview on smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Int J Comput Methods2008; 05(01): 135–188.
15.
BelytschkoTKrongauzYOrganD, et al. Meshless methods: an overview and recent developments. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng1996; 139(1-4): 3–47.
16.
LiuWKChenYJunS, et al. Overview and applications of the reproducing kernel particle methods. Arch Comput Methods Eng1996; 3(1): 3–80.
17.
GingoldRAMonaghanJJ. Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: theory and application to non-spherical stars. Mon Not R Astron Soc1977; 181(3): 375–389.
18.
StorrerJCruseH. Systemanalytische Untersuchung eines aufgeschnittenen Regelkreises, der die Beinstellung der Stabheuschrecke Carausius morosus kontrolliert: Kraftmessungen an den Antagonisten Flexor und Extensor tibiae. Biol Cybernetics1977; 25(3): 131–142.
19.
JohnsonRA. Gold on silver(110): an embedded-atom-method study. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng1994; 2(5): 985–994.
20.
RichterRLeylandP. Entropy correcting schemes and non-hierarchical auto-adaptive dynamic finite element-type meshes: applications to unsteady aerodynamics. Int J Numer Methods Fluids1995; 20(8-9): 853–868.
21.
MishnaevskyLLSchmauderS. Damage evolution and localization in heterogeneous materials under dynamical loading: stochastic modelling. Comput Mech1997; 20(1-2): 89–94.
22.
MesquitaADCodaHBVenturiniWS. Alternative time marching process for BEM and FEM viscoelastic analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng2001; 51(10): 1157–1173.
23.
KimHJSwanCC. Voxel-based meshing and unit-cell analysis of textile composites. Int J Numer Methods Eng2003; 56(7): 977–1006.
24.
Rodríguez-TemblequeLAbascalRAliabadiMH. A boundary elements formulation for 3D fretting-wear problems. Eng Anal Bound Elem2011; 35(7): 935–943.
25.
ValenciaOFGómez-EscalonillaFJDíezJL. Influence of selectable parameters in element-free Galerkin method: one-dimensional bar axially loaded problem. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci2008; 222(9): 1621–1633.
26.
FarahaniBVTavaresPJMoreiraPMGP, et al. Stress intensity factor calculation through thermoelastic stress analysis, finite element and RPIM meshless method. Eng Fract Mech2017; 183: 66–78.
AbdolkhaniFHashemianMAghadavoudiF, et al. Creep of autofrettaged thick-walled FGM cylindrical vessel. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci2024; 238(6): 2308–2328.
29.
SedighianiKMosayebnejadJMafiM. Fracture analysis of a semi-elliptical crack in a nozzle–vessel junction under external loads. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci2012; 226(4): 871–886.
30.
ZerbstUSchödelMWebsterS, et al. Fitness-for-service fracture assessment of structures containing cracks: a workbook based on the European SINTAP/FITNET procedure. Academic Press, 2013. pp.313.
31.
WenPHYangJJHuangT, et al. Infinite element in meshless approaches. European J Mech A/Solids2018; 72: 175–185.
32.
ChenXFZiYYLiB, et al. Identification of multiple cracks using a dynamic mesh-refinement method. J Strain Anal Eng Des2006; 41(1): 31–39.
33.
DehghanMAbbaszadehMMohebbiA. Error estimate for the numerical solution of fractional reaction–subdiffusion process based on a meshless method. J Comput Appl Math2015; 280: 14–36.
34.
HuangWYangJJSladekJ, et al. Meshless finite block method with infinite elements for axisymmetric cracked solid made of functionally graded materials. European J Mech A/Solids2023; 97: 104852.
35.
PaulKBaluASBabuNarayanKS. Fracture mechanics-based meshless method for crack propagation in concrete structures. Structures2025; 74: 108422.
36.
ChenJSChenZHillmanM, et al. Special issue on recent advances in meshfree and particle methods. Eng Comput2025; 41(3): 1335–1338.
37.
BaadalAEachanCGaborG, et al. Pressure intensity factor interface in cylindrical vessel through crack using finite element approaches. World Eng Appl Sci J2023; 14(04): 389–393.
38.
GonçalvesDRamalhoLCampilhoR, et al. Meshless fracture mechanics approach to mixed-mode crack growth in adhesively bonded lap joints. In: MilaniGMagagniniEKhatirS (eds). Proceedings of the 4th international conference of steel and composite for engineering structures, Springer Nature Switzerland; 2025. p. 68–79.
39.
WaenWZacariasYEachanC, et al. Stress intensity factors in thin-walled cylindrical vessels. Am Eurasian J Sci Res2023; 11(06): 1847–1851.
40.
GaborGJabaliINaagarjunL, et al. Investigating the effect of semi-elliptical crack on the failure of pressure vessels using finite element analysis. Asian J Basic Appl Sci2023; 10(06): 300–306.
41.
StarkHLBauJKellyDW. A destructive procedure to determine the residual stresses in thick-walled cylindrical pressure vessels. J Strain Anal Eng Des1994; 29(1): 57–63.
42.
LeiYBuddenPJ. Limit load solutions for thin-walled cylinders with circumferential cracks under combined internal pressure, axial tension and bending. J Strain Anal Eng Des2004; 39(6): 673–683.
43.
LinXBSmithRA. Stress intensity factors for semi-elliptical internal surface cracks in autofrettaged thick-walled cylinders. J Strain Anal Eng Des1997; 32(5): 351–363.
44.
GuozhongCKangdaZDongdiW. Stress intensity factors for internal semi-elliptical surface cracks in pressurized thick-walled cylinders using the hybrid boundary element method. Eng Fract Mech1995; 52(6): 1055–1064.
45.
ShuyaoLDe’anHAnY. A study on the weight function of the moving least square approximation in the local boundary integral equation method. Acta Mech Solida Sin2003; 16(3): 276–282.
46.
Yu-yingYJingL. A study of weight function in element-free Galerkin method. J Plast Eng2005; 12(4): 5–9.
47.
XuTZouPXuT, et al. Study on weight function of meshless method based on B-spline wavelet function. In: 2010 Third international joint conference on computational science and optimization, 2010, p. 36–40. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/5532930 (accessed 23 October 2025)
48.
LiuGRZhangGYGuYT, et al. A meshfree radial point interpolation method (RPIM) for three-dimensional solids. Comput Mech2005; 36(6): 421–430.
49.
FardaghaieAShahrooiSShishehsazM. A novel correlation to calculate stress intensity factors of the semi-elliptical crack in high-strength carbon steel pipe based on extended isogeometric analysis. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng2022; 44(1): 50.
50.
TanCLFennerRT. Stress intensity factors for semi-elliptical surface cracks in pressurised cylinders using the boundary integral equation method. Int J Fract1980; 16(3): 233–245.
